Discussion:
U.S. Navy Nightmare: The Chinese Fleet Doesn't Have 300 Ships, It Has 650 (Was: Af/Pak & Other News (1/30/2019))
(too old to reply)
Byker
2019-01-31 22:42:34 UTC
Permalink
U.S. Navy Nightmare: The Chinese Fleet Doesn't Have 300 Ships, It Has
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy-nightmare-chinese-fleet-doesnt-have-300-ships-it-has-650-42822
Sounds like China's navy is trying to repeat the mammoth waves of men
attacks its Army used in Korea except with ships.
Sounds like they want to supply us with lots of targets...
w***@yahoo.com.sg
2019-02-01 00:16:00 UTC
Permalink
US carriers in the South China Sea make very nice targets -- big and lumbering. When faced with difficulties, Americans masturbate.

Wakalukong
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 00:30:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
Sounds like they want to supply us with lots of targets...
There will be lots of targets for both sides.
and
There will be many deaths on both sides.
Andrew Swallow
2019-02-01 01:07:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
U.S. Navy Nightmare: The Chinese Fleet Doesn't Have 300 Ships, It Has
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy-nightmare-chinese-fleet-doesnt-have-300-ships-it-has-650-42822
Sounds like China's navy is trying to repeat the mammoth waves of men
attacks its Army used in Korea except with ships.
Sounds like they want to supply us with lots of targets...
The US Navy will need a large number of missiles to hit those targets.

They may play 'Find the Queen' games to trick the USA in to sending its
capital warships against the water cannons whilst their capital ships
sneak in.
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 01:15:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew Swallow
Post by Byker
U.S. Navy Nightmare: The Chinese Fleet Doesn't Have 300 Ships, It Has
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy-nightmare-chinese-fleet-doesnt-have-300-ships-it-has-650-42822
Sounds like China's navy is trying to repeat the mammoth waves of men
attacks its Army used in Korea except with ships.
Sounds like they want to supply us with lots of targets...
The US Navy will need a large number of missiles to hit those targets.
They may play 'Find the Queen' games to trick the USA in to sending its
capital warships against the water cannons whilst their capital ships
sneak in.
No need to play "Find the queen" games.
China has hypersonic weapons, railguns,...
whie we still experimenting the same weapons...
We can only brag while China need not brag...
Byker
2019-02-01 01:19:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew Swallow
Post by Byker
U.S. Navy Nightmare: The Chinese Fleet Doesn't Have 300 Ships, It Has
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy-nightmare-chinese-fleet-doesnt-have-300-ships-it-has-650-42822
Sounds like China's navy is trying to repeat the mammoth waves of men
attacks its Army used in Korea except with ships.
Sounds like they want to supply us with lots of targets...
The US Navy will need a large number of missiles to hit those targets.
Then we'll just crank up production.

And who says the Navy will be the only ones launching them?
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 01:29:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
Post by Andrew Swallow
Post by Byker
U.S. Navy Nightmare: The Chinese Fleet Doesn't Have 300 Ships, It Has
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy-nightmare-chinese-fleet-doesnt-have-300-ships-it-has-650-42822
Sounds like China's navy is trying to repeat the mammoth waves of men
attacks its Army used in Korea except with ships.
Sounds like they want to supply us with lots of targets...
The US Navy will need a large number of missiles to hit those targets.
Then we'll just crank up production.
Crank up production???? by lazy Americans????? don't make people laugh.
Post by Byker
And who says the Navy will be the only ones launching them?
America still uses WWII technology weapons while China has much more advanced weapons... Do some research for yourself.
Byker
2019-02-01 01:39:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew Swallow
They may play 'Find the Queen' games to trick the USA in to sending its
capital warships against the water cannons whilst their capital ships
sneak in.
And when one or more of our capital ships are sent to the bottom, Charlie
Chan will wish to God his country had never advanced beyond the Qing
dynasty.

