ARIEL BOLUDOVSKY
2005-11-04 16:15:46 UTC
By AMIR TAHERI
2 hours, 41 minutes ago
AS THE night falls, the "troubles" start - and the pattern is always the
same.
Bands of youths in balaclavas start by setting fire to parked cars, break
shop windows with baseball bats, wreck public telephones and ransack
cinemas, libraries and schools. When the police arrive on the scene, the
rioters attack them with stones, knives and baseball bats.
The police respond by firing tear-gas grenades and, on occasions, blank
shots in the air. Sometimes the youths fire back - with real bullets.
These scenes are not from the West Bank but from 20 French cities, mostly
close to Paris, that have been plunged into a European version of the
intifada that at the time of writing appears beyond control.
The troubles first began in Clichy-sous-Bois, an underprivileged suburb
east
of Paris, a week ago. France's bombastic interior minister, Nicholas
Sarkozy, responded by sending over 400 heavily armed policemen to "impose
the laws of the republic," and promised to crush "the louts and
hooligans"
within the day. Within a few days, however, it had dawned on anyone who
wanted to know that this was no "outburst by criminal elements" that
could
be handled with a mixture of braggadocio and batons.
By Monday, everyone in Paris was speaking of "an unprecedented crisis."
Both
Sarkozy and his boss, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, had to cancel
foreign trips to deal with the riots.
How did it all start? The accepted account is that sometime last week, a
group of young boys in Clichy engaged in one of their favorite sports:
stealing parts of parked cars.
Normally, nothing dramatic would have happened, as the police have not
been
present in that suburb for years.
The problem came when one of the inhabitants, a female busybody,
telephoned
the police and reported the thieving spree taking place just opposite her
building. The police were thus obliged to do something - which meant
entering a city that, as noted, had been a no-go area for them.
Once the police arrived on the scene, the youths - who had been reigning
over Clichy pretty unmolested for years - got really angry. A brief chase
took place in the street, and two of the youths, who were not actually
chased by the police, sought refuge in a cordoned-off area housing a
power
pylon. Both were electrocuted.
Once news of their deaths was out, Clichy was all up in arms.
With cries of "God is great," bands of youths armed with whatever they
could
get hold of went on a rampage and forced the police to flee.
The French authorities could not allow a band of youths to expel the
police
from French territory. So they hit back - sending in Special Forces,
known
as the CRS, with armored cars and tough rules of engagement.
Within hours, the original cause of the incidents was forgotten and the
issue jelled around a demand by the representatives of the rioters that
the
French police leave the "occupied territories." By midweek, the riots had
spread to three of the provinces neighboring Paris, with a population of
5.5
million.
But who lives in the affected areas? In Clichy itself, more than 80
percent
of the inhabitants are Muslim immigrants or their children, mostly from
Arab
and black Africa. In other affected towns, the Muslim immigrant community
accounts for 30 percent to 60 percent of the population. But these are
not
the only figures that matter. Average unemployment in the affected areas
is
estimated at around 30 percent and, when it comes to young would-be
workers,
reaches 60 percent.
In these suburban towns, built in the 1950s in imitation of the Soviet
social housing of the Stalinist era, people live in crammed conditions,
sometimes several generations in a tiny apartment, and see "real French
life" only on television.
The French used to flatter themselves for the success of their policy of
assimilation, which was supposed to turn immigrants from any background
into
"proper Frenchmen" within a generation at most.
That policy worked as long as immigrants came to France in drips and
drops
and thus could merge into a much larger mainstream. Assimilation,
however,
cannot work when in most schools in the affected areas, fewer than 20
percent of the pupils are native French speakers.
France has also lost another powerful mechanism for assimilation: the
obligatory military service abolished in the 1990s.
As the number of immigrants and their descendants increases in a
particular
locality, more and more of its native French inhabitants leave for
"calmer
places," thus making assimilation still more difficult.
In some areas, it is possible for an immigrant or his descendants to
spend a
whole life without ever encountering the need to speak French, let alone
familiarize himself with any aspect of the famous French culture.
The result is often alienation. And that, in turn, gives radical
Islamists
an opportunity to propagate their message of religious and cultural
apartheid.
