Discussion:
Burnore FAQ
(too old to reply)
atlas bugged
2009-01-06 02:33:06 UTC
Permalink
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
Citation is located here:
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
picture. Or you can go here:
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE

This FAQ is dedicated to the countless number of people victimized by the
net abusers of Databasix.COM, in particular.....

1. Who is Gary LEE Burnore?
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
3. What does Gary Burnore do for a living?
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post under?
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
7. Does Gary Burnore have criminal offenses on his record?
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
9. Where can I get more information on Gary L. Burnore?
10. Is Gary L. Burnore a Convicted Child Molester?
11. Why does Gary Burnore hate Martin Hannigan?
12. Why does Gary Burnore hate Ron Guillemette?
13. Why does Gary Burnore hate Jerry Terranson?
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
16. Is Burnore really a service provider?
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
18. What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore auctioned on eBay?
20. What did Gary say abot this FAQ?
21. Where can I find the famous Court Documents?
22. What is Hell-Flame-Wars?
23. Who is Belinda Burnore?


1. Who is Gary L. Burnore?

Gary Lee Burnore is an approximately 44 year old man from Raleigh. NC.
He moved from Santa Clara County in California to Raleigh in 1998.
He is married to Belinda Bryan Burnore, formerly Belinda West, formrely
Belinda Bryan.

2. Where is Gary Burnore from?

Ohio. He is believed to be one of three siblings. Himself, and two sisters.

3. What does Gary Burnore do?

It is unknown at this time, but previously he worked at Keane, Inc.
http://www.keane.com and it is believed he was terminated against his
will. He has never said otherwise.

He previously worked at Wells Fargo Bank and was terminated against
his will. [ Refuted - See item 20 ]

4. What domains does Gary Burnore post from?

databasix.com
dtbs.com
usenet-performance-art.org
hell-flame-wars.org
netbasix.net
garllburnore.com/net/org
zoeburnore.com/net/org
gburnore.com/net/org

5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?

No. However, spam has come from his machine. Gary claims this
happened when hackers broke into his insecure machine.
[ refuted - See item 20 ]

7. Does Gary Burnore have a criminal arrest record?

Yes. He does.

1. Annoying and Molesting
Santa Clara County, CA
Case 9615185

2. Possesion of a schedule IV controlled substance
Franklin County, North Carolina
Case 00 CR 000365

3. Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072601

4. Reckless Driving to Endanger
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072800

5. Speeding
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627

6. Inspection Violation
Wake Country, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627


[ Refuted by Belinda, see item 20 ]

8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?

He's probably there to invade it. Typically, when he shows
up in a newsgroup, it goes downhill very fast from there. First Gary pops
in and begins berating people. Then the "sock puppets" start popping in,
accounts that are different than Gary's, but Gary nonetheless. Then the
rest of the crew shows up.

Then, someone will "disagree" with him or admnonish him for his
bad behavior. At this point, someone will get labeled a "kook" and
others will suddenly appear to support Gary. Don't worry, the awards
are meaningless and only the people from Gary's machine vote or care.

At this point, just complain to this upstreams. He is abusing the net.

9. Where can I get more information on Gary Lee Burnore?

Go to http://www.google.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
Go to http://www.lycos.com and enter "Gary Burnore"

10. Is Gary Lee Burnore a convicted molester?

See the CA State Statute 647.6 A PC, and reference the section
pertaining to his criminal activities. YOU BE THE JUDGE.
[ Authors note: It appears so to me anyways..he refutes ]

11. Why does Gary hate Martin Hannigan?

Gary hates Martin Hannigan because in 1998 while Martin was at XCOM,
Gary made a request to peer his machine with Martins. At the time, XCOM's
news server was up in the low 50's on the Usenet Top 1000 and would be a
good peering partner for any news system. Martin refused and so started
the problem. Martin made the mistake of telling Burnore to "piss off"
after Burnore began to harangue him over the no answer.

Gary hates Martin over the faq as well.

http://www.freenix.org/reseau/top1000/1998/top9812.html Search for "xcom".

12. Why does Gary hate Ron Guillemette?

Ron found out about Gary's registration to the North Carolina Sex
Offender Registry and posted it all over the Internet.

13. Why does Gary hate Jerry Terranson?

Jerry Terranson archives all of databasix users posts even though
they specify X-No-Archive: YES, and then makes them public
to all folks on the internet. Note, there is no written or unwritten
law that says MFN cannot due this. X-No-Archive was created due to
DejaNews, and Deja voluntarily agreed to honor XNA. All bets are off
for others.

14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?

If you are netcopped by Burnore, point your provider or employer to
this FAQ and explain that Gary is a not worrisome even though he may
threaten
them as "the power that be" on the internet. They should simply ignore
him and go about their business understanding that Burnore has a history
of attacking newbies and clueless folk alike and then netcopping them
when they don't agree with what he is doing.

15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?

No. If someone can find me some informatio indicating otherwise,
I'd love to see it. The only people who acknowledge that Burnore
is some head honcho of something is himself and Belinda.

16. Is he really a service provider?

He says he is. Most folks definition of service provider is a lot different
than his. The fact that he runs his PC off of a DSL line in his home
makes me think he is not truly a service provider, but a hobbyist
offering accounts to people he "deems worthy". Databasix is also not
incorporated, as far as I can tell, nor does it have any sort of
account signup mechanism, pricing or other typical information available.

17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?

AUK Kook of The Month
http://www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html. Note: That was taken
down. Gary and crew somehow convinced the author to remove it.

Unfortunately, we found it cached in google, here:

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html+&hl=en

I've archived a copy of it just in case the google cache expires.

Second Place Winner AUK LMA
http://www.thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/agsf/heads/terri/looneymaroon-oct97.txt

Wicked Samurai Jack Ass
http://www.realjackass.com

18: What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?

Go here and find out:

http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/profile.xp?ST=PS&URN=695322125

19. Was Gary Lee Burnore REALLY auctioned on eBay?

Yes. He was placed up for auction. There were no public bids.
He was auctioned as Internet Stalker. There was one private bid
for .24 cents from a friend, and I let Gary Burnore go for a week.

20. What did Gary say about this FAQ?

He said it was innacurate via his wife Belinda West Bryan Burnore,
but refused to be specific. Instead, she screamed liar liar
pants on fire.

I have offered Gary a chance to respond via this
link, if he so chooses:

http://www.databasix.com/~gburnore/myanswer.html

If he notified me he would like to respond some other
way, I will point this link wherever he wants.

21. Where can I find the famous court documents?

They can be found at ftp://archives.mfn.org or by writing to
***@fugawi.net.

22. What is 'Hell-Flame-Wars"?

Hell Flame Wars is a loose association of folks that oppose Gary.

23. Who is Belinda Burnore

Belinda is Gary Burnores wife, we think. She goes by a few names
in real life. Belinda West. Belinda West Bryan, Belinda Bryan, and
last but not least, Belinda Burnore. She also has some usenet
sock puppets. They are jbrenner@*, eridani@*, faxor@*, faxor@*.,
and possibly 2 more we are confirming.

- --
Martin Hannigan e: ***@world.std.com
Boston, MA w: http://world.std.com/~hannigan
arin: mh309-arin netsol: mh309
Check out the Burnore FAQ: http://world.std.com/~hannigan/fun/bfaq.html
Some Guy
2009-01-06 05:25:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
[snip]

"My end? I'm a public figure, a published author (latest is final week
of August, '07, have a look at 189 N.J.L.J. 685) and a reputable
businessman. I'm not vulnerable to any sort of exposure or investigation
or even "kook" charge."

--Atlas Bugged, 9/2/07 (among many other times)
--
"There will be plenty of toilet time for the on-lookers."

(Alexa)


"Plonking you is likely to be the last thing I ever do on Usenet. "

(Atlas Bugged)


"I never lose a moment of sleep worrying about cowards who daren't even
say their name."

(Atlas Bugged)


"Pissant little cog in the AUK hate machine is all you are."

(Atlas Bugged)
John "C"
2009-01-06 05:44:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
[snip]
"My end? It's wide enough to stick an eggplant up it !!
--
Michael Baldwin Deco
Good one, Carl !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ

Purchasing BoloViewer
BoloViewer isn't shareware; I am selling it via e-mail instead. If
e-mail doesn't work for your situation, I will get you a copy on a
floppy disk or an Iomega ZIP 100 disk, provided you send a blank disk
with your payment. Please send $25.00 U.S. to:

Carl R. Osterwald
75 S. Dudley St.
Lakewood, CO 80226 USA
***@usa.net

A site license is available for $75.00 U.S.
n***@gmail.com
2009-01-06 05:55:27 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:44:32 -0600, "John \"C\""
Post by John "C"
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
money.
[snip]
"My end? It's wide enough to stick an eggplant up it !!
--
Michael Baldwin Deco
Good one, Carl !!
Be honest, John. Why do you let Novins suck your dick?
John "C"
2009-01-07 03:45:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by n***@gmail.com
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:44:32 -0600, "John \"C\""
Post by John "C"
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
money.
[snip]
"My end? It's wide enough to stick an eggplant up it !!
--
Michael Baldwin Deco
Good one, Carl !!
Be honest, John. Why do you let Novins suck your dick?
Because he's got a perrdy mouth ?!?

Squeal like a pig "notesticles"...
--
Your Pal,
HJ
Some Guy
2009-01-07 04:34:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by n***@gmail.com
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:44:32 -0600, "John \"C\""
Post by John "C"
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
money.
[snip]
"My end? It's wide enough to stick an eggplant up it !!
--
Michael Baldwin Deco
Good one, Carl !!
Be honest, John. Why do you let Novins suck your dick?
Any old port in a storm, apparently.

But it's nice to see the list of people who I am thought to be
expanding. Soon, everyone on the Internet will be me, and then Atlas
will be able to carry out his Captain Ahab fantasies at last!
--
"That would be and is a lie. I hava brother with a Ph.D, remember? "

(Jan Drew)


"This is one reason I enjoy AUK - there does seem to be more than one or
two real-deal psychos here that desperately *need* to be beaten into
submission. This fits in with my self-image as a 'service provider.' "

(Atlas Bugged)


"The best pivot-point for shutting down cyber-bullies is via their
employment. If they're with any type of company or institution that has
to maintain any sort of public face, Usenet-bullying will often see the
perp get fired. I've managed to bring this happy result about a couple
of times now."

(Atlas Bugged)


"I'm trying something new now: public humiliation. Newspapers,
especially local rags, love to run stories about the neighborhood
jerkoff cyberbully. Find out where your cyberstalker or bully lives, and
see if you can interest the editors."

(Atlas Bugged)
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-06 16:15:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by John "C"
Post by Some Guy
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my money.
[snip]
"My end? It's wide enough to stick an eggplant up it !!
--
Michael Baldwin Deco
Good one, Carl !!
Bad one, HJ. If some nutcase shows up at that woman's house, how will
you feel?

Besides...do you really want to be like Kali?
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
John "C"
2009-01-07 03:53:32 UTC
Permalink
"that woman's house"
You callin' Carl Osterwald "that woman" ??
LOL !!
Besides...do you really want to be like Kali?
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Heaven's NO !!

I repent!

