— STRAWBERRIES —
"CALIGULA'S ARMY MARCHES, {#1}
ALL ACROSS THE LAND. {#2}
THE TRIUMPHANT ARCHES. {#3}
WITH BASKETS IN HAND. {#4}
LIKE A LITTLE SMURF, {#5}
THEY'RE HARD TO FIND. {#6}
FROM MOUNT TO SURF. {#7}
IT'S SUCH A GRIND. {#8}
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. {#9}
TIME IS MONEY. {#10}
IT'S OFF TO TRUMP TOWER. {#11}
TRY NOT TO BE FUNNY. {#12}
SPIT THE DUMMY. {#13}
SO MUCH TO COUNT. {#14}
PEE A PENNY. {#15}
MORE TO MOUNT." {#16}
CONJECTURAL PROPOSITION: “SAME SEX MARRIAGE / LEST WE FORGET / WORLD WAR
ONE CENTENNIAL 2018 / SUGGESTED CAUSE FOR NEEDLES IN STRAWBERRY FOOD
CONTAMINATION dated 3 October 2018
YOUTUBE: "Remember Me (Chilcott : Atlanta Master Chorale)"
— REMEMBERED {@1} (LEST WE FORGET) {@2} SABBATH DAYS {@3} —
"REMEMBER ME WHEN I AM GONE AWAY AS THE FLEETING OF DAY {@4}.
GONE FAR AWAY INTO THE SILENT LAND AND THE SWAY OF DRIFTING SAND {@5}.
WHEN YOU CAN NO MORE HOLD ME BY THE HAND NESTLED TOGETHER WITH WEDDED BAND
{@6 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY};
NOR I HALF TURN TO GO YET TURNING STAY TO HAVE LOVED THEE COME WHAT MAY
{@7}.
REMEMBER ME WHEN NO MORE DAY BY DAY AS EACH DAWN AND DUSK SWAY {@8}.
YOU TELL ME OF OUR FUTURE THAT YOU PLANN'D--I DO, {@9} AND I'M SAD {@10}.
ONLY REMEMBER ME; {@11} YOU UNDERSTAND AND ARE GLAD {@12}.
IT WILL BE LATE TO COUNSEL THEN OR PREY UPON IMPISH SCHEMES OF HELL {@13 -
#810 - *A* *NEEDLE*}.
YET IF YOU SHOULD FORGET ME FOR A WHILE AS YOU AWAIT HEAVEN'S TRIAL {@14}.
AND AFTERWARDS REMEMBER, {@15} DID NOT GRIEVE OVER LIFE'S MOMENTS YOU
THIEVE {@16}.
FOR IF THE DARKNESS AND CORRUPTION LEAVE THOSE YOU DECEIVE {@17}.
A *VESTIGE* OF THE THOUGHTS THAT ONCE I HAD WERE EVIL AND BAD {@18}.
BETTER BY FAR YOU SHOULD FORGET AND SMILE YOUR FENCE POST HOLE IS JUST YOUR
STYLE {@19}.
THAN THAT YOU SHOULD REMEMBER AND BE SAD NO MORE OVER ANY ETERNITY YOU
NEVER BY GOD'S GRACE HAD. {@20}"
[Poem by Christine ROSSETTI prior 1862 / Adaption by Dolf BOEK 17 June 2017
winner of the inaugural 1997 Victorian Rainbow Award for leadership by a
gay male]
REMEMBERED_SABBATH_DAYS@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 43 (#43),
@2: Sup: 17 (#30); Ego: 74 (#117),
@3: Sup: 45 (#75); Ego: 66 (#183),
@4: Sup: 20 (#95); Ego: 11 (#194),
@5: Sup: 71 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 61 (#255),
@6: Sup: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26} /
*CONDEMNATION* *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT); Ego: 26 (#281),
@7: Sup: 40 (#208); Ego: 59 (#340),
@8: Sup: 55 (#263); Ego: 4 (#344),
@9: Sup: 2 (#265); Ego: 79 (#423),
@10: Sup: 35 (#300); Ego: 47 (#470),
@11: Sup: 74 (#374); Ego: 28 (#498),
@12: Sup: 70 (#444); Ego: 32 (#530),
@13: Sup: 32 (#476); Ego: 11 (#541 - *TO* *SPURN*, *CONTEMN*,
*DESPISE*, *ABHOR* / *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
*ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*),
@14: Sup: 81 (#557); Ego: 57 (#598),
@15: Sup: 68 (#625); Ego: 33 (#631),
@16: Sup: 16 (#641); Ego: 4 (#635),
@17: Sup: 68 (#709); Ego: 77 (#712),
@18: Sup: 28 (#737); Ego: 61 (#773),
@19: Sup: 49 (#786); Ego: 26 (#799),
@20: Sup: 24 (#810); Ego: 46 (#845),
Male: #810; Feme: #845
}
#810 as [#1, #4, #5, #30, #500, #70, #200] / #620 as [#1, #4, #5, #30,
#500, #70, #10] = adelphos (G80): {UMBRA: #52 as #620 % #41 = #5} 1) a
brother, whether born of the same two parents or only of the same father or
mother; 2) having the same national ancestor, belonging to the same people,
or countryman; 3) any fellow or man; 4) *A* *FELLOW* *BELIEVER*, *UNITED*
*TO* *ANOTHER* *BY* *THE* *BOND* *OF* *AFFECTION*; 5) an associate in
employment or office; 6) brethren in Christ; 6a) his brothers by blood; 6b)
all men; 6c) apostles; 6d) Christians, as those who are exalted to the same
heavenly place;
#810 as [#100, #1, #500, #9, #200] = rhaphís (G4476): 1) From a primary
(*TO* *SEW*; perhaps rather akin to the base of ῥαπίζω through the idea of
puncturing); *A* *NEEDLE*:-- needle.