Some are even calling for the areas where Muslims form a majority of the
population to be reorganized on the basis of the "millet" system of the
Ottoman Empire: Each religious community (millet) would enjoy the right
to
organize its social, cultural and educational life in accordance with its
religious beliefs.
In parts of France, a de facto millet system is already in place. In
these
areas, all women are obliged to wear the standardized Islamist "hijab"
while
most men grow their beards to the length prescribed by the sheiks.
The radicals have managed to chase away French shopkeepers selling
alcohol
and pork products, forced "places of sin," such as dancing halls, cinemas
and theaters, to close down, and seized control of much of the local
administration.
A reporter who spent last weekend in Clichy and its neighboring towns of
Bondy, Aulnay-sous-Bois and Bobigny heard a single overarching message:
The
French authorities should keep out.
"All we demand is to be left alone," said Mouloud Dahmani, one of the
local
"emirs" engaged in negotiations to persuade the French to withdraw the
police and allow a committee of sheiks, mostly from the Muslim
Brotherhood,
to negotiate an end to the hostilities.
President Jacques Chirac and Premier de Villepin are especially sore
because they had believed that their opposition to the toppling of
Saddam Hussein in 2003 would give France a heroic image in the Muslim
community.
That illusion has now been shattered - and the Chirac administration,
already passing through a deepening political crisis, appears to be
clueless
about how to cope with what the Parisian daily France Soir has called a
"ticking time bomb."
It is now clear that a good portion of France's Muslims not only refuse
to
assimilate into "the superior French culture," but firmly believe that
Islam
offers the highest forms of life to which all mankind should aspire.
So what is the solution? One solution, offered by Gilles Kepel, an
adviser
to Chirac on Islamic affairs, is the creation of "a new Andalusia" in
which
Christians and Muslims would live side by side and cooperate to create a
new
cultural synthesis.
The problem with Kepel's vision, however, is that it does not address the
important issue of political power. Who will rule this new Andalusia:
Muslims or the largely secularist Frenchmen?
Suddenly, French politics has become worth watching again, even though
for
the wrong reasons.
Amir Taheri, editor of the French quarterly "Politique internationale,"
is a
member of Benador Associates.
2 hours, 41 minutes ago
AS THE night falls, the "troubles" start - and the pattern is always the
same.
Bands of youths in balaclavas start by setting fire to parked cars, break
shop windows with baseball bats, wreck public telephones and ransack
cinemas, libraries and schools. When the police arrive on the scene, the
rioters attack them with stones, knives and baseball bats.
The police respond by firing tear-gas grenades and, on occasions, blank
shots in the air. Sometimes the youths fire back - with real bullets.
These scenes are not from the West Bank but from 20 French cities, mostly
close to Paris, that have been plunged into a European version of the
intifada that at the time of writing appears beyond control.
The troubles first began in Clichy-sous-Bois, an underprivileged suburb
east
of Paris, a week ago. France's bombastic interior minister, Nicholas
Sarkozy, responded by sending over 400 heavily armed policemen to "impose
the laws of the republic," and promised to crush "the louts and
hooligans"
within the day. Within a few days, however, it had dawned on anyone who
wanted to know that this was no "outburst by criminal elements" that
could
be handled with a mixture of braggadocio and batons.
By Monday, everyone in Paris was speaking of "an unprecedented crisis."
Both
Sarkozy and his boss, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, had to cancel
foreign trips to deal with the riots.
How did it all start? The accepted account is that sometime last week, a
group of young boys in Clichy engaged in one of their favorite sports:
stealing parts of parked cars.
Normally, nothing dramatic would have happened, as the police have not
been
present in that suburb for years.
The problem came when one of the inhabitants, a female busybody,
telephoned
the police and reported the thieving spree taking place just opposite her
building. The police were thus obliged to do something - which meant
entering a city that, as noted, had been a no-go area for them.
Once the police arrived on the scene, the youths - who had been reigning
over Clichy pretty unmolested for years - got really angry. A brief chase
took place in the street, and two of the youths, who were not actually
chased by the police, sought refuge in a cordoned-off area housing a
power
pylon. Both were electrocuted.
Once news of their deaths was out, Clichy was all up in arms.