You may have noticed by now that YouTube is FULL of robo-voiced slide-show
"news" videos bragging about "invincible" the Chinese Army/Navy/Air Force
is, and how the U.S. will turn tail and run when a CVN or two is sunk:
https://tinyurl.com/y7kel6q3

Just keep thinking that way, Chinkos. JUST KEEP THINKING THAT WAY.

China sinking an aircraft carrier is not just one ship. They would pretty
much have to destroy the entire task force too. So 10,000 dead, a dozen
warships sunk, and they think we're not going to respond? First, we’re going
to turn all the lights off in China. Then we’ll dust off the war plans we’ve
been working on for the last forty years and update it. Rest assured there
are senior officers at the Pentagon who has been tasked with planning just
such a strategy if we need one.

No one even thinks about invading China. All we need do is trash their
infrastructure to push them back into the Middle Ages, and most likely it
wouldn't require nukes...
w***@yahoo.com.sg
2019-02-01 01:45:45 UTC
Permalink
See, Americans "solve" their problems by masturbating. The Chinese just get down to clear thinking and hard work.

Wakalukong
Jesus Christ is a WHITE RACE monopoly Power
2019-02-01 03:02:07 UTC
Permalink
CHINA will build 20 000 mini subs

like those in TAIWAN
Jesus Christ is a WHITE RACE monopoly Power
2019-02-01 06:18:16 UTC
Permalink
CHINESE have the manpower to control 20 000 mini subs with short range missikes to rule
South China Sea and
NEW SOUTH CHINA MALAYSIA
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 16:39:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jesus Christ is a WHITE RACE monopoly Power
CHINA will build 20 000 mini subs
like those in TAIWAN
Mini-subs are useless...
Japan sent 5 mini-subs to Pearl Harbor.
None survived, and they did no damage...
Byker
2019-02-01 09:52:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
China sinking an aircraft carrier is not just one ship. They would pretty
much have to destroy the entire task force too.
Why?
The whole POINT of a CVBG is to protect the carrier(s). Take those out,
and the task force (after finishing picking up sailors from life rafts)
can shoot off their Tomahawks and head home.
Right. Clear the seas for the air onslaught against the Chinese mainland
from every air base in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. In the meantime, our
Boomers will be punching in their nuclear codes, standing by for launch
orders...
w***@yahoo.com.sg
2019-02-01 09:59:39 UTC
Permalink
Endless masturbation. And Americans love to do this when faced with adversity.

Wakalukong
Byker
2019-02-01 14:19:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
Right. Clear the seas for the air onslaught against the Chinese mainland
from every air base in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. In the meantime, our
Boomers will be punching in their nuclear codes, standing by for launch
orders...
That's not how the nuclear launch authorisation process works...
That's what you've been led to believe.

Let's pretend we're Herman Kahn and think about the unthinkable:

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/china/Book2006.pdf
https://arretsurinfo.ch/any-war-with-china-will-be-a-nuclear-war/
https://carnegieendowment.org/files/ChineseNuclearThinking_Final.pdf
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-10-15/beijings-nuclear-option

Taken from a Chinese source: 20 American cities most likely to be targeted
by Chinese ICBMs:

New York City, New York
Los Angeles, California
Chicago, Illinois
Houston, Texas
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Phoenix, Arizona
San Antonio, Texas
San Diego, California
San Francisco, California
San Jose, California
Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas
Austin, Texas
Seattle, Washington
Columbus, Ohio
Charlotte, North Carolina
Detroit, Michigan
El Paso, Texas
Memphis, Tennessee
Jacksonville, Florida
Phoenix, Arizona

By striking these cities with single 3 MT warheads, they'd kill about 20
million Americans, some 6% of our population. They'd basically cripple the
United States economically if they targeted these cities. We'd definitely be
"down" but NOT "out".

