Post by MattbPost by SnitPost by MattbPost by TedPost by MattbPost by SnitPost by MattbPost by SnitPost by SnitPost by SnitOn 12/17/18 4:35 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth -
Post by Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScottyRecord $135 billion a year for illegal immigration, average $8,075
each, $25,000 in NY
A $5 BILLION dollar wall would be cheap if it only stopped half of them.
Half of who them?
Post by Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScottyIf it stops them all then it would have paid for ObamaCare and it might
NOT have collapsed. But the Democrats are GREEDY and they want it all
they want all the future Democrats flooding over the border and they
wanted the FREE HEALTH CARE and there was no way to pay for both.....
Future Democrats?
And we cannot afford to NOT have universal health care. NOT having it
costs us billions.
Post by Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScottyIf you are a Democrat you can blame HARRY REED AND NANCY PELOSI and
SCHUMER and OBAMA AND HILLARY for the failure of OBAMACARE because they
underfunded it and over loaded it with new people that can't pay for
their medical care flooding over the border.
So kill it and move to universal health care... saving us billions.
Post by Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScottyI have to chuckle about the stupidity of the Democrats, to actually try
to stop the wall and allow ObamaCare to be over whelmed and fail because
they were just plain greedy and it's typical of Democrats they're all
greedy.
How emotional of you.
Klaus and MattB responded to note they find no flaw in what I say ? and it
pisses them off so badly they cannot control their lashing out.
MattB responded by trying to change the topic. Not biting.
MattB responded by trying to change the topic from his bigoted crap.
Why do I need control stating the truth. You and your kind are
worthless much like Merkel.
I enjoy watching you snowflakes melt.
You would need to control the truth to have it match your bigoted crap,
otherwise you lied.
What do you mean by "control the truth"? Do you mean control the
media? Truth is truth outside of media control.
Post by SnitHint: you lied. And now you are in tantrum mode. Amuse me more to keep
getting so much attention.
The Snit snowflake is melting. His kind melt easily.
Snit seems a bit different. I don't think he's as closed-minded as the rest
of the pseudo-left here, regardless of the propaganda he's still parroting.
He is deceptive in how he post. I would like to know what he meant by
"You would need to control the truth". How does one "control the
truth".
Show the context. I do not recall ever saying that and it certainly does
not represent my view.
But it is fair to ask me, just as I ask you about your views on climate
change. Your response is to say I am wrong about your view but not say how.
Where in this post are we talking about "climate change"?
I am noting how we should respond when someone says we said something.
You claim I said "You would need to control the truth". I think you made
that up, but maybe it is grossly out of context or something. Fine.
Instead of freaking out over you saying it I explained my view on
"truth" and our acceptance of it (as opposed to control of it, whatever
that means).
But look at what happens when I note things YOU have said. You freak out
and say you will not even discuss it. You call me names and spew
insults. You act like a child.
Even with that I give you chance after chance. Here the current list of
the lies you told about climate change. If you think I am misstating
your view on any of these by all means clarify. I would love to see you
act in such a mature way:
1) Those who accept the science cite only scientists with the
most extreme views
2) Mainstream scientific opinion varies quite a bit about
how much humans contribute to climate change. Other times
you insist the amount is known but "minuscule".
3) It is trending warmer but that isn't necessarily bad nor is it
certain the trend will continue.
4) [We] pretend we can control the climate.
5) Stopping or even reducing the change caused by humans is impossible.
6) The alternative is a plunge into the next glaciation period.
(When faced with your own lie there even you responded: "That's not an
alternative, it's a possibility. Have a fifth grader explain the
difference between those two.")
7) The IPCC reports are not well based on scientific evidence, and
is filled with unsupported "doom-and-gloom prophecies".
8) The current sea level rise is only "slightly influenced by
human activity".
9) Climate models ignore natural activity and focus only on
human factors.
10) Scientists try to draw significance from very short term
data and never look at the big picture.
11) There are so many other factors that drive climate which we can't
control or predict it.
12) Those who accept the science thing "we can dial up whatever
climate we choose".
13) Climate scientists only look at the negative effects of a
warmer climate while ignoring the positives.
These are all complete fabrications on your part. The closest you will
ever get is with #2 where there is SOME level of disagreement in the
models, but to claim they are as different as you push is insanely wrong.
Post by MattbPost by SnitWith truth we should try to understand it the best we can. The best way to
do so is through science, at least in general, and for non-personal
questions.
But not sure what you mean by controlling truth.
I have no idea why you brought that up or what you meant by it.
So you think I said it but cannot recall or find what context, and do
not even know what was meant.
I think you are simply wrong that I ever said it... but in case I did,
or even if I did not, elsewhere I went into quite some detail on my
views on the topic you claimed I was wrong about.
Happy to dig it up and quote it for you if needed.
And, fact it, you will NOT be that generous in terms of your ideas I
have shown to you. You will dodge them again. You will blame me.
This is completely predictable.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
http://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308