#266 as [#1, #9, #30, #8, #200, #8, #10] = athleo (G118): {UMBRA: #14 as
#845 % #41 = #25} 1) *TO* *ENGAGE* *IN* *A* *CONTEST*, *CONTEND* *IN*
*PUBLIC* *GAMES*, *CONTEND* *FOR* *A* *PRIZE*; 2) *TO* *ENDURE*
ADOLF HITLER SAID: "MY AGE SAVES ME FROM THE SUSPICION THAT I AM PERHAPS
PLEADING #321 - *PRO* *DOMO* {ie. as (G156): being (logical) reason
(motive, matter), (legal) crime (alleged or proved)
[1, {@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1)}
10, {@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11)}
300, {@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}
9, {@4: Sup: 77 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#77 -
*JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)}
1] {@5: Sup: 78 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK ON 7 JUNE
1942 AS IDEA: *ANYONE* *WHO* *FOR* *FALSE* *REASONS* *OF* *MERCY*
*DEVIATES* *FROM* *THIS* *CLEAR* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *AIDING*, *WILLINGLY*
*OR* *UNWILLINGLY*, *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*); Ego: 1 (#78 -
*JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)}
*PRO* *DOMO* MEANING *FOR* *HIS* *OWN* *CAUSE* is a relative value term of
SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE PRINCIPLE and this notion is not contradictory
to the fact that clergy theorists have subjected Western society to very
heavy exogamous constraints and to a marked (largely *PRO* *DOMO*)
*VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* [Joseph Morsel ( with the collaboration of
Christine Ducourtieux), The History (of the Middle Ages) is a #444 -
*SPORT* OF COMBAT ... Reflections on the aims of the History of the Middle
Ages intended for a society in which even the students of history's
question, 2007]
WHICH MIGHT REASONABLY AND PREDICTABLY BE CONSIDERED THAT *PRO* *DOMO*
*VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* IS PERVERSE AND DELIBERATE SEDITION {#444 -
*SPORT* OF COMBAT} BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF
COHESION {
@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN:
#3 + #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
} AGAINST BOTH THE PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81
} AND PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {
@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27
} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY AND THE PROBITY OF JUDGES
WITHIN AUSTRALIA AS TO WHY ONE CANNOT GET ANY CONSIDERATION OF JUSTICE FOR
ADHERING TO THESE TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLES WHICH ALL INHABITANTS MUST ADHERE
*TO* *AS* FIRST PRINCIPLES OF EXISTENCE AS THAT WHICH OUGHT TO PROCEED
BEFORE EVERYONE ELSE *AND* *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *OUR* *JUDICIAL* *SYSTEM* WHOM
UNDER SECTION III the "GOVERNOR GENERAL MAY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT, IN OUR
NAME AND ON OUR BEHALF, ALL SUCH JUDGES, COMMISSIONERS, JUSTICES OF THE
PEACE, AND OTHER NECESSARY OFFICERS AND MINISTERS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH,
AS MAY BE *LAWFULLY* *CONSTITUTED* OR APPOINTED BY US" IN ACCORD WITH THE
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {
@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH
COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS
BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
DAYS: #6 x #364 = #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
The Latin *PRO* *DOMO* *SUA* ("for his house") is derived from a speech of
Cicero, pronounced in 57 BCE, before the *PONTIFFS* to obtain the
restitution of his property confiscated by the tribune Clodius, during his
condemnation to the exile.
[140] It was then reported to you, O priests, and after that it became a
common topic of conversation, how he, with preposterous language with
ill-omened auspices, at times interrupting himself, doubting, fearing,
hesitating, pronounced and did everything in a manner wholly different from
that which you have recorded as proper in your books. It is, indeed, not
very strange that in doing an act of such wickedness and such insanity,
even his audacity could not wholly repress his fear.
In truth, if no *ROBBER* was ever so savage and inhuman, as, when he had
plundered temples, and then, having been excited by dreams or some
superstitious feelings, consecrated some altar on a desert shore, not to
shudder in his mind when compelled to propitiate with his prayers the deity
whom he has insulted by his wickedness; what do you suppose must have been
the agitation of mind of that plunderer of every temple, and of every
house, and of the whole city, when he was consecrating one single altar to
avert the vengeance due to his numberless acts of wickedness? [141] He
could not possibly (although the insolence of power had elated his mind,
and although he was armed by nature with incredible audacity) fail to
blunder in his proceedings, or to keep constantly making mistakes,
especially when he had a priest and teacher who was compelled to teach
before he had learnt himself. There is great power, not only in the
divinity of the immortal gods, but also in the republic itself. When the
immortal gods saw the guardian and protector of their temples driven away
in a most wicked manner, they were unwilling to quit their temples and to
remove into his house. Therefore they alarmed the mind of that most
insensible man with fear and anxiety. But the republic, although that was
banished at the same time with myself, was still constantly present to the
eyes of its destroyer, and from his excited and kindled frenzy was
constantly demanding my restoration and its own. What marvel then is it, if
he, urged on by the insanity of fear and drawn on headlong by wickedness,
was neither able properly to perform the ceremonies which he had begun, nor
to utter one single word in due order with proper solemnity? [THE ORATIONS
OF MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO, LITERALLY TRANSLATED BY C. D. YONGE, B. A.
LONDON. GEORGE BELL & SONS, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1891]
AS CONVEYING A PRO [#391 v's #541 --> CONTEMN / CONDEMN] DOMO [cf: ADOLF
HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942] IMPETUS: *FOR*
(*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
#123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct {#78
/ #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN*
*OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 =
#65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE.