Since the Chinese lack enough warheads to take out all our missile silos and
military bases, apparently they prefer to hold our population centers
hostage. Note the curious absence of Washington, D.C. Why spare the U.S.
capitol? They think they'll need to keep it for peace negotiations (!).

Since they would target our population centers, I'm assuming we'd target at
least twice as many of theirs (6% of China's population equates to 88
million). Of course we would contact Moscow to let them know that no
missiles are coming their way:

Beijing nuked: https://tinyurl.com/yagl99ww

And that's just ONE W88 warhead out of 8-12 carried by each Trident missile,
twenty of which are on every Ohio-class boomer:
https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/trident/

Surprise! 260 million people live in just 15 Chinese cities

Shanghai (34 million)
Guangzhou (25 million)
Beijing (24.9 million)
Shenzhen (23.3 million)
Wuhan (19 million)
Chengdu (18.1 million)
Chongqing (17 million)
Tianjin (15.4 million)
Hangzhou (13.4 million)
Xian (12.9 million)
Changzhou (12.4 million)
Shantou (12 million)
Nanjing (11.7 million)
Jinan (11 million)
Harbin (10.5 million)

Then there are the rest of their densely-populated "urban centers":

Dongguan
Shenyang
Guangzhou
Wenzhou
Xiamen
Qingdao
Suzhou
Changsha
Zhengzhou
Shijiazhuang
Taiyuan
Wuxi
Zibo
Kunming
Hefei
Changchun
Dalian
Tangshan
Ningbo
Fuzhou
Taizhou
Urumqi
Guiyang
Nanning

Plus there are some 360+ military/industrial targets not necessarily in
populated areas.

Then there is this matter of subsequent famines, epidemics, and civil war,
which would make China come apart like an exploded assembly diagram, not
unlike the former Soviet Union...
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 16:41:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
Post by Byker
China sinking an aircraft carrier is not just one ship. They would pretty
much have to destroy the entire task force too.
Why?
The whole POINT of a CVBG is to protect the carrier(s). Take those out,
and the task force (after finishing picking up sailors from life rafts)
can shoot off their Tomahawks and head home.
Right. Clear the seas for the air onslaught against the Chinese mainland
from every air base in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. In the meantime, our
Boomers will be punching in their nuclear codes, standing by for launch
orders...
All you can do is brag!!!
Americans are all braggarts!!!
Byker
2019-02-01 12:22:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
China sinking an aircraft carrier is not just one ship. They would
pretty much have to destroy the entire task force too.
Why?
The whole POINT of a CVBG is to protect the carrier(s). Take those out,
and the task force (after finishing picking up sailors from life rafts)
can shoot off their Tomahawks and head home.
If an army does not patrol a contested bit of land then it soon loses it.
The same applies to the sea.
Face it: The U.S. has lost, or at least failed to win, four of the five
major wars it has entered since WWII (Korea was at best a draw, Vietnam a
loss, and Iraq and Afghanistan unlikely to turn out well. Only Operation
Desert Storm in 1991 to force Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait counts as a clear
win).

Former secretary of defense Robert Gates stated the obvious: "In my opinion,
any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big
American land army in Asia or the Middle East or Africa should 'have his
head examined,' as General MacArthur so delicately put it."
http://archive.defense.gov/Speeches/Speech.aspx?SpeechID=1539

In recent decades, Americans -- and the policymakers sending American troops
to war -- have also displayed an ever-decreasing tolerance toward losing
American lives in combat. The impact of this aversion to casualties is
self-evident: Military planners now rule out entire categories of operations
because of their risk to military personnel, while politicians speak less
and less of victory and more and more of protecting troops. The Chinese are
well aware of this. Most of their leadership, in offline conversations, like
to quip that they have millions of "surplus" single males ready to die for
their country.

