Post by Jonathan M DavisPost by David NadlingerPlease post all feedback in this thread, and remember: Although
comprehensive reviews are obviously appreciated, short comments are very
welcome as well!
Why does vlog even exist? It's a needless complication IMHO. Let the log
levels manage what does and doesn't get logged. I see no reason to add the
concept of verbosity on top of that. It's a needless complication.
Needless? Man, you really make some "strange" comments. I believe that
this is better served by you asking for the motivation for vlog
instead of make a useless comment like the one above. The reason why
vlog exist is to provide users with the ability to enable/disable
logging at a package or module level. Lets say that for a particular
load you are seeing that module X is not behaving correctly. The next
time you run your application (or you can do this at runtime if you
have coded your application correctly) you can enable verbose logging
in this module by using the --v and --vmodule command line options. I
have tried to explain this in the properties
Configuration.maxVerboseLevel and Configuration.verboseFilter. Let me
know if it still no clear and if I should expand the documentation.
Post by Jonathan M DavisAlso, _please_ add a debug level. Personally, I'd argue for simply copying
syslog's levels and matching them, since ideally any logging on Linux would be
going to syslog anyway. But there are good reasons to have messages beyond
info. I sure wouldn't want _all_ messages which don't indicate a problem in
the app to be marked as info. For instance, what if I want to have info
displayed in release mode but want greater verbosity in debug mode?
debug info("More information in debug mode");
I think it is very helpful that instead of just suggestion more level
we try to see how we can use this module and the power of D to do what
you want. If we find that it is not possible or clunky then we can
talk about adding more functionality.
Post by Jonathan M DavisI'd need
another log level which isn't there. Using the concept of verbosity to try and
handle this is a needless complication. syslog has
#define LOG_EMERG ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? /* system is unusable */
#define LOG_ALERT ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? /* action must be taken immediately */
#define LOG_CRIT ? ? ? ?2 ? ? ? /* critical conditions */
#define LOG_ERR ? ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? /* error conditions */
#define LOG_WARNING ? ? 4 ? ? ? /* warning conditions */
#define LOG_NOTICE ? ? ?5 ? ? ? /* normal but significant condition */
#define LOG_INFO ? ? ? ?6 ? ? ? /* informational */
#define LOG_DEBUG ? ? ? 7 ? ? ? /* debug-level messages */
And I'd like to at least see notice and debug added.
While we're at it, what's the point of dfatal? Why on earth would a _fatal_
condition not be fatal if it were in release mode if it were fatal in debug
mode? Is it fatal or not? It seems to me like another needless complication.
Barely a complication. dfatal looks as follow:
debug alias log!(Severity.fatal) dfatal; /// ditto
else alias log!(Severity.critical) dfatal; /// ditto
Post by Jonathan M DavisIf you're going to have write, then have writef, not format. Then it's
actually consistent with our normal I/O functions.
Good suggestion. Will do.
Post by Jonathan M DavisAlso, do writef and format
automatically append a newline? If so, then they should be writeln and
writefln.
Technically, no. The module was abstracted with a frontend and a
backend. At a very high-level the front does filtering based on
compile time and run time configuration options. The backend is
basically responsible for persisting messages. It just happens that
the only backend implementation that we have writes to a human
consumable file hence the newline but it is possible that users are
going to want to store this data in persistent storage where each
logging event is not separated by a newline.
Post by Jonathan M DavisRich is a horrible name IMHO. It says nothing about what it actually is or
does. I'm not sure what a good name would be (BoolMessage?, LogResult?), but
Rich by itself is very confusing and utterly uninformative.
Yeah. I don't like Rich. Let me think about a better name. Thanks for
the suggestions!
Post by Jonathan M DavisAnd why does Configuration's logger property throw if you set it after a
logging call has been made. Is it really that inconceivable that someone would
swap out loggers at runtime? Or is the idea that you'd swap out the
Configuration?
The idea is not to swap out the Configuration but to instead be able
to reset each property. There is no technical reason why you can't
replace the Logger. I just didn't think this is something the users
would want to do in practice. Again this goes beyond technical reason
is more of the operational consequence if you allow this. For example:
1. You started logging to /tmp/application/...log...
2. You swapped the logger at runtime to start logging to syslog
You have a bunch of important data in /tmp/application/...log... what
are you going to do with it? Think of this like a stream flowing into
a lake and at some point you want to route the stream to the ocean.
What is the state of the lake after the routing change?
I would also like to add that this is a restriction that we can remove
in the future. I am honestly a little hesitant to remove it now
without giving it a little bit of more thought. Thoughts?
Thanks!
-Jose