H7750@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
@3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
@4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
Male: #142; Feme: #82
} // #325
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;
THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 - I
INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
{UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO* *THRUST*
*OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to swerve, fall
away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to censorship or
kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or ignore
conversationally;
<— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT
OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE
CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS
THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE OF
CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO INHERENT
GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
I have this morning poured an interpretation of the Greek [α, ρ, χ, η] in
association {#1, #21, #61} with #41 - ontic necessity of moral prescription
and epistemological premise for knowledge independence from language in
relation to STOICHEION belief systems and its sure to cause a tumult within
countries which derive a right to rule from such.
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU:
As a proposed strategy for the protecting an instantiated notion of #ONE as
having a property of SOVEREIGNTY from any #288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE
{*REGENERATION*}: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER {#ONE: FRIDAY OF 3 APRIL 33 AD}, @5
- PENTECOST {#FIVE: + 7x7+1 AS 50 DAYS ON 23 MAY}, #65 - SOLDIERS {MARS},
#175 - MARRIAGE {VENUS} THEURGIC COSMOGONIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM
COMMONLY USED BY PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM /
ISLAM etc) which then *MAY* *BE* *IN* *CONFLICT* *WITH* *THOSE* *FOREIGN*
*POWERS*.
"THEREFORE LEAVING THE #41 - *ONTIC* / #SOUTH NECESSITY PRINCIPLES {
#41 - KANT'S ONTIC PERSPECTIVE OBJECTIVE: IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS
AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE
CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON)
{IDEA: @329}.
[α, {@1: Sup: 1 (#1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG / #NORTH); Ego: 1 (#1 -
#NORTH)}
ρ, {@2: Sup: 20 (#21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS / #EAST); Ego: 19 (#20)}
χ, {@3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53)}
η] {@4: Sup: 61 (#135 - ISLAM'S *STOICHEION* *OF* *MORAL* *BLINDNESS**AS*
*LACK* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *IGNORANCE* *ESPECIALLY* *OF* *DIVINE*
*THINGS*); Ego: 8 (#61 - #WEST)}
FOUR MALE SYMBOLS (四象) OF SIGNS (OF HEAVENS, APPROVAL, ETC) AS ADVISORS (四輔
- SÌFǓ) UPON THE CHARIOTS OF TWENTY-EIGHT LUNAR MANSIONS
#EAST: Azure Dragon (青龍) assigned to the Spring equinox (#21 - I DO NOT
CAUSE TERRORS)
#SOUTH: Vermilion Bird (朱雀) assigned to the Summer solstice (#41)
#WEST: White Tiger (白虎) assigned to the Autumn equinox (#61)
#NORTH: Black Tortoise (玄武) assigned to the Winter solstice (#1 - I AM NOT
A DOER OF WRONG])
#CENTER: Yellow Dragon (黃龍) Earth AND THE HIEROS LOGOS AS THE FAUX LOGICAL
GROUNDING OF INFINITY
G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 % #41
= #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things; 1b) of
*MORAL* blindness;
YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
That is an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: HERITAGE & ENVIRONMENT / KIN
SPIRITS as Cultural values; community; gives area its collective identity:
5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER* (#25)} which occurs within the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE
{ICOSAHEDRON: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT / TRUTH FORCE as Maintaining an harmonious
environment: 7x7 = #175 - *MARRIAGE* (#49)} / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175: [22 - I
AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR] WITH ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON
THE WATER IN ITS FLOW] / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH
ANY ONE] / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161 [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES] as
validating meta-descriptor prototypes by that which is conjoined as the
TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS: AN ESTABLISHED REGIME OF COOPERATION / FLEX
FLOW: Rejuvenates the earth; reintegrates all life systems.
In the same sense of the ROMAN *MITHRAEUM* @1 (#SOUTH: #1), @5, #65
(#CENTRE: #5), #175 (#WEST: #7) cosmogonic regeneration {#5 AS DODECAHEDRON
+ #7 AS ICOSAHEDRON = #10 AS TETRACTYS} methodology deploying a #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (#NORTH: #9) with a *STOICHEION* of 64 elements as
north-south-east-west + 60 x 6 7/80 chimera of reality to the sacred sun as
the Julian calendar 365.25 days which are in contradiction to the same
depiction of them by YANG HSIUNG's 4 / 2 BCE treatise known as the CANON OF
SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING)
YOUTUBE: "I. AM. TALKING! (Doctor Who)"
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL *SOVEREIGN* / *MARRIAGE* *DYNAMIC* nomenclature as
consideration upon binary NUMBER and RELIGIOUS / STATE ECONOMY, thereby
they are defined as *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 / @5, #15 (#260) ... #369 (#15)}
within origins *AND* *NOT* *OSTENSIBLY* *JEWISH* / *CHRISTIAN* {ie. a moral
law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT” which
implies a TRINOMIAL worldview} as the premise for our AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH'S alternative historical development of its perennialist
understanding of #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY DYNAMIC
BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902 - RULE OF LAW ...
} OF THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST, LET US GO ON UNTO PERFECTION; NOT LAYING AGAIN
THE FOUNDATION OF REPENTANCE FROM DEAD WORKS, AND OF FAITH TOWARD GOD, OF
THE DOCTRINE OF BAPTISMS, AND OF LAYING ON OF HANDS, AND OF RESURRECTION OF
THE DEAD, AND OF ETERNAL JUDGMENT.