In short, there won't be much need for a big land army in the event of a war
with China. About the only territory we'll need to occupy will be their
artificial islands in the South China Sea...
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 16:53:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
Post by Byker
China sinking an aircraft carrier is not just one ship. They would
pretty much have to destroy the entire task force too.
Why?
The whole POINT of a CVBG is to protect the carrier(s). Take those out,
and the task force (after finishing picking up sailors from life rafts)
can shoot off their Tomahawks and head home.
If an army does not patrol a contested bit of land then it soon loses it.
The same applies to the sea.
Face it: The U.S. has lost, or at least failed to win, four of the five
major wars it has entered since WWII (Korea was at best a draw, Vietnam a
loss, and Iraq and Afghanistan unlikely to turn out well. Only Operation
Desert Storm in 1991 to force Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait counts as a clear
win).
Former secretary of defense Robert Gates stated the obvious: "In my opinion,
any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big
American land army in Asia or the Middle East or Africa should 'have his
head examined,' as General MacArthur so delicately put it."
http://archive.defense.gov/Speeches/Speech.aspx?SpeechID=1539
In recent decades, Americans -- and the policymakers sending American troops
to war -- have also displayed an ever-decreasing tolerance toward losing
American lives in combat. The impact of this aversion to casualties is
self-evident: Military planners now rule out entire categories of operations
because of their risk to military personnel, while politicians speak less
and less of victory and more and more of protecting troops. The Chinese are
well aware of this. Most of their leadership, in offline conversations, like
to quip that they have millions of "surplus" single males ready to die for
their country.
In short, there won't be much need for a big land army in the event of a war
with China. About the only territory we'll need to occupy will be their
artificial islands in the South China Sea...
This will be a big task!!! "...need to occupy will be their artificial islands in the South China Sea..."...

China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi said:
"Giving up on the South China Sea would shame our ancestors"
That means China will fight for the South China Sea.

China Says Giving Up South China Sea Claims Would Shame Ancestors

https://www.ibtimes.com/china-says-giving-south-china-sea-claims-would-shame-ancestors-1986738

China has all kinds of DF missiles of all sizes...
I don't think you can even get close to China's coastline....
Resty Wyse
2019-02-01 16:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
Post by Andrew Swallow
They may play 'Find the Queen' games to trick the USA in to sending its
capital warships against the water cannons whilst their capital ships
sneak in.
And when one or more of our capital ships are sent to the bottom, Charlie
Chan will wish to God his country had never advanced beyond the Qing
dynasty.
Man!!! The Qing Dynasty was a shame to the Chinese people!!!
It was NOT China, but Manchuria!!!!
Post by Byker
You may have noticed by now that YouTube is FULL of robo-voiced slide-show
"news" videos bragging about "invincible" the Chinese Army/Navy/Air Force
https://tinyurl.com/y7kel6q3
Just keep thinking that way, Chinkos. JUST KEEP THINKING THAT WAY.
They must have reason to think that way.
They are not stupid, and they don't brag like Americans do.
Post by Byker
China sinking an aircraft carrier is not just one ship. They would pretty
much have to destroy the entire task force too. So 10,000 dead, a dozen
warships sunk, and they think we're not going to respond? First,...
You respond, and in turn, they respond,...
So what do we have? Gotta be WWIII!!!
Post by Byker
... we’re going
to turn all the lights off in China.
And of course, they, in turn, turn off all the lights off in the U.S....
Post by Byker
Then we’ll dust off the war plans we’ve
been working on for the last forty years and update it.
Yes, "...dust off the war plans we’ve been working on for the last forty years and update it..."

But it's still 40 years old,... with WWII technology weapons...
Post by Byker
Rest assured there
are senior officers at the Pentagon who has been tasked with planning just
such a strategy if we need one.
Yes, WWII technoogy, WWII war experience...
We saw the results in Vietnam, Afghanistan, and the whole Middle East...
Post by Byker
No one even thinks about invading China.
That is because like Vietnam, China is a mud hole no one, no nation dare to think of invading. i.e., once get in, can never get out alive...
Post by Byker
All we need do is trash their
infrastructure to push them back into the Middle Ages, and most likely it
wouldn't require nukes...
China's infrastructure is all over the world, i.e., the BRI... It would be the U.S. against the rest of the world...

