Richard Hertz
2021-10-11 05:10:25 UTC
Relativists finally succeeded to introduce Einstein's 1911 proposal of gravity
affecting the behavior of electrons in atoms, forcing corrections on hyperfine
transitions within cesium atoms in atomic clocks. At least in Germany, and at
least theoretically.
--------------------- Excerpt from Einstein 1911 paper ------------------------------------
§ 3. Time and the Velocity of Light in the Gravitational Field
f the radiation emitted in the uniformly accelerated system K′ in S2 toward
S1 had the frequency f2 relative to the clock at S2, then, relative to S1, at
its arrival at S1 it no longer has the frequency f2 relative to an identical
clock at S1, but a greater frequency f1, such that, to a first approximation
(2) f1 = f2 . (1+γh/c²)
..............
(2a) f1 = f2 . (1+Φ/c²)
--------------------------------------------------- End of excerpt ------------------------------------
From (2a), is derived that Δf/f2 = Φ/c² = −G.Me/c². (1/Re - 1/Rs) , for gravitational shift, which Einstein applied to his "light-generator".
The definition of a second, established (BIPM 1998) as the base unit of
time for the International System of Units (SI) is:
https://www.bipm.org/en/si-base-units/second
-------------------------------------------------
The second, symbol s, is the SI unit of time. It is defined by taking the
fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency Δν_Cs, the unperturbed
ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium-133 atom, to
be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to 1/s.
--------------------------------------------------
This is very sub-atomic and specific, indeed.
Standard cesium clock has a typical relative frequency instability per day
about ± 10E-13, implying that it will keep time to within one second over
25,000 years. Improved versions of cesium fountain clock achieve, since
2011, accuracy within ± 10E-16. These new generation of Cs clocks can
last 25 million years before a second is lost (and life as we know is gone).
Now, the funny part when it comes to worldwide timekeeping by national
agencies, like NIST or USNO (USA), PTB (Germany), OP (France), NICT (Japan), SU (Russia), NTSC (China), etc. (all subrogated to BIMP), is that
keep the difference between the UTC (BIMP) below ± 10 nanoseconds.
However, as it's available at the German PTB site,
https://www.ptb.de/cms/en.html
TAI (Temps Atomique International), calculated by the International
Bureau for Weights and Measures (BIPM), as well as UTC (Coordinated
Universal Time), also kept as master source from BIPM, HAVE TO BE
ADJUSTED for Einstenian gravitational time dilatation.
This is because BIMP averages the time of about 400 atomic clocks from
50 different sites around the world, which are located at different heights
compared to the average ground level.
Excerpt from the German site:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the relativistic time dilatation caused by the earth's gravitational potential, the SI second could only be realised by atomic clocks at sea level if no corrections were applied.
In order to compensate for the gravitational time dilatation, the rates of atomic clocks located at an altitude h above sea level are corrected by a relative amount of -1.09.10E-16 (h/m).
The PTB clocks for example are located at heights of h = 78 until 79 m
so that the relative rate correction is about -8.6.10E-15. This takes into
account that the atomic second intervals realised by the PTB clocks are
shorter by 8.6.10E-15 than the SI second produced by a caesium clock
located on the geoid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, it doesn't matter that national timekeepers have best values for
differences around ± 10E-9 sec (at best) between them, or that best
values for national timekeeping accuracy/day are in the order of
± 10E-13 to ± 10E-16, which has a dispersion between 10,000:1 and
1,000,000:1 depending on how modern are their atomic clocks.
EVERY SINGLE atomic clock in the world SHOULD BE corrected by a
relative amount of -1.09.10E-16 (h/m), depending on the height above
the average ground level for the geode that Earth is.
Then, relativists have succeeded bringing GR within the atom, and the
genial Einstein predicted this by 1911, when nor he neither any other
physicist HAD A FVCKING IDEA of what an atom was and, much less,
about hyperfine transitions 30 years before even anyone started thinking
about them.
And, what is more RIDICULOUS, is that the effect is more than 10,000
below any perceived difference within atomic clocks that BIMP control.
I wonder why such level of corrections (1.09.10E-16 . h) are needed, and
how come a 110 crazy idea has entered into the quantum world officially.
If it's not to perpetuate Einstein's role in modern physics, I don't know
what it is. Any arbitrary perturbation of NATURE has a greater impact
that 10E-16 . h, even when sites that host atomic clocks are stabilized
for temperature, humidity and shielded against electromagnetic sources.
I bet that a fat man coming into any of those rooms influence the clocks
more than this. Not to mention earthquakes, continental drift, Moon's
erratic orbits, planet's alineation, Cosmic Radiation showers, magnetic poles shifting, etc.