AND THIS WILL WE DO, IF GOD PERMIT.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609%20%28Censored%29.pdf>
*FOR* *IT* *IS* *IMPOSSIBLE* *FOR* *THOSE* *WHO* *WERE* *ONCE*
*ENLIGHTENED*, AND HAVE TASTED OF THE HEAVENLY GIFT, AND WERE MADE
PARTAKERS OF THE HOLY GHOST,
YOUTUBE: "Holy Holy Holy Lord God Almighty .. [Agnus Dei]"
AND *HAVE* *TASTED* *THE* *GOOD* *WORD* *OF* *GOD*, *AND* *THE* *POWERS*
*OF* *THE* *WORLD* *TO* *COME*, *IF* *THEY* *SHALL* *FALL* *AWAY*, *TO*
*RENEW* *THEM* *AGAIN* *UNTO* *REPENTANCE*; *SEEING* *THEY* *CRUCIFY* *TO*
*THEMSELVES* THE* *SON* *OF* *GOD* *AFRESH*, *AND* *PUT* *HIM* *TO* *AN*
*OPEN* *SHAME*. " [Hebrews 6:1-20 (KJV)]
MICHAEL: “Dolf please give me a day or two to digest the vast amount of
history and information please; I’ll message you with me thoughts
perhaps!!?”
DOLF: “It is indeed very vast as the product of 24 years self education and
for a party trick I am able to spontaneously write poems using a particular
dialectic and derive therefrom a CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING and an
interpretation from Immanuel Kant’s Prolegomena published in 1783.
These matters are subject to COUNTY COURT APPEAL which have been adjourned
until 3 APRIL 2019.
The theoretical question is that if one has contended against a foreign
power making seditious use of the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE autonomous
principle that it ought similarly be able to effect a #343 - RIGHT OF
SUCCESSION and in such a circumstance (eg: PELL’s refusal of communion to
RAINBOW 🌈 SASH GBLTI COMMUNITY on Pentecost Sunday 31 MAY 1998 and 21 JUNE
2000) is considered to be TREASON.
Now that he has been convicted of child sexual abuse, those other charges
may well be considered.”
MICHAEL: “Dolf just wow. Let’s get him. I knew his Cousin Neville’s story.
He used to work for me. Tainted him at work too poor guy.”
DOLF: "Do be very careful when you read it though because it is Neural
Linguistic Programming written (for anti-terrorism purposes) to a TRINOMIAL
MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON which is entirely supranatural being
outside temporality or immediate sense perception and should you have
abnormal physiological effects of sensory overload such as anxiety--THEN
LAY DOWN...
I'm still incorporating narrative of an earlier syncretism involving an
intervention over TRUMPS failed cemetery visit and prior to as intersecting
with MACRN's NATIONALISM v's PATRIOTISM speech at WORLD WAR I CENTENNIAL
COMMEMORATIONS within FRANCE ...
— ALL HAIL THE POTUS —
[Written 1124 hours (AEDT) 11 November 2018]
“WITH TRUMP YOU KNOW.
IT’S EITHER FIRE OR FURY.
OR WATER LOGGED.
THE WIND DOTH BLOW.
YET SOIL MAKES MERRY.
BY FIELDS LEFT UNTROD.”
Just a few weeks ago, at a rally in Texas, he had said “*YOU* *KNOW* *WHAT*
*I* *AM*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*. *OK*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*…. *USE*
*THAT* *WORD*. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*”.
REMEMBRANCE DAY 2018@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 34 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 29 (#109),
@3: Sup: 8 (#92); Ego: 38 (#147),
@4: Sup: 5 (#97); Ego: 6 (#153),
@5: Sup: 33 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 20 (#173 - I AM
NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@6: Sup: 14 (#144); Ego: 8 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@7: Sup: 67 (#211); Ego: 19 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #211; Feme: #200
}
#211 as [#10, #200, #1] = yare' (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1)
to fear, revere, be afraid; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear, reverence,
honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be dreadful, be feared;
1b2) *to* *cause* *astonishment* *and* *awe*, *be* *held* *in* *awe*; 1b3)
to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) *to* *make* *afraid*,
*terrify*;
#200 as [#40, #70, #40, #10, #40] = `am (H5971): {UMBRA: #10 as #110 % #41
= #28} 1) nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) *people*, *nation*; 1b)
*persons*, *members* *of* *one's* *people*, *compatriots*, *country*-*men*;
- dolf
Post by ]v[etaphoidPost by The ChadOn Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:54:26 -0400, Alexander "Dink" Cain as "Scott Oof"
http://imgur.com/a/hQwGV
The kid on the left is already producing his own short films.
The kid on the right is attending Brown in the fall.
Steve Austin Bryant's college tuition was even shorter than his
sociopathic dad's!
Well played - another low-skilled fatass being left behind in the
information age...
DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM OF
ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"
JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
"MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:
MACRON’S POPALARITY
Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"
— HOMO ERECTUS —
"SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."
GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:
French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder during
a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the G-20 summit,
where they also talked about the need to find a solution to the situation
in Yemen, Reuters reported.
In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper, Macron
can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who appears
acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands while the crown
prince nods and smiles.
Salman is heard saying “Don’t worry,” to which the French president
responds: “I am worried”.
“I told you, I told you,” Macron is heard saying. “Yes, you told me, thank
you very much,” replied Mohammad bin Salman, who is smiling in the video.
The crown prince then tells Macron that “we will meet you.”
Later in the one-minute clip posted on Twitter, Macron is heard saying:
“You never listen to me,” and Prince Mohammed replies: “I will listen, of
course.”
At the end of the video, Macron says: “I am a man of my word.”
Macron had previously suggested that he planned to confront the Saudi
leader about the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi
Consulate in Istanbul in early October.
