Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerI thought so. Gringo, you're nothing but wind, hot air, gigantic fart.
You talk bullshit and cannot back it up. I would tell you to STFU
until you know what you are talking about but it would just be a waste
of my time. You won't shut up and you never know what you are talking
about.
Back what up, realityfucker? Whatever are you barking about now?
Why don't you consult the 6 gig file you keep of all the times you've
been embarrassed by your weak arguments.
You're such a piece of shit, even trying to use her to attack me, you
deny that she is your friend. If you didn't join the chihuahua pack's
attack on Joyce, it was because you were gone that day on your
once-weekly 30-mile run.
I always know what I'm talking about when it comes to a discussion of
your low character--not that you need any help in that regard: you
continue to display it so well.
...........
Post by realitytruckerThat I attacked Joyce, for starters. Like I said, learn to read and I
won't have to repeat myself.
If you did not join on the latest gang attack on Joyce, you must have
been taking some time off to bark at the moon. It's certainly true that
whenever that whatever your buddies go off about, you follow right
along. As I have noted already, cowardly dogs bark loudest. You bark
loudest of all. But there's no bite.
Sit, Spot! Roughtrader will take you out for a walk later!
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoSon, my talk is always about the disaster that you compassionate
conservatives have brought America--and I can and do back that up. It's
rather difficult to defend a president who is so incompetent, isn't it?
How much time do you have? Let me know when you'd like me to list a few
of bush's lies; of his crime family's ripoffs of taxpayers.
Are you certain you want to take me on regarding my "'talk' that you
(meaning me) can't back up?" Surely you aren't stupid enough to
challenge me re: bush, are you?
Sure, I want to "take you on". I requested that you back up the claim
that I attacked Joyce. Just like your husband Rocky you sidestepped
the issue and went off on a tangent. That's what I want you to back
up. And you haven't done it yet. All you're doing is blowing smoke.
Post by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerROTFLMAO! And you're a comedian too!! LMAO
Actually, I am. I have sold several dozen jokes to well-known
comedians--three to Chris Rock, even. One of my many writing talents.
I am especially gifted in my ability to kick repuglican ass. I have
kicked yours often enough. That rolling around laughing you're doing?
That's hysterical laughter, brought about by your utter humiliation at
the hands of one lone Liberal.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoEven on the rare occasion that I am
wrong, I am on the side of the little guy. Make a derogatory comment
about another driver, you'll hear from me. Sneer at the working
mothers
man, I
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringowill be all over you. Attack those who speak out against the
incompetents now running our government, you will get a fight from me.
I don't like bullies. You are a bully.
And you think you're not? You have no social skills, evidently. You
can't get along with anyone in this group, can you?
To the contrary. I get along fine with those who don't consider
10,000,000 single mothers needing a helping hand something to sneer
about. Fully 70% of Americans agree with me that George Bush is an
incompetent thief. They don't speak up very often on this NG, because I
handle you compassionate conservatives so easily. Fair play is not a
term you boys would be familiar with. But no problem. I am proficient
enough, and intelligent enough, and energetic enough to battle your
entire ratpack all at once. The many Liberals who regularly visit this
NG sit back and enjoy the show.
Yep, you an Rocky
Post by realitytruckerwould make a great pair. My only question would be who would be the
"man" in the relationship. Judging from your posts I'd guess Rocky.
I do give Rocky credit. Standing alone against a gaggle of raging
chihuahuas. You nip at his heels, but you have yet to pull him down.
If the man devoted a little of that energy and those computer skills to
defending America's working class rather than himself against clowns
like you, he'd soon have you running from him...the way you all
eventually run from me.
Now, besides polluting usenet with your left wing political
rants...what have YOU done to "defend America's working class"? Care
to enlighten us?
It's an important job. Defending the working class against the
misguided rants of, oh, about a dozen of you "compassionate
conservatives." All by myself too. But then, I don't need any help
against a pack of barking chihuahuas. It's time consuming, but, hey,
I'm up to it...I'm answering every single post that's attacking me.
You, too, will eventually tuck your tail and slink off into the
darkness. And tomorrow or the next day, you'll start another thread,
attacking rocky. Apparently he's kicking your asses too--it's taking so
many of you to stand up to him.
Sidestepping again, I see. You still didn't answer the question. What
have you done to defend the working class? WHat have you done to help
these poor mothers you keep going on about? You accuse everyone else
of doing nothing so I ask again: whAT HAVE you DONE?