Einsteinian apology at its best.
affecting the behavior of electrons in atoms, forcing corrections on hyperfine
transitions within cesium atoms in atomic clocks. At least in Germany, and at
least theoretically.
--------------------- Excerpt from Einstein 1911 paper ------------------------------------
§ 3. Time and the Velocity of Light in the Gravitational Field
f the radiation emitted in the uniformly accelerated system K′ in S2 toward
S1 had the frequency f2 relative to the clock at S2, then, relative to S1, at
its arrival at S1 it no longer has the frequency f2 relative to an identical
clock at S1, but a greater frequency f1, such that, to a first approximation
(2) f1 = f2 . (1+γh/c²)
..............
(2a) f1 = f2 . (1+Φ/c²)
--------------------------------------------------- End of excerpt ------------------------------------
From (2a), is derived that Δf/f2 = Φ/c² = −G.Me/c². (1/Re - 1/Rs) , for gravitational shift, which Einstein applied to his "light-generator".
The definition of a second, established (BIPM 1998) as the base unit of
time for the International System of Units (SI) is:
https://www.bipm.org/en/si-base-units/second
-------------------------------------------------
The second, symbol s, is the SI unit of time. It is defined by taking the
fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency Δν_Cs, the unperturbed
ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium-133 atom, to
be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to 1/s.
--------------------------------------------------
This is very sub-atomic and specific, indeed.
Standard cesium clock has a typical relative frequency instability per day
about ± 10E-13, implying that it will keep time to within one second over
25,000 years. Improved versions of cesium fountain clock achieve, since
2011, accuracy within ± 10E-16. These new generation of Cs clocks can
last 25 million years before a second is lost (and life as we know is gone).
Now, the funny part when it comes to worldwide timekeeping by national
agencies, like NIST or USNO (USA), PTB (Germany), OP (France), NICT (Japan), SU (Russia), NTSC (China), etc. (all subrogated to BIMP), is that
keep the difference between the UTC (BIMP) below ± 10 nanoseconds.
However, as it's available at the German PTB site,
https://www.ptb.de/cms/en.html
TAI (Temps Atomique International), calculated by the International
Bureau for Weights and Measures (BIPM), as well as UTC (Coordinated
Universal Time), also kept as master source from BIPM, HAVE TO BE
ADJUSTED for Einstenian gravitational time dilatation.
This is because BIMP averages the time of about 400 atomic clocks from
50 different sites around the world, which are located at different heights
compared to the average ground level.
Excerpt from the German site:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the relativistic time dilatation caused by the earth's gravitational potential, the SI second could only be realised by atomic clocks at sea level if no corrections were applied.
In order to compensate for the gravitational time dilatation, the rates of atomic clocks located at an altitude h above sea level are corrected by a relative amount of -1.09.10E-16 (h/m).
The PTB clocks for example are located at heights of h = 78 until 79 m
so that the relative rate correction is about -8.6.10E-15. This takes into
account that the atomic second intervals realised by the PTB clocks are
shorter by 8.6.10E-15 than the SI second produced by a caesium clock
located on the geoid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, it doesn't matter that national timekeepers have best values for
differences around ± 10E-9 sec (at best) between them, or that best
values for national timekeeping accuracy/day are in the order of
± 10E-13 to ± 10E-16, which has a dispersion between 10,000:1 and
1,000,000:1 depending on how modern are their atomic clocks.
EVERY SINGLE atomic clock in the world SHOULD BE corrected by a
relative amount of -1.09.10E-16 (h/m), depending on the height above
the average ground level for the geode that Earth is.
Then, relativists have succeeded bringing GR within the atom, and the
genial Einstein predicted this by 1911, when nor he neither any other
physicist HAD A FVCKING IDEA of what an atom was and, much less,
about hyperfine transitions 30 years before even anyone started thinking
about them.
And, what is more RIDICULOUS, is that the effect is more than 10,000
below any perceived difference within atomic clocks that BIMP control.
I wonder why such level of corrections (1.09.10E-16 . h) are needed, and
how come a 110 crazy idea has entered into the quantum world officially.
If it's not to perpetuate Einstein's role in modern physics, I don't know
what it is. Any arbitrary perturbation of NATURE has a greater impact
that 10E-16 . h, even when sites that host atomic clocks are stabilized
for temperature, humidity and shielded against electromagnetic sources.
I bet that a fat man coming into any of those rooms influence the clocks
more than this. Not to mention earthquakes, continental drift, Moon's
erratic orbits, planet's alineation, Cosmic Radiation showers, magnetic poles shifting, etc.
Einsteinian apology at its best.