c***@gmail.com
2019-05-13 20:35:03 UTC
There are physical discrepancies regarding the Apollo 11 lunar mission that dispute the actual occurrence of the Apollo 11 lunar mission. During the Apollo 11 lander descent to the surface of the moon, the lander (2,504 lb moon wt.) achieves a downward velocity estimated at 2 km/s then the lander's rocket engine ignites and produces a thrust of 10,000 lb that reduces the lander's downward velocity. Near the moon's surface the lander's thrust is reduced to 3,000 lb which would result in the formation of an enormous amount of rocket smoke that is indicitive of a rocket engine thrust yet the lunar descent video does not depict any rocket smoke. The lack of the moon's atmosphere is used to justify the non-existence of rocket smoke but the production of rocket smoke is caused by the combustion of the Aerozine rocket fuel and the oxidizer (liquid oxygen) which would result in the formation of an enormous amount of rocket smoke. In another argument, the Aerozine rocket fuel is said to burn clean and does not produce any smoke but Aerozine rocket fuel that is used in the Trident missile launch produces an enormous amount of rocket smoke (video 1). The non-existence of rocket smoke in the Apollo 11 videos contests the landing of the lander onto the lunar surface. The descent video of the lunar lander also shows the lander propagating in a horizontal direction that would require a rocket thrust in the horizontal direction and a constant center of mass of the lander yet the lander would experience an enormous change in the center of mass because of the fuel being consumed during the landing which would shift the center of mass and render it impossible for the horizontal motion of the lander using horizontal rocket thrusters during the lunar descent. The Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) is used to justify the lander propagating in the horizontal direction but the main engine of the LLRV is a jet that would not function on the moon and a rocket engine would require 20 times more fuel to produce the LLRV flight depicted in the videos. One of the most compelling reason to question the Apollo 11 mission is the photographic images of the Apollo 11 lander do not depict a blast zone beneath the exhaust nozzle of the lander caused by the 3,000 lb rocket thrust. The argument that the 3,000 lb thrust is not significant enough to produce a blast zone beneath the lander is used to justify the non-existence of the blast zone. Using an analogy, a Lear jet engine is rated with a 3,500 lb thrust. The 3,000 lb lander rocket thrust that produces a 2,000o F flame would result in a blast zone beneath the Apollo 11 lunar lander yet the Apollo 11 photograph (fig 37) shows boot prints just below the lander's exhaust nozzle.
In the Apollo 11 photographs, the shadows of the lunar objects are pointing in different directions. The large distance from the Sun to the moon results in parallel shadows of all lunar objects on a level surface yet numerous Apollo 11 photographs depict large variations of the angles of the shadows formed by objects on a level lunar surface. The variation in the contour of the lunar surface is used to explain the multiple directions of the lunar shadows but in an Apollo 11 photograph (fig 38), a rock and the lander, on a near level surface, are separated by the distance of 100 meters and are forming shadows that produce an angle of 45 degrees which negates the contour surface argument. In another argument, the Sun's intensity reflected by the earth is used to represent a second light source that forms the multiple directional lunar shadows but the light intensities of the Sun and the Earth would form two separate shadows yet each lunar object forms a single shadow. The varying angles of the lunar shadows prove the Apollo 11 photographs were fabricated in a large movie studio with a light source attached to the ceiling. Also, the Apollo 11 photographs (fig 39a,b) depict part of the cross hairs in the back of a lunar object but the cross hairs are etched into a glass plate within the camera which would result in the cross hairs to always be in front of all the lunar objects yet numerous Apollo 11 photographs show part of the cross hairs behind the lunar object. Furthermore, no photographs were taken that included the stars of the stellar universe and an Apollo 11 astronaut while on the surface of the moon since if the stars appeared in any of the photographs, every photograph would require the stars' positions to align with a specific time which would be extremely difficult to emulate. In an on camera interview after the Apollo 11 mission Armstrong stated that he did not recall the stars of the celestial universe while on the surface of the moon (video 3). The Apollo 11 astronauts appear extremely nervous when asked the question regarding why no stars appear in the Apollo 11 photographs. NASA justifies the absence of stars in the Apollo photographs using the extremely high intensity of reflected Sun light from the surface of the moon prevents the stars from appearing in the Apollo 11 photographs but the background of the celestial universe in the Apollo 11 photographs is pitch black which would result in a few of the higher intensity stars to appear in the Apollo 11 photographs. If the reflected Sun light prevents the stars to appear in the Apollo 11 photographs, the background stellar universe of the Apollo 11 photographs would appear gray yet the Apollo 11 photograph's background celestial universe is pitch black, and, a lens hood would block the reflected lunar light from entering the camera lens which would allow the stars to appear the the Apollo 11 photographs. In the photographs taken at the international space station, during the day, stars appear in the ISS photographs yet none of the photographs taken during the Apollo 11 mission contain any stars.
