It's the part I've underlined, Aaron: FOSS *is* about anarchy, and anarchy is about "the creation of a society of free and
equal members based on a harmony of interests and the voluntary
participation of everybody in carrying out social responsibilities." In other words, FOSS is not about "marketing", "hype", "vaporware", "competition", "leaders", "experts", "producers", "consumers" et al. It's a different vision about how to do things, to live in society, to make software and hardware and the like. It's a totally different paradigm, so I guess it's no surprise you missed my point...
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Aaron Newcomb <***@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Aaron Newcomb <***@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Lumiera] New Open Source Video Editor
To: "General Discussion about Lumiera" <***@lists.lumiera.org>
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 4:15 PM
Thanks for sharing your view of anarchy, but other than that I am afraid I missed your point. Sorry.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Hudson Luce <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now you really stuck your foot in it, Aaron. Enrico Malatesta, in "Anarchy"(http://theanarchistlibrary.org/anarchy-0):
"Anarchists, including this writer, have used the word State, and
still do, to mean the sum total of the political, legislative,
judiciary, military and financial institutions through which the
management of their own affairs, the control over their personal
behaviour, the responsibility for their personal safety, are taken away
from the people and entrusted to others who, by usurpation or
delegation, are vested with the powers to make the laws for everything
and everybody, and to oblige the people to observe them, if need be, by
the use of collective force. In this sense the word State means government, or to put it another
way, it is the impersonal abstract expression of that state of affairs,
personified by government: and therefore the terms abolition of the
State, Society without the State, etc., describe exactly the concept
which anarchists seek to express, of the destruction of all political
order based on authority, and the creation of a society of free and
equal members based on a harmony of interests and the voluntary
participation of everybody in carrying out social responsibilities."
Anarchy does not mean chaos, nor disorder: "[T]he word anarchy was universally used in the sense of disorder and
confusion; and it is to this day used in that sense by the uninformed
as well as by political opponents with an interest in distorting the
truth. ... The existence of this prejudice and its influence on the publicâs
definition of the word anarchy, is easily explained. Man, like all
living beings, adapts and accustoms himself to the conditions under
which he lives, and passes on acquired habits. Thus, having being born
and bred in bondage, when the descendants of a long line of slaves
started to think, they believed that slavery was an essential condition
of life, and freedom seemed impossible to them. Similarly, workers who
for centuries were obliged, and therefore accustomed, to depend for
work, that is bread, on the goodwill of the master, and to see their
lives always at the mercy of the owners of the land and of capital,
ended by believing that it is the master who feeds them, and
ingenuously ask one how would it be possible to live if there were no
masters."
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Aaron Newcomb <***@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Aaron Newcomb <***@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Lumiera] New Open Source Video Editor
To: "General Discussion about Lumiera" <***@lists.lumiera.org>
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 3:35 PM
Sounds like we are getting hung up in semantics for the most part. I
sincerely hope your view of FOSS as anarchy is not shared by the wider
community. Otherwise we are all in trouble.
Cheers!
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Burkhard Plaum
was impossible I just said it was very
Post by Burkhard PlaumPost by Aaron Newcombunlikely. Also, a lot of the opinion on this point depends on your
definition of "marketing". Here is the dictionary.com definition ...
"the total of activities involved in the transfer of goods from the
producer or seller to the consumer or buyer, including advertising,
shipping, storing, and selling." The only thing different in this case
is that we are not selling anything. We are giving it away.
Ok, for me marketing has a purely commercial meaning.
Post by Aaron NewcombPost by Burkhard Plaumffmpeg makes hardly any marketing and has become
the defacto standard codec library.
libquicktime makes *zero* marketing and is used in a number of
professional movie production studios.
1) These libraries work well. 2) People talk about them (and the
projects that use them) in blogs, word of mouth, whatever. And 3) more
Post by Burkhard PlaumPost by Aaron Newcombpeople use them.
#2 above is still part of the marketing process even though it may
have happened organically in these cases.
Yes, and that's the best and most efficient way to make a project popular..
For you it's a kind of marketing, I would call it word-of-mouth propaganda.
The difference is, that the independent opinion of users is much more
credible than what developers (or other people connected to a project) say.
And for that you need (see your point 1) something that works well in the
first place (and programmers who write it).
Post by Aaron NewcombPost by Burkhard PlaumCinelerra had little else than a website and has a large user community
by now.
Wow. I really have to disagree here. For myself I have done video
tutorials, Floss Weekly episodes, blog
posts and presentations at
Post by Burkhard PlaumYes, but you are not connected to the original cinelerra project. I know
that, because it's a one-man project. What you do (and it's good that you
do it) is no marketing for me.
Post by Aaron NewcombAlthough sometimes hard to measure, I would like to think
that at least some part of that large community (and that of Lumiera
for that matter) have come as a result of these "marketing" efforts on
my part.
How many developers did you recruit?
[...]
Post by Aaron NewcombWrong for the above reasons. Unfortunately many in the FOSS community
share your opinions and this needs to change.
It shouldn't change and it won't. Remember the 'F' in FOSS stands for
freedom. As soon as you want people to change their opinion, the basic
principle is lost.
My
personal view of FOSS is that it's pure anarchy with all pros and
Post by Burkhard Plaumcons. Established rules from the corporate/business world simply don't apply
here. If you look at the motivations people have for working on FOSS
projects (and also at the projects temselves), you'll find an extremely
wide variety. People who don't like that diversity, should stay away.
People who want the community to develop is a certain direction, haven't
understood what freedom means. They should rather become politicians.
Burkhard
_______________________________________________
Lumiera mailing list
http://lists.lumiera.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lumiera
http://lumiera.org/donations.html
--
Thanks,
Aaron Newcomb
http://www.thesourceshow.org
_______________________________________________
Lumiera mailing list
***@lists.lumiera.org
http://lists.lumiera.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lumiera
http://lumiera.org/donations.html
_______________________________________________
Lumiera mailing list
***@lists.lumiera.org
http://lists.lumiera.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lumiera
http://lumiera.org/donations.html
--
Thanks,
Aaron Newcomb
http://www.thesourceshow.org
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----