Of course, China doesn't need to trash America's infrastructure. It's already in a mess, i.e., freeway, bridges, crumbling...

America can't even handle a couple of third world-nations like Vietnam and Afghanistan, you want to tangle with a fire-breathing dragon China???
Byker
2019-02-02 20:31:33 UTC
Permalink
You have to forgive Byker. What he knows about Naval combat is small
compared to what he knows about other spheres of warfare (and what he
knows about other spheres of warfare is microscopic).
And what you know about the politics of war is Zilch. Your postings
consist of vast amounts of internet searches and not actual War room
planning. Sink a carrier and the perpetrator will evaporate in nuclear
smoke. Mandated by the American public! Pearl Harbor only took 2000
casualties to create a Full Surrender. You time at sea was minimal! So
drop the super Expert bullshit. Your every day chore is to sit on
internet.
I killfiled Freddie a long time ago. The only reason I know he's still here
is because people keep answering his bullshit...
w***@yahoo.com.sg
2019-02-02 23:53:08 UTC
Permalink
In the first place, why send a big army to fight on the other side of the globe?

Wakalukong

s***@gmail.com
2019-02-01 17:04:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Resty Wyse
No need to play "Find the queen" games.
China has hypersonic weapons, railguns,...
whie we still experimenting the same weapons...
We can only brag while China need not brag...
Yes, "...dust off the war plans we’ve been working on for the last forty years and update it..."
But it's still 40 years old,... with WWII technology weapons...
Yes, WWII technoogy, WWII war experience...
We saw the results in Vietnam, Afghanistan, and the whole Middle East...
China's infrastructure is all over the world, i.e., the BRI... It would be the U.S. against the rest of the world...
Of course, China doesn't need to trash America's infrastructure. It's already in a mess, i.e., freeway, bridges, crumbling...
America can't even handle a couple of third world-nations like Vietnam and Afghanistan, you want to tangle with a fire-breathing dragon China???
Yippee !! What joy, Resty (Yale Guen Mar) - USA is a paper tiger.

Yale Guen Mar, PRC is invincible, isn't it?

Do you shit in delight every time you think you have such happy thoughts?

Yale Guen Mar, are you still angry with the neighbors of PRC that you have taken to deride as the seven dwarfs?

Yale Guen Mar, haven't you opined that PRC's neighbors (you deride them as the the "seven dwarfs") atr the Chinaman's burden? Did you do that on your own? Or were you specifically asked by your handler with the CCP to post so? Do you get a bonus over your usual 50 cents for posting so?
Post by Resty Wyse
The longer we wait, the stronger China becomes in the South China Sea.
China will have fighter planes, missiles,... installed on those artificial islands. There will be no way to get China out after 2018.
"The longer we wait"? Are you once again posing as an American citizen even as you advocate a war between USA and PRC?


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.china/mzY0FCFcZHk
Post by Resty Wyse
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi already said: "Giving up on the South China Sea will be shameful to their ancestors".
China will fight for the South China Sea.
Yale Guen Mar, why do you want PRC to fight for ownership of the South China Sea?

Why do you decry PRC's neighbors as the "seven dwarfs"?

Why do you want the "seven dwarfs" to kowtow to PRC?

Yale Guen Mar, if the PRC shares your enthusiasm for war, why isn't it occupying the Senkaku Islands?

Does PRC know something that you don't want to know?

Are you just happy with the 50 cents you get from PRC for your warmongering posts?

Why do you announce the imminence of a display of "shock and awe" by the PRC?

Yale Guen Mar, recall how PRC ruthlessly occupied the Paracel islands in 1974 from Vietnam?

Yale Guen Mar, recall the massacre of Vietnamese in Spratly islands in 1988?

Yale Guen Mar, surely you know that the CCP dictatorship in Beijing is not averse to killing at will.

