Discussion:
I'm voting Labour
(too old to reply)
M***@closed.gov.uk
2019-11-21 20:34:56 UTC
Permalink
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.

You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.

I'm mad.

Therefore I'm voting Labour.

Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
abelard
2019-11-21 20:45:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
that seems logical :-)
--
www.abelard.org
Pancho
2019-11-23 12:11:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
that seems logical :-)
Not really.

I don't think therefore I am not.
abelard
2019-11-23 14:08:46 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:11:22 +0000, Pancho
Post by Pancho
Post by abelard
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
that seems logical :-)
Not really.
I don't think therefore I am not.
augustine said ~i question therefore i am, 800
years prior to descartes

mi5 did not say he did not think...neither did augustine...

what do you believe you men by 'sane'?

My motto, to the extent that I have one, has been noted often enough,
and I've always conformed to it. It's the one I've given to old
Maigret, who resembles me in certain points ...
'understand and judge not.'
Georges Simenon
[Quotes from Jules Maigret]



"How do you explain that?"
"I don't explain it."
p.105, Maigret and the killer

"You don't agree with them?"
"I don't know enough to contradict them. The only difference between
hem and me is I don't divide people into categories."
"But it's necessary."
"Necessary why?"
"To judge them, for example."
"It's not my role to judge."
p.159, Maigret and the killer



thinking is for idiots
--
www.abelard.org
Joe
2019-11-23 14:12:07 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 15:08:46 +0100
Post by abelard
My motto, to the extent that I have one, has been noted often enough,
and I've always conformed to it. It's the one I've given to old
Maigret, who resembles me in certain points ...
'understand and judge not.'
Georges Simenon
[Quotes from Jules Maigret]
OK for a start, but at some point you must make a decision...

Maigret was pointing out that he was a policeman, not a member of the
judiciary.
--
Joe
abelard
2019-11-23 14:34:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 15:08:46 +0100
Post by abelard
My motto, to the extent that I have one, has been noted often enough,
and I've always conformed to it. It's the one I've given to old
Maigret, who resembles me in certain points ...
'understand and judge not.'
Georges Simenon
[Quotes from Jules Maigret]
OK for a start, but at some point you must make a decision...
a decision is not a judgement, it is a choice...

measure agent cob by this rule...he refuses to make choices
but he never ceases from making judgements, of others
Post by Joe
Maigret was pointing out that he was a policeman, not a member of the
judiciary.
this is also true
--
www.abelard.org
Roger
2019-11-23 15:07:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 15:08:46 +0100
Post by abelard
My motto, to the extent that I have one, has been noted often enough,
and I've always conformed to it. It's the one I've given to old
Maigret, who resembles me in certain points ...
'understand and judge not.'
Georges Simenon
[Quotes from Jules Maigret]
OK for a start, but at some point you must make a decision...
Maigret was pointing out that he was a policeman, not a member of the
judiciary.
--
Joe
A decision must be made; that does not imply that the decision must be determined by a single indiviual even if that individual is part pf the decision making.

In an election voters cast their opinions, the decision is collective.

This is different from Magrait's case where the detective is part of a pool of persons who collect data, the decision is made by a judge, a collective decision of several judges, or the collective decision of a jury (AFAIK in UK and France at least a definitive judgement on a criminal case can never be made by a single individual).
abelard
2019-11-23 15:17:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger
Post by Joe
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 15:08:46 +0100
Post by abelard
My motto, to the extent that I have one, has been noted often enough,
and I've always conformed to it. It's the one I've given to old
Maigret, who resembles me in certain points ...
'understand and judge not.'
Georges Simenon
[Quotes from Jules Maigret]
OK for a start, but at some point you must make a decision...
Maigret was pointing out that he was a policeman, not a member of the
judiciary.
--
Joe
A decision must be made; that does not imply that the decision must be determined by a single indiviual even if that individual is part pf the decision making.
In an election voters cast their opinions, the decision is collective.
This is different from Magrait's case where the detective is part of a pool of persons who collect data, the decision is made by a judge, a collective decision of several judges, or the collective decision of a jury (AFAIK in UK and France at least a definitive judgement on a criminal case can never be made by a single individual).
all reasonable comment

"In point of fact our chief job is to protect the State in the first
place—whatever government is in power, with its institutions; in the
second place the currency, public property and private property; and
then, last of all, the lives of the individual private citizens.

