Discussion:
Taliban Victory Parades: Entire Fleets Of US Armored Vehicles And Aircraft
(too old to reply)
Míloch
2021-09-03 05:45:45 UTC
Permalink
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and aircraft
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during the
evacuation from Kabul.

The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning combat
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during victory
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs, Humvees, and Fox
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned by
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.





*
Míloch
2021-09-08 23:40:27 UTC
Permalink
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and aircraft
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during the
evacuation from Kabul.

The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning combat
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during victory
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs, Humvees, and Fox
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned by
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.

http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY



*
Byker
2021-09-08 23:58:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the
false narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US
forces prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on
HKIA during the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning
combat vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during
victory celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60
Blackhawks, manned by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Moloch must be absolutely crushed because he's not there to cheer it on...



*
super70s
2021-09-09 19:49:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and
aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during
the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning combat
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during victory
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs, Humvees, and
Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned
by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles
to run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never
thinks that far ahead apparently.
Blue Lives Matter
2021-09-09 20:02:38 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:49:16 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and
aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during
the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning combat
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during victory
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs, Humvees, and
Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned
by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles
to run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never
thinks that far ahead apparently.
The military doesn't expect a stupid, demented president to give 80
billion dollars worth of military equipement to our enemies.
super70s
2021-09-10 03:16:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Blue Lives Matter
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:49:16 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and
aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during
the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning combat
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during victory
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs, Humvees, and
Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned
by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles
to run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never
thinks that far ahead apparently.
The military doesn't expect a stupid, demented president to give 80
billion dollars worth of military equipement to our enemies.
Just like your dipshit Mango Mussolini hero (responsible for the whole
damn thing) would have done it any different.
Blue Lives Matter
2021-09-10 07:52:13 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:16:20 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Blue Lives Matter
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:49:16 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and
aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during
the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning combat
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them during victory
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs, Humvees, and
Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned
by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles
to run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never
thinks that far ahead apparently.
The military doesn't expect a stupid, demented president to give 80
billion dollars worth of military equipement to our enemies.
Just like your dipshit Mango Mussolini hero (responsible for the whole
damn thing) would have done it any different.
It was Biden that did it, Dummy, and the polls show that the people
believe it was his big mistake.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president-biden-job-approval-7320.html
super70s
2021-09-10 14:10:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Blue Lives Matter
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:16:20 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Blue Lives Matter
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:49:16 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the
false narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed
by US forces prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of
vehicles and aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that
were on HKIA during the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning
combat vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness
and participant videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of
MRAPs, Humvees, and Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as
UH-60 Blackhawks, manned by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles
to run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never
thinks that far ahead apparently.
The military doesn't expect a stupid, demented president to give 80
billion dollars worth of military equipement to our enemies.
Just like your dipshit Mango Mussolini hero (responsible for the whole
damn thing) would have done it any different.
It was Biden that did it, Dummy, and the polls show that the people
believe it was his big mistake.
The polls show 73% back the withdrawal from Afghanistan, that's all that
will matter in the end everybody but the most boneheaded Trump disciple
knew it would be messy no matter which president was in office.

https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/551040-poll-73-percent-
support-us-withdrawal-from-afghanistan
Post by Blue Lives Matter
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president-biden-job-approval-73
20.html
"Last Trump Job Approval 34%; Average Is Record-Low 41%"

https://news.gallup.com/poll/328637/last-trump-job-approval-average-recor
d-low.aspx
Siri Cruise
2021-09-10 15:32:54 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by super70s
The polls show 73% back the withdrawal from Afghanistan, that's all that
will matter in the end everybody but the most boneheaded Trump disciple
knew it would be messy no matter which president was in office.
A popular use of thermite grenades is drop them down artillery
barrels that can't be moved fast enough during a retreat.
Thermite can also sometimes foul engines. Warships can be shelled
and torpedoed by their owners to sink them rather be captured.