Stephen King couldn't think up a worse event !!
--
John C.
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-06 05:39:27 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]

Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
John "C"
2009-01-06 05:53:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
--
Garrry the kiddie's Pal
Don't fart, Rusty Butt !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
atlas bugged
2009-01-06 06:58:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.

Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.

I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.

I'll think about it.

Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
Gregory Hall
2009-01-06 18:35:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux. I decided I most definitely
didn't want to be associated with hardcore Usenet rabble, thugs and liars
the likes of the lowlife individuals using Databasux. Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers. Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin (Except for one Lady
Pilot who has finally decided she doesn't want to be associated with a troll
server either). You should read what goes on in their local groups some day.
I'd call a lot of what goes on - the conspiring to do harm, etc. - criminal
behavior. So, let's just say Gary is in his element.
--
Gregory Hall
Cujo DeSockpuppet
2009-01-06 18:50:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life,
you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux. I decided I most
definitely didn't want to be associated with hardcore Usenet rabble,
thugs and liars the likes of the lowlife individuals using Databasux.
So it had absolutely nothing to do with being told to stop your morphing
to evade killfiles? <snicker>

So it had nothing to do with being told you were about to get kicked off?

So it had nothing to do with using someone else's account?

You're a fucking liar. A clumsy one too.
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the 'females,' and I use that term loosely, have
"complimentary" accounts mostly because Gary realized that the
hard-core, net abusing males that use his pay service and his buddies
to whom he gives free accounts are known the world around as trolls
and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple of females would
temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some legitimacy.
Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers. Not only that
but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin (Except for one Lady Pilot
who has finally decided she doesn't want to be associated with a troll
server either). You should read what goes on in their local groups
some day. I'd call a lot of what goes on - the conspiring to do harm,
etc. - criminal behavior. So, let's just say Gary is in his element.
Let's not. Let's just laugh at you instead.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I won long ago. They just don't realize its over." - Ed wins another
important court decision in the Court of Kookiness and Delusion.
the messenjah
2009-01-06 19:04:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged.  You're now officially my newest poodle.  From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh.  I see.
Good strategy, if it is.  Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux.  Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux. I decided I most definitely
didn't want to be associated with hardcore Usenet rabble, thugs and liars
the likes of the lowlife individuals using Databasux.  Many of the
'females,'  and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and  troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers. Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin (Except for one Lady
Pilot who has finally decided she doesn't want to be associated with a troll
server either). You should read what goes on in their local groups some day.
I'd call a lot of what goes on - the conspiring to do harm, etc.  - criminal
behavior. So, let's just say Gary is in his element.
--
Gregory Hall- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Mr. Hall. I wrote a couple of fictional poems a la lolita. Burnore
accused me of being a pedophile. Ironic considering he was actually
arrested for molesting a young girl.

But does that matter to these morons who troll people in this sorry-
ass newsgroup?

http://www.chuck-lysaght.info
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-06 22:14:50 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:04:33 -0800 (PST), the messenjah
Post by the messenjah
Mr. Hall. I wrote a couple of fictional poems a la lolita.
You fucking pedo. We all know you tried to molest your fiends kid,
then wrote about it.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Veronica O'Donoghue
2009-01-06 22:20:52 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:04:33 -0800 (PST), the messenjah
Post by the messenjah
Mr. Hall. I wrote a couple of fictional poems a la lolita.
In the novel "Lolita" by Nabokov, the female object of the old man's
sexual obsession is 12 years old.

Sounds just like chuckles to me.
Peter J Ross
2009-01-07 01:03:24 UTC
Permalink
In rec.arts.poems on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:20:52 +0000, Veronica
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:04:33 -0800 (PST), the messenjah
Post by the messenjah
Mr. Hall. I wrote a couple of fictional poems a la lolita.
In the novel "Lolita" by Nabokov, the female object of the old man's
sexual obsession is 12 years old.
Sounds just like chuckles to me.
Lolita habitually hooks chuckles up with vegetarian chicken
casseroles. And then she goes to the Art Walk with him.

Lobamba, Lotoyah and Lobridge do the same.

Pretty Lotramp, Lowhore and Loscum wave to chuckles as he passes on
his tricycle.
--
PJR :-)

<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/verse/>
Gregory Hall
2009-01-06 22:45:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux. I decided I most definitely
didn't want to be associated with hardcore Usenet rabble, thugs and liars
the likes of the lowlife individuals using Databasux. Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers. Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin (Except for one Lady
Pilot who has finally decided she doesn't want to be associated with a troll
server either). You should read what goes on in their local groups some day.
I'd call a lot of what goes on - the conspiring to do harm, etc. -
criminal
behavior. So, let's just say Gary is in his element.
--
Gregory Hall- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
| Mr. Hall. I wrote a couple of fictional poems a la lolita. Burnore
| accused me of being a pedophile. Ironic considering he was actually
| arrested for molesting a young girl.
|
| But does that matter to these morons who troll people in this sorry-
| ass newsgroup?
|
| http://www.chuck-lysaght.info


That Burnore is the most gigantic, collosal, humongous and titanic example
of PKB ever conceived.
--
Gregory Hall
SharonB
2009-01-06 20:35:11 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall" <***@home.fake>
wrote:


[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?

Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?

Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Gregory Hall
2009-01-06 20:52:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.

There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know? You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
--
Gregory Hall
SharonB
2009-01-06 21:57:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."

But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?

I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?

Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Gregory Hall
2009-01-06 22:24:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."

Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
--
Gregory Hall
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-06 22:38:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
Nice bunch of shovinistpig remarks, net abuser.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
atlas bugged
2009-01-07 02:43:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
Nice bunch of shovinistpig remarks, net abuser.
What? You are saying he's not repsectin' the women? You?

Holy mother of god jesus mother mary!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So when you assault women you tell 'em nice stuff? Izzat it?
http://glbcrimes.notlong.com
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
http://gb4docs.notlong.com

See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
John "C"
2009-01-07 04:59:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by atlas bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
Nice bunch of shovinistpig remarks, net abuser.
What? You are saying he's not repsectin' the women? You?
Holy mother of god jesus mother mary!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So when you assault women you tell 'em nice stuff? Izzat it?
http://glbcrimes.notlong.com
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
http://gb4docs.notlong.com
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
LOL !

HJ
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-07 18:54:55 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
John "C"
2009-01-07 22:10:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
--
Garrry the kiddies Pal
Garrry that Mug-Shot looked a little ruff...

Won't the cops let you make another one ??
--
Your Pal,
HJ
Atlas Bugged
2009-01-07 23:06:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by John "C"
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
--
Garrry the kiddies Pal
Garrry that Mug-Shot looked a little ruff...
Won't the cops let you make another one ??
Don't blame Gary. I'm told the mug-shot camera adds ten extra sex assaults
to your appearance.
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 00:54:31 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:06:27 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by John "C"
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
--
Garrry the kiddies Pal
Garrry that Mug-Shot looked a little ruff...
Won't the cops let you make another one ??
Don't blame Gary.
He knows it wasn't my picture. You?
Post by Atlas Bugged
I'm told the mug-shot camera adds ten extra sex assaults
to your appearance.
There'd have to be a first before there ere "extras", owned one. I've
never been charged with, nor convicted of a sexual assault. Maybe
you're speaking more from experience?
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-08 01:48:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:06:27 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by John "C"
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
--
Garrry the kiddies Pal
Garrry that Mug-Shot looked a little ruff...
Won't the cops let you make another one ??
Don't blame Gary.
He knows it wasn't my picture. You?
Post by Atlas Bugged
I'm told the mug-shot camera adds ten extra sex assaults
to your appearance.
There'd have to be a first before there ere "extras", owned one. I've
never been charged with, nor convicted of a sexual assault. Maybe
you're speaking more from experience?
How else could he possibly get laid?
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Atlas Bugged
2009-01-07 22:52:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
Yes, fear, that's it. You so big and strong and dangerous!
Ohhhhhhhhh.......

How about logic? Got logic?
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-07 22:58:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
Yes, fear, that's it. You so big and strong and dangerous!
Ohhhhhhhhh.......
How about logic? Got logic?
Logic says you're a narcissist.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 00:24:07 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:52:20 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
Yes, fear, that's it. You so big and strong and dangerous!
Ohhhhhhhhh.......
Fear? You really are a dumb fuck. You don't have the balls to fire
me because of a far more powerful thing than fear.
Post by Atlas Bugged
How about logic? Got logic?
Plenty. Something you've proven time and time again you lack.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Aratzio
2009-01-08 00:39:01 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:52:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
Yes, fear, that's it. You so big and strong and dangerous!
Ohhhhhhhhh.......
How about logic? Got logic?
Novins is a coward.
Aratzio
2009-01-08 00:32:22 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:54:55 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:43:08 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
See, this is entertainment, this is why I don't KF you.
You don't killfile me because you don't have the balls.
Yer just not skeery nuff. Slap his head hard enough and he will run
like the coward he is.
SharonB
2009-01-07 00:18:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
You forgot to address the above part.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs
<laughing>
Clearly, you don't know as much as you believe you do.

I'm so far from liberal that I can barely see liberal from where I am.

But don't let common sense or reality get in the way of your
preconceived notions, especially about folks you don't even know.

that I
Post by Gregory Hall
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
<laughing>
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer)
You're kidding, right?

Just because I'm a kind and helpful soul I'm going to give you a
little clue here: you continue thru life with that notion and you're
gonna end up being taken to the cleaners.

A lot.

Instead of "pretty women have pretty attitudes" you should subscribe
to the notions: "never judge a book by its cover" and "pretty is as
pretty does".

Safer for you that way.
Post by Gregory Hall
Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
The disclaimer? Sure. I also noticed how your generalities are
generally false, generally speaking.

It also makes me wonder at what age you consider someone to be "old"
and is the marker different for men and women?

And what about the men who are on Usenet for vast stretches of time?
Are they old and dried up with little or no other life because they're
unattractive, can't get a date and can't get a real woman to look at
them?

Just wondering how you categorize yourself in there, being someone who
seems to spend a lot of time on Usenet. Just an impression, going on
the number of posts I see in my window bearing your moniker.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat.
1. I'm boggled at your lack of awareness of the world around you.
2. I'm boggled that you waste neuron cycles wondering about it.
3. Ask someone here who knows me if it troubles you that much.
Post by Gregory Hall
Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
No, but I'm pretty sure most of them are disabused of that notion
prior to leaving highschool.
Bob Officer
2009-01-07 01:39:16 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
He's all yours, cousin...