Recall how the PLA had invaded Vietnam in 1979 across the Friendship Pass to teach Vietnam a lesson? It is another matter that by the time PLA was forced to withdraw after 4 weeks, it had lost more than 100,000 soldiers.

Yale Guen Mar, you shouldn't have to post for so little. 50 cents per post shouldn't be enough for what you do. Try to get a better deal from Uncle Chang. That's the only way you can be compensated for what you have to endure - including contempt of patriotic Hmong neighbors on Twilight Avenue.

Yale Guen Mar, you think the the CCP dictatorship in Beijing can get away by bullying the 7 neighbors that you contemptuously dismiss as the "seven dwarfs".
Post by Resty Wyse
Vietnam wins U.S. defense pledges as tension with China grows - Uncle Sam is taken on something we can not stop. When China is ready, she will take all of the South China Sea. The US cannot stop China.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/vietnam-wins-u-defense-pledges-200838818.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=2_08
Yes, Yale Guen Mar, you have always been ever ready to molest every pig's asshole in sight. Why wouldn't you earn 50 cents at the behest of your handler by posting that PRC will take all of the South China Sea.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.china/nALRUXmiQ7c

Yale Guen Mar, is that what your handler with the CCP dictatorship in PRC has asked you to post?

That might earn you 50 cents from the CCP dictatorship but not much else.

Beijing's bandit regime is indeed a rattle snake. It is a menace to all its neighbors.

Ho Chi Minh had rightly observed at the height of his fight against French colonial rulers, "It is better to sniff French dung for a while than to eat Chinese dung all our lives".

The CCP dictatorship has proved by its banditry and piracy against neighboring countries how right Ho Chi Minh was.
Post by Resty Wyse
That's what "show of force" meant!!!
The more the better.
Of course, that's involves somewhere around 15,000 - 20,000 naval personnel.
Kinda expensive "a show of force"!!!
Yale Guen Mar, you have been advocating a show of "Shock-and-Awe" by the PLA. How cheap is that going to be?

Yale Guen Mar, is it your contention that only PRC must exhibit its "shock and awe", howsoever expensive that may be, while others must kowtow to the CCP dictatorship in Beijing?

Yale Guen Mar, you have never tired of showing your contempt for the small neighbors of PRC - you deride them as the "seven dwarfs". You want PRC to bully and bludgeon them into kowtowing to the CCP dictatorship in Beijing.

Naturally, you don't want another bully from the other side of the Pacific to encroach upon PRC's turf. You want the PRC to be the sole bully in the region.

It is not at all surprising that (posting under the fake name of Resty Wyse) is an ardent cheerleader for the imperialist agenda of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship in Beijing who would dance in public in the nude if it advances the CCP agenda.

As the Dr. Strangelove of soc.culture.china, Yale Guen Mar (who posts under the fake name of Resty Wyse) is stinking up the newsgroup with his inane dreams of mayhem and rapes.

Yale Guen Mar must be one desperate Dr. Strangelove to dream of PLA invading Japan. rstx has gone on to describe his evil orgasmic dream quite vividly:

" ... Chinese troops enter Tokyo, be sure to kill and rape at least 300,000. And use Japanese civilians for bayonet practice."


http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/46c71cdfd0e4e9c3 ;

The Tojo regime paid the price for its evil acts. The CCP dictatorship in Beijing too will have to pay for its evil acts if it gets goaded by the likes of rst0/rst7/rst9 to commit war crimes in Japan or any where else.

The CCP dictatorship in Beijing is of course angry. The CCP dictatorship wants to enjoy unbridled liberty to bully the "seven dwarfs" anytime and every time it chooses to. It wants to be the sole bully in East Asia. It does not want another bully from the other shore of the Pacific to interfere.