I don't whine that my taxes are too high. What else would you have me
do to help 10,000,000 mothers? Petition Gates to open his purse strings
here in America as he has in Africa?
I do what I can: I speak out in defense of the downtrodden-- you pull on
your hobnailed boots and step on the backs of their necks. Oh, and
stoopid, I didn't accuse anyone of doing anything to anyone, other than
you boys with your whining and calling them "welfare queens." I
accomplish a great deal for the working class, actually. Whenever an
important election comes up, I usually volunteer to help one or more of
the candidates I believe strongly in. I walk the streets, handing out
pamphlets and urging people to register before it's too late. On
election day, I pick up those who need transportation and deliver them
to the polls. In other words, I wipe out your vote with the votes of a
few of the dozens of people I encourage/help to vote.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringowrong
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoabout anything that matters. It'd be easier for you to come up with a
single time you or your ratpack have been proven right.
But, yes, on a couple of occasions I have been proven wrong--and
on both
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringooccasions I owned up to my error. This too is something you can't
understand. But then, if you started admitting your mistakes,
you'd be
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringositting on the toilet all week. Because you have never been right.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoI really enjoy kicking you around, boy. Come on, keep coming at
me. :)
making
rantings. I
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerhaven't seen one of your posts that made any sense. Oh, BTW, before
you start having the runs again I AM a democrat, have always
voted the
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerdemocratic ticket with the exception of the LAST presidential
election. I voted for BUSH simply because he had the BALLS to do
what
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerneeded to be done, unlike your idol Mr Clinton. I just don't take
my politics to the extreme left as you do.
Not only are you stupid, you don't even have the courage to stand
up for
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringowhat you believe. You're no more a Democrat than Bush is a Christian.
In case that comment is too hard for you to understand, I'm
calling you
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoa liar if you're claiming to be a Democrat.
I might take offense if I had the slightest inkling what you are
talking about.
Simple, really. You claimed to be a Democrat. So did Zell Miller.
Zell got pissed off 'cause they wouldn't back his nomination for the
presidency. You got pissed off because the Democratic Party refused
your application for membership. In other words, you lack the balls to
stand up and be counted as a conservative: you're running from the
label. :)
Really? And where, pray tell, did you get this information from? Got
news for you, Mrs. Roads, I never applied for membership in ANY party.
From you, realityfucker. You denied being republican a couple of hours
ago. And here you are, doing it again. Speak, Spot! Speak!.
I am not a republican. Nor am I a democrat. I do not belong to any
political party. I stated in a previous post that I was a democrat.
Poor choice of words. What I meant was that I always voted democrat
prior to the last election. I vote for the best candidate. The one I
feel can do the job. I don't vote for a party. I vote for a
candidate. I don't follow the party line as you do, Mr Marx. I vote
my conscious.
Post by gringoPost by realitytruckerAnd I never will. Partisan politics disgust me, frankly. I vote for
the individual who can do the JOB. Not because he/she is a Democrat or
Republican. Partisan politics is whats wrong with this country today.
Idiots like you voting for someone just because he's a belongs to a
Post by realitytruckerparticular party. Thats just plain foolish.
But, see, that's what's wrong with this country: people who accept the
"conservative" Party Line. Whenever the Republican Party gets caught
(1) with their hands in the corporate cookie jar; (2)when a cheney
shoots his lover's husband in the head; (3) when the indictments start
to come in, that's when these slimeballs begin to shout, "It's not about
the Party! We have to come together for the sake of the nation!"
Funny thing, when they have the entire country kissing their collective
asses, where is their spirit of compromise then? They allowed the
pharmaceutical industry to write the infamous Medicare drug plan--behind
locked doors, no Democrats allowed. When the "energy plan" was drafted,
only the dick cheney and oil company execs were in attendance. They
have behaved like the bullies they are. And now, now that they are on
the run, scared about the next elections, now, they shout, "Compromise!"
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoNow, please, list for me a few of my extreme left wing rantings. To a
"compassionate conservative" like you, anyone who supports social
security and the minimum wage is a flaming commie.
Why do you call me a "compassionate conservative"? Because I voted for
a republican one time?
Post by gringoShall we now switch to the debate you promised me about Iraq?
I promised you a debate? Funny, I don't remember doing that. You've
really got to learn how to read.
Didn't think you'd want to.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerMy point was to advise you to READ a post before you respond.
READ the
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerheaders before you spout off. The old webtv does NOT use windows XP.
