AlleyCat
2018-04-05 00:54:44 UTC
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 14:21:10 -0700 (PDT), young and angry says...
HE'S the one who cried to Fox's sponsors, dumb ass.
SHE didn't say a fucking thing to be considered a snowflake like you
crying and whining liberals, who cried when Hitlery lost.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
When you lose a liberal newspaper, you lose it all.
Have you ever wondered why these idiots are called "survivors"?
I'm so sick and tired of EVERYONE that was just AT the school, being
called a "survivor". Was the chicken-shit school "resource officer" EVER
called a survivor?
Were the first responders EVER called survivors? Are ANY first responders
ever called survivors, if they DON'T get killed by their criminal
attackers? No.
I LIVE in Florida... am "I" a "survivor"? I DO sympathize with those who
actually DID survive, either having been pointed at, or being shot at by
Cruz, but NOT those simply just AT the school at the time. The media uses
the term to draw immediate sympathy for those who WEREN'T even pointed at
by Cruz, but are now mouth-pieces for those who are against LAWFUL gun
ownership. START PUTTING CRAZIES BACK IN ASYLUMS!!
=====
Commentary: Free Speech Takes Another Hit From Thin-Skinned Liberals
David Hogg, a "survivor" of the school shooting at Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School, speaks at the March For Our Lives in Washington,
D.C., on March 24, 2018. (Jim Lo Scalzo / EPA-EFE/REX/Shuttershock)
Cal ThomasTribune Content Agency
http://www.trbimg.com/img-5ac50eb8/turbine/ct-1522863796-xr7mlq11wh-snap-
image/750/750x422
What a pansy. Have you seen his arms? Twigs. Must play with the girls
during P.E..
Fox News host Laura Ingraham has apologized, as has the network, for
nothing more serious than her tweet: "David Hogg rejected by four colleges
to which he applied and whines about it. (Dinged by UCLA with a 4.1 GPA .
totally predictable given acceptance rates.)" Hogg actually has a 4.2
grade-point average.
The 17-year-old Hogg, a "survivor" of the Feb. 14 mass shooting at Marjory
Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., is the new face of the
anti-gun movement, having achieved overnight victim status, reserved,
apparently, only for those on the left, which supposedly insulates him
from criticism.
Hogg rejected Ingraham's apology and called her a "bully." Whatever
happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never
harm me"? If Hogg thinks he is being bullied by Ingraham, how would he
react to a real bully, the kind who punches you in the face?
Instead of adopting a "poor me" stance, Hogg should have asked to appear
on Ingraham's show, where the two could have debated the issues. He didn't
make this request; instead he swiped at Ingraham in the media. Isn't there
something a little cowardly about that?
I first met Laura Ingraham in the early '80s when she was a student at
Dartmouth College. Even then she was smart, articulate and opinionated.
She and two male colleagues got into a battle with the college
administration over a student publication called "The Dartmouth Review."
The conservative campus newspaper often satirized the growing political
correctness movement, including attempts by the school to remove its
Native American mascot.
Laura is a kind, compassionate woman and a practicing Roman Catholic. She
is a single mother of three adopted children who might have experienced a
far different life without her. She is also a breast cancer survivor.
The left says things far worse than what she tweeted about David Hogg. My
hate mail makes her remarks seem tame by comparison, but I don't demand
apologies. I can take it.
Speaking of comparisons, recall what Joy Behar said on ABC's "The View"
about Vice President Mike Pence's Christian faith. She mocked his beliefs
and suggested they might reflect a mental illness.
Apparently under similar pressure from ABC, Behar apologized on the air
and went further, calling the vice president and apologizing to him
directly, which he graciously accepted.
In an interview with The Outline, Hogg spewed the worst profanities and
insulted parents, who he thinks are stupid because they are not fluent in
social media. Where is parental discipline when it's needed most? If he
were my kid and behaved as he does, he'd be grounded. If the behavior
continued, he'd have to find somewhere else to live.
Some sponsors have pulled their commercials from Ingraham's show, as some
did after Behar's insulting remark.
This is the wrong approach. Instead of boycotts and threats, how about
celebrating the First Amendment by encouraging people to say what they
think? Then viewers can decide whether to "buy" what a program is selling
or change channels. That was what the left said to do in the 1980s when
conservatives were upset by some TV programming. "If you don't like it,
change the channel," they said. If that was an option then, why isn't it
an option now?
Debate is better than boycotts and pressure, egged on by groups that raise
funds from this type of controversy. The country and its politics would
benefit from genuine debate, rather than attempts to silence people with
whom we might disagree.
Let David Hogg speak his immature mind and let Laura Ingraham have her
say. And then let them debate each other, assuming Hogg doesn't want to
adopt another role, that of coward.
The anti-Trump resistance should stop bringing knives to a gunfight
So, you want them to bring a gun? How pro-gun of you.Poor Laura Ingraham, the delicate snowflake.