I suggest hanging something other than his scalp.
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
John "C"
2009-01-07 05:01:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory
Post by Gregory Hall
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:52:44 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing
males that
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts
are known
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured
that a
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and
give it
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal
Usenet-addicted women
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC
disclaimer) so
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
He's all yours, cousin...
I suggest hanging something other than his scalp.
--
Bob Officer
Faggot !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
SharonB
2009-01-07 11:40:36 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:39:16 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
He's all yours, cousin...
I suggest hanging something other than his scalp.
Is there space on the Banquet Hall walls?
Bob Officer
2009-01-07 19:19:46 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:40:36 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:39:16 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
He's all yours, cousin...
I suggest hanging something other than his scalp.
Is there space on the Banquet Hall walls?
Lodge pole would be fitting, don't you think?
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
John "C"
2009-01-07 22:12:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:40:36 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:39:16 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory
Post by Gregory Hall
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:52:44 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing
males that
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts
are known
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured
that a
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and
give it
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal
Usenet-addicted women
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC
disclaimer) so
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?) Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
He's all yours, cousin...
I suggest hanging something other than his scalp.
Is there space on the Banquet Hall walls?
Lodge pole would be fitting, don't you think?
--
Bob Officer
Any size "pole" would fit in your Huge ass-hole, Injun Bob (the "Brave"
sucker).
--
Your Pal,
HJ
SharonB
2009-01-08 01:35:26 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:19:46 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:40:36 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:39:16 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:24:03 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory
[...]
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Gregory Hall
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think. You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat. Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
He's all yours, cousin...
I suggest hanging something other than his scalp.
Is there space on the Banquet Hall walls?
Lodge pole would be fitting, don't you think?
I dun think he has room up there....
Kali
2009-01-07 17:37:42 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@home.fake
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Post by Gregory Hall
You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat.
Intelligent women are ugly and fat.
Post by Gregory Hall
Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
Pretty women kiss your ass. Only ugly women find fault with you.
--
Kali
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 18:53:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency. She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades of pink.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got to taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes. Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then what would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc." Sorry
KaliKunt I won't be playing your games.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent. Listen to her speak or read
what she writes. Her writing reflects exactly how she appears. Listening to
SharonB speak through her posts brings to mind an agressive, fat, ugly woman
like Rosey O'Donnell.
--
Gregory Hall
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-07 19:24:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency. She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades of pink.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got to taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes. Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then what would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc." Sorry
KaliKunt I won't be playing your games.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent.
Show just what kind of fucking moron you really are.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 19:44:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:52:44 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that
a
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give
it
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of
him
is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency. She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades of pink.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to
look
at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got to taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes. Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then what would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc."
Sorry
KaliKunt I won't be playing your games.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent.
Show just what kind of fucking moron you really are.
Aww! Poor Gary. I'm sure it really sticks in your craw how Coulter earns
more money on just ONE of her best-selling books than you've made from
Databasux the whole time you've been running it into the ground. But, keep
trying. One of these days you just might succeed at SOMETHING. But, here's a
clue. Get rid of your fag buddy K.A. Cannon. Your reputation is tarnished
enough already without doing it even more harm by associating with the world
heavyweight champion asshole.
--
Gregory Hall
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-07 20:03:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:52:44 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that
a
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give
it
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of
him
is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency. She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades of pink.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to
look
at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got to taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes. Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then what would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc."
Sorry
KaliKunt I won't be playing your games.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent.
Show just what kind of fucking moron you really are.
Aww! Poor Gary. I'm sure it really sticks in your craw how Coulter
Fucking neocon dupe. She's a fucking DOG. She might be intelligent,
but she uses it in the wrong way: lying, dodging the truth. Hey, no
wonder you like her.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
John "C"
2009-01-07 22:20:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:53:12 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:52:44 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have
"complimentary"
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that
a
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give
it
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he
failed
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of
him
is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the
service
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old,
fat
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know
what
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat
and ugly
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these
days.
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency. She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal.
Well, she's
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A
conservative would
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades
of
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
pink.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal
Usenet-addicted
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC
disclaimer)
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to
look
at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got
to
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that
burdens
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like
you
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
that
saying what I mean entails absolutes. Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then
what
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc."
Sorry
KaliKunt I won't be playing your games.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young,
thin
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent.
Show just what kind of fucking moron you really are.
Aww! Poor Gary. I'm sure it really sticks in your craw how Coulter
Fucking neocon dupe. She's a fucking DOG. She might be intelligent,
but she uses it in the wrong way: lying, dodging the truth. Hey, no
wonder you like her.
--
Garry
That was the best "Turn-around" that I've ever seen on Usenet !

Too bad that nobody really cares !!!!

Poorrrrrr Garrrrry...
--
HJ

p.s. Garrry, what do you do for a living besides post what Kali wants
you to post ?
Bob Officer
2009-01-07 21:32:20 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:24:35 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Gary L.
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency. She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades of pink.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got to taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes. Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then what would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc." Sorry
KaliKunt I won't be playing your games.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent.
Show just what kind of fucking moron you really are.
I suspect the kind of moron that believes he is smarter than he
really is.
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
Kali
2009-01-07 20:48:08 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@home.fake
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency.
Only by troglodytes.
Post by Gregory Hall
She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar. Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all. It's a bunch of propaganda and wishy washy crap. A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes. Conservatives know full
there really is bright red while liberals see everything is shades of pink.
Concrete thinking is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

Or mental illness.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal Usenet-addicted women
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC disclaimer) so
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Oh my. I think I'll just have to jump off a cliff and end my misery. Kali
thinks I'm an idiot. Woe is me. When the GREAT Kali speaks it's got to taken
seriously. Yah right!!!
You protest too much.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Ignorant slut!
Defensive attempt at sexual domination noted and laughed at.
Post by Gregory Hall
How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes.
Speaking in absolutes makes you an idiot. hth.
Post by Gregory Hall
Only stupid liberals would have me
qualify everything I say with every possible exception to the generality
that exists in the entire universe. If I had to do as morons like you wish
it would take me about a gigabyte of data in every post. And then what would
you do? You would run around yelling "screed, foam, plagiarism etc." Sorry
Say what you mean, mean what you say. You claimed to have a PhD in
Journalism - surely you learned to convey your ideas in an efficient
manner.
Post by Gregory Hall
KaliKunt
Defensive attempt at sexual domination noted and laughed at.
Post by Gregory Hall
I won't be playing your games.
Wear your weak intellect proudly.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent. Listen to her speak or read
what she writes. Her writing reflects exactly how she appears.
Indeed, she is a hateful, paranoid, screeding, lying lunatic in
writing as well as personal presentation. She's always been a loon,
but her new book and recent interviews suggest she's about to jump
the shark completely.

She does have lovely hair.
Post by Gregory Hall
Listening to
SharonB speak through her posts brings to mind an agressive, fat, ugly woman
like Rosey O'Donnell.
I don't think Rosie is ugly. Maybe not attractive to you because
she's not a knock-kneed bimbo and she is a lesbian. Of course a
lesbian wouldn't be interested in you. And aggressive is just your
concrete opposite of submissive.
--
Kali
John "C"
2009-01-07 22:23:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
I don't think Rosie is ugly. Maybe not attractive to you because
she's not a knock-kneed bimbo and she is a lesbian. Of course a
lesbian wouldn't be interested in you. And aggressive is just your
concrete opposite of submissive.
--
Kali
Did you read that in that psychology book that you picked-up at that
garage sale this summer for 50 cents ??
--
HJ
Atlas Bugged
2009-01-07 23:03:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
says...
Indeed, she is a hateful, paranoid, screeding, lying lunatic in
writing as well as personal presentation. She's always been a loon,
but her new book and recent interviews suggest she's about to jump
the shark completely.
She does have lovely hair.
Great ass, pretty much, also. Can speak the language with some alacrity
(AUKtards, look it up.)

Might have jumped the shark, however. Actually, I do think so, for sure.

She simply "attributes too much to malice, things which can better be
explained by stupidity" to paraphrase the famous quote.
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Listening to
SharonB speak through her posts brings to mind an agressive, fat, ugly woman
like Rosey O'Donnell.
I don't think Rosie is ugly.
Awwwww, jeez! C'mon. She looks like a dog chasing parked cars.
Post by Kali
Maybe not attractive to you because
she's not a knock-kneed bimbo and she is a lesbian.
What? She's fugly, period, end of sentence.
Post by Kali
Of course a
lesbian wouldn't be interested in you.
Only a fucked-up lesbian is doing Rosie.
Post by Kali
And aggressive is just your
concrete opposite of submissive.
Rosie is right about various gay issues, incredibly stupid about most else.

And when she's being ugly in her speech, the outside lines right up.

When she's shitty, she's the whole enchilada!
SharonB
2009-01-08 01:43:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Pointing out a bunch of crap like how she doesn't realize that speaking in
absolutes is done for expediency.
So you don't really believe what you're saying, you're just conserving
time.

Okay.

So if someone says, "black women are sluts"...they're just saving
time, they don't mean black women are sluts what they mean is that
some women they've met who are sluts also happened to be black.

I somehow don't think that's gonna fly.
Post by Gregory Hall
She wants every little exception noted
like every other dumb liberal. She claims she's not a liberal. Well, she's a
liar.
Nope.
Post by Gregory Hall
Conservatives abhor PC speech because it says nothing - nothing at
all.
Um. Abhorring PC speech is not a liberal or conservative thing as
best I can tell.

But that's not what you were doing.
Post by Gregory Hall
A conservative would
never complain about people speaking in absolutes.
You are quite wrong there.

I'm thinking it's because you don't understand what the words mean.

I'm thinking you think of them as a flag to stand behind except you're
blind and can't really see what it is.

[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Ignorant slut! How many times do I have to explain to morons like you that
saying what I mean entails absolutes.
OIC. Just above you said you were being "expedient"...now you're
saying what you mean.

OMI

[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Ann Coulter is both beautiful and intelligent.
Sure to both. I think she sees things too much in black & white and
not enough color.

And she's convinced her way is the one true way. I certainly wouldn't
call her fair minded, not based on what I've seen of her on the
O'Reilly Factor anyway...she's more like the flip side of Chris
Matthews, only he's got a better sense of humor.
Post by Gregory Hall
Listen to her speak or read
what she writes. Her writing reflects exactly how she appears. Listening to
SharonB speak through her posts brings to mind an agressive, fat, ugly woman
like Rosey O'Donnell.
You've got to be kidding. You've never noticed how abrasive AC is?
Seriously?

She comes across as very butch to me.
miguel
2009-01-08 03:23:34 UTC
Permalink
And she's convinced her way is the one true way.  I certainly wouldn't
call her fair minded, not based on what I've seen of her on the
O'Reilly Factor anyway...she's more like the flip side of Chris
Matthews, only he's got a better sense of humor.
That's outrageously stupid.