XP hadn't even come out when that model of webtv came on the market.
Are you saying that webtv does not use Windows at all? Horseshit.
get
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerPost by gringoreal.
Hey, Joyce's friend, now would be a good time for you to offer Joyce
some helpful advice.
You're pathetic. The only help you're capable of giving anyone is if
you suddenly broke a fingernail--at least for a day or so you'd stop
whining.
Say, I've been thinking....
Now, THAT'S a first for you.
Post by gringoif you stop telling lies about me, I'll stop
stop telling the truth about you.
When did I tell a lie about you? ANd you wouldn't know the truth if it
walked up and bit you on the ass. Thats evident from your posts.
Gringo, save this "sonny", "son", and "boy" shit for your kids. I'd
gamble to say that I am about the same age as you if not older.
I am 57 in years, and 500 years old in accumulated wisdom.
Now how is it you are only 4 years older than me and you're senile
already? I'm so sorry for you.
Oh, but I am not nearly as forgetful as you wish me to be. Every
stupidity you post, I retain enough of the details to be able to slap
you with it later.
you are correct about one thing: you are one sorry man.
Post by realitytruckerEven though
Post by gringomy wife and I drive 240,000+ miles in a year, each of us reads
five-seven books per week.
I don't have a co-driver to do half of my work for me so my average is
only 2 to 3 books a week.
Heh heh. That's on top of posting at all hours of the day and night and
driving 3000 miles. Quick, do a web search so you can get the names of
some books!
Post by realitytruckerMy tastes in reading material are eclectic.
As are mine.
Post by gringo"Escape in Iraq" (a trucker's story);
Read it.
Post by gringo"Unequal Protection," about corporate crimes here in America;
A novel by Harlan Coben;
"The Da Vinci Code";
Reading it.
Post by gringo"Holy Blood, Holy Grail" which Dan Brown's book was based on.
Next on the list after "Code"
Post by gringoThat's hundreds of books per year.
Have you finished reading "My Pet Goat" yet?
Whats your point? I read a great deal too as I am sure most in the
group do.
No point, doofus: you asked about my personal life, and I responded.
Take note that I have never asked anyone, not even you, a single
question about your life outside this ng and trucking. Firstly, it is
none of my business, and secondly, I truly don't give a fuck about your
private life.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckerI am not going to spar with you any longer. Just like Rocky, you're
too narrow minded to have an intelligent debate with. You can see no
one's point of view but your own. You're right and everyone else is
wrong and nothing I or anyone else say will ever change your mind. And
To have an intelligent debate, first you have to be willing to read and
actually consider your opponent's arguments. This is something you
cannot do. For you are diametrically opposed to that which you don't
understand-- and you understand so very little.
What thinks you know me so well, Gringo? What makes you think you know
Roughrider or tscott or ANY of us so well that you can make the absurd
statements about us that you do? From postings on usenet? If thats
what you base your opinions on you aren't too bright at all.
From the extreme positions that you take. Roughrider repeated the same
5,000 page swiftboat liars' mantra over and over about Kerry. I
produced irrefutable proof--in their own words--that those people were
touring the country at repugnut expense, besmirching a good man's name.
tscott has been posting anti-trucker drivel for about ten years now.
He's no longer OTR, if he ever was, and he now, quite obviously,
believes that he and he alone is a safe, responsible driver; he preaches
that if a driver gets fucked over by a fleet, *he deserves it*-- in
other words, tscott is a company lapdog.
Some honesty here? You, realitytrucker, I believe to be an intelligent
man. You probably are not the hard-hearted pig that your postings lead
people to believe you are. But your mindset is so goddamn anti Liberal,
pro-business and George Bush that you get caught up in the company line.
That thread about the ten million mothers? You and zeke (or was it just
zeke) and Top and even Dave Smith jumped on me, accusing me of
supporting lazy drug addicts and drunks who were doing nothing to help
themselves. If you had first read my post, you'd have known that was
not the case. I, too, said that those who will not help themselves
should be hoisted on their own petard. My point was and remains that
the children--no matter who or how lowlife the parents are--MUST be
helped. It ain't an infant's fault that his mother is a crack addict.
My point was that helping those children *now* with nutrition,
schooling...healthcare saves dollars later. So, 20,000 words and a lot
of smelly insults spewing from both of us, do you now understand, maybe,
exactly what I was talking about in that thread?