" 'Did you ever take a look into the Penal Code? You have to read as
far as page 177 before you come to anything about cries against human
beings. One day later on, when I retire, I'll work it out precisely.
!but let's say that three-quarters of the Code, if not four-fifths, is
concerned with goods and chattels, real estate, forged currency,
forgeries of public and private documents, falsifications of wills,
etc., etc. In short, with money in all its shapes and forms … To such
an extent that Article 274, on mendicancy, comes before Article 295,
on wilful homicide …' "
p.230, Maigret and the Lazy Burglar



it is also necessary to distinguish decisions actions...but i'm
trying not to confuse :-)
https://www.abelard.org/metalogic/metalogicB1.htm
--
www.abelard.org
abelard
2019-11-23 15:20:18 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:17:05 +0100, abelard <***@abelard.org>
wrote:

missing word
it is also necessary to distinguish decisions [from] actions...but i'm
trying not to confuse :-)
https://www.abelard.org/metalogic/metalogicB1.htm
--
www.abelard.org
Joe
2019-11-23 16:33:55 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:17:05 +0100
Post by abelard
" 'Did you ever take a look into the Penal Code? You have to read as
far as page 177 before you come to anything about cries against human
beings. One day later on, when I retire, I'll work it out precisely.
!but let's say that three-quarters of the Code, if not four-fifths, is
concerned with goods and chattels, real estate, forged currency,
forgeries of public and private documents, falsifications of wills,
etc., etc. In short, with money in all its shapes and forms … To such
an extent that Article 274, on mendicancy, comes before Article 295,
on wilful homicide …' "
p.230, Maigret and the Lazy Burglar
In the UK today, I'd have said that at least 90% of the law concerns
taxation, the thing always uppermost in the mind of any government.
--
Joe
Pancho
2019-11-23 14:15:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:11:22 +0000, Pancho
Post by Pancho
Post by abelard
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
that seems logical :-)
Not really.
I don't think therefore I am not.
augustine said ~i question therefore i am, 800
years prior to descartes
mi5 did not say he did not think...neither did augustine...
what do you believe you men by 'sane'?
(a implies b) does not imply (b implies a)
abelard
2019-11-23 14:35:36 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 14:15:43 +0000, Pancho
Post by Pancho
Post by abelard
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 12:11:22 +0000, Pancho
Post by Pancho
Post by abelard
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
that seems logical :-)
Not really.
I don't think therefore I am not.
augustine said ~i question therefore i am, 800
years prior to descartes
mi5 did not say he did not think...neither did augustine...
what do you believe you men by 'sane'?
(a implies b) does not imply (b implies a)
it would help if you defined a & b
--
www.abelard.org
Brian Gaff (Sofa)
2019-11-22 08:19:13 UTC
Permalink
Chuckle I like your logic here..... grin.
Brian
--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
***@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
KWills Shill #2
2019-11-22 10:00:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
--
Shill #2 (recently promoted).
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
Loading Image...
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Grikbassterder®™
2019-11-22 13:28:43 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWilly Shit #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
Where do you GET such profound thoughts from?
Incubus
2019-11-22 13:37:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Grikbassterder®™
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWilly Shit #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
Where do you GET such profound thoughts from?
MI5 mind-control, beamed straight into his head.
Grikbassterder®™
2019-11-22 14:14:10 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:37:42 -0000 (UTC), Incubus
Post by Incubus
Post by Grikbassterder®™
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWilly Shit #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
Where do you GET such profound thoughts from?
MI5 mind-control, beamed straight into his head.
Gotta be!
Peeler
2019-11-22 15:19:17 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:14:10 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbassterder®™)", farted
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by Incubus
MI5 mind-control, beamed straight into his head.
Gotta be!
Happy again that another senile idiot thought you psychopathic swine were
worthy of an answer, pedophilic gay Razovic?
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"That [referring to the term "consenting adults"] is just an outdated legal
construct. Are you telling me that a 13-year old who spends 15 hours a day
on Facebook is incapable of consent?"
MID: <Og0VE.1298131$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2019-11-22 17:54:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Grikbassterder®™
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:37:42 -0000 (UTC), Incubus
Post by Incubus
Post by Grikbassterder®™
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWilly Shit #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
Where do you GET such profound thoughts from?
MI5 mind-control, beamed straight into his head.
Gotta be!
Some things are just so fucking obvious.


