Gail Peterson
2021-06-17 14:16:04 UTC
Hello again, my dear Medieval genealogists and historians
I am in quite a quandry regarding the supposed marriage of Richard de Puleston aka Pyvelesdon born abt 1275 in Emral, Flintshire, Wales with Angharad de Warenne b abt 1283. My interest is with the Warrene side of the equasion.
Many pedigrees have Angharad de Warenne as being a daughter of William de Warenne, the 7th Earl of Surrey and Joan de Vere, but this cannot be accurate as 1) William died in 1286 after having sired only 2 children, John and Alice and 2) Burke's Peerage lists Richard de Puleston's wife as Agnes, a daughter of either Sir William or Sir Griffith Warenne of Warrenhall, Solop. see https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZfdRAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA816&lpg=PA816&dq=puleston+salop&source=bl&ots=AsKOQ9I2Eq&sig=4LIE_lW1jlT9U9a9GCGj-alXUX0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq-KbV16XZAhVHIsAKHT9JCRAQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=puleston%20salop&f=false
and 3) Action at Westminster by Richard Puleston 20 October 1314 lists Agnes as his wife see Feet of Fines CP 25/1/194/9, number 1 at http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_194_9.shtml
Since Angharad de Warenne should probably be considered, instead, as Agnes de Warenne, my questions are: how does this Agnes Warenne tie into the Warenns of Shropshire and do these Shropshire Warrens directly relate to the Earls of Surrey at some earlier point in time? Thank you very much for any assistance you can provide.
Cheers,
Gail Peterson
I am in quite a quandry regarding the supposed marriage of Richard de Puleston aka Pyvelesdon born abt 1275 in Emral, Flintshire, Wales with Angharad de Warenne b abt 1283. My interest is with the Warrene side of the equasion.
Many pedigrees have Angharad de Warenne as being a daughter of William de Warenne, the 7th Earl of Surrey and Joan de Vere, but this cannot be accurate as 1) William died in 1286 after having sired only 2 children, John and Alice and 2) Burke's Peerage lists Richard de Puleston's wife as Agnes, a daughter of either Sir William or Sir Griffith Warenne of Warrenhall, Solop. see https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZfdRAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA816&lpg=PA816&dq=puleston+salop&source=bl&ots=AsKOQ9I2Eq&sig=4LIE_lW1jlT9U9a9GCGj-alXUX0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq-KbV16XZAhVHIsAKHT9JCRAQ6AEIXTAI#v=onepage&q=puleston%20salop&f=false
and 3) Action at Westminster by Richard Puleston 20 October 1314 lists Agnes as his wife see Feet of Fines CP 25/1/194/9, number 1 at http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_194_9.shtml
Since Angharad de Warenne should probably be considered, instead, as Agnes de Warenne, my questions are: how does this Agnes Warenne tie into the Warenns of Shropshire and do these Shropshire Warrens directly relate to the Earls of Surrey at some earlier point in time? Thank you very much for any assistance you can provide.
Cheers,
Gail Peterson