The lunar surface is said to reach the temperature of 220o Fahrenheit which would result in the Apollo astronauts to experience heat stroke after 2.5 hours on the lunar surface. A water capillary coolant system is said to cool the outer surface of the astronauts to prevent the astronauts from perishing from the intense heat that would accumulate after 2.5 hours on the lunar surface. The argument that the space suit reflects the Sun's intensity is used to justify the Apollo 11 space suit water coolant system is insignificant since the reflected solar light would result in the space suit to absorb an enormous amount solar light energy. It would require an air conditioner unit and batteries to cool the interior of the Apollo 11 space suit to allow the astronauts to survive on the lunar surface for 2.5 hours. Example, if a person walked on the surface of Death Valley (120o F) in an enclosed suit for 2.5 hr it would require an air conditioning unit and batteries to maintain a temperature to sustain the person at a comfortable temperature. Furthermore, the original video of Armstrong stepping on the surface of the moon has been lost and the only record of the event is a distorted video taken indirectly by a television camera videoing Armstrong walking on the lunar surface that was projected from a NASA monitor (video 5). There is a problem regarding the position of the video camera that extents from the side of the lander (fig 40) and Armstrong making his first step onto the moon's surface since Armstrong takes three steps away from the lander towards the video camera after stepping on the lunar surface yet the video camera is attached to the side of the lander and is approximately two meter from the ladder and pointing parallel to the side of the lander. Furthermore, in a video, an Apollo astronaut is shown placing a flag on the surface of the moon but in the video, the flag appears to be flapping similar to a flag blowing in the wind (video 6) yet the surface of the moon has no atmosphere that could form the waving of a flag with the intensity depicted in the Apollo 11 video. It is argued that the momentum of the flag created by the astronaut placing the flag pole onto the moon's surface causes the flag to wave but the intensity of the flag waving in the horizontal direction suggests that the Apollo 11 mission flag waving was created by a cooling fan in a movie studio. Furthermore, NASA justifies the lunar mission using moon rocks but the moon rocks could be meteors that landed on the surface of the earth and passed off as moon rocks.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The power of the radio signal produce by the Apollo 11 lander is estimated at 50 Watts. A radio signal's intensity is dependent on the inverse of the second order of the distance I = U2 = {[A cos(kr)]/r]}2 where A represents the power of the radio signal. After a radio signal propagates the distance of 238,000 miles (3.8 x 108 m) to the earth, a 50 W radio signal's intensity would diminish to I = A2 [cos2(kr)]/r2 = (50 W)2 (0.5) / (3.8 x 108 m)2 = 8.65 x 10-15 W2/m2. The Parkes radio dish antenna located in Sydney Australia was used to communicate with the Apollo 11 mission. The sensitivity of the Parkes radio antenna is extrapolated using the radio signal intensity formed by a 300 km height communication satellite that emits a 20 W radio signal and produces an radio signal intensity at the surface of the earth of I = A2 [cos2(kr)]/r2 = (20 W)2 (.5) / (3 x 105m)2 = 2.22 x 10-9 W2/m2; adding two orders of magnitude to the satellite radio signal's intensity that forms at the surface of the earth, the sensitivity of the Parkes radio antenna is estimated at 10-11 W2/m2. There is a four order of magnitude difference between the extrapolated sensitivity of the Parkes radio telescope and the 10-15 W2 /m2 s-band radio signal that originates from the Apollo 11 mission. Also, a radio signal cannot penetrate the Van Allen radiation belt that surrounds the earth. It is questionable how NASA communicated with the Apollo missions, Voyagers, and Mars probes using radio waves. It is argue that a satellite that is orbiting the earth at a height of 30,000 km above the earth that is passed the Van Allen belt justifies the functionality of the Apollo 11 communication system but the described satellite height is 20 % of the distance to the moon which is a doubtful magnitude for the height for orbiting communication satellite. NASA uses the Voyager to justify the communication system of the Apollo 11 mission but NASA states that the Voyager is sending back a 50 W radio signal from a distance of over 1 billion miles (1.61 x 1012m) from the earth which would produce a radio signal of I = (50 W)2 (0.5) / (1.61 x 1012 m)2 = 5 x 10-22 W2/m2 at the earth that is 11 orders of magnitude less than the extrapolated sensitivity of the Parkes (10-11 W2/m2). NASA engineers have not yet establish the maximum range of a radio signal.
In the Apollo 11 photographs, the shadows of the lunar objects are pointing in different directions. The large distance from the Sun to the moon results in parallel shadows of all lunar objects on a level surface yet numerous Apollo 11 photographs depict large variations of the angles of the shadows formed by objects on a level lunar surface. The variation in the contour of the lunar surface is used to explain the multiple directions of the lunar shadows but in an Apollo 11 photograph (fig 38), a rock and the lander, on a near level surface, are separated by the distance of 100 meters and are forming shadows that produce an angle of 45 degrees which negates the contour surface argument. In another argument, the Sun's intensity reflected by the earth is used to represent a second light source that forms the multiple directional lunar shadows but the light intensities of the Sun and the Earth would form two separate shadows yet each lunar object forms a single shadow. The varying angles of the lunar shadows prove the Apollo 11 photographs were fabricated in a large movie studio with a light source attached to the ceiling. Also, the Apollo 11 photographs (fig 39a,b) depict part of the cross hairs in the back of a lunar object but the cross hairs are etched into a glass plate within the camera which would result in the cross hairs to always be in front of all the lunar objects yet numerous Apollo 11 photographs show part of the cross hairs behind the lunar object. Furthermore, no photographs were taken that included the stars of the stellar universe and an Apollo 11 astronaut while on the surface of the moon since if the stars appeared in any of the photographs, every photograph would require the stars' positions to align with a specific time which would be extremely difficult to emulate. In an on camera interview after the Apollo 11 mission Armstrong stated that he did not recall the stars of the celestial universe while on the surface of the moon (video 3). The Apollo 11 astronauts appear extremely nervous when asked the question regarding why no stars appear in the Apollo 11 photographs. NASA justifies the absence of stars in the Apollo photographs using the extremely high intensity of reflected Sun light from the surface of the moon prevents the stars from appearing in the Apollo 11 photographs but the background of the celestial universe in the Apollo 11 photographs is pitch black which would result in a few of the higher intensity stars to appear in the Apollo 11 photographs. If the reflected Sun light prevents the stars to appear in the Apollo 11 photographs, the background stellar universe of the Apollo 11 photographs would appear gray yet the Apollo 11 photograph's background celestial universe is pitch black, and, a lens hood would block the reflected lunar light from entering the camera lens which would allow the stars to appear the the Apollo 11 photographs. In the photographs taken at the international space station, during the day, stars appear in the ISS photographs yet none of the photographs taken during the Apollo 11 mission contain any stars.
The lunar surface is said to reach the temperature of 220o Fahrenheit which would result in the Apollo astronauts to experience heat stroke after 2.5 hours on the lunar surface. A water capillary coolant system is said to cool the outer surface of the astronauts to prevent the astronauts from perishing from the intense heat that would accumulate after 2.5 hours on the lunar surface. The argument that the space suit reflects the Sun's intensity is used to justify the Apollo 11 space suit water coolant system is insignificant since the reflected solar light would result in the space suit to absorb an enormous amount solar light energy. It would require an air conditioner unit and batteries to cool the interior of the Apollo 11 space suit to allow the astronauts to survive on the lunar surface for 2.5 hours. Example, if a person walked on the surface of Death Valley (120o F) in an enclosed suit for 2.5 hr it would require an air conditioning unit and batteries to maintain a temperature to sustain the person at a comfortable temperature. Furthermore, the original video of Armstrong stepping on the surface of the moon has been lost and the only record of the event is a distorted video taken indirectly by a television camera videoing Armstrong walking on the lunar surface that was projected from a NASA monitor (video 5). There is a problem regarding the position of the video camera that extents from the side of the lander (fig 40) and Armstrong making his first step onto the moon's surface since Armstrong takes three steps away from the lander towards the video camera after stepping on the lunar surface yet the video camera is attached to the side of the lander and is approximately two meter from the ladder and pointing parallel to the side of the lander. Furthermore, in a video, an Apollo astronaut is shown placing a flag on the surface of the moon but in the video, the flag appears to be flapping similar to a flag blowing in the wind (video 6) yet the surface of the moon has no atmosphere that could form the waving of a flag with the intensity depicted in the Apollo 11 video. It is argued that the momentum of the flag created by the astronaut placing the flag pole onto the moon's surface causes the flag to wave but the intensity of the flag waving in the horizontal direction suggests that the Apollo 11 mission flag waving was created by a cooling fan in a movie studio. Furthermore, NASA justifies the lunar mission using moon rocks but the moon rocks could be meteors that landed on the surface of the earth and passed off as moon rocks.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The power of the radio signal produce by the Apollo 11 lander is estimated at 50 Watts. A radio signal's intensity is dependent on the inverse of the second order of the distance I = U2 = {[A cos(kr)]/r]}2 where A represents the power of the radio signal. After a radio signal propagates the distance of 238,000 miles (3.8 x 108 m) to the earth, a 50 W radio signal's intensity would diminish to I = A2 [cos2(kr)]/r2 = (50 W)2 (0.5) / (3.8 x 108 m)2 = 8.65 x 10-15 W2/m2. The Parkes radio dish antenna located in Sydney Australia was used to communicate with the Apollo 11 mission. The sensitivity of the Parkes radio antenna is extrapolated using the radio signal intensity formed by a 300 km height communication satellite that emits a 20 W radio signal and produces an radio signal intensity at the surface of the earth of I = A2 [cos2(kr)]/r2 = (20 W)2 (.5) / (3 x 105m)2 = 2.22 x 10-9 W2/m2; adding two orders of magnitude to the satellite radio signal's intensity that forms at the surface of the earth, the sensitivity of the Parkes radio antenna is estimated at 10-11 W2/m2. There is a four order of magnitude difference between the extrapolated sensitivity of the Parkes radio telescope and the 10-15 W2 /m2 s-band radio signal that originates from the Apollo 11 mission. Also, a radio signal cannot penetrate the Van Allen radiation belt that surrounds the earth. It is questionable how NASA communicated with the Apollo missions, Voyagers, and Mars probes using radio waves. It is argue that a satellite that is orbiting the earth at a height of 30,000 km above the earth that is passed the Van Allen belt justifies the functionality of the Apollo 11 communication system but the described satellite height is 20 % of the distance to the moon which is a doubtful magnitude for the height for orbiting communication satellite. NASA uses the Voyager to justify the communication system of the Apollo 11 mission but NASA states that the Voyager is sending back a 50 W radio signal from a distance of over 1 billion miles (1.61 x 1012m) from the earth which would produce a radio signal of I = (50 W)2 (0.5) / (1.61 x 1012 m)2 = 5 x 10-22 W2/m2 at the earth that is 11 orders of magnitude less than the extrapolated sensitivity of the Parkes (10-11 W2/m2). NASA engineers have not yet establish the maximum range of a radio signal.