Yale Guen Mar, you have ceased to care about anything else other than earning 50 cents per post. You don't even care to ask your caregiver, Meichi Thai, to to change you into a fresh diaper a lot more often even as you continue to have "accidents" on Ms. Rolida Lee's reclining char and Mr. Ravinder Singh's sofa.

Yale Guen Mar, is earning 50 cents per post with Uncle Chang's lies really that important for you?

Yale Guen Mar, your intelligence is only skin deep. In fact, the only thing deep about you is your hemorrhoid ridden asshole. It is as full of shit as your skull.

For the sake of 50 cents, you are willing to post anything.

Yale Guen Mar, you have been saying, "War waged by China is good, all other wars bad." You could easily been one of the pigs in George Orwell's Animal Farm.

It is not at all surprising that Yale Guen Mar (rstx) is an ardent cheerleader for the imperialist agenda of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship in Beijing who would dance in public in the nude if it advances the CCP agenda.



https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.china/Nxift8p1xTM
Post by Resty Wyse
North Korea isn't the biggest problem in the world - “China’s getting more powerful by the day, particularly economically,” “Chinese money is increasingly trumping US muscle” on the world stage.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/north-korea-isnt-biggest-problem-world-121214299.html
Yale Guen Mar, USA is just a paper tiger, right?

Isn't that what your handler with the CCP dictatorship in Beijing has asked you to post for you to be sure of receiving 50 cents as payment for your trouble.

Yale Guen Mar (posting under the fake name of Resty Wyse), you continue to lustily working as an agent provocateur on the newsgroup in the hope of approval of 50 cents payment.

What animal instinct is driving you to beat the war drums constantly on behalf of the CCP dictatorship?

Yale Guen Mar, you really want PRC to display its "shock and awe" instead of the US, right?

Do you really believe that PRC will remain unscathed on the sidelines if a war breaks out between North Korea and the PRC?

Do you really believe that PRC will emerge as the superpower of significance after the the war is over?

Is that why why you continuously post dares and act the agent provocateur?


Yale Guen Mar, don't you get angry with PRC's neighbors (whom you deride as the "seven dwarfs") if they resist kowtowing to the CCP regime in Beijing?

Isn't it true that you want PRC to be the only bully in the region?

Aren't you angry because you feel very strongly about a bigger bully queering the pitch for PRC.

Yes, Yale Guen Mar, you have always been ever ready to molest every pig's asshole in sight. Why wouldn't you earn 50 cents at the behest of your handler by posting that PRC will take all of the Himalayan mountain and all of South China Sea.

Yale Guen Mar belongs to the 50 cent party, that is his sole professional affiliation:


*****************

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party ;

The 50 Cent Party are Internet commentators (网络评论员, 網絡評論員, wǎnglù pínglùn yuán) hired by the government of the People's Republic of China (both local and central) or the Communist Party to post comments favorable towards party policies in an attempt to shape and sway public opinion on various Internet message boards. The commentators are said to be paid for every post that either steers a discussion away from anti-party or sensitive content on domestic websites, bulletin board systems, and chatrooms, or that advances the Communist party line.

*******************

Yale Guen Mar is, at best a double agent, with primary loyalty to the bandit regime in Beijing.

So, Yale Guen Mar, you prefer the CCP dictatorship in Beijing to go looking for trouble?
Post by Resty Wyse
China is sitting on a gold mine. They know what India has, and they know what they can do. Once they act, India will lose big, big, big,...
China may even set their own boundary instead of continuing using the McMahon Line. Let's called it "The Xi Jinping Line".
Yale Guen Mar, someone needs to implant the CCP flag inside your blasted asshole.
Post by Resty Wyse
There can not be rules concerning weapons of war. I think North Korea is wise to make nukes of all kinds, including ICBMs for self-defense.
Yale Guen Mar, is that your way of saying that you'll never give up shitting in the taro patches of your Hmong neighbors on Twilight Avenue in Merced, CA?

Yale guen Mar, you must delighted that the PLA is invincible - it cannot be touched by the US forces.
Loading...