Noooo... the snowflake is the Hogg who couldn't take being called wrong...HE'S the one who cried to Fox's sponsors, dumb ass.
SHE didn't say a fucking thing to be considered a snowflake like you
crying and whining liberals, who cried when Hitlery lost.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
When you lose a liberal newspaper, you lose it all.
Have you ever wondered why these idiots are called "survivors"?
I'm so sick and tired of EVERYONE that was just AT the school, being
called a "survivor". Was the chicken-shit school "resource officer" EVER
called a survivor?
Were the first responders EVER called survivors? Are ANY first responders
ever called survivors, if they DON'T get killed by their criminal
attackers? No.
I LIVE in Florida... am "I" a "survivor"? I DO sympathize with those who
actually DID survive, either having been pointed at, or being shot at by
Cruz, but NOT those simply just AT the school at the time. The media uses
the term to draw immediate sympathy for those who WEREN'T even pointed at
by Cruz, but are now mouth-pieces for those who are against LAWFUL gun
ownership. START PUTTING CRAZIES BACK IN ASYLUMS!!
=====
Commentary: Free Speech Takes Another Hit From Thin-Skinned Liberals
David Hogg, a "survivor" of the school shooting at Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School, speaks at the March For Our Lives in Washington,
D.C., on March 24, 2018. (Jim Lo Scalzo / EPA-EFE/REX/Shuttershock)
Cal ThomasTribune Content Agency
http://www.trbimg.com/img-5ac50eb8/turbine/ct-1522863796-xr7mlq11wh-snap-
image/750/750x422
What a pansy. Have you seen his arms? Twigs. Must play with the girls
during P.E..
Fox News host Laura Ingraham has apologized, as has the network, for
nothing more serious than her tweet: "David Hogg rejected by four colleges
to which he applied and whines about it. (Dinged by UCLA with a 4.1 GPA .
totally predictable given acceptance rates.)" Hogg actually has a 4.2
grade-point average.
The 17-year-old Hogg, a "survivor" of the Feb. 14 mass shooting at Marjory
Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., is the new face of the
anti-gun movement, having achieved overnight victim status, reserved,
apparently, only for those on the left, which supposedly insulates him
from criticism.
Hogg rejected Ingraham's apology and called her a "bully." Whatever
happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never
harm me"? If Hogg thinks he is being bullied by Ingraham, how would he
react to a real bully, the kind who punches you in the face?
Instead of adopting a "poor me" stance, Hogg should have asked to appear
on Ingraham's show, where the two could have debated the issues. He didn't
make this request; instead he swiped at Ingraham in the media. Isn't there
something a little cowardly about that?
I first met Laura Ingraham in the early '80s when she was a student at
Dartmouth College. Even then she was smart, articulate and opinionated.
She and two male colleagues got into a battle with the college
administration over a student publication called "The Dartmouth Review."
The conservative campus newspaper often satirized the growing political
correctness movement, including attempts by the school to remove its
Native American mascot.
Laura is a kind, compassionate woman and a practicing Roman Catholic. She
is a single mother of three adopted children who might have experienced a
far different life without her. She is also a breast cancer survivor.
The left says things far worse than what she tweeted about David Hogg. My
hate mail makes her remarks seem tame by comparison, but I don't demand
apologies. I can take it.
Speaking of comparisons, recall what Joy Behar said on ABC's "The View"
about Vice President Mike Pence's Christian faith. She mocked his beliefs
and suggested they might reflect a mental illness.
Apparently under similar pressure from ABC, Behar apologized on the air
and went further, calling the vice president and apologizing to him
directly, which he graciously accepted.
In an interview with The Outline, Hogg spewed the worst profanities and
insulted parents, who he thinks are stupid because they are not fluent in
social media. Where is parental discipline when it's needed most? If he
were my kid and behaved as he does, he'd be grounded. If the behavior
continued, he'd have to find somewhere else to live.
Some sponsors have pulled their commercials from Ingraham's show, as some
did after Behar's insulting remark.
This is the wrong approach. Instead of boycotts and threats, how about
celebrating the First Amendment by encouraging people to say what they
think? Then viewers can decide whether to "buy" what a program is selling
or change channels. That was what the left said to do in the 1980s when
conservatives were upset by some TV programming. "If you don't like it,
change the channel," they said. If that was an option then, why isn't it
an option now?
Debate is better than boycotts and pressure, egged on by groups that raise
funds from this type of controversy. The country and its politics would
benefit from genuine debate, rather than attempts to silence people with
whom we might disagree.
Let David Hogg speak his immature mind and let Laura Ingraham have her
say. And then let them debate each other, assuming Hogg doesn't want to
adopt another role, that of coward.
--
Wanna make a Conservative mad? Tell him a lie.
Wanna make a Liberal mad? Tell him the truth.
Wanna make a Conservative mad? Tell him a lie.
Wanna make a Liberal mad? Tell him the truth.