John "C"
2009-01-07 22:14:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:52:44 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing
males that
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts
are known
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured
that a
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and
give it
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Primarily the ones he bribed with free accounts. But, what he failed to
realize is that any female who would take favors from the likes of him is
basically a whore and acts the part.
Really?
A whore takes money in exchange for sexual acts, no?
Post by Gregory Hall
There are probably a handful of females who pay for the service without
realizing they subscribed to a mostly killfiled troll haven.
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
How should I know?
Presumably because you're the one who said, "they are all old, fat and
ugly as sin."
But now in a subsequent post you're stating you don't know what you're
talking about.
Oh, stop it! It gets so tiresome explaining to you freaking libs that I
don't do PC speech. I could have said, "they are all old, fat and ugly as
sin . . . but, of course, there might be an exception or two to the
generalization and I hasten to point this out so as not to offend the
sensibilities of you PC types who might not be thoroughly ugly."
Stinking liberal crap is ruining even the way we write these days. Stupid
liberals, stupid expectations!
Pointing out your inconsistency means she's a liberal?
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gregory Hall
You could be a regular Jenny McCarthy for all I know but
there's always an exception to every rule.
Which brings to mind a follow up question, why do you care what women
subscribers look like one way or the other?
I care because pretty women have pretty attitudes.(for the most part -
approved PC disclaimer) Old, dried up, post-menopausal
Usenet-addicted women
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
have little or no other life because they are (usually - PC
disclaimer) so
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
unattractive. They can't get a date, they can't get any real man to look at
them twice so they hide out on Usenet and pretend to be somebody they
aren't. (For the most part - satisfied with the PC disclaimer?)
No. But I am satisfied that you are an idiot.
Post by Gregory Hall
Did you
notice how it's just a wishy-washy and useless addition that burdens and
degrades the discussion?
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. If you have to issue a "PC
disclaimer" then there is something wrong with your assertion to
begin with. Idiot.
Post by Gregory Hall
I mean, I could see if you were a member of Mensa caring that the
other members were high IQ, but a Usenet provider?
Isn't that like saying, ' I only want to subscribe to your cable tv
service if I know that your female subscribers are all young, thin and
attractive'....or...'I'll only subscribe to Verizon if I know the
female subscribers are young, thin and attractive'?
Only a plain or ugly women would even think like you think.
Intelligent women are ugly.
Post by Gregory Hall
You've pretty
much got to be ugly and fat.
Intelligent women are ugly and fat.
THIS ONE IS YOU, KIMBERLY K. BARNYARD !!!!!!!!
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
Pretty women sound pretty when they write and
that's a fact. I'm sure I'm not the first male to notice it.
Pretty women kiss your ass. Only ugly women find fault with you.
--
Kali
Bob Officer
2009-01-07 00:51:25 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
John "C"
2009-01-07 05:03:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
--
Bob Officer
Not as funny as when the security guard caught you sucking Art Deco's
Dickie-Wickie !!
--
Your pal,
HJ
SharonB
2009-01-07 11:39:58 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
Kali
2009-01-07 17:44:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 18:59:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung out in
and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused women to be
well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they wandered too far while
it had the opposite effect on males. The brains of either sex evolved
differently to better cope with the two disparate strategies. Men are far
superior in IQ tests that check for spatial conceptuality than women and
that's a fact as well.

I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost anyway by
virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
--
Gregory Hall
Kali
2009-01-07 21:11:04 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@home.fake
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact.
You never learned the difference between a theory and a fact.
Post by Gregory Hall
Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung out in
and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused women to be
well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they wandered too far while
it had the opposite effect on males. The brains of either sex evolved
differently to better cope with the two disparate strategies. Men are far
superior in IQ tests that check for spatial conceptuality than women and
that's a fact as well.
Theory. Should I waste my time explaining why? Self-justifying
emotional resonance is not a good test of correctness, Captain
Genius.

Difference does not mean superior. IQ tests are achievement tests,
not tests of aptitude, and your biological theory is only part of a
much larger picture involving familial, social role, and other
sociological factors, and therefore inadequate.

You claim to have a Ph.D. Why don't I believe you?
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but
You can't resist a woman's attention.
Post by Gregory Hall
women are always lost anyway by
virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
False.
--
Kali
John "C"
2009-01-07 22:28:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
False.
--
Kali
Kimberly's daddy was really disappointed that he got Kimberly instead of
a boy !!

It affected Kimberly's mental state ever since !!
--
HJ
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 22:58:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that
a
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give
it
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact.
You never learned the difference between a theory and a fact.
Post by Gregory Hall
Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung out in
and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused women to be
well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they wandered too far while
it had the opposite effect on males. The brains of either sex evolved
differently to better cope with the two disparate strategies. Men are far
superior in IQ tests that check for spatial conceptuality than women and
that's a fact as well.
Theory. Should I waste my time explaining why? Self-justifying
emotional resonance is not a good test of correctness, Captain
Genius.
Difference does not mean superior. IQ tests are achievement tests,
not tests of aptitude, and your biological theory is only part of a
much larger picture involving familial, social role, and other
sociological factors, and therefore inadequate.
You claim to have a Ph.D. Why don't I believe you?
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but
You can't resist a woman's attention.
If that were the case why would I be treating with you, Kali?
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
women are always lost anyway by
virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
False.
How can you say that? Women are always so proud of the fact that they will
stop the car and ask somebody how to get some place because they are lost.

Then women have the nerve to criticize men for not stopping and asking.

Women never once realize that men don't NEED to ask for directions because
they have directions pre-programmed into their brains and will find their
way without help. Women don't understand they often insult a man by implying
he is lost just because women find it normal to be lost and have to navigate
by committee. Men don't. Men are proud of being able to find their own way.
It's a manly challenge women have no clue about.
--
Gregory Hall
Kali
2009-01-07 23:40:14 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@home.fake
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males
that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are
known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that
a
couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give
it
some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact.
You never learned the difference between a theory and a fact.
Post by Gregory Hall
Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung out in
and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused women to be
well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they wandered too far while
it had the opposite effect on males. The brains of either sex evolved
differently to better cope with the two disparate strategies. Men are far
superior in IQ tests that check for spatial conceptuality than women and
that's a fact as well.
Theory. Should I waste my time explaining why? Self-justifying
emotional resonance is not a good test of correctness, Captain
Genius.
Difference does not mean superior. IQ tests are achievement tests,
not tests of aptitude, and your biological theory is only part of a
much larger picture involving familial, social role, and other
sociological factors, and therefore inadequate.
You claim to have a Ph.D. Why don't I believe you?
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but
You can't resist a woman's attention.
If that were the case why would I be treating with you, Kali?
Sense this does not make.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by Gregory Hall
women are always lost anyway by
virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
False.
How can you say that? Women are always so proud of the fact that they will
stop the car and ask somebody how to get some place because they are lost.
You're generalizing again.
Post by Gregory Hall
Then women have the nerve to criticize men for not stopping and asking.
Anecdotal; stereotypical reasoning.
Post by Gregory Hall
Women never once realize that men don't NEED to ask for directions because
they have directions pre-programmed into their brains and will find their
way without help. Women don't understand they often insult a man by implying
he is lost just because women find it normal to be lost and have to navigate
by committee. Men don't. Men are proud of being able to find their own way.
It's a manly challenge women have no clue about.
Better check your trousers. That was quite a fart.
--
Kali
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-07 22:29:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung
out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused
women to be well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they
wandered too far while it had the opposite effect on males. The
brains of either sex evolved differently to better cope with the two
disparate strategies. Men are far superior in IQ tests that check for
spatial conceptuality than women and that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.

You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.

And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ testing,"
because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost
anyway by virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
You were one of those classic overachievers, eh? It must really scorch
your nuts that there are women in this world who can blow you right out
of the water without cracking a book.

Poor baby.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Kali
2009-01-07 23:10:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung
out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused
women to be well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they
wandered too far while it had the opposite effect on males. The
brains of either sex evolved differently to better cope with the two
disparate strategies. Men are far superior in IQ tests that check for
spatial conceptuality than women and that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.
You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.
And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ testing,"
because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Spatial reasoning has been part of standardized intelligence testing
since it made its way into the 1986 Stanford Binet. It is considered
one type of nonverbal intelligence.

See Louis Thurstone and Gardner's Multiple Intelligences for more
information.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost
anyway by virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
You were one of those classic overachievers, eh? It must really scorch
your nuts that there are women in this world who can blow you right out
of the water without cracking a book.
Poor baby.
--
Kali
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 23:23:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kali
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts
are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung
out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused
women to be well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they
wandered too far while it had the opposite effect on males. The
brains of either sex evolved differently to better cope with the two
disparate strategies. Men are far superior in IQ tests that check for
spatial conceptuality than women and that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.
You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.
And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ testing,"
because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Spatial reasoning has been part of standardized intelligence testing
since it made its way into the 1986 Stanford Binet. It is considered
one type of nonverbal intelligence.
See Louis Thurstone and Gardner's Multiple Intelligences for more
information.
Scoooooooooooooooooooooooooooore!!!!!!
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 23:11:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung
out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused
women to be well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they
wandered too far while it had the opposite effect on males. The
brains of either sex evolved differently to better cope with the two
disparate strategies. Men are far superior in IQ tests that check for
spatial conceptuality than women and that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.
You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.
And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ testing,"
because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Is that so? Read on and rid yourself of such ignorant assumptions. . .
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost
anyway by virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
You were one of those classic overachievers, eh? It must really scorch
your nuts that there are women in this world who can blow you right out of
the water without cracking a book.
Poor baby.
"Sex differences are more pronounced in tests of spatial skills than for any
other intelligence. Males score more highly than females. Gardner speculates
that genetic selection, dating to hunting-gathering days, may be the cause."

From: http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow/7In/Spatial.html

Don't argue with a writer. Especially a male writer with a Ph.D. You won't
win, honey.

You sound like you might be a reader. This is a good thing because you might
have some inkling of what I am about to explain to you.

Have you ever stopped to think why most female novelists have a difficult
time writing novels that have significant spatial aspects. Most female
novelists handle romance pretty well but forget all about any manly
adventure novel that encompass a wide scope, both from a historic and
geographic standpoint. Women generally fall flat when it comes to this type
of writing. It's not because they are stupid. Rather it's because their
brains lack the foundation to understand this sort of thing so they just
cannot convey it realistically in their writing.
--
Your mentor,
Gregory Hall
Kali
2009-01-07 23:47:05 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@home.fake
says...
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts
are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and far-ranging
roamers while women were the gatherers and child care units who hung
out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of evolution caused
women to be well- suited to staying put and getting lost if they
wandered too far while it had the opposite effect on males. The
brains of either sex evolved differently to better cope with the two
disparate strategies. Men are far superior in IQ tests that check for
spatial conceptuality than women and that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.
You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.
And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ testing,"
because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Is that so? Read on and rid yourself of such ignorant assumptions. . .
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost
anyway by virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
You were one of those classic overachievers, eh? It must really scorch
your nuts that there are women in this world who can blow you right out of
the water without cracking a book.
Poor baby.
"Sex differences are more pronounced in tests of spatial skills than for any
other intelligence. Males score more highly than females. Gardner speculates
that genetic selection, dating to hunting-gathering days, may be the cause."
From: http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow/7In/Spatial.html
Don't argue with a writer. Especially a male writer with a Ph.D. You won't
win, honey.
Who are you referring to?

