On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 5:07:38 PM UTC+3,
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 06:44:13 UTC-7,
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:32:07 AM
Post by a***@gmail.comit's a g00d problem, though, iff
you consider both the superparticular and the
subparticular ratios,
The (max or best approximation) ratio, can be
visualized in number sense as in binary would seem
an endless repeated digits of one as this (0.111...),
which also impossible to exist and therefore can
not be exactly as one, but a mind illusion, fake
number and distorted picture of one, one is nothing
but truly one, and one is really very very angry from
all who keep distorting him deliberately to endless
pieces
Note that this proof is based only on "common
sense" that top professional mathematicians must
acquire!,
And this is indeed required urgently from clever
students to convince the world's top Journals and
Universities that two successive integers are
impossible to be equal
Don't hold your breath. The top journals are run by
the same idiots who propagate these dumb ideas. I
made the same argument on Space Time and the Universe
forum and those idiots just brushed it off. The fact
is that no n exists such that 1 = n/(n+1) and as
you've pointed out, no n exists either such that
0.999... = n/(n+1).
Students have the full right now to say to
We do not need now education, ...
Teachers, leave those kids away, ...
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
integer
Post by a***@gmail.comPost by Peter Percivalwhich doesn't exist
--
Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord
Darlington, just explain
Post by a***@gmail.comPost by Peter Percivalto me what you really mean.
I think I had better not, Duchess. Nowadays
to be intelligible is
Windermere's Fan
Don't hold your breath. The top journals are run by
the same idiots who propagate these dumb ideas. I
made the same argument on Space Time and the Universe
forum and those idiots just brushed it off. The fact
is that no n exists such that 1 = n/(n+1) and as
you've pointed out, no n exists either such that
0.999... = n/(n+1).
******************************************************
**********************
But I believe that truth would win in the end if we
e assume that mankind is an intelligent being,
otherwise not at all, and the whole problem is far
beyond this little particular example,
It is the huge consequences waiting behind this fake
e protection high infinite wall which is standing as
mind barrier block in the professional
mathematician’s heads, especially the right side of
the brain that seems completely damaged, it was well
planted in their skulls due to the phobia of being
too big or too small, even though it is not their
deeds, but a bad inherited thoughts that would not be
thrown away completely from mathematics, but can
simply reconsidered and redefined more suitably
In simple words “No number exists with endless terms
(with or without) a decimal notation in any defined
constructible number base system” (excluding zeros
case), but can be visualized as (John Gabriel) does
explain it repeatedly as magnitudes (being impossible
to measure exactly) in any well defined units.
I know it is too hard and very difficult for the
e vast majority to believe that (Pi), (e), cubrt(2),
and infinitely many more as real algebraic and
transcendental numbers are all fake non existing
numbers on the number line,
of course everything seems as kind of madness, but
t unfortunately “this is the truth”
And can be proved with very little common sense
Some would prefer to dismiss the number line being
the main criteria for testing what is true or what is
fake, being as physical dimension, or geometry and
thinking that mathematics is only mind obstruction,
but I see no valid reason for this, since mathematics
sense started by numbering or courting, from the
observable countable physical existing objects around
us, so yes physics was the origin of (our
mathematics)
Once this huge fiction in mathematics is announced
d clearly by the many who got it, then, there is more
fiction stories in mathematics would find their way
to be eliminated completely from mathematician’s
minds
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin