Post by Sir Gilligan HorryUnsolved Mysteries - The UFO Files - Volume 4.avi
Good documentary about crap circles ...
I mean ... crop circles, in that video.
Satellites with various cameras and spectrums would know more details.
I'll have three Satellites please bar tender !
___
___
___
NEW !!! SIR GILLIGAN HORRY UFO POSTCARD !!!
http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t2/SirGilliganHorry/Extraterrestri...
"Jims Space Agency"
http://www.YouTube.com/JimsSpaceAgency
___
Them gold stars for rating topics went away again, and perhaps this
time for good. I’ve reloaded the newsgroup page several times, lo and
behold, all them gold stars have been taken away, and not just voted
down to one gold star. Even when I go into each topic there are
missing stars that I know had given out. Not only are they gone but
others entirely missing, which is quite odd because, normally you and
I can only change the 5 star or whatever star rating of a given topic
down to one star, but we're not allowed to entirely remove stars or
much less forbid them from entirely sticking no matters how many times
others try to give topics or subsequent replies any of those stars.
So it's obviously an inside job.
Either our Google Groups version of Usenet/newsgroups has been broken
(again), or it's simply badly infected with the usual gauntlet of
pesky Semites and their hoards of brown-nosed clowns (usually public
funded) doing their typical damage control, because once again it
seems them gold stars are not always sticking like they should, if at
all.
For one thing that’s clearly wrong with our public Usenet/
newsgroup(s), it seems they (bad guys) keep taking away our gold
stars, such as whenever a 5 gold star rating is given to a topic, they
(insider bad guys) keep removing them stars over and over, as well as
blocking any future star rating. What's up with that?
Contributor “Tholen” is clearly one of those Usenet insider bad guys,
as a certified rusemaster that gets to do pretty much anything they
want, but otherwise it's mostly their relentless status-quo army of
devout Semites and their personal crowd of brown-nosed clowns as their
devout minions (mostly public funded), doing much of their damage-
control and dirty work.
Go right ahead and try giving our topics as many gold stars as
possible, and see if they actually stick. It seems the insiders of
Google Groups (most likely DARPA, MI6 and those cloak and dagger
members of our Skull and Bones) doesn’t appreciate our creative sense
of humor when it comes down to rating our topics or any others with
those gold stars. Perhaps they’ll have to come up with a new and
improved rating system, whereas only certain peer moderated wizards
get gold star rating privileges.
If any of you folks firmly believe in ETs, UFOs or favor that at least
some them crop circles as per having anything whatsoever to do with
off-world intelligence, then by all means their doing whatever they
like with utilizing the planet Venus is nothing but an ET win-win-win
(because they also get to torment us).
About interpreting what the planet Venus has to offer:
Unless you are actually that mainstream dysfunctional and blind as
well as snookered and dumbfounded yourself past the point of no
return, thereby incapable of figuring anything out for yourself, then
exactly what sort of snookered and dumbfounded ETs would find the
planet Venus as unacceptable and of no mineral or raw element value?
ETs accomplishing Venus seems entirely rational and even perfectly
logical if you’ve mastered space travel (especially interstellar),
whereas by all means the mineral and raw element wealth of Venus would
be kind of extremely ideal, especially since Venus offers unlimited
local energy that’s renewable and nonpolluting to boot, as well as
nearly undetectable to us, and not to forget that you’ve also got <67
kg/m3 buoyancy at 90% gravity to work with. In other words, where’s
the down side?
Supposedly Japan’s first lady Nobuko Kan has already been to Venus,
and I’m absolutely certain that sufficient ET technology would have
made that adventure as doable and obviously survivable. Without
evidence objectively proving she hasn’t been to Venus, I’d have to go
along with her version.
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj