Richard Hipp
2017-11-24 14:35:55 UTC
Which is better?
A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline
B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline
Also:
A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c
B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/finfo?name=src/search.c
Surf about from any of the links above for additional views.
The change here is to emphasis the check-in comment and de-emphasize
the links to the check-in details and other information.
In the recent HN discussion of Fossil
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15752725) some comments were
sharply critical of the timeline display in Fossil. While I think
those comments were overly dramatic, they did bring up the point that
the check-in comment is probably the most important feature and should
be more prominent. This A/B comparison is my attempt to make them so.
Further suggestions and/or comments are welcomed.
A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline
B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline
Also:
A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c
B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/finfo?name=src/search.c
Surf about from any of the links above for additional views.
The change here is to emphasis the check-in comment and de-emphasize
the links to the check-in details and other information.
In the recent HN discussion of Fossil
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15752725) some comments were
sharply critical of the timeline display in Fossil. While I think
those comments were overly dramatic, they did bring up the point that
the check-in comment is probably the most important feature and should
be more prominent. This A/B comparison is my attempt to make them so.
Further suggestions and/or comments are welcomed.
--
D. Richard Hipp
***@sqlite.org
D. Richard Hipp
***@sqlite.org