Post by The PeelerOn Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:58:48 -0700, clinically insane, serbian bitch
Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual
Well, YES, you ARE a VERY VERY sick asshole! Under ANY nym you keep posting,
gay anal Razovic!
The mangina has no chance against the Guardian Angels of Israel and
other honorable, decent people.
Now here is Judith Bergman writing about the elections in Denmark.
Denmark's Elections
by Judith Bergman
June 14, 2019 at 5:00 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14375/denmark-elections
Send
Print
Share146
A significant development in this election was that anti-immigration parties
generally fared poorly.
"Many citizens wrongly think that the immigration issue is under control and
that it can therefore safely be left to the Left. It is not under control...
[B]y the year 2050, we will see a doubling of the Muslim population in
Denmark... that would not be a problem if we had a solution for how to
integrate them, but nowhere in Western Europe has a solution been found". —
Kasper Støvring, author and commentator, Debatten-DR, June 6, 2019.
Another new development was that for the first time, according to a report
in Jyllands Posten, Muslim voters were organized, in certain urban areas....
[A]n electoral group was set up, which, in co-operation with a mosque and
various other associations, recommended that people vote for the two
parties: the center-left Det Radikale Venstre and the far left
Enhedslisten... Both parties have a pro-immigration stance. Det Radikale
Venstre, for instance, wants to make it easier for refugees to gain
permanent residence in Denmark.
Immigration policy will be one of the main challenges for the Social
Democratic Party, as it attempts to form a government with the seats of Det
Radikale Venstre and Enhedslisten, in addition to the Socialist People's
Party.... the Social Democrats [wanted] the bulk of their policy focusing on
how to reduce and control the influx of refugees and migrants, including the
use of reception centers outside of Europe. In addition, their policy
included making all stays for refugees in Denmark temporary, and extending
border controls and reforming the Schengen cooperation so that individual
countries decide when and how long they can control their own borders. Their
policy also backs sending rejected asylum seekers home and tightening the
laws in order to stop illegal migrants from working in Denmark.
In Denmark's general election on June 5, the Danes gave the center-left and
far left parties on the political spectrum 91 seats in parliament, a
majority out of the 179 available seats. Pictured: Christiansborg Castle,
seat of Denmark's parliament. (Image source: Jebulon/Wikimedia Commons)
In Denmark's general election on June 5, the Danes gave the center-left and
far left parties on the political spectrum -- the Social Democratic Party,
Det Radikale Venstre (the Danish Social Liberal Party), Socialistisk
Folkeparti (the Socialist People's Party), and Enhedslisten (the Red-Green
Alliance) -- 91 seats in parliament, a majority out of the 179 available
seats. In doing so, the Danes waved goodbye to the current
liberal-conservative government. The largest party on the left, the Social
Democratic Party with 48 seats, and led by Mette Frederiksen, is currently
trying to form a government.
A significant development in this election was that anti-immigration parties
generally fared poorly. Dansk Folkeparti, (the Danish People's Party), which
had become the second-largest party in the 2015 elections, when it was the
only party running on a strict anti-immigration platform and where it
received 21% of the votes and 37 seats, was reduced to less than half,
receiving only 8.7% of the votes and 16 seats. The new anti-Islamic,
anti-immigration party, Stram Kurs, which campaigned on a platform of
prohibiting Islam and deporting Muslims from Denmark, did not manage to
cross the election threshold of 2%. It received only 1.8 % of the votes. Led
by Rasmus Paludan, who became famous for demonstrating across Denmark --
where he frequently featured a "Koran stunt" in which he would either throw
a Koran around, burn it or put bacon on it -- the party only managed to
qualify to run in the elections a month before they took place. Finally, a
new party on the right, Nye Borgerlige (the New Right) won four seats, with
2.4 % of the vote. The party ran on a platform that demanded that no more
asylum seekers be allowed into the country, that foreigners must support
themselves financially and that foreign criminals be deported after their
first sentencing in court. The current Prime Minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen,
said he would not cooperate politically with either Rasmus Paludan or the
New Right should they be elected to parliament.
Some Danish analysts, such as the author and commentator Kasper Støvring,
estimated that Danes did not vote for the anti-immigration parties this time
because, "Many citizens wrongly think that the immigration issue is under
control and that it can therefore safely be left to the Left. It is not
under control".
"Five years in a row," he added, "The crime rates have gone up among
non-Western descendants; we have areas where the rule of law has de facto
been suspended; we saw in the election campaign, that there are areas where
you cannot gather and speak freely; when you go for a walk you nearly
stumble on the concrete blocks [meant to protect terrorist targets] that
remind us of the intrusive terror threat. These are very serious problems
that do not go away... they will keep popping back because they have not
been resolved... and by the year 2050 we will see a doubling of the Muslim
population in Denmark... that would not be a problem if we had a solution
for how to integrate them, but nowhere in Western Europe has a solution been
found".
Another new development was that for the first time, according to a report
in Jyllands Posten, Muslim voters were organized, in certain urban areas
listed by the government as ghettos. In Gellerup, in western Aarhus, an
electoral group was set up, which, in co-operation with a mosque and various
other associations, recommended that people vote for the two parties: the
center-left Det Radikale Venstre and the far left Enhedslisten. As a result,
in Gellerup, Det Radikale Venstre went from receiving 5.1% of the vote in
2015, to 34.2% in 2019. The same trend could be seen in other ghetto-areas,
such as Vollsmose, Tingbjerg and in Nørrebro, where Enhedslisten was also
popular. Both parties have a pro-immigration stance. Det Radikale Venstre,
for instance, wants to make it easier for refugees to gain permanent
residence in Denmark. The parties gained 8.6% and 6.9% of the votes
respectively, corresponding to 16 and 13 seats.
Immigration policy will be one of the main challenges for the Social
Democratic Party, as it attempts to form a government with the seats of Det
Radikale Venstre and Enhedslisten, in addition to the Socialist People's
Party. In their election campaign, the Social Democrats made it clear that
they wanted what they call a 'fair and realistic' immigration policy, with
the bulk of their policy focusing on how to reduce and control the influx of
refugees and migrants, including the use of reception centers outside of
Europe. In addition, their policy included making all stays for refugees in
Denmark temporary, and extending border controls and reforming the Schengen
cooperation so that individual countries decide when and how long they can
control their own borders. Their policy also backs sending rejected asylum
seekers home and tightening the laws in order to stop illegal migrants from
working in Denmark. Earlier this year, the Social Democrats voted for the
liberal-conservative government's stricter immigration policies.
That stance might make it difficult for the Social Democrats to form a
government with Det Radikale Venstre, which has said that it wants to ease
Denmark's current policies on immigration. Instead of focusing on sending
migrants and refugees home, Det Radikale Venstre wishes to focus on better
integration. Before the elections, the leader of the Social Democrats, Mette
Frederiksen, said that if she won, "The tight immigration policy, which is
set by a broad majority in the Folketing [the Danish parliament], is
fixed... there will be no easing of the immigration policy and there is no
party or party that can make an ultimatum on this".
It now remains to be seen whether Frederiksen will be able to keep her word
and still form a government.
Judith Bergman, a columnist, lawyer and political analyst, is a
Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com