A writer with a Ph.D. would know the difference between a
psychologist's speculation about causation, based on a pet theory or
area of expertise, and a fact.
Post by Gregory Hall
You sound like you might be a reader. This is a good thing because you might
have some inkling of what I am about to explain to you.
Have you ever stopped to think why most female novelists have a difficult
time writing novels that have significant spatial aspects. Most female
novelists handle romance pretty well but forget all about any manly
adventure novel that encompass a wide scope, both from a historic and
geographic standpoint. Women generally fall flat when it comes to this type
of writing. It's not because they are stupid. Rather it's because their
brains lack the foundation to understand this sort of thing so they just
cannot convey it realistically in their writing.
This isn't even good enough to be classified as pseudoscience. This
is laughably self-serving horseshit.
--
Kali
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-07 23:48:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and
far-ranging roamers while women were the gatherers and child care
units who hung out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of
evolution caused women to be well- suited to staying put and
getting lost if they wandered too far while it had the opposite
effect on males. The brains of either sex evolved differently to
better cope with the two disparate strategies. Men are far superior
in IQ tests that check for spatial conceptuality than women and
that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.
You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.
And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ
testing," because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Is that so? Read on and rid yourself of such ignorant assumptions. . .
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost
anyway by virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
You were one of those classic overachievers, eh? It must really
scorch your nuts that there are women in this world who can blow you
right out of the water without cracking a book.
Poor baby.
"Sex differences are more pronounced in tests of spatial skills than
for any other intelligence. Males score more highly than females.
Gardner speculates that genetic selection, dating to
hunting-gathering days, may be the cause."
From: http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow/7In/Spatial.html
I am aware that in an effort to make everyone smart, we have come to the
point of describing all manner of talents--including the talents of the
sociopath (after all, who does "emotional intelligence" better than
anyone, at least in the short term?)--as "intelligence."

That's just redefining a long-understood word to cover myriad, unrelated
abilities.

I don't buy it, and I don't care how many PhDs you offer up in
sacrifice.
Post by Gregory Hall
Don't argue with a writer. Especially a male writer with a Ph.D. You
won't win, honey.
There are quite a few PhDs with kooky and otherwise out-there ideas.
Having a doctorate means that one was able to plod ones way through
reams of paper, and we all know what Heinlein had to say about that. (I
know many people who have managed to prepend "Dr." to their names. Some
of them are right idiots.)
Post by Gregory Hall
You sound like you might be a reader. This is a good thing because
you might have some inkling of what I am about to explain to you.
Have you ever stopped to think why most female novelists have a
difficult time writing novels that have significant spatial aspects.
Oh, like Lois McMaster Bujold, perhaps?
Post by Gregory Hall
Most female novelists handle romance pretty well but forget all about
any manly adventure novel that encompass a wide scope, both from a
historic and geographic standpoint. Women generally fall flat when it
comes to this type of writing. It's not because they are stupid.
Rather it's because their brains lack the foundation to understand
this sort of thing so they just cannot convey it realistically in
their writing.
I don't actually disagree that men generally have better spatial skills
than women.

Generally.

But women have talents men lack, for the same reasons. Your attempt to
slant the situation to make us appear inferior fails on its face.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
John "C"
2009-01-08 00:56:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary"
accounts mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net
abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free
accounts
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Kali
Post by SharonB
Post by Bob Officer
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured
that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and
give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that
all the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently
don't apply to the "male" posters.
I was copying my posts to him to soc.mans earlier. You know he'd
make a few friends there. I know they'd be interested in his
evolutionary theory that explains why women are inferior to men.
--
Kali
Theory? Sorry, but it is fact. Males were the hunters and
far-ranging roamers while women were the gatherers and child care
units who hung out in and around the camp. Thousands of years of
evolution caused women to be well- suited to staying put and
getting lost if they wandered too far while it had the opposite
effect on males. The brains of either sex evolved differently to
better cope with the two disparate strategies. Men are far
superior
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
in IQ tests that check for spatial conceptuality than women and
that's a fact as well.
If I were to guess, you've been reading the Pease books.
You left some important stuff out, unfortunately.
And just so you know, testing for spatial awareness is not "IQ
testing," because it has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
Is that so? Read on and rid yourself of such ignorant assumptions. . .
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
I was going to tell you to 'get lost' but women are always lost
anyway by virtue of the way their smaller brains evolved.
You were one of those classic overachievers, eh? It must really
scorch your nuts that there are women in this world who can blow you
right out of the water without cracking a book.
Poor baby.
"Sex differences are more pronounced in tests of spatial skills than
for any other intelligence. Males score more highly than females.
Gardner speculates that genetic selection, dating to
hunting-gathering days, may be the cause."
From: http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow/7In/Spatial.html
I am aware that in an effort to make everyone smart, we have come to the
point of describing all manner of talents--including the talents of the
sociopath (after all, who does "emotional intelligence" better than
anyone, at least in the short term?)--as "intelligence."
That's just redefining a long-understood word to cover myriad,
unrelated
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
abilities.
I don't buy it, and I don't care how many PhDs you offer up in
sacrifice.
Post by Gregory Hall
Don't argue with a writer. Especially a male writer with a Ph.D. You
won't win, honey.
There are quite a few PhDs with kooky and otherwise out-there ideas.
Having a doctorate means that one was able to plod ones way through
reams of paper, and we all know what Heinlein had to say about that. (I
know many people who have managed to prepend "Dr." to their names. Some
of them are right idiots.)
Rhonda Slaps Dr. Pinky Sue Lamb right across her "Tammy Faye" made-up
face !!!!

Glad I lived long enough to see that !!!!
--
John C.
Bob Officer
2009-01-07 19:26:00 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:39:58 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I just saw something from his rambling on about Liberal's refusing to
see absolutes and Conservatives see everything as absolute. How
Conservatives never use PC talk, and lots of other self aggrandizing
bullshit. So much hypocrisy in one post should make him eligible for
immediate induction into Soc.Fr00ts "hall of lame", shouldn't it.
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
SharonB
2009-01-08 01:45:13 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:26:00 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:39:58 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:51:25 -0800, Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by SharonB
[...]
Post by Gregory Hall
Many of the
'females,' and I use that term loosely, have "complimentary" accounts
mostly because Gary realized that the hard-core, net abusing males that use
his pay service and his buddies to whom he gives free accounts are known the
world around as trolls and troublemakers. He wrongly figured that a couple
of females would temper the poor reputation of the server and give it some
legitimacy. Turns out the females are some of the worst net abusers.
So....you're saying that Gary got snookered by females and that all
the female DataBasix users are net abusers?
Or only the females with comp'd accounts?
Post by Gregory Hall
Not
only that but they are all old, fat and ugly as sin
I am?
Sharon --always amazed at the things I larn on duh usernet-- B
Funny isn't it...
I should introduce him to soc.fr00ts; he seems to have quite the
preconceived notions about "female" Usenetizens that apparently don't
apply to the "male" posters.
I just saw something from his rambling on about Liberal's refusing to
see absolutes and Conservatives see everything as absolute. How
Conservatives never use PC talk, and lots of other self aggrandizing
bullshit. So much hypocrisy in one post should make him eligible for
immediate induction into Soc.Fr00ts "hall of lame", shouldn't it.
He's sure got some funny ideas alright.
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-06 22:13:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Gregory Hall
2009-01-06 22:50:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz! I quit while you and Cannon where plotting and
scheming to defraud me of one more month's rent prior to booting me. Well,
your little plot was discovered and I quit before you two could gitRdunn.
Booted YOUR sorry asses is how it really happened. But keep lying to
yourself, maybe one of these days you'll have brainwashed yourself into
thinking it's really true.
--
Gregory Hall
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-06 22:54:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Atlas Bugged
2009-01-07 22:37:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would settle
it. But we see no citations or proofs.
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.

Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-07 22:43:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?

*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.

If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon you
when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me he's not
a felon...."

You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Gregory Hall
2009-01-07 23:30:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon you
when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me he's not a
felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.

It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the admin
of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is the server bank
owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.

Your opinion counts for almost nothing as your bias because of your
relationship with the above scum of the earth types is well-known.

If I were you I'd be ashamed to be associated with them in any capacity.

--
Gregory Hall
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-07 23:56:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon
you when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me
he's not a felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.
I am? And you're not?

I have an account with DataBasix. I am at odds with nearly every
DataBasix customer who frequents auk. Gary voted yes to my Ministry of
Circle Jerks award. I believe Kevin did, as well.

Please, therefore, explain where my bias lies.
Post by Gregory Hall
It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the
admin of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is
the server bank owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.
You have a lot of opinion mixed in with your singular "fact."
Post by Gregory Hall
Your opinion counts for almost nothing
Your opinion is that of a net abuser who was kicked off the DataBasix
server for his abuse.
Post by Gregory Hall
as your bias because of your
relationship with the above scum of the earth types is well-known.
What relationship?
Post by Gregory Hall
If I were you I'd be ashamed to be associated with them in any
capacity.
I'll give the lot of them credit for one thing: none of them are racist
fucktards.

That alone makes up for a lot of deficiencies.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Gregory Hall
2009-01-08 00:13:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll
see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon
you when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me
he's not a felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.
I am? And you're not?
I strive to present a 'fair and balanced' approach to Usenet discourse.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
I have an account with DataBasix. I am at odds with nearly every DataBasix
customer who frequents auk. Gary voted yes to my Ministry of Circle Jerks
award. I believe Kevin did, as well.
Please, therefore, explain where my bias lies.
See below.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the
admin of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is
the server bank owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.
You have a lot of opinion mixed in with your singular "fact."
I have an historical perspective.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Your opinion counts for almost nothing
Your opinion is that of a net abuser who was kicked off the DataBasix
server for his abuse.
The fact is I quit that outlaw server. I was not kicked off.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
as your bias because of your
relationship with the above scum of the earth types is well-known.
What relationship?
I read all the posts where you whined like a little baby because Atlas
Bugged "real lifed" you. Kevin Cannon is really Kevin Fries - your husband.
You flipped out when Atlas posted your home 20.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
If I were you I'd be ashamed to be associated with them in any capacity.
I'll give the lot of them credit for one thing: none of them are racist
fucktards.
Is a perceived racist fucktard worse than a real-life, convicted pedophile
fucktard?
--
Gregory Hall
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-08 00:21:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll
see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your
pathetic fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably
upon you when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove
to me he's not a felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.
I am? And you're not?
I strive to present a 'fair and balanced' approach to Usenet
discourse.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
I have an account with DataBasix. I am at odds with nearly every
DataBasix customer who frequents auk. Gary voted yes to my Ministry
of Circle Jerks award. I believe Kevin did, as well.
Please, therefore, explain where my bias lies.
See below.
<choke> OMG.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the
admin of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is
the server bank owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.
You have a lot of opinion mixed in with your singular "fact."
I have an historical perspective.
So do I.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Your opinion counts for almost nothing
Your opinion is that of a net abuser who was kicked off the DataBasix
server for his abuse.
The fact is I quit that outlaw server. I was not kicked off.
I don't think that's true.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
as your bias because of your
relationship with the above scum of the earth types is well-known.
What relationship?
I read all the posts where you whined like a little baby because Atlas
Bugged "real lifed" you. Kevin Cannon is really Kevin Fries - your
husband. You flipped out when Atlas posted your home 20.
If this keeps up, my name is going to be longer than the approved
four-line sig.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
If I were you I'd be ashamed to be associated with them in any capacity.
I'll give the lot of them credit for one thing: none of them are
racist fucktards.
Is a perceived racist fucktard worse than a real-life, convicted
pedophile fucktard?
You have demonstrated you are a racist fucktard. Your words, baby, no
one else's.

There is no "convicted pedophile" anywhere near this conversation, but
your insistence on the appellation makes you an ignorant racist
fucktard.