Michael
Peeler
2019-11-22 15:17:48 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:37:42 -0000 (UTC), Incubus, another mentally
Post by Incubus
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by KWills Shill #2
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
Where do you GET such profound thoughts from?
MI5 mind-control, beamed straight into his head.
Or rather the psychopathic serb pissed right into your senile head again!
Peeler
2019-11-22 15:15:36 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:28:43 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbassterder®™", farted
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by KWills Shill #2
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
Where do you GET such profound thoughts from?
You don't like the way he counters or deals with clinical insanity, you
clinically insane psychopathic perv? No suprise! <BG>
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"There will always be progressives such as Harriet Harperson who want to
take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from
being widely accepted."
MID: <rlMUE.676067$***@usenetxs.com>
M***@closed.gov.uk
2019-11-22 15:31:37 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWills Shill #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
What about tactical voting, Brexit party v Tories? You actually want
the Brexit party to win a constituency, but they won't, so you vote
Tory to keep out the opposition?
KWills Shill #2
2019-11-23 13:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWills Shill #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
What about tactical voting, Brexit party v Tories? You actually want
the Brexit party to win a constituency, but they won't, so you vote
Tory to keep out the opposition?
Not living in England, I can't vote for any candidate. I don't
pay enough attention to British politics to offer an informed opinion
as to which party would be better.
--
Shill #2 (recently promoted).
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Grikbassterder®™
2019-11-23 13:43:15 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:38:23 -0800, KWilly Shit #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:00:51 -0800, KWills Shill #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
What about tactical voting, Brexit party v Tories? You actually want
the Brexit party to win a constituency, but they won't, so you vote
Tory to keep out the opposition?
Not living in England, I can't vote for any candidate. I don't
pay enough attention to British politics to offer an informed opinion
as to which party would be better.
You're EXEMPT from informed opinions about ANYTHING, liar.
Peeler
2019-11-23 15:55:49 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:43:15 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbassterder®™", farted
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by KWills Shill #2
Not living in England, I can't vote for any candidate. I don't
pay enough attention to British politics to offer an informed opinion
as to which party would be better.
You're EXEMPT from informed opinions about ANYTHING, liar.
You are PROJECTING, yet again, you pathological liar!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Why do we still have outdated laws prohibiting paedophilia? Do you
seriously think that a 12-year old who spends 15 hours a day on Facebook
doesn't know what's going on?"
MID: <FnMUE.676068$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2019-12-01 17:34:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peeler
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:43:15 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbassterder®™", farted
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by KWills Shill #2
Not living in England, I can't vote for any candidate. I don't
pay enough attention to British politics to offer an informed opinion
as to which party would be better.
You're EXEMPT from informed opinions about ANYTHING, liar.
You are PROJECTING, yet again, you pathological liar!
The mangina projects in an attempt to feel better about himself.

But in the end, he is just as miserable.

Happy New Month!


Michael
Peeler
2019-12-01 17:43:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Peeler
You are PROJECTING, yet again, you pathological liar!
The mangina projects in an attempt to feel better about himself.
Doesn't seem to work well for her. Maybe should should try something
different after 20 years of trolling! LOL
Post by Michael Ejercito
But in the end, he is just as miserable.
Exactly!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Happy New Month!
Likewise!
Michael Ejercito
2019-12-05 16:46:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Peeler
You are PROJECTING, yet again, you pathological liar!
The mangina projects in an attempt to feel better about himself.
Doesn't seem to work well for her. Maybe should should try something
different after 20 years of trolling! LOL
Yup.
Post by Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
But in the end, he is just as miserable.
Exactly!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Happy New Month!
Likewise!
Thank you.


Michael

Joe
2019-11-23 13:51:00 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:38:23 -0800
Post by KWills Shill #2
Not living in England, I can't vote for any candidate. I don't
pay enough attention to British politics to offer an informed opinion
as to which party would be better.
It's not a matter of which party in power would be 'better', as to
trying to guess which would do least damage. Most of the trouble in
the world is caused by government action. Certainly all of the wars,
and taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.
--
Joe
KWills Shill #2
2019-11-24 11:52:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Grikbassterder®™
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:38:23 -0800
Post by KWills Shill #2
Not living in England, I can't vote for any candidate. I don't
pay enough attention to British politics to offer an informed opinion
as to which party would be better.
It's not a matter of which party in power would be 'better', as to
trying to guess which would do least damage.
I can't make an informed opinion on that either. :)
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Most of the trouble in
the world is caused by government action. Certainly all of the wars,
and taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.
To a large degree, yes. Some taxes do benefit the taxed. Money
used to repair roads, for example.
Sadly, the benefits are greatly outweighed by the rest.
--
Shill #2 (recently promoted).
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Richard Bos
2019-11-23 11:50:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
That would be reasonable if he lived in a democracy, but he lives in the
UK, which is a large-grained-FPTP two-party oligarchy.