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoAbout the 10,000,000 single mothers? Without reading a word I had
written, you made a sneering, sniveling, whining comment about how dare
anyone expect you to offer help to-- how'd you put it?--someone who
won't help themselves? What? You didn't post to that thread? Frankly,
I can't tell you and your twin sister zeke apart.
GO back to reading your novels. You obviously can't read newsgroup
posts. We all know you can't read headers.
You overlook something that is quite obvious. You are posting only
against me. I have to battle you, zeke, gashauler, top, and usually all
of you at the same time. It's hard to keep all the names straight,
frankly. AS for the headers, well, those are the least of my concerns.
You see, what newsreader someone is using is not something I worry about.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoPost by realitytruckeryou have the nerve to call ME pathetic. Say hello to your husband,
Rocky, for me.
But you are so very pathetic.
One thing that can be said about rocky that no one will ever say about
you. He fights his own battles. He doesn't need to clusterfuck.
Now go lie down, Spot! You know that if you get upset you'll piss all
over the couch again.
And you claim to read 5-7 books a week?? I find that difficult to
believe because you're showing me in this post that you haven't read a
thing in this group. If you had you'd know how ridiculous that
statement was.
All I know about this rocky character is what I have witnessed. 20-30
postings by three or four of you, feeding each other's frenzy re: rocky.
Rocky does do the nasty, yes: there's no excuse for his assuming other
people's identity. But what is his chief complaint? that y'all keep
denying that he is a driver? So, give that to him--is it any skin off
your nose? Or would that deprive you of too much pleasure? Me? I don't
give a shit one way or the other. I attack only those who attack me or
my beliefs.
Post by realitytruckerI have a visual image of you, Gringa: you pull a flatbed. You have a
high powered CB with echo turned up so far no one can understand a word
you say yet you think it sounds "cool". ANd you get in the hammer lane
and run 6 inches off a 4 wheelers rear bumper trying to intimidate them
out of your way.
Evidently you're so busy thinking up your next line you pay very little
attention to what's in front of you. I have never pulled tanker. I
have never pulled flatbed. I once drove covered wagon for a few weeks,
but did not care for it. I pulled doubles for almost four years, no
triples as I don't live in a triples state. I pull 53' drybox. General
freight: foodstuffs, paper, steel, paint, computers and even DVDs.
My driving habits: I drive 77 or so in 70 mph states; 70 or so in 60-65
mph zones; and 65 or so in a 55. 45 and slower, I honor because that
usually means a city or a construction zone. My present radio is a
Galaxy 959. I hate echo almost as much as I hate "compassionate
conservatives." The only time I come close to tailgating is when
there's lane restrictions and the fool is running 50 in my only passing
lane. If he can move over, I will encourage him to do so; but if
traffic is heavy and the guy can't go anywhere, unlike far too many
others, I stay well back. I do not run in a pack--of cars or trucks.
In the last 20 years of trucking, I have been involved in exactly one
accident--and it was charged to me. Over the years I have received a
total of four speeding tickets, one for illegal lane usage (in CA) and
one overweight fine of $40. Anything else you wish to know about me?
Post by realitytruckerJust like you try to intimidate everyone in this group who disagrees
with your point of view.
It isn't the disagreement: it's how it's done. Dave posted to that
thread we've discussed so much, not really disagreeing with me, just
making the point that he does not want to fund anybody else's laziness.
Me either. So, I explained my position a little better, and I think
he went away satisfied. Zeke, on the other hand, got increasingly
hostile; over and over he kept repeating the very same line, ignoring
obviously the point I had been making all along.
Look, like you, I enjoy a spirited debate. All I ask is that you give
my post an honest read-- don't insert into it any thoughts that aren't
there, don't get hot and sarcastic, and I will try to remain cool and
calm as well. Believe it or not, I am not out to convert anyone to
Liberalism. And please, if I'm having a go with someone else, please
refrain from the urge to pile on: don't make any asides to either the
other person or to me. If you'll wait awhile, I'll be glad to go at it
with you too.
Post by realitytruckerPost by gringoI know I said I wasn't going to respond to you but your statements are
so ludicrous that I had to. But thats it. I have to be on the road
early in the morning.
Have a safe trip.
Post by realitytruckerYou finish your comic book and get some sleep too. Then you can get up
and tend to your garden tomorrow.
Nighty night, Mr. Roads.
I'm going to refrain from saying the nasty comment that came to mind.
--
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and
causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . Corporations
have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow,
and the money-power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by
working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated
in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.
--Abraham Lincoln