Keep going. Maybe my label for you will end up being as long as the name
in my sig.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries Jared Cannon <space reserved for next bad guess>

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Cujo DeSockpuppet
2009-01-08 00:49:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
I read all the posts where you whined like a little baby because Atlas
Bugged "real lifed" you. Kevin Cannon is really Kevin Fries - your
husband. You flipped out when Atlas posted your home 20.
I'd nominate this for a BWMDW only I'm not sure who the trainer should be.
But this is good enough for for HL&S. I'll happily vote for it, it's just a
pity I can't nominate you due to a conflict of interest.

That "doctorate" isn't doing you much good, Crappy. I'd ask for a refund.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Be careful though, your kookshit about how I am this and that will
reveal who the real kook is." - Edmo in PKB mode.
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 01:28:18 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:49:50 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
Post by Cujo DeSockpuppet
Post by Gregory Hall
I read all the posts where you whined like a little baby because Atlas
Bugged "real lifed" you. Kevin Cannon is really Kevin Fries - your
husband. You flipped out when Atlas posted your home 20.
I'd nominate this for a BWMDW only I'm not sure who the trainer should be.
It'd be all of AUK, I believe.
Post by Cujo DeSockpuppet
But this is good enough for for HL&S. I'll happily vote for it, it's just a
pity I can't nominate you due to a conflict of interest.
That "doctorate" isn't doing you much good, Crappy. I'd ask for a refund.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
miguel
2009-01-08 03:15:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cujo DeSockpuppet
Post by Gregory Hall
I read all the posts where you whined like a little baby because Atlas
Bugged "real lifed" you. Kevin Cannon is really Kevin Fries - your
husband. You flipped out when Atlas posted your home 20.
I'd nominate this for a BWMDW only I'm not sure who the trainer should be.
But this is good enough for for HL&S. I'll happily vote for it, it's just a
pity I can't nominate you due to a conflict of interest.
That "doctorate" isn't doing you much good, Crappy. I'd ask for a refund.
It's not a real doctorate. It's in journalism. That shouldn't even be
a field of academic study.
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 00:26:59 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:56:15 -0600, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll
see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon
you when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me
he's not a felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.
I am? And you're not?
I have an account with DataBasix. I am at odds with nearly every
DataBasix customer who frequents auk. Gary voted yes to my Ministry of
Circle Jerks award. I believe Kevin did, as well.
Please, therefore, explain where my bias lies.
He can't. He's like the k00ks of old who claimed that people only
have a DataBasix account if they agree with my opinions.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the
admin of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is
the server bank owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.
You have a lot of opinion mixed in with your singular "fact."
Post by Gregory Hall
Your opinion counts for almost nothing
Your opinion is that of a net abuser who was kicked off the DataBasix
server for his abuse.
Yep.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
as your bias because of your
relationship with the above scum of the earth types is well-known.
What relationship?
You pay your bill and you don't abuse the net?
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
If I were you I'd be ashamed to be associated with them in any capacity.
I'll give the lot of them credit for one thing: none of them are racist
fucktards.
That alone makes up for a lot of deficiencies.
:)
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-08 01:56:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:56:15 -0600, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll
see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your
pathetic fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably
upon you when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove
to me he's not a felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.
I am? And you're not?
I have an account with DataBasix. I am at odds with nearly every
DataBasix customer who frequents auk. Gary voted yes to my Ministry
of Circle Jerks award. I believe Kevin did, as well.
Please, therefore, explain where my bias lies.
He can't. He's like the k00ks of old who claimed that people only
have a DataBasix account if they agree with my opinions.
<miffed> I never got /that/ memo.
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the
admin of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is
the server bank owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.
You have a lot of opinion mixed in with your singular "fact."
Post by Gregory Hall
Your opinion counts for almost nothing
Your opinion is that of a net abuser who was kicked off the DataBasix
server for his abuse.
Yep.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
as your bias because of your
relationship with the above scum of the earth types is well-known.
What relationship?
You pay your bill and you don't abuse the net?
Beating my husband with a sock is so much more satisyfing. Speaking of
which, please feel free to send my bill to Kevin Cannon.
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Gregory Hall
If I were you I'd be ashamed to be associated with them in any capacity.
I'll give the lot of them credit for one thing: none of them are
racist fucktards.
That alone makes up for a lot of deficiencies.
:)
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 00:22:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon you
when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me he's not a
felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Rhonda you have no standing here. You are obviously biased.
It is well known that Kevin and Gary are "good buddies." Gary is the admin
of a net abusing, troll haven of an obscure NSP and Kevin is the server bank
owner and roving netKKKop - Gary's little snitch.
Poor little tard. Have you seen anyone anywhere, including Kevin,
disagree with me when I say the SUN Enterprise Servers (PLURAL you
fucking tard) are owned by me? Can't you tell the truth about
anything?
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
atlas bugged
2009-01-08 02:37:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
Who's demanding proofs?

There is a disagreement on a discussion board, and I was simply setting out
details of how to analyze it.

Accurately, I fancy.

I *do* post proofs, however, and I can count the number (unusually large)
who seem to feel they merit examination.
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon you
when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me he's not a
felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
What? What happened to "this isn't court?"

The usual AKTard chicanery. Dull, uninspired chicanery, as usual.

I'm just publicizing Burnore's record of lawlessness. That's inherently
non-private.

The fact you try to defend or deny it is mind boggling.

You call *me* an idiot, while *you* try to refute plain facts, about an
obvious reprobate, publicly making a fool of yourself.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
And that's because you have said this, therefore it is true. And you have
said it.

It's cool how you just say stuff, and this confirms its truth.

Imagine what people smarter than garden vegetables must think of you.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
2009-01-08 03:06:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:50:34 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets
old for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle.
From now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic
fucking life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would
settle it. But we see no citations or proofs.
"We"?
*You* have no basis for demanding proofs.
Who's demanding proofs?
That would be you--the guy who keeps posting false information because
he claims no one has proved to his satisfaction that it's untrue.
Post by atlas bugged
There is a disagreement on a discussion board, and I was simply
setting out details of how to analyze it.
It's not a disagreement. It's you engaging in libelous posting.
Post by atlas bugged
Accurately, I fancy.
Not even close to accurately.
Post by atlas bugged
I *do* post proofs, however, and I can count the number (unusual
large) who seem to feel they merit examination.
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
"I saw it on the internet; it must be true."
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
If he does sue you for libel, the judge will not look favorably upon
you when you say, "But, but, but, your Honor, he didn't prove to me
he's not a felon...."
You're an idiot, y'know?
What? What happened to "this isn't court?"
If you were to be sued for engaging in libelous discourse, it would
certainly end up in court.

I'd love to see you explain yourself to any of the judges in Ocean
County. What a hoot.

Not being such a respected member of the legal community has its
downside, y'know.
Post by atlas bugged
The usual AKTard chicanery. Dull, uninspired chicanery, as usual.
I'm just publicizing Burnore's record of lawlessness. That's
inherently non-private.
Calling him a felon and a child-molestor is something altogether
different, numbnuts.
Post by atlas bugged
The fact you try to defend or deny it is mind boggling.
What is mind-boggling is that a lawyer who pretends to the stature you
do (which of course is not the stature you have) is posting this kind of
shit in a newsgroup.
Post by atlas bugged
You call *me* an idiot, while *you* try to refute plain facts, about
an obvious reprobate, publicly making a fool of yourself.
Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
That appears to be mostly projection.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Right. And it ain't you.
And that's because you have said this, therefore it is true. And you
have said it.
It's cool how you just say stuff, and this confirms its truth.
Yeah, but I don't say things that could cause me to lose a libel suit.
Post by atlas bugged
Imagine what people smarter than garden vegetables must think of you.
I know what some very good lawyers--the kind who are respected by their
colleagues for their ethical behavior and fine legal minds--think of me.
The only lawyers I've ever had any problems with are the kind who
were/are well on their way to reprimands, suspensions and disbarrments.
Funny that.

I remember you now. All it took was seeing your picture, and I was
suddenly back to that day more than 20 years ago when I hand-delivered a
post-judgment motion to Judge Cooper. You were an asshole then, and
you're an even bigger asshole now.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
so_you_say
2009-01-07 23:21:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Atlas Bugged
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would settle
it.  But we see no citations or proofs.
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
The person who can count to 3?
ah
2009-01-07 23:54:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by so_you_say
Post by Atlas Bugged
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would settle
it. But we see no citations or proofs.
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
The person who can count to 3?
ROLF!
--
ah
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 00:27:27 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:21:55 -0800 (PST), so_you_say
Post by so_you_say
Post by Atlas Bugged
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would settle
it.  But we see no citations or proofs.
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
The person who can count to 3?
Heh. Now _THAT's_ funny.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Gary L. Burnore
2009-01-08 00:21:02 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:37:28 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by atlas bugged
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life,
you
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or
not.
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
Quite.
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would settle
it. But we see no citations or proofs.
It'd be unethical to post such. Unlike you, I'm ethical/
Post by Atlas Bugged
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
.
That crap still the best you can do? You've still not proven YOU are
not a felon.
Post by Atlas Bugged
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this
Yep. I do. Even a moron like you should be able to figure it out.
He's claiming I'm in dire need of his 5.99/mo and drivvling over it
regularly. He's jealous that some people have comp'd accounts and he
doesn't.


BTW, glad to see you're proving my point, owned one.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Aratzio
2009-01-08 00:42:36 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:37:28 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Post by Atlas Bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by atlas bugged
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life,
you
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or
not.
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz!
Keep lying to yourself, luser. I understand.
1) It's trivial to prove who's right, either way
2) You're the one primarily in possession of the facts which would settle
it. But we see no citations or proofs.
2) You're an ex-con and fabulous, notorious liar, abuser, even idiot.
Pretty easy to figure who's got the true end of this.
Can we have counting for $500, Alex?
The answer is: Three
*DING*
What comes after Two?
Cujo DeSockpuppet
2009-01-06 23:06:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old
for my money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From
now on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking
life, you will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz! I quit while you and Cannon where plotting and
scheming to defraud me of one more month's rent prior to booting me.
Well, your little plot was discovered and I quit before you two could
gitRdunn. Booted YOUR sorry asses is how it really happened. But keep
lying to yourself, maybe one of these days you'll have brainwashed
yourself into thinking it's really true.
Nice hissy fit, Drama Queen.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"You will answer in court bitch." - Edmo just before her land
sharks forced Edmo to repay loans.
John "C"
2009-01-07 05:06:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:02 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:06 -0500, "atlas bugged"
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see
this
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by SharonB
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gary L. Burnore
Post by atlas bugged
guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
[Martin Hannigan's shrine page snipped]
Good boy, bugged. You're now officially my newest poodle. From now
on you have no choice, for the rest of your pathetic fucking life, you
will follow me.
Ahh. I see.
Good strategy, if it is. Now I can't tell if you're truly crazy or not.
I have my own "Formosa" code, as it were.
I'll think about it.
Still, most of the sewage traces back to Databasux. Not good.
That's the main reason I quit using Databasux.
You quit using DataBasix because I canned your sorry ass for abuse.
In your dreams, putz! I quit while you and Cannon where plotting and
scheming to defraud me of one more month's rent prior to booting me. Well,
your little plot was discovered and I quit before you two could gitRdunn.
Booted YOUR sorry asses is how it really happened. But keep lying to
yourself, maybe one of these days you'll have brainwashed yourself into
thinking it's really true.
--
Gregory Hall
Garrry and Pop-gun are sucking each other's peckers ?!?