Abandonning equipment is common. You just want the military to
have enough demolition to render abandonned equipment unusable.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed
Blue Lives Matter
2021-09-10 16:56:12 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:10:14 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Blue Lives Matter
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:16:20 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Blue Lives Matter
On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:49:16 -0500, super70s
Post by super70s
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the
false narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed
by US forces prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of
vehicles and aircraft made unserviceable is in reference to the few that
were on HKIA during the evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully functioning
combat vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness
and participant videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of
MRAPs, Humvees, and Fox armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as
UH-60 Blackhawks, manned by Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles
to run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never
thinks that far ahead apparently.
The military doesn't expect a stupid, demented president to give 80
billion dollars worth of military equipement to our enemies.
Just like your dipshit Mango Mussolini hero (responsible for the whole
damn thing) would have done it any different.
It was Biden that did it, Dummy, and the polls show that the people
believe it was his big mistake.
The polls show 73% back the withdrawal from Afghanistan, that's all that
will matter in the end everybody but the most boneheaded Trump disciple
knew it would be messy no matter which president was in office.
Biden is the one that pulled the troops out before getting the
civilians out. Biden is the one that had to send more troops back in.
Biden is the one that left American in Afghanistan. Biden is the one
that got 13 of our troops killed and many more injured. Biden is the
one that just dropped under water in the polls.
Post by super70s
https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/551040-poll-73-percent-
support-us-withdrawal-from-afghanistan
Post by Blue Lives Matter
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president-biden-job-approval-73
20.html
"Last Trump Job Approval 34%; Average Is Record-Low 41%"
https://news.gallup.com/poll/328637/last-trump-job-approval-average-recor
d-low.aspx
Byker
2021-09-09 20:25:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Míloch
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
There has to be some way to use proprietary software for these vehicles to
run and make it easy to disable them if need be, the military never thinks
that far ahead apparently.
Just have drones zap any U.S.-made military vehicle they happen to see...
Democrat Surrender Monkeys
2021-09-09 01:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping the false
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by US forces
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles and aircraft
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA during the
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and participant
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks, manned by
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Good. Maybe Biden will have to cough up some of that bribe money
Hunter has been holding for him.
BTR1701
2021-09-09 01:47:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Míloch
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping
the false
Post by Míloch
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by
US forces
Post by Míloch
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft
Post by Míloch
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA
during the
Post by Míloch
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant
Post by Míloch
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks,
manned by
Post by Míloch
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much weaponry as
the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball estimates peddled by
the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more than 95% of what the rest of the
world spends on its annual military budget.
moviePig
2021-09-09 02:44:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Míloch
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping
the false
Post by Míloch
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by
US forces
Post by Míloch
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft
Post by Míloch
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA
during the
Post by Míloch
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant
Post by Míloch
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks,
manned by
Post by Míloch
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much weaponry as
the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball estimates peddled by
the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more than 95% of what the rest of the
world spends on its annual military budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
BTR1701
2021-09-09 02:55:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by Míloch
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping
the false
Post by Míloch
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by
US forces
Post by Míloch
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft
Post by Míloch
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA
during the
Post by Míloch
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant
Post by Míloch
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks,
manned by
Post by Míloch
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much weaponr
as
the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball estimates peddled by
the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more than 95% of what the rest o
the
world spends on its annual military budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to clea
these days.
moviePig
2021-09-09 03:44:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by Míloch
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping
the false
Post by Míloch
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by
US forces
Post by Míloch
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft
Post by Míloch
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA
during the
Post by Míloch
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant
Post by Míloch
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks,
manned by
Post by Míloch
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much weaponry as
the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball estimates peddled by
the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more than 95% of what the rest of the
world spends on its annual military budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to clear
these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
The question is whether your opinion preceded Biden's actions.
BTR1701
2021-09-09 03:50:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by Míloch
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping
the false
Post by Míloch
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by
US forces
Post by Míloch
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft
Post by Míloch
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA
during the
Post by Míloch
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant
Post by Míloch
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks,
manned by
Post by Míloch
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as muc
weaponry
as
the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball estimate
peddled by
the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more than 95% of what the rest of the
world spends on its annual military budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to clear
these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit u
now.
moviePig
2021-09-09 15:10:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by Míloch
Post by Míloch
Recent MSM reports seem to be shilling for the Pentagon in hyping
the false
Post by Míloch
narrative that much of the abandoned US hardware was destroyed by
US forces
Post by Míloch
prior to the evacuation. To clarify, the tiny fraction of vehicles
and aircraft
Post by Míloch
made unserviceable is in reference to the few that were on HKIA
during the
Post by Míloch
evacuation from Kabul.
The Taliban, in fact, are in control of thousands of fully
functioning combat
Post by Míloch
vehicles and aircraft, and they couldn't wait to flaunt them
during victory
Post by Míloch
celebration parades across Afghanistan. Some of the witness and
participant
Post by Míloch
videos, reportedly out of Kandahar, show long lines of MRAPs,
Humvees, and Fox
Post by Míloch
armored recon vehicles flying Taliban flags as UH-60 Blackhawks,
manned by
Post by Míloch
Taliban pilots, buzz overhead.
http://youtu.be/MFvyurDXrHY
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry
as
the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball estimates peddled by
the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more than 95% of what the rest of the
world spends on its annual military budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to clear
these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit up
now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
BTR1701
2021-09-09 16:48:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit up
now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.

Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
moviePig
2021-09-09 18:57:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit up
now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.

Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
BTR1701
2021-09-09 20:07:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit
up now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.
Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
I've connected the fact that you retreat behind the shield of
'hyperbole' any time someone calls you on your nonsense.
moviePig
2021-09-09 21:04:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit
up now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.
Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
I've connected the fact that you retreat behind the shield of
'hyperbole' any time someone calls you on your nonsense.
So...

Biden is a "shitty President" because he gave the Taliban more guns.

He's thus set the Taliban to be more ill-behaved than previously.

As he gave them LOTS more guns, their bad behavior will be incalculable.

(Hope that wasn't too tortuous...)
BTR1701
2021-09-09 22:14:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit
up now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.
Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
I've connected the fact that you retreat behind the shield of
'hyperbole' any time someone calls you on your nonsense.
So...
Biden is a "shitty President" because he gave the Taliban more guns.
He's thus set the Taliban to be more ill-behaved than previously.
As he gave them LOTS more guns, their bad behavior will be incalculable.
There's still a massive logic chasm between that and the "Taliban is on
the precipice of world domination".

I know, I know... hyperbole.
moviePig
2021-09-09 22:28:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit
up now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.
Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
I've connected the fact that you retreat behind the shield of
'hyperbole' any time someone calls you on your nonsense.
So...
Biden is a "shitty President" because he gave the Taliban more guns.
He's thus set the Taliban to be more ill-behaved than previously.
As he gave them LOTS more guns, their bad behavior will be incalculable.
There's still a massive logic chasm between that and the "Taliban is on
the precipice of world domination".
I know, I know... hyperbole.
Here's a stepping-stone:

Biden's guns make the Taliban dramatically more dangerous than before.
BTR1701
2021-09-09 23:53:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit
up now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.
Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
I've connected the fact that you retreat behind the shield of
'hyperbole' any time someone calls you on your nonsense.
So...
Biden is a "shitty President" because he gave the Taliban more guns.
He's thus set the Taliban to be more ill-behaved than previously.
As he gave them LOTS more guns, their bad behavior will be incalculable.
There's still a massive logic chasm between that and the "Taliban is on
the precipice of world domination".
I know, I know... hyperbole.
Biden's guns make the Taliban dramatically more dangerous than before.
Not to people in Uruguay.
moviePig
2021-09-10 03:11:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Never in the history of warfare has a hostile power seized as much
weaponry as the Taliban took from Joe Biden. Even with the lowball
estimates peddled by the White House, Biden gave the Taliban more
than 95% of what the rest of the world spends on its annual military
budget.
Does this mean the Taliban is on the precipice of world domination?
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to
clear these days.
It means you think the Taliban's been hampered by a lack of weaponry.
No, what I wrote doesn't mean that at all. You're literally making shit
up now.
"Biden is a shitty President because he left weaponry for the
Taliban." How does that mis-paraphrase you?
First, I didn't miscapitalize 'president' the way you did, so the quote
marks are inappropriate.
Second, saying Biden is a shitty president is not equivalent to saying
the "Taliban is on the precipice of world domination".
Yes, 'President' is a solecism I use for POTUS, because, even though
officially wrong, it's seldom misunderstood.
Regarding "equivalency", are you really unable to connect the hyperbole?
I've connected the fact that you retreat behind the shield of
'hyperbole' any time someone calls you on your nonsense.
So...
Biden is a "shitty President" because he gave the Taliban more guns.
He's thus set the Taliban to be more ill-behaved than previously.
As he gave them LOTS more guns, their bad behavior will be incalculable.
There's still a massive logic chasm between that and the "Taliban is on
the precipice of world domination".
I know, I know... hyperbole.
Biden's guns make the Taliban dramatically more dangerous than before.
Not to people in Uruguay.
You mean Biden didn't leave them ships? I felt sure he left ships...
Ubiquitous
2021-09-11 00:58:00 UTC
Permalink
No, it means Joe is one shitty president and that bar is a high one to clear
these days.
Speaking of which, I see that Wrecking Ball Joe killed an aid worker and nine
children in that drone strike on August 29th in which he claimed to have
killed Taliban members...

So now Joke Biden has the blood of 21 people on his hands?

--
Trump won.

Loading...