Richard
John Williamson
2019-11-23 12:16:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Richard Bos
Richard
'Allo, stranger. Long time no hear.
--
Tciao for Now!

John.
KWills Shill #2
2019-11-23 13:38:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Richard Bos
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
That would be reasonable if he lived in a democracy, but he lives in the
UK, which is a large-grained-FPTP two-party oligarchy.
I'm not saying the candidate he votes for will win. Only that he
should vote for the one he wants to win.
--
Shill #2 (recently promoted).
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Grikbassterder®™
2019-11-23 13:44:57 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:38:31 -0800, KWilly Shit #2
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by Richard Bos
Post by KWills Shill #2
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
You vote for whomever you wish to see win. If you want to see
Labour win, vote Labour. If you want Tory, vote Tory. Etc.
That would be reasonable if he lived in a democracy, but he lives in the
UK, which is a large-grained-FPTP two-party oligarchy.
I'm not saying the candidate he votes for will win. Only that he
should vote for the one he wants to win.
You've achieved new depths in profundity with that pearl of wisdom.
Pancho
2019-11-23 14:12:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by KWills Shill #2
I'm not saying the candidate he votes for will win. Only that he
should vote for the one he wants to win.
You've achieved new depths in profundity with that pearl of wisdom.
Perhaps not. Tactical voting is often the optimal strategy.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem>
Peeler
2019-11-23 15:58:55 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:44:57 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by KWills Shill #2
I'm not saying the candidate he votes for will win. Only that he
should vote for the one he wants to win.
You've achieved new depths in profundity with that pearl of wisdom.
Nope, you only achieved a new depth of inanity with your latest inane troll,
you endlessly projecting illiterate serb peasant!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$***@usenetxs.com>
Grikbassterder®™
2019-11-22 13:28:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
Vote for whichever party your mindcontrol tells you to vote for.
Peeler
2019-11-22 15:20:44 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:28:02 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbassterder®™", farted
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
Vote for whichever party your mindcontrol tells you to vote for.
Are YOU even ALLOWED to vote, you incapacitated psychopathic serb cretin?
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Why do we still have outdated laws prohibiting paedophilia? Do you
seriously think that a 12-year old who spends 15 hours a day on Facebook
doesn't know what's going on?"
MID: <FnMUE.676068$***@usenetxs.com>
M***@closed.gov.uk
2019-11-22 15:28:22 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:28:02 -0800, Grikbassterder®™
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
Vote for whichever party your mindcontrol tells you to vote for.
Screaming Lord Sutch is sadly not standing in this election, as far as
I know.

But either Corbyn or Johnson would fit his shoes.
Norman Wells
2019-11-22 15:39:14 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:28:02 -0800, Grikbassterder®™
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
Vote for whichever party your mindcontrol tells you to vote for.
Screaming Lord Sutch is sadly not standing in this election, as far as
I know.
It's a bit difficult when you're dead, so I'm told.
Grikbassterder®™
2019-11-22 17:42:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:28:02 -0800, Grikbassterder®™
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
I've just been looking at coverage of Labour's manifesto.
You would have to be mad to vote for a party with these policies.
I'm mad.
Therefore I'm voting Labour.
Which part of "insanity" did you not understand?
Vote for whichever party your mindcontrol tells you to vote for.
Screaming Lord Sutch is sadly not standing in this election, as far as
I know.
But either Corbyn or Johnson would fit his shoes.
Listen to your mindcontrol. You *know* it makes sense.
Peeler
2019-11-22 18:01:17 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:42:03 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbassterder®™", farted
Post by Grikbassterder®™
Post by M***@closed.gov.uk
Screaming Lord Sutch is sadly not standing in this election, as far as
I know.
But either Corbyn or Johnson would fit his shoes.
Listen to your mindcontrol. You *know* it makes sense.
It makes more sense than if he listened to you, pedophilic gay Razovic!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Why do we still have outdated laws prohibiting paedophilia? Do you
seriously think that a 12-year old who spends 15 hours a day on Facebook
doesn't know what's going on?"
MID: <FnMUE.676068$***@usenetxs.com>
Loading...