I can see that !!
--
HJ
Gregory Hall
2009-01-06 18:51:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
This FAQ is dedicated to the countless number of people victimized by the
net abusers of Databasix.COM, in particular.....
1. Who is Gary LEE Burnore?
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
3. What does Gary Burnore do for a living?
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post under?
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
7. Does Gary Burnore have criminal offenses on his record?
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
9. Where can I get more information on Gary L. Burnore?
10. Is Gary L. Burnore a Convicted Child Molester?
11. Why does Gary Burnore hate Martin Hannigan?
12. Why does Gary Burnore hate Ron Guillemette?
13. Why does Gary Burnore hate Jerry Terranson?
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
16. Is Burnore really a service provider?
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
18. What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore auctioned on eBay?
20. What did Gary say abot this FAQ?
21. Where can I find the famous Court Documents?
22. What is Hell-Flame-Wars?
23. Who is Belinda Burnore?
1. Who is Gary L. Burnore?
Gary Lee Burnore is an approximately 44 year old man from Raleigh. NC.
He moved from Santa Clara County in California to Raleigh in 1998.
He is married to Belinda Bryan Burnore, formerly Belinda West, formrely
Belinda Bryan.
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
Ohio. He is believed to be one of three siblings. Himself, and two sisters.
3. What does Gary Burnore do?
It is unknown at this time, but previously he worked at Keane, Inc.
http://www.keane.com and it is believed he was terminated against his
will. He has never said otherwise.
He previously worked at Wells Fargo Bank and was terminated against
his will. [ Refuted - See item 20 ]
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post from?
databasix.com
dtbs.com
usenet-performance-art.org
hell-flame-wars.org
netbasix.net
garllburnore.com/net/org
zoeburnore.com/net/org
gburnore.com/net/org
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
No. However, spam has come from his machine. Gary claims this
happened when hackers broke into his insecure machine.
[ refuted - See item 20 ]
7. Does Gary Burnore have a criminal arrest record?
Yes. He does.
1. Annoying and Molesting
Santa Clara County, CA
Case 9615185
2. Possesion of a schedule IV controlled substance
Franklin County, North Carolina
Case 00 CR 000365
3. Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072601
4. Reckless Driving to Endanger
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072800
5. Speeding
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627
6. Inspection Violation
Wake Country, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627
[ Refuted by Belinda, see item 20 ]
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
He's probably there to invade it. Typically, when he shows
up in a newsgroup, it goes downhill very fast from there. First Gary pops
in and begins berating people. Then the "sock puppets" start popping in,
accounts that are different than Gary's, but Gary nonetheless. Then the
rest of the crew shows up.
Then, someone will "disagree" with him or admnonish him for his
bad behavior. At this point, someone will get labeled a "kook" and
others will suddenly appear to support Gary. Don't worry, the awards
are meaningless and only the people from Gary's machine vote or care.
At this point, just complain to this upstreams. He is abusing the net.
9. Where can I get more information on Gary Lee Burnore?
Go to http://www.google.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
Go to http://www.lycos.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
10. Is Gary Lee Burnore a convicted molester?
See the CA State Statute 647.6 A PC, and reference the section
pertaining to his criminal activities. YOU BE THE JUDGE.
[ Authors note: It appears so to me anyways..he refutes ]
11. Why does Gary hate Martin Hannigan?
Gary hates Martin Hannigan because in 1998 while Martin was at XCOM,
Gary made a request to peer his machine with Martins. At the time, XCOM's
news server was up in the low 50's on the Usenet Top 1000 and would be a
good peering partner for any news system. Martin refused and so started
the problem. Martin made the mistake of telling Burnore to "piss off"
after Burnore began to harangue him over the no answer.
Gary hates Martin over the faq as well.
http://www.freenix.org/reseau/top1000/1998/top9812.html Search for "xcom".
12. Why does Gary hate Ron Guillemette?
Ron found out about Gary's registration to the North Carolina Sex
Offender Registry and posted it all over the Internet.
13. Why does Gary hate Jerry Terranson?
Jerry Terranson archives all of databasix users posts even though
they specify X-No-Archive: YES, and then makes them public
to all folks on the internet. Note, there is no written or unwritten
law that says MFN cannot due this. X-No-Archive was created due to
DejaNews, and Deja voluntarily agreed to honor XNA. All bets are off
for others.
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
If you are netcopped by Burnore, point your provider or employer to
this FAQ and explain that Gary is a not worrisome even though he may
threaten
them as "the power that be" on the internet. They should simply ignore
him and go about their business understanding that Burnore has a history
of attacking newbies and clueless folk alike and then netcopping them
when they don't agree with what he is doing.
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
No. If someone can find me some informatio indicating otherwise,
I'd love to see it. The only people who acknowledge that Burnore
is some head honcho of something is himself and Belinda.
16. Is he really a service provider?
He says he is. Most folks definition of service provider is a lot different
than his. The fact that he runs his PC off of a DSL line in his home
makes me think he is not truly a service provider, but a hobbyist
offering accounts to people he "deems worthy". Databasix is also not
incorporated, as far as I can tell, nor does it have any sort of
account signup mechanism, pricing or other typical information available.
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
AUK Kook of The Month
http://www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html. Note: That was taken
down. Gary and crew somehow convinced the author to remove it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html+&hl=en
I've archived a copy of it just in case the google cache expires.
Second Place Winner AUK LMA
http://www.thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/agsf/heads/terri/looneymaroon-oct97.txt
Wicked Samurai Jack Ass
http://www.realjackass.com
18: What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/profile.xp?ST=PS&URN=695322125
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore REALLY auctioned on eBay?
Yes. He was placed up for auction. There were no public bids.
He was auctioned as Internet Stalker. There was one private bid
for .24 cents from a friend, and I let Gary Burnore go for a week.
20. What did Gary say about this FAQ?
He said it was innacurate via his wife Belinda West Bryan Burnore,
but refused to be specific. Instead, she screamed liar liar
pants on fire.
I have offered Gary a chance to respond via this
http://www.databasix.com/~gburnore/myanswer.html
If he notified me he would like to respond some other
way, I will point this link wherever he wants.
21. Where can I find the famous court documents?
They can be found at ftp://archives.mfn.org or by writing to
22. What is 'Hell-Flame-Wars"?
Hell Flame Wars is a loose association of folks that oppose Gary.
23. Who is Belinda Burnore
Belinda is Gary Burnores wife, we think. She goes by a few names
in real life. Belinda West. Belinda West Bryan, Belinda Bryan, and
last but not least, Belinda Burnore. She also has some usenet
and possibly 2 more we are confirming.
- --
Boston, MA w: http://world.std.com/~hannigan
arin: mh309-arin netsol: mh309
Check out the Burnore FAQ: http://world.std.com/~hannigan/fun/bfaq.html
That's a lot of stuff there. Interesting and revealing.

But, I think my Gary Burnore FAQ is more accurate and easier on the eyes.

~~~~ Gary Burnore FAQ ~~~~

1) stupid
2) stupid
3) stupid


