AWILLIS957
2004-05-18 21:40:19 UTC
Do women talk differently to men?
Apparently, Jane Austen never wrote scenes of men talking alone together
because she didn't feel well-enough informed. Do the sexes talk differently
when alone together?
One good thing about Reality TV is that it offers the opportunity to eavesdrop
on members of the opposite sex talking to each other alone ( I couldn't care
less about the nudity; I'm a dialogue perv) - if being watched by millions of
viewers can be called being alone. Studies have shown that women interrupt far
less often than men. When they're alone with each other in a non-conflict
situation they appear, in Reality Shows at least, not so much to take turns to
speak as to create a combined voice, in an instinctive attempt to empathise
with each other and provide support. Take this exchange, which I jotted down
from last year's Big Brother:
STEPH
I totally feel that my nose is dirty all the time.
NUSH
I know.
But how can she know that? What is she saying, that she instinctively knows it?
That she's noticed Steph blowing her nose? That she herself has a runny nose,
because of the air-conditioning in the environment they share? Or that she just
shares a sense of ill-health? Here's another typical exchange:
STEPH
I just want to . . .
NUSH
Have a good time.
STEPH
It's because it's nominations.
NUSH
As well.
These women, who don't know each other well (so this isn't about established
intimacy) seem to be creating a mirroring improvisation, in which they seek to
merge into one.
First, I don't see how Nush can possibly know what Steph was about to say; even
so she finishes her sentence and isn't contradicted, as if the two of them are
allowing meanings to shift after utterance, to a compromise pooint between
them. Steph's next comment, about the nominations, seems to indicate that she
wasn't going to say what Nush thought she was going to say; and so Nush comes
out with this odd "as well" to vaguely tether the strands together. The
important thing is the establishing of a contact between them - the phatic
communion - not the content.
Do you take things like that into account while writing your dialogue?
Apparently, Jane Austen never wrote scenes of men talking alone together
because she didn't feel well-enough informed. Do the sexes talk differently
when alone together?
One good thing about Reality TV is that it offers the opportunity to eavesdrop
on members of the opposite sex talking to each other alone ( I couldn't care
less about the nudity; I'm a dialogue perv) - if being watched by millions of
viewers can be called being alone. Studies have shown that women interrupt far
less often than men. When they're alone with each other in a non-conflict
situation they appear, in Reality Shows at least, not so much to take turns to
speak as to create a combined voice, in an instinctive attempt to empathise
with each other and provide support. Take this exchange, which I jotted down
from last year's Big Brother:
STEPH
I totally feel that my nose is dirty all the time.
NUSH
I know.
But how can she know that? What is she saying, that she instinctively knows it?
That she's noticed Steph blowing her nose? That she herself has a runny nose,
because of the air-conditioning in the environment they share? Or that she just
shares a sense of ill-health? Here's another typical exchange:
STEPH
I just want to . . .
NUSH
Have a good time.
STEPH
It's because it's nominations.
NUSH
As well.
These women, who don't know each other well (so this isn't about established
intimacy) seem to be creating a mirroring improvisation, in which they seek to
merge into one.
First, I don't see how Nush can possibly know what Steph was about to say; even
so she finishes her sentence and isn't contradicted, as if the two of them are
allowing meanings to shift after utterance, to a compromise pooint between
them. Steph's next comment, about the nominations, seems to indicate that she
wasn't going to say what Nush thought she was going to say; and so Nush comes
out with this odd "as well" to vaguely tether the strands together. The
important thing is the establishing of a contact between them - the phatic
communion - not the content.
Do you take things like that into account while writing your dialogue?