With cries of "God is great," bands of youths armed with whatever they
could
get hold of went on a rampage and forced the police to flee.
The French authorities could not allow a band of youths to expel the
police
from French territory. So they hit back - sending in Special Forces,
known
as the CRS, with armored cars and tough rules of engagement.
Within hours, the original cause of the incidents was forgotten and the
issue jelled around a demand by the representatives of the rioters that
the
French police leave the "occupied territories." By midweek, the riots had
spread to three of the provinces neighboring Paris, with a population of
5.5
million.
But who lives in the affected areas? In Clichy itself, more than 80
percent
of the inhabitants are Muslim immigrants or their children, mostly from
Arab
and black Africa. In other affected towns, the Muslim immigrant community
accounts for 30 percent to 60 percent of the population. But these are
not
the only figures that matter. Average unemployment in the affected areas
is
estimated at around 30 percent and, when it comes to young would-be
workers,
reaches 60 percent.
In these suburban towns, built in the 1950s in imitation of the Soviet
social housing of the Stalinist era, people live in crammed conditions,
sometimes several generations in a tiny apartment, and see "real French
life" only on television.
The French used to flatter themselves for the success of their policy of
assimilation, which was supposed to turn immigrants from any background
into
"proper Frenchmen" within a generation at most.
That policy worked as long as immigrants came to France in drips and
drops
and thus could merge into a much larger mainstream. Assimilation,
however,
cannot work when in most schools in the affected areas, fewer than 20
percent of the pupils are native French speakers.
France has also lost another powerful mechanism for assimilation: the
obligatory military service abolished in the 1990s.
As the number of immigrants and their descendants increases in a
particular
locality, more and more of its native French inhabitants leave for
"calmer
places," thus making assimilation still more difficult.
In some areas, it is possible for an immigrant or his descendants to
spend a
whole life without ever encountering the need to speak French, let alone
familiarize himself with any aspect of the famous French culture.
The result is often alienation. And that, in turn, gives radical
Islamists
an opportunity to propagate their message of religious and cultural
apartheid.
Some are even calling for the areas where Muslims form a majority of the
population to be reorganized on the basis of the "millet" system of the
Ottoman Empire: Each religious community (millet) would enjoy the right
to
organize its social, cultural and educational life in accordance with its
religious beliefs.
In parts of France, a de facto millet system is already in place. In
these
areas, all women are obliged to wear the standardized Islamist "hijab"
while
most men grow their beards to the length prescribed by the sheiks.
The radicals have managed to chase away French shopkeepers selling
alcohol
and pork products, forced "places of sin," such as dancing halls, cinemas
and theaters, to close down, and seized control of much of the local
administration.
A reporter who spent last weekend in Clichy and its neighboring towns of
Bondy, Aulnay-sous-Bois and Bobigny heard a single overarching message:
The
French authorities should keep out.
"All we demand is to be left alone," said Mouloud Dahmani, one of the
local
"emirs" engaged in negotiations to persuade the French to withdraw the
police and allow a committee of sheiks, mostly from the Muslim
Brotherhood,
to negotiate an end to the hostilities.
President Jacques Chirac and Premier de Villepin are especially sore
because they had believed that their opposition to the toppling of
Saddam Hussein in 2003 would give France a heroic image in the Muslim
community.
That illusion has now been shattered - and the Chirac administration,
already passing through a deepening political crisis, appears to be
clueless
about how to cope with what the Parisian daily France Soir has called a
"ticking time bomb."
It is now clear that a good portion of France's Muslims not only refuse
to
assimilate into "the superior French culture," but firmly believe that
Islam
offers the highest forms of life to which all mankind should aspire.
So what is the solution? One solution, offered by Gilles Kepel, an
adviser
to Chirac on Islamic affairs, is the creation of "a new Andalusia" in
which
Christians and Muslims would live side by side and cooperate to create a
new
cultural synthesis.
The problem with Kepel's vision, however, is that it does not address the
important issue of political power. Who will rule this new Andalusia:
Muslims or the largely secularist Frenchmen?
Suddenly, French politics has become worth watching again, even though
for
the wrong reasons.
Amir Taheri, editor of the French quarterly "Politique internationale,"
is a
member of Benador Associates.