~~~~ End Gary Burnore FAQ ~~~~~
--
Gregory Hall
John "C"
2009-01-07 05:07:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for my
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this guy's
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
This FAQ is dedicated to the countless number of people victimized by the
net abusers of Databasix.COM, in particular.....
1. Who is Gary LEE Burnore?
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
3. What does Gary Burnore do for a living?
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post under?
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
7. Does Gary Burnore have criminal offenses on his record?
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
9. Where can I get more information on Gary L. Burnore?
10. Is Gary L. Burnore a Convicted Child Molester?
11. Why does Gary Burnore hate Martin Hannigan?
12. Why does Gary Burnore hate Ron Guillemette?
13. Why does Gary Burnore hate Jerry Terranson?
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
16. Is Burnore really a service provider?
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
18. What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore auctioned on eBay?
20. What did Gary say abot this FAQ?
21. Where can I find the famous Court Documents?
22. What is Hell-Flame-Wars?
23. Who is Belinda Burnore?
1. Who is Gary L. Burnore?
Gary Lee Burnore is an approximately 44 year old man from Raleigh. NC.
He moved from Santa Clara County in California to Raleigh in 1998.
He is married to Belinda Bryan Burnore, formerly Belinda West, formrely
Belinda Bryan.
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
Ohio. He is believed to be one of three siblings. Himself, and two sisters.
3. What does Gary Burnore do?
It is unknown at this time, but previously he worked at Keane, Inc.
http://www.keane.com and it is believed he was terminated against his
will. He has never said otherwise.
He previously worked at Wells Fargo Bank and was terminated against
his will. [ Refuted - See item 20 ]
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post from?
databasix.com
dtbs.com
usenet-performance-art.org
hell-flame-wars.org
netbasix.net
garllburnore.com/net/org
zoeburnore.com/net/org
gburnore.com/net/org
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
No. However, spam has come from his machine. Gary claims this
happened when hackers broke into his insecure machine.
[ refuted - See item 20 ]
7. Does Gary Burnore have a criminal arrest record?
Yes. He does.
1. Annoying and Molesting
Santa Clara County, CA
Case 9615185
2. Possesion of a schedule IV controlled substance
Franklin County, North Carolina
Case 00 CR 000365
3. Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072601
4. Reckless Driving to Endanger
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072800
5. Speeding
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627
6. Inspection Violation
Wake Country, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627
[ Refuted by Belinda, see item 20 ]
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
He's probably there to invade it. Typically, when he shows
up in a newsgroup, it goes downhill very fast from there. First Gary pops
in and begins berating people. Then the "sock puppets" start popping in,
accounts that are different than Gary's, but Gary nonetheless. Then the
rest of the crew shows up.
Then, someone will "disagree" with him or admnonish him for his
bad behavior. At this point, someone will get labeled a "kook" and
others will suddenly appear to support Gary. Don't worry, the awards
are meaningless and only the people from Gary's machine vote or care.
At this point, just complain to this upstreams. He is abusing the net.
9. Where can I get more information on Gary Lee Burnore?
Go to http://www.google.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
Go to http://www.lycos.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
10. Is Gary Lee Burnore a convicted molester?
See the CA State Statute 647.6 A PC, and reference the section
pertaining to his criminal activities. YOU BE THE JUDGE.
[ Authors note: It appears so to me anyways..he refutes ]
11. Why does Gary hate Martin Hannigan?
Gary hates Martin Hannigan because in 1998 while Martin was at XCOM,
Gary made a request to peer his machine with Martins. At the time, XCOM's
news server was up in the low 50's on the Usenet Top 1000 and would be a
good peering partner for any news system. Martin refused and so started
the problem. Martin made the mistake of telling Burnore to "piss off"
after Burnore began to harangue him over the no answer.
Gary hates Martin over the faq as well.
http://www.freenix.org/reseau/top1000/1998/top9812.html Search for "xcom".
12. Why does Gary hate Ron Guillemette?
Ron found out about Gary's registration to the North Carolina Sex
Offender Registry and posted it all over the Internet.
13. Why does Gary hate Jerry Terranson?
Jerry Terranson archives all of databasix users posts even though
they specify X-No-Archive: YES, and then makes them public
to all folks on the internet. Note, there is no written or unwritten
law that says MFN cannot due this. X-No-Archive was created due to
DejaNews, and Deja voluntarily agreed to honor XNA. All bets are off
for others.
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
If you are netcopped by Burnore, point your provider or employer to
this FAQ and explain that Gary is a not worrisome even though he may
threaten
them as "the power that be" on the internet. They should simply ignore
him and go about their business understanding that Burnore has a history
of attacking newbies and clueless folk alike and then netcopping them
when they don't agree with what he is doing.
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
No. If someone can find me some informatio indicating otherwise,
I'd love to see it. The only people who acknowledge that Burnore
is some head honcho of something is himself and Belinda.
16. Is he really a service provider?
He says he is. Most folks definition of service provider is a lot different
than his. The fact that he runs his PC off of a DSL line in his home
makes me think he is not truly a service provider, but a hobbyist
offering accounts to people he "deems worthy". Databasix is also not
incorporated, as far as I can tell, nor does it have any sort of
account signup mechanism, pricing or other typical information available.
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
AUK Kook of The Month
http://www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html. Note: That was taken
down. Gary and crew somehow convinced the author to remove it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html+&hl=en
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
I've archived a copy of it just in case the google cache expires.
Second Place Winner AUK LMA
http://www.thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/agsf/heads/terri/looneymaroon-oct97.txt
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Wicked Samurai Jack Ass
http://www.realjackass.com
18: What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/profile.xp?ST=PS&URN=695322125
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore REALLY auctioned on eBay?
Yes. He was placed up for auction. There were no public bids.
He was auctioned as Internet Stalker. There was one private bid
for .24 cents from a friend, and I let Gary Burnore go for a week.
20. What did Gary say about this FAQ?
He said it was innacurate via his wife Belinda West Bryan Burnore,
but refused to be specific. Instead, she screamed liar liar
pants on fire.
I have offered Gary a chance to respond via this
http://www.databasix.com/~gburnore/myanswer.html
If he notified me he would like to respond some other
way, I will point this link wherever he wants.
21. Where can I find the famous court documents?
They can be found at ftp://archives.mfn.org or by writing to
22. What is 'Hell-Flame-Wars"?
Hell Flame Wars is a loose association of folks that oppose Gary.
23. Who is Belinda Burnore
Belinda is Gary Burnores wife, we think. She goes by a few names
in real life. Belinda West. Belinda West Bryan, Belinda Bryan, and
last but not least, Belinda Burnore. She also has some usenet
and possibly 2 more we are confirming.
- --
http://world.std.com/~hannigan
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
arin: mh309-arin netsol: mh309
http://world.std.com/~hannigan/fun/bfaq.html
Post by Gregory Hall
That's a lot of stuff there. Interesting and revealing.
But, I think my Gary Burnore FAQ is more accurate and easier on the eyes.
~~~~ Gary Burnore FAQ ~~~~
1) stupid
2) stupid
3) stupid
~~~~ End Gary Burnore FAQ ~~~~~
--
Gregory Hall
LOL !
--
HJ
Atlas Bugged
2009-01-07 22:48:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
I'm sure this has been posted previously, but it never gets old for
my
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
money.
http://gb1faq.notlong.com
If you look in the dictionary under "never learns," you'll see this
guy's
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
http://gb2pic.notlong.com
***************************************
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY LEE BURNORE
This FAQ is dedicated to the countless number of people victimized
by the
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
net abusers of Databasix.COM, in particular.....
1. Who is Gary LEE Burnore?
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
3. What does Gary Burnore do for a living?
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post under?
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
7. Does Gary Burnore have criminal offenses on his record?
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
9. Where can I get more information on Gary L. Burnore?
10. Is Gary L. Burnore a Convicted Child Molester?
11. Why does Gary Burnore hate Martin Hannigan?
12. Why does Gary Burnore hate Ron Guillemette?
13. Why does Gary Burnore hate Jerry Terranson?
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
16. Is Burnore really a service provider?
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
18. What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore auctioned on eBay?
20. What did Gary say abot this FAQ?
21. Where can I find the famous Court Documents?
22. What is Hell-Flame-Wars?
23. Who is Belinda Burnore?
1. Who is Gary L. Burnore?
Gary Lee Burnore is an approximately 44 year old man from Raleigh.
NC.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
He moved from Santa Clara County in California to Raleigh in 1998.
He is married to Belinda Bryan Burnore, formerly Belinda West,
formrely
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Belinda Bryan.
2. Where is Gary Burnore from?
Ohio. He is believed to be one of three siblings. Himself, and two sisters.
3. What does Gary Burnore do?
It is unknown at this time, but previously he worked at Keane, Inc.
http://www.keane.com and it is believed he was terminated against
his
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
will. He has never said otherwise.
He previously worked at Wells Fargo Bank and was terminated against
his will. [ Refuted - See item 20 ]
4. What domains does Gary Burnore post from?
databasix.com
dtbs.com
usenet-performance-art.org
hell-flame-wars.org
netbasix.net
garllburnore.com/net/org
zoeburnore.com/net/org
gburnore.com/net/org
5. Has Gary Burnore ever spammed?
No. However, spam has come from his machine. Gary claims this
happened when hackers broke into his insecure machine.
[ refuted - See item 20 ]
7. Does Gary Burnore have a criminal arrest record?
Yes. He does.
1. Annoying and Molesting
Santa Clara County, CA
Case 9615185
2. Possesion of a schedule IV controlled substance
Franklin County, North Carolina
Case 00 CR 000365
3. Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072601
4. Reckless Driving to Endanger
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 98 CR S072800
5. Speeding
Wake County, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627
6. Inspection Violation
Wake Country, North Carolina
Case 99 CR 086627
[ Refuted by Belinda, see item 20 ]
8. Why is Gary Burnore in my newsgroup?
He's probably there to invade it. Typically, when he shows
up in a newsgroup, it goes downhill very fast from there. First Gary
pops
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
in and begins berating people. Then the "sock puppets" start popping
in,
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
accounts that are different than Gary's, but Gary nonetheless. Then
the
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
rest of the crew shows up.
Then, someone will "disagree" with him or admnonish him for his
bad behavior. At this point, someone will get labeled a "kook" and
others will suddenly appear to support Gary. Don't worry, the awards
are meaningless and only the people from Gary's machine vote or
care.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
At this point, just complain to this upstreams. He is abusing the
net.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
9. Where can I get more information on Gary Lee Burnore?
Go to http://www.google.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
Go to http://www.lycos.com and enter "Gary Burnore"
10. Is Gary Lee Burnore a convicted molester?
See the CA State Statute 647.6 A PC, and reference the section
pertaining to his criminal activities. YOU BE THE JUDGE.
[ Authors note: It appears so to me anyways..he refutes ]
11. Why does Gary hate Martin Hannigan?
Gary hates Martin Hannigan because in 1998 while Martin was at XCOM,
Gary made a request to peer his machine with Martins. At the time,
XCOM's
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
news server was up in the low 50's on the Usenet Top 1000 and would
be a
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
good peering partner for any news system. Martin refused and so
started
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
the problem. Martin made the mistake of telling Burnore to "piss
off"
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
after Burnore began to harangue him over the no answer.
Gary hates Martin over the faq as well.
http://www.freenix.org/reseau/top1000/1998/top9812.html Search for
"xcom".
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
12. Why does Gary hate Ron Guillemette?
Ron found out about Gary's registration to the North Carolina Sex
Offender Registry and posted it all over the Internet.
13. Why does Gary hate Jerry Terranson?
Jerry Terranson archives all of databasix users posts even though
they specify X-No-Archive: YES, and then makes them public
to all folks on the internet. Note, there is no written or unwritten
law that says MFN cannot due this. X-No-Archive was created due to
DejaNews, and Deja voluntarily agreed to honor XNA. All bets are off
for others.
14. Burnore has Net Copped me. What should I do?
If you are netcopped by Burnore, point your provider or employer to
this FAQ and explain that Gary is a not worrisome even though he may
threaten
them as "the power that be" on the internet. They should simply
ignore
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
him and go about their business understanding that Burnore has a
history
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
of attacking newbies and clueless folk alike and then netcopping
them
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
when they don't agree with what he is doing.
15. Is Burnore really a "power" on the Internet?
No. If someone can find me some informatio indicating otherwise,
I'd love to see it. The only people who acknowledge that Burnore
is some head honcho of something is himself and Belinda.
16. Is he really a service provider?
He says he is. Most folks definition of service provider is a lot different
than his. The fact that he runs his PC off of a DSL line in his
home
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
makes me think he is not truly a service provider, but a hobbyist
offering accounts to people he "deems worthy". Databasix is also not
incorporated, as far as I can tell, nor does it have any sort of
account signup mechanism, pricing or other typical information
available.
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
17. What awards has Gary L. Burnore won?
AUK Kook of The Month
http://www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html. Note: That was
taken
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
down. Gary and crew somehow convinced the author to remove it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.members.iglou.com/bandit/lw990305.html+&hl=en
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
I've archived a copy of it just in case the google cache expires.
Second Place Winner AUK LMA
http://www.thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/agsf/heads/terri/looneymaroon-oct97.txt
Post by atlas bugged
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
Wicked Samurai Jack Ass
http://www.realjackass.com
18: What usenet newsgroups can he be found in?
http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/profile.xp?ST=PS&URN=695322125
19. Was Gary Lee Burnore REALLY auctioned on eBay?
Yes. He was placed up for auction. There were no public bids.
He was auctioned as Internet Stalker. There was one private bid
for .24 cents from a friend, and I let Gary Burnore go for a week.
20. What did Gary say about this FAQ?
He said it was innacurate via his wife Belinda West Bryan Burnore,
but refused to be specific. Instead, she screamed liar liar
pants on fire.
I have offered Gary a chance to respond via this
http://www.databasix.com/~gburnore/myanswer.html
If he notified me he would like to respond some other
way, I will point this link wherever he wants.
21. Where can I find the famous court documents?
They can be found at ftp://archives.mfn.org or by writing to
22. What is 'Hell-Flame-Wars"?
Hell Flame Wars is a loose association of folks that oppose Gary.
23. Who is Belinda Burnore
Belinda is Gary Burnores wife, we think. She goes by a few names
in real life. Belinda West. Belinda West Bryan, Belinda Bryan, and
last but not least, Belinda Burnore. She also has some usenet
and possibly 2 more we are confirming.
- --
http://world.std.com/~hannigan
Post by Gregory Hall
Post by atlas bugged
arin: mh309-arin netsol: mh309
http://world.std.com/~hannigan/fun/bfaq.html
Post by Gregory Hall
That's a lot of stuff there. Interesting and revealing.
But, I think my Gary Burnore FAQ is more accurate and easier on the
eyes.
Post by Gregory Hall
~~~~ Gary Burnore FAQ ~~~~
1) stupid
2) stupid
3) stupid
~~~~ End Gary Burnore FAQ ~~~~~
--
Gregory Hall
LOL !
And so terribly incomplete.

Criminal
Net-abuser who poses as net defender, "Hypocrite" for the one-word answer.
Illiterate. Or does "stupid" cover that?
Sociopath

Even with a couple more "stupids," I think you need a 10-point list to do
Burnore justice.
Loading...