b***@m.nu
2018-09-13 09:02:42 UTC
The main problem that I have is the "Penzias and Wilsons Persistent
Noise" is persistent on earth, I would even go so far as to say it is
persistent in this solar system and possibly even this galaxy, but for
anyone at all to say that it is a universal constant is a bold step to
that person being classified as a complete idiot.
Another problem I have is where is the center of the universe? Lets
say that the universe first started expanding 13.8 bya and has not
stopped expanding since. The galaxies at the center or at least near
the center at that time will be billions of light years from the
actual center any gas, dust and/or any matter would have long since
expanded billions of years from that center. So lets say that there
was a black hole there now from the large amount of matter that was
released there in the center. It would be so large and so bright you
would think someone would have seen it by now. If not that then there
should be about at least a 13 billion LY gap between that galaxy and
any the nearest galaxies which would be noticeable even with out
technology. Lets say there is a 10 by gap then we could not see the
center because it would be too far but then the age of the universe
would have to be altered because then where did that extra space come
from? ? All this would perhaps be correct if a galaxy of stars formed
around the initial black hole immediately after the black hole
formed. But matter did not form right away and it took even longer for
stars and other stellar thing to form so the very large black hole
would possibly be a naked singularity. There would be no way to detect
this visually but it would be giving off a "very loud" detectable
signature that possibly could be detected.
These are the reasons why the big bang theory is not a good enough
explanation. This is also why the numbers that are supposed to be
representative of the age of the universe are totally incorrect and
quite frankly just plain stupid. The universe is AT least twice the
age of the current size and that is just common sense
These are the reasons why the big bang theory is not a good enough
explanation. This is also why the numbers that are supposed to be
representative of the age of the universe are totally incorrect and
quite frankly just plain stupid. The universe is AT least twice the
age of the current size and that is just common sense.
Noise" is persistent on earth, I would even go so far as to say it is
persistent in this solar system and possibly even this galaxy, but for
anyone at all to say that it is a universal constant is a bold step to
that person being classified as a complete idiot.
Another problem I have is where is the center of the universe? Lets
say that the universe first started expanding 13.8 bya and has not
stopped expanding since. The galaxies at the center or at least near
the center at that time will be billions of light years from the
actual center any gas, dust and/or any matter would have long since
expanded billions of years from that center. So lets say that there
was a black hole there now from the large amount of matter that was
released there in the center. It would be so large and so bright you
would think someone would have seen it by now. If not that then there
should be about at least a 13 billion LY gap between that galaxy and
any the nearest galaxies which would be noticeable even with out
technology. Lets say there is a 10 by gap then we could not see the
center because it would be too far but then the age of the universe
would have to be altered because then where did that extra space come
from? ? All this would perhaps be correct if a galaxy of stars formed
around the initial black hole immediately after the black hole
formed. But matter did not form right away and it took even longer for
stars and other stellar thing to form so the very large black hole
would possibly be a naked singularity. There would be no way to detect
this visually but it would be giving off a "very loud" detectable
signature that possibly could be detected.
These are the reasons why the big bang theory is not a good enough
explanation. This is also why the numbers that are supposed to be
representative of the age of the universe are totally incorrect and
quite frankly just plain stupid. The universe is AT least twice the
age of the current size and that is just common sense
These are the reasons why the big bang theory is not a good enough
explanation. This is also why the numbers that are supposed to be
representative of the age of the universe are totally incorrect and
quite frankly just plain stupid. The universe is AT least twice the
age of the current size and that is just common sense.