The Saudi government recently admitted that its officials were responsible
for the murder of Khashoggi, who was a U.S. resident and a columnist for
The Washington Post. Saudi Arabia claims that the crown prince was not
responsible for the murder. At least five Saudi officials have been handed
the death penalty over the murder.
U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded that the crown prince
was responsible for ordering the murder.
President Donald Trump has continued to cast doubt on Salman’s
responsibility for the murder.
In a presidential statement released November 20, Trump sided with the
Saudi leader despite the conclusions of the American intelligence
community."
[<https://theguardiansofdemocracy.com/macron-confronts-saudi-crown-prince-over-khashoggi-killing-warns-i-am-a-man-of-my-word>]
— VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
"SARCASM AND WIT.
IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT.
AND SEDITIOUS CLAMOUR."
NDTV (RIYADH) @ 2153 HOURS (ITS) ON 23 OCTOBER 2018: "HANDSHAKE,
CONDOLENCES AS SAUDI ROYALS MEET JAMAL KHASHOGGI'S FAMILY: Saudi Arabia's
King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman met with family members of
slain journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Riyadh on Tuesday, state media said.
The Saudi rulers met with Khashoggi's son *SALAH* and brother *SAHEL* at
the royal palace, state-run news agency SPA reported.
The report said King Salman and Prince Mohammed offered their condolences
to the family of the Saudi journalist.
Khashoggi -- a Washington Post contributor and critic of the crown prince
-- was killed after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2.
After more than two weeks of vehemently denying Khashoggi was dead, the
Saudi government on Saturday said he was killed in a fight inside the
consulate and said the murder was not state-sanctioned.
Khashoggi was a US resident and had lived in self-imposed exile in Virginia
since 2017, shortly after the powerful Prince Mohammed was appointed heir
to the throne."
[<https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/saudi-king-crown-prince-meet-murdered-journalist-jamal-khashoggis-family-1936429>]
— MANDALAY SWAY —
[Bastille Day on Saturday 14 July 2018]
“STEVE DOTH MOW.
HIS PADDOCK TODAY.
BUT NO EVIL TO SOW.
OR DEATH ITS SWAY.
A GREETING WAVE.
OF FATES COURSE.
AND WICKED NIEVE {#541 as [#80, #400, #3, #40, #8, #10] = pugme (G4435):
{#53 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) the fist, clenched hand; 2) up to the elbow}
ETERNITY DIVORCE {#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] =
apokteino (G615): {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever;
2) metaphor: to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish;
2a) to inflict mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE*
*AND* *PROCURE* *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*}.
MUSIC PLAYS CLEAR.
RHAPSODY SO PURE.
OF HEAVEN’S CHEER.
AND GRACE DEMURE.”
YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"
CONTEMN@{
@1: Sup: 71 (#71); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 13 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 43 (#65),
@3: Sup: 14 (#98); Ego: 29 (#94),
@4: Sup: 69 (#167); Ego: 32 (#126),
@5: Sup: 51 (#218); Ego: 34 (#160),
@6: Sup: 3 (#221); Ego: 65 (#225),
@7: Sup: 52 (#273 *** *FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN*
*AUTONOMY* ***); Ego: 45 (#270),
@8: Sup: 61 (#334); Ego: 12 (#282), <-- *MENS* *REA*: #334 as [#40, #4,
#200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 = #19} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f)
of moral character (figurative);
@9: Sup: 13 (#347); Ego: 48 (#330 - SECRET NAME: HRUMACHIS - 'The Holy
Spirit of Truth and Justice'),
@10: Sup: 35 (#382); Ego: 24 (#354),
@11: Sup: 75 (#457); Ego: 38 (#392),
@12: Sup: 21 (#478); Ego: 17 (#409),
@13: Sup: 63 (#541); Ego: 38 (#447),
Male: #541; Feme: #447
}
DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018: "When you are laying in bed at 0328
hours and your eyes are barely open and you think to yourself:
'ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT':
— WELL ***@CK YOU ALL {@1},
I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD {@2} —
"YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED, {@3}
BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY. {@4}
BY WHICH *REALITY* IS AMBIGUATED. {@5}
BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY. {@6}
DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED. {@7}
NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY. {@8}
OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED." {@9}
AFFECTION FOR INTEGRITY@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 71 (#71),
@2: Sup: 4 (#30); Ego: 37 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*),
@3: Sup: 15 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 64 (#172),
@4: Sup: 24 (#69); Ego: 55 (#227),
@5: Sup: 26 (#95); Ego: 27 (#254),
@6: Sup: 27 (#122); Ego: 37 (#291),
@7: Sup: 60 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 64 (#355),
@8: Sup: 5 (#187); Ego: 16 (#371 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: HOW IS
METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?),
@9: Sup: 46 (#233 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT);
Ego: 66 (#437),
Male: #233; Feme: #437
}
YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night (doctor
who)"
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1783 - *APRIORITY* *TO* *FRENCH* *REVOLUTION*) PROLEGOMENA
SECTION #39 - APPENDIX TO PURE NATURAL SCIENCE ON THE SYSTEM OF CATEGORIES:
Nothing can be more desirable to a philosopher than to be able to derive a
priori from one principle the multiplicity of concepts or basic principles
that previously had exhibited themselves to him piecemeal, in the use he
had made of them *IN* *CONCRETO* {ie:
THE *FRENCH* *CONCRETE* *ALLIANCE* OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
Being the need to respond @ 0803 hours with further (given below of
Saturday 15 DECEMBER 2018) clarification over issues (nebulous /
*CONCRETE*) reported within news media as an overheard conversation
occurring between Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission
and British Prime Minister Theresa May on Friday 14 DECEMBER 2018 ...
AS SPECIFICALLY THE QUESTION: WHETHER THE #541 / #478 - NEBULOUS CLOUD
IMPEDING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRAVEL TO WAR GRAVES OCCURRING
WITHIN FRANCE UPON 11 NOVEMBER 2018 DURING WORLD WAR ONE CENTENNIAL WAS
NATURAL OR SUPERNATURAL?
YOUTUBE: "Imagine Dragons (Thunder)"
TAKE NOTE OF THIS 12 NOVEMBER 2016 WARNING AS NOTICE OF EXPULSION: BEING A
SOVEREIGN DEMAND AS KNOWLEDGE TO A DUTY OF ANY PRINCIPLE AS A DEMAND OF
COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY NOMINATED PARTIES [SAINT VINCENT’S HEALTH
AUSTRALIA ('HOSPITAL') UNDER THE STEWARDSHIP OF MARY AIKENHEAD MINISTRIES]
MUST BE AWARE: THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE MODIFIED AT ANY TIME, EVEN AFTER ITS
SERVICE AND THE CONVEYING OF A SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY MAKING AN EFFECTUAL
DEMAND AS A DUTY OF COMPLIANCE (‘EVENT’) PLACED UPON ANY NOMINATED PARTIES
(WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFIED).
SUCH AMENDMENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED THEREAFTER THE SAID EVENT, WILL BE
CONSTRUED AS A DEMAND BEING PLACED UPON ANY NOMINATED PARTIES AT THE TIME
OF SAID EVENT AND NOT THEREAFTER.
ACCORDINGLY, THERE IS NO IMMUTABILITY OF ANY PENALTY SOUGHT AND WHICH MAY
ARBITRARILY AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPOSED AS EXIGENCY DEMAND IN BEING CONSTRUED
AS A LIABILITY WHICH IS PLACED UPON THE ABSENCE OF KNOWLEDGE TO A DUTY OF
ANY PRINCIPLE AS A DEMAND OF COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY NOMINATED PARTIES
MUST BE AWARE.
THIS IS TO AVOID ANY POSSIBILITY OF ANY HINDRANCE, OBSTRUCTION AND
FRUSTRATION OF THE PREROGATIVE AS SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY. THUS IF A PROVISION
IS INEFFECTUAL AND AN ATTEMPT MADE TO CONTRAVENE AND MITIGATE THE CLEAR
DUTY OF ANY PROVISION OF COMPLIANCE.
IT WILL BE MODIFIED AND INCLUDED HEREIN UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THIS NOTICE,
AND CONSTRUED AS KNOWLEDGE TO A DUTY OF ANY PRINCIPLE AS A DEMAND OF
COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY NOMINATED PARTIES MUST BE AWARE.
}, and in this way to be able to unite them all in one cognition.
Previously, he believed simply that what was left to him after a certain
abstraction, and that appeared, through mutual comparison, to form a
distinct kind of cognitions, had been completely assembled: but this was
only an aggregate; now he knows that only precisely so many, not more, not
fewer, can constitute this kind of cognition, and he has understood the
necessity of his division: this is a comprehending, and only now does he
have a system.
To pick out from ordinary cognition the concepts that are not based on any
particular experience and yet are present in all cognition from [IDEA:
@323] experience (for which they constitute as it were the mere form of
connection) required no greater reflection or more insight than to cull
from a language rules for the actual use of words in general, and so to
compile the elements for a grammar (and in fact both investigations are
very closely related to one another) without, for all that, even being able
to give a reason why any given language should have precisely this and no
other formal constitution, and still less why precisely so many, neither
more nor fewer, of such formal determinations of the language can be found
at all. [page 74]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232] AS ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:
PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
*IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
*ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE* *PREVIOUS*
*STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO* *PERCEPTIONS*
*IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition, but is
here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE* *IMAGINATION* *THAT*
*DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *RELATION* *IN*
*TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states
in two different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in
time; for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to it.
*I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY* *THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES*
*ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER* *AFTER*, not that in the object
[IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective
relation of the appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined
through mere perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that it
is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed before,
which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it
a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the
understanding, which does not lie in perception – and here it is the
concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the former determines
the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as something that could
precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then,
only because we subject the succession of appearances, hence all
alterations, to the law of causality that experience itself – i.e.,
empirical cognition of the appearances – is possible; hence the appearances
themselves as objects of experience are possible only in accordance with
this very law.
@1 = Position {#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* AS *METHOD* *TO*
*ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE*}
@2 = Poise {#236 - PAIRING}
@3 = Purpose {#238 / #77 - Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 -
Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 -
Guardedness}
@4 = Process {#239 / #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming}
@5 = Pairing {#236} / DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE: #369)"
*THE* *APPREHENSION* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IS* *ALWAYS*
*SUCCESSIVE*. [IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one
another. Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further
point for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can
in fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) are objects, but only in so far as
they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations,
[IDEA: @A190] are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are not
at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the
synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of
appearances is always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances
things in themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from
the succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances
might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with
our own representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that stands
before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold of this
house itself also is successive in itself, which of course no one will
grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up to
transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself,
but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH* *POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU*
*SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined in the appearance itself
(*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)? That which lies in the
successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*
*METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE OR
SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO SILENCE, YOU
ARE OBMUTESCENT] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an
appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a
*REALITY* following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state
of things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows upon
another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of
apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a house, it does
not in this way yet distinguish itself from the others. But I also note:
that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding
state of perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
*KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B can
only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot follow but
only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream. My perception
of its location further down succeeds the perception of its location
further up the course of the river, and it is impossible that in the
apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be perceived further
downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here, then, the order in the
succession of perceptions in the apprehension is determined, and the
apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous example of a house, in
the apprehension my perceptions could start at the [IDEA: @B238] top of the
house and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just
as they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that happens,
and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the
apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @B232 TO
@B238 / @A189 TO @A193]
TORRENTIAL STORM EVENT: 2.6.6.44.0@{
@1: Sup: 44 (#44); Ego: 44 (#44),
@2: Sup: 7 (#51); Ego: 44 (#88),
@3: Sup: 71 (#122); Ego: 64 (#152),
@4: Sup: 18 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 28 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S
WIFE {%19}),
@5: Sup: 8 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 71 (#251),
@6: Sup: 8 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 81 (#332),
@7: Sup: 36 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}); Ego: 28 (#360 -
ANKH ROMAN TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE),
@8: Sup: 20 (#212); Ego: 65 (#425),
@9: Sup: 56 (#268 - *SYNTHETIC* *JUDGMENTS* *REQUIRE* *A* *PRINCIPLE*
*OTHER* *THAN* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 36
(#461),
Male: #268; Feme: #461
}
To illustrate this POINT of #541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1,
#200, #5, #10] = episkiazo (G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} *AS* *AN*
*IDEA* *OF* *A* *CLOUD* *AS* *SYMBOLISING* *THE* *IMMEDIATE* *PRESENCE*
*AND* *POWER* *OF* *GOD* at about 1425 HOURS ON 15 DECEMBER 2018 as I was
sitting within the RESTAURANT having my customary SABBATH meal there was a
very localised TORRENTIAL STORM EVENT which lasted about 10 MINUTES and it
was so tumultuous that people left their tables to look out the windows.
Nous: #44
Time: 14:25 hrs
Date: 2018.10.30
Torah: [#40, #2, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 42 (#82); Ego: 2 (#42),
@3: Sup: 47 (#129); Ego: 5 (#47),
Male: #129; Feme: #47
} // #47
Dao: Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts
Tetra: #36 - Strength
I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action,
The key, God
Latin: Amabilis {Conservative God} Alt: Yahhael {God is the God} {
1. PROTECTS & HELPS AGAINST THOSE WISHING TO USURP THE FORTUNES OF OTHERS
2. JUSTICE, TRUTH & LIBERTY
3. PROTECTS TRUTH, LOVERS OF JURISPRUDENCE
4. Thesogar
}
Solar Eclipse: 20 March 2015 (AEST)
Heber {The region beyond, One that passes; anger}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#268 - *SYNTHETIC* *JUDGMENTS* *REQUIRE* *A*
*PRINCIPLE* *OTHER* *THAN* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTION* /
#461} / HETEROS {#296 / #475} / TORAH {#252 / #453}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:6,col:6,nous:44&idea:{m,51}&idea:{f,88}&idea:{m,268}&idea:{f,461}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 2, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 44 [Date: 2018.10.30, Time: 14:25
hrs, Super: #268 / #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance; I-Ching:
H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 - Closed Mouth,
Ego: #461 / #44 - Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure
Yang, Creative Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra:
36 - Strength]
H852@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 77 (#78); Ego: 76 (#77),
@3: Sup: 6 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 10 (#87),
@4: Sup: 56 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 50 (#137),
Male: #140; Feme: #137
} // #461
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;
THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191
#461 as [#1, #400, #10, #50] = 'ath (Aramaic) (H852): {UMBRA: #1 as #401 %
#41 = #32} 1) sign, miraculous signs, wonders; 2) 'oth cycle is #6 x #364 =
#2184
"I thought- it good to show the signs {#461 as [#1, #400, #10, #50] = 'ath
(Aramaic) (H852): sign} and wonders that the high God hath wrought toward
me." [Daniel 4:2 (KJV)]
"How great are his signs {#461 as [#1, #400, #10, #50] = 'ath (Aramaic)
(H852): sign}! and how mighty are his wonders! his kingdom is an
everlasting kingdom, and his dominion is from generation to generation."
[Daniel 4:3 (KJV)]
"He delivereth and rescueth, and he worketh signs {#461 as [#1, #400, #10,
#50] = 'ath (Aramaic) (H852): sign} and wonders in heaven and in earth, who
hath delivered Daniel {Judgement of God} from the power of the lions."
[Daniel 6:27 (KJV)]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1785) IDEA @268: SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS REQUIRE A
PRINCIPLE OTHER THAN THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - CONTRADICTION: There are
synthetic judgments a posteriori whose origin is empirical; but there are
also synthetic judgments that are a priori certain and that arise from pure
understanding and reason. Both however agree in this, that they can by no
means arise solely from the principle of analysis, namely the PRINCIPLE OF
#312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY}; they demand yet a completely different principle, though they
always must be derived from some fundamental proposition, whichever it may
be, in accordance with the PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 +
#371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}; for nothing can run
counter to this principle, even though everything cannot be derived from
it. I shall first classify the synthetic judgments.
1. *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* are always synthetic. For it would be
absurd [IDEA: @268] to base an analytic *JUDGMENT* *ON* *EXPERIENCE*, since
I do not at all need to go beyond my concept in order to formulate the
judgment and therefore have no need for any testimony from experience. That
a body is extended, is a proposition that stands certain a priori, and
*NOT* *A* *JUDGMENT* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*.
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment
already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
accordance with the principle of contradiction, and by this means can
simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of the judgment, which
experience could never teach me.
2. MATHEMATICAL JUDGMENTS ARE ONE AND ALL SYNTHETIC: This proposition
appears to have completely escaped the observations of analysts of human
reason up to the present, and indeed to be directly opposed to all of their
conjectures, although it is incontrovertibly certain and very important in
its consequences. Because they found that the inferences of the
mathematicians all proceed in accordance with the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY} (which, by nature, is required of any apodeictic certainty [as
clearly established beyond dispute]), they were persuaded that the
fundamental propositions were also known through the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY}, in which they were very mistaken; for a synthetic proposition
can of course be discerned in accordance with the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY}, but only insofar as another synthetic proposition is
presupposed from which the first can be deduced, never however in itself.
First of all it must be observed: that properly mathematical propositions
are always a priori and not empirical judgments, because they carry
necessity with them, which cannot be taken from experience. But if this
will not be granted me, very well, I will restrict my proposition to pure
mathematics, the concept of which already conveys that it contains not
empirical but only pure cognition a priori. One might well at first think:
that the proposition 5 + 7 = 12 {ie.
#5 AS DODECAHEDRON + #7 AS ICOSAHEDRON = #10 AS TETRACTYS
}. Is a purely analytic proposition that follows from the concept of a sum
of seven and five according to the PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION*
{#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}. However,
upon closer inspection, one finds that the concept of the sum of 5 and 7
contains nothing further than the unification of the two numbers into one,
through which by no means is thought what this single number may be that
combines the two. The concept of twelve is in no way already thought
because I merely think to myself this unification of seven and five, and I
may analyze my concept of such a possible sum for as long as may be, still
I will not meet with twelve therein. One must go beyond these concepts, in
making use of the intuition that corresponds to one of the two, such as
one’s five fingers, or (like Segner in his arithmetic) five points, and in
that manner adding the units of the five given in intuition step by step to
the concept of seven. One therefore truly amplifies one’s concept through
this proposition 5 + 7 = 12 and adds to the first concept a new one that
was not thought in it; that is, an arithmetical proposition is always
synthetic, which can be seen all the more plainly in the case of somewhat
larger numbers, for it is then clearly evident that, though we may turn and
twist our concept as we like, we could never find the sum through the mere
analysis of our concepts, without making use of intuition.
Nor is any fundamental proposition of pure geometry analytic. That the
straight line between two points is the shortest is a synthetic
proposition. For my concept of the straight contains nothing of magnitude,
but only a quality. The concept of the shortest is therefore wholly an
addition and cannot be extracted by any analysis from the concept of the
straight line. Intuition must therefore be made use of here, by means of
which alone the synthesis is possible.
Some other fundamental propositions that geometers presuppose are indeed
actually analytic and rest on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364
x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}; how- ever, they
serve only, like identical propositions, as links in the chain of method
and not as principles: e.g., a = a, the whole is equal to itself, or (a +
b) > a, i.e., the whole is greater than its part. And indeed even these,
al- though they are valid from concepts alone, are admitted into
mathematics only because they can be exhibited in intuition.
It is merely ambiguity of expression which makes us commonly believe here
that the predicate of such apodeictic judgments already lies in our concept
and that the judgment is therefore analytic. Namely, we are required to add
in thought a particular predicate to a given concept, and this necessity is
already attached to the concepts. But the question is not, what we are
required to add in thought to a given concept, but what we actually think
in it, even if only obscurely, and then it becomes evident that the
predicate attaches to such concepts indeed necessarily, though not
immediately, but rather through an intuition that has to be added.
The essential feature of pure mathematical cognition, differentiating it
from all other a priori cognition, is that it must throughout proceed not
from concepts, but always and only through the construction of concepts
(Critique, p. 713). Because pure mathematical cognition, in its
propositions, must therefore go beyond the concept to that which is
contained in the intuition corresponding to it, its propositions can and
must never arise through the analysis of concepts, i.e., analytically, and
so are one and all synthetic.
I cannot, however, refrain from noting the damage that neglect of this
otherwise seemingly insignificant and unimportant observation has brought
upon philosophy. Hume, when he felt the call, worthy of a philosopher, to
cast his gaze over the entire field of pure a priori cognition, in which
the human understanding claims such vast holdings, inadvertently lopped off
a whole (and indeed the most considerable) province of the same, *NAMELY*
*PURE* *MATHEMATICS*, *BY* *IMAGINING* *THAT* *THE* *NATURE* {#364 x 3 =
#1092 x 2 = #2184 - 24 PRIESTLY DIVISIONS OF YAHAD / NAZARENE SECT OF
APOSTLES: } *AND* *SO* *TO* *SPEAK* *THE* *LEGAL* *CONSTITUTION* *OF*
*THIS* *PROVINCE* *RESTED* *ON* *COMPLETELY* *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*,
*NAMELY* *SOLELY* *ON* *THE* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364
x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}:
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT*
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON NOVICHOK
#274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 - PRIESTLY
SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
And although he had by no means made a classification of propositions as
formally and generally, or with the nomenclature, as I have here, it was
nonetheless just as if he had said: Pure mathematics contains only analytic
propositions, but metaphysics contains synthetic propositions a priori. Now
he erred severely in this, and this error had decisively damaging
consequences for his entire conception. For had he not done this, he would
have expanded his question about the origin of our synthetic judgments far
beyond his metaphysical concept of causality and extended it also to the
possibility [IDEA @273] of a priori mathematics; for he would have had to
accept mathematics as synthetic as well. But then he would by no means have
been able to found his metaphysical propositions on mere experience, for
otherwise he would have had to subject the axioms of pure mathematics to
experience as well, which he was much too reasonable to do.6 The good
company in which metaphysics would then have come to be situated would have
secured it against the danger of scornful mistreatment; for the blows that
were intended for the latter would have had to strike the former as well,
which was not his intention, and could not have been; and so the acute man
would have been drawn into reflections which must have been similar to
those with which we are now occupied, but which would have gained
infinitely from his inimitably fine presentation. [page 17-21]
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS