Discussion:
Dezi Caused His Father to Suicide-Disgust at Dezi Perversions? Send Him to Iran
(too old to reply)
R***@gmail.com
2011-11-20 17:47:52 UTC
Permalink
Subject: Did Dezi Kill His Dad?

How many warrants are still outstanding in the UK, which is the real reason
Dezi was hiding in France?

Were there also warrants against Dezi in France, which is why he had to
flee for his life to ersatz Israel?

Were complaints of child molesting against Dezi the reason he was fired
as a junior clerk with the Paris Government?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/11/sex-with-animals-penis-cancer_n_1088874.html

Why can't molester and thief zionazi Dezi keep any job?

Was Dezi's kiddie molesting the real reason his wife from Lebanon
dumped him and left?

Even Dezi's mother, Rebecca, has disowned this pervert.

No wonder criminal Dezi has to keep changing his name and aliases !


On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:42:21 -0700, Susan Shiksa Cohen
<***@vex.net> wrote:

Based on what despicable,diseased Dezi has himself posted, it seems
quite probable, that he caused his father's death.
Interested minds want to know, did Desi kill his dad, the former cop?
Is that why his mother Rebecca disowned the disgusting pervert?
Is that why he is afraid to return to the U.K., not just because
he is wanted for theft charges there?Don't forget why he got fired
by Scottish Power,for theft. And Grolier, in Paris.
Is Desi still dumpster-diving in Paris, poop-scooping with the
dogs for choice morsels? Is that what he did in Israel?
From whom is he now stealing telecommunications and internet,
since he has no paid employment?
He got himself fired from Scottish Power, and Grolier in Paris for thefts.
No wonder Dezi Coughlan is using aliases such as Dezi Cohen,
and Yitzhak Goldstein, to try to hide his CRIMINAL PAST in
England, Scotland and even France.

He is scared to visit muslim countries, such as Iran, because he would get
executed by public beheading.

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/religion-by-hanging-iran-
executes-three-men-for-having-gay-sex/politics/2011/09/06/26460

Iran has executed by hanging three men for the crime of having
gay sex, early on Sunday morning, September 4th. The three men
were officially executed for “forbidden acts against religion,”
as Iran does not acknowledge the existence of homosexuality,
which is also officially a crime.

AFP reports:

Two convicted rapists and a drug smuggler were sent to the
gallows in the same prison.

The latest hangings bring to 180 the number of executions
reported in Iran so far this year, according to an AFP tally
based on media and official reports.

Iranian media reported 179 hangings last year but international
human rights groups say the actual number was much higher,
ranking the Islamic republic second only to China in the number
of people it executed in 2010.

Tehran says the death penalty is essential to maintain law and
order, and it is applied only after exhaustive judicial
proceedings.

Murder, rape, armed robbery, drug trafficking and adultery are
among the crimes punishable by death in Iran.

Iran Human Rights (IHR) also reports,

The men were identified as: “M. T.”, “T. T.” and “M. Ch.” (age
not mentioned for any of them) and besides being convicted of
sodomy, had also committed other offences such as kidnapping and
robbery, said the report.

Condemning the executions, the spokesperson of Iran Human Rights
(IHR), Mahmood Amiry-?Moghaddam, said:”Yesterday’s executions
for sodomy might be among the rare cases were the Iranian
authorities admit to having executed men convicted of homosexual
acts”. He added: “Iranian authorities normally present such
cases as rape, but rape as not been mentioned in this case”.

IHR is currently investigating the case of the three men
executed for sodomy.

According to ISNA, the three others executed in Ahvaz today,
were “A. H.” convicted of keeping and trafficking of 6309 grams
of heroin, and “J. N.” and “A. Sh.” convicted of rape and
robbery.

The report didn’t mention the age of those who were executed.

Amiry-?Moghaddam warned about a new wave of executions scheduled
for the coming weeks in Iran. He said: “After a short break in
the executions due to the Holy month of Ramadan, we have
received reports about many scheduled executions in the coming
days and weeks in Iran”. Amiry-?Moghaddam added: “Many of the
scheduled executions are planned to be carried out publically”.

The Advocate adds,

Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad once famously told a
reporter during a news conference that, ”In Iran, we don’t have
homosexuals like in your country. We don’t have that in our
country. In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon. I don’t know
who’s told you that we have it.”
http://www.jewwatch.com
Watch the filthy Christkiller ZYDS and their shabbas-goy refuse to answer the
facts in the article.

Watch disgusting diseased AIDS-spreaders, criminals such as thieves,
drug dealers and child molesters, all refuse to answer facts detailed.

Instead, they forge and fabricate claiming that a nemesis in S.Philippines
is haunting them.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-20 17:57:42 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
Runge 131
2011-11-20 18:12:12 UTC
Permalink
Here we go again, they won't miss a single day of their life

"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :
mlrnp8-***@yahoo.co.il...

<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-20 19:18:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Runge 131
Here we go again, they won't miss a single day of their life
"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" a écrit dans le message de groupe de
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Runge 131
2011-11-20 20:39:26 UTC
Permalink
I believe they are two useless, childish old guys.

"William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit" a écrit dans le message de groupe de
Post by Runge 131
Here we go again, they won't miss a single day of their life
"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" a écrit dans le message de groupe de
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-20 22:08:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Runge 131
I believe they are two useless, childish old guys.
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Post by Runge 131
"William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit" a écrit dans le message de groupe de
Post by Runge 131
Here we go again, they won't miss a single day of their life
"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" a écrit dans le message de groupe de
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
saracene
2011-11-20 22:38:28 UTC
Permalink
On Nov 20, 7:18 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by Runge 131
Here we go again, they won't miss a single day of their life
"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein"  a écrit dans le message de groupe de
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-21 16:56:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel and
defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
saracene
2011-11-21 19:57:21 UTC
Permalink
On Nov 21, 4:56 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel and
defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
I don't really know who either of these people are.
I read that one William Grosvenor had a run in with what I hear from
other sources was an extremely unpleasant libel lawyer called Richard
Warman.
But I'm sure that Shitsack can look after himself.
Clem Kadiddlehopper
2011-11-21 20:16:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
On Nov 21, 4:56 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel and
defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
I don't really know who either of these people are.
I read that one William Grosvenor had a run in with what I hear from
other sources was an extremely unpleasant libel lawyer called Richard
Warman.
But I'm sure that Shitsack can look after himself.
Have you read the judgment in the warman-v-grosvenor case? If not, you
really shouldn't discuss warman's character - or grosvenor's, for that
matter.

Educate yourself:

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728
.html
t***@universal.zionazi.sk
2011-11-21 20:21:35 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:16:16 +0000 (UTC), Clem Kadiddlehopper
Post by Clem Kadiddlehopper
Post by saracene
On Nov 21, 4:56 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel and
defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
I don't really know who either of these people are.
I read that one William Grosvenor had a run in with what I hear from
other sources was an extremely unpleasant libel lawyer called Richard
Warman.
But I'm sure that Shitsack can look after himself.
Have you read the judgment in the warman-v-grosvenor case? If not, you
really shouldn't discuss warman's character - or grosvenor's, for that
matter.
In the court documents, the judge states that there was no actual evidence
supporting the allegations of Warman, but that because Grosvenor had not
appeared, she had to give a default order !

Warman was a lawyer and brought his charges thousands of miles away from where
the Defendant lived.
Grosvomit Boyhumper
2011-11-21 21:50:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@universal.zionazi.sk
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:16:16 +0000 (UTC), Clem Kadiddlehopper
Post by Clem Kadiddlehopper
Post by saracene
On Nov 21, 4:56 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
news:a815c608-9f31-4579-ba57-
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel
and defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
I don't really know who either of these people are.
I read that one William Grosvenor had a run in with what I hear from
other sources was an extremely unpleasant libel lawyer called
Richard Warman.
But I'm sure that Shitsack can look after himself.
Have you read the judgment in the warman-v-grosvenor case? If not, you
really shouldn't discuss warman's character - or grosvenor's, for that
matter.
In the court documents, the judge states that there was no actual evidence
supporting the allegations of Warman, but that because Grosvenor had
not appeared, she had to give a default order !
You're lying, Grosvenor. The judge was quite clear about it - you were
busted, plain and simple, and you paid for it by losing your home.

It's like this, asshole. You can't threaten people without paying a high
price, and you can't defame people without paying a high price.

Your big mouth and seething hatred for anyone who has actually succeeded
in life has been your biggest downfall.

You lie, you extort, you spread hatred by spewing your disgusting vomit
from one end of usenet to another.

Here's a small part of what the judge had to say about you, asshole:

Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 21, 2008

For two years, Edmonton resident William Grosvenor engaged in a virtual
campaign of terror against Ottawa human rights lawyer Richard Warman.
Grosvenor bombarded the Internet with calls to murder Warman while
providing his home address, and links to pictures of him and Google maps
on how to get to his home. Combined with this were hundreds of online
postings attempting to destroy Warman's personal and professional
reputation.
Now a judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has granted an
injunction to put an end to it and has awarded Warman $50,000 in damages
for defamation and assault, the latter stemming from Grosvenor's death
threats and incitement to violence. These threats of violence repeatedly
called for Warman's murder, described him as a "Dead Jew walking", and
said: "I AM GOD AND I HAVE A RUGER P-90 AND IT'S BULLETS HAVE YOUR NAME
ON THEM FAGBOY WARMAN?." [sic]

In her decision issued 20 October 2008, Justice Lynn Ratushny found that
despite Grosvenor having filed papers saying he intended to defend the
civil suit, he never did and was thus deemed to have admitted the
allegations against him. Instead of defending the action, the day after
being served with the statement of claim on 15 Jan. 2008 , Grosvenor
began sending waves of emails to Warman's personal email address
repeating his online threats and libel.

Justice Ratushny described Grosvenor's defamatory postings as "vicious,
profane and extreme". She found they were made dishonestly and in knowing
or reckless disregard for the truth, and said it amounted to "highly
reprehensible misconduct". sHe went on to note the level of hatred and
anger contained in Grosvenor's threats. Justice Ratushny said Grosvenor's
efforts to target Warman for violence, including repeatedly providing his
home address during a two-year period, took them beyond empty threats and
meant they had to be taken seriously.

Warman is an Ottawa lawyer who has successfully filed and litigated 14
cases against members of the white supremacist and neo-Nazi movements
under the Canadian Human Rights Act provisions prohibiting the spreading
of hate propaganda through the Internet.

Responding to the decision, Warman said "I'm hugely relieved that the
injunction has been granted and hope this will bring an end to this two-
year long nightmare." He continued, "I wish I had never heard of William
Grosvenor, but if someone is going to encourage people to kill me then
I'm going to see what I can do to stop them."

The terms of the injunction granted by Justice Ratushny at paragraph 92
of her judgement reference the submissions of the plaintiff at subparas.
119(c-f). These sub-paragraphs require Grosvenor to issue a complete
retraction of the defamatory comments; take all reasonable steps to
remove them and his threats from the Internet; prohibit him from
publishing further defamatory material or incitement to violence; and
also from contacting or communicating with Warman in any way.

Here's the REST of her judgment, asshole:

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728
.html
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-21 22:43:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Grosvomit Boyhumper
The terms of the injunction granted by Justice Ratushny at paragraph 92
of her judgement reference the submissions of the plaintiff at subparas.
119(c-f). These sub-paragraphs require Grosvenor to issue a complete
retraction of the defamatory comments; take all reasonable steps to
remove them and his threats from the Internet; prohibit him from
publishing further defamatory material or incitement to violence; and
also from contacting or communicating with Warman in any way.
Did he comply with this part?

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has
is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough
criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime
that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws'
(Ayn Rand (1905-1982))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-21 23:24:11 UTC
Permalink
In alt.activism.death-penalty Grosvomit Boyhumper
Post by Grosvomit Boyhumper
The terms of the injunction granted by Justice Ratushny at paragraph
92 of her judgement reference the submissions of the plaintiff at
subparas. 119(c-f). These sub-paragraphs require Grosvenor to issue a
complete retraction of the defamatory comments; take all reasonable
steps to remove them and his threats from the Internet; prohibit him
from publishing further defamatory material or incitement to
violence; and also from contacting or communicating with Warman in
any way.
Did he comply with this part?
No, he did not.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-21 23:28:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
In alt.activism.death-penalty Grosvomit Boyhumper
Post by Grosvomit Boyhumper
The terms of the injunction granted by Justice Ratushny at paragraph
92 of her judgement reference the submissions of the plaintiff at
subparas. 119(c-f). These sub-paragraphs require Grosvenor to issue a
complete retraction of the defamatory comments; take all reasonable
steps to remove them and his threats from the Internet; prohibit him
from publishing further defamatory material or incitement to
violence; and also from contacting or communicating with Warman in
any way.
Did he comply with this part?
No, he did not.
Where is he living now?

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'When people criticize Zionists they mean Jews, you are talking
anti-Semitism'
(Martin Luther King, Jr., qtd. by Congressman John Lewis in San
Francisco Chronicle, Jan. 21, 2002)
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-21 23:40:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Where is he living now?
Many believe he is living in Edmonton, Alberta.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 00:21:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Where is he living now?
Many believe he is living in Edmonton, Alberta.
Isn't that where he was before?

I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).

I would say that he 'got what he deserved', but in fact, when he deserves
is to have a 12" carving knife rammed into the soft tissue under his chin
with such force that his feet are lifted from the ground, and the blade
snaps off inside his skull.

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've
always worked for me'
(Hunter Thompson)
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-22 00:34:46 UTC
Permalink
In alt.activism.death-penalty William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Where is he living now?
Many believe he is living in Edmonton, Alberta.
Isn't that where he was before?
Grosvenor is believed to have fled Canada following the forced sale of
his home, to hide out in the slums of Manila. I do not know whether this
is true or not, but there were usenet clues suggesting it was.

In time it became clear that he was posting from Edmonton. An analysis of
posting times established this beyond doubt. If he hid in the Philippines
for a time, it wasn't a long time.
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In
the mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of
Alberta Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I
even offered to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the
time).
You must have disagreed with something he said. He always attacks those
who do, often by forging their names (as he does with you). He is
certainly delusional, particularly if he thinks his forgeries aren't
recognized for what they are.

Alberta's AG has never had the balls to deal with the asshole - many have
tried. I think that is one reason why Warman decided to hit him in the
civil courts, where his protection by lazy and indifferent AGs wouldn't
help him.
I would say that he 'got what he deserved', but in fact, when he
deserves is to have a 12" carving knife rammed into the soft tissue
under his chin with such force that his feet are lifted from the
ground, and the blade snaps off inside his skull.
I am certain many, many people feel that way. He's gone out of his way to
create a lot of enemies, and shows no sign of stopping now.

I'd like to think that one day when one searches for "asshole" on wiki,
his photograph will appear.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 01:28:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
In alt.activism.death-penalty William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Where is he living now?
Many believe he is living in Edmonton, Alberta.
Isn't that where he was before?
Grosvenor is believed to have fled Canada following the forced sale of
his home, to hide out in the slums of Manila. I do not know whether this
is true or not, but there were usenet clues suggesting it was.
In time it became clear that he was posting from Edmonton. An analysis of
posting times established this beyond doubt. If he hid in the Philippines
for a time, it wasn't a long time.
Interesting. So if he's back in Edmonton, where is he hiding? Does anyone
know what he looks like? Are there photographs of him online?
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In
the mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of
Alberta Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I
even offered to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the
time).
You must have disagreed with something he said. He always attacks those
who do, often by forging their names (as he does with you). He is
certainly delusional, particularly if he thinks his forgeries aren't
recognized for what they are.
Ironically enough, I didn't even know he existed, until he started going on
about my 'crime' of being Jewish. He then found out where I worked and
started to spam them and also the French police, demanding that I be
arrested as I was apparently 'a fugitive from the British police'. Oh,
the irony!
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Alberta's AG has never had the balls to deal with the asshole - many have
tried. I think that is one reason why Warman decided to hit him in the
civil courts, where his protection by lazy and indifferent AGs wouldn't
help him.
Had I been aware of this suit, I would quite possibly have gone to Canada
to assist.
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
I would say that he 'got what he deserved', but in fact, when he
deserves is to have a 12" carving knife rammed into the soft tissue
under his chin with such force that his feet are lifted from the
ground, and the blade snaps off inside his skull.
I am certain many, many people feel that way. He's gone out of his way to
create a lot of enemies, and shows no sign of stopping now.
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force. I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
I'd like to think that one day when one searches for "asshole" on wiki,
his photograph will appear.
I spoke to him once on the phone, _circa_ 1998. He came across as being an
arrogant fuckhead.

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'The fact that there are these refugees is the direct consequence of
the act of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish
state...'
(Emile Ghoury, secretary of the Fakestinian Arab Higher Committee, 6
September 1948)
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
saracene
2011-11-22 20:18:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-23 07:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.


Planet Visitor II
saracene
2011-11-23 07:57:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-24 06:50:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all. Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.


Planet Visitor II
saracene
2011-11-24 07:42:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-24 21:04:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Ewwww.... and that's supposed to scare me. You fucking Nazi moron.
You're probably pissed and jealous because you thought that YOU were
the only one your sister was dick-sucking.

Of course, if she sues me (ha ha ha), she'd have to reveal her real
name, and then she'd have to defend how many times it can be found
along with her telephone number on every shithouse wall within 25
miles of your home, preceded by the comment "for a good time, call...."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

You fucking Nazi moron.



Planet Visitor II
saracene
2011-11-24 21:15:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you  are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Ewwww.... and that's supposed to scare me.  You fucking Nazi moron.
You're probably pissed and jealous because you thought that YOU were
the only one your sister was dick-sucking.
Of course, if she sues me (ha ha ha), she'd have to reveal her real
name, and then she'd have to defend how many times it can be found
along with her telephone number on every shithouse wall within 25
miles of your home, preceded by the comment "for a good time, call...."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
If you weren't such a filthy, incontinent and exceedingly stupid
lowlife you would leave my sister out of it, who has never done you
any harm.
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-25 19:39:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you  are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Ewwww.... and that's supposed to scare me.  You fucking Nazi moron.
You're probably pissed and jealous because you thought that YOU were
the only one your sister was dick-sucking.
Of course, if she sues me (ha ha ha), she'd have to reveal her real
name, and then she'd have to defend how many times it can be found
along with her telephone number on every shithouse wall within 25
miles of your home, preceded by the comment "for a good time, call...."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
If you weren't such a filthy, incontinent and exceedingly stupid
lowlife you would leave my sister out of it, who has never done you
any harm.
What's your problem, Nazi-boy? Everyone knows the slutty ways of
your sister. It's in the genes. After all, it was your mother who starred
as the bride in "The Bride and the Burro," in a cabaret in Tijuana,
back in the early 70s.

Which is how she met your father when he caught the bouquet.

After that role as the bride, birthing you was no more trouble for her
than crapping out a raisin.

Tell me, did she ever have that cosmetic surgery to remove those
hanging flaps on her vagina? They sure were tough to cover up
when she wore anything shorter than a peasant frock. And she
had a crotch larger than a well-endowed man when she tried to
tuck them in. Ah, well... the product of a desolate youth.

You fucking Nazi moron.


Planet Visitor II
saracene
2011-11-25 20:39:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you  are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Ewwww.... and that's supposed to scare me.  You fucking Nazi moron.
You're probably pissed and jealous because you thought that YOU were
the only one your sister was dick-sucking.
Of course, if she sues me (ha ha ha), she'd have to reveal her real
name, and then she'd have to defend how many times it can be found
along with her telephone number on every shithouse wall within 25
miles of your home, preceded by the comment "for a good time, call...."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
If you weren't such a filthy, incontinent and exceedingly stupid
lowlife you would leave my sister out of it, who has never done you
any harm.
What's your problem, Nazi-boy?  Everyone knows the slutty ways of
your sister.  It's in the genes.  After all, it was your mother who starred
as the bride in "The Bride and the Burro," in a cabaret in Tijuana,
back in the early 70s.
Which is how she met your father when he caught the bouquet.
After that role as the bride, birthing you was no more trouble for her
than crapping out a raisin.
Tell me, did she ever have that cosmetic surgery to remove those
hanging flaps on her vagina?  They sure were tough to cover up
when she wore anything shorter than a peasant frock.  And she
had a crotch larger than a well-endowed man when she tried to
tuck them in.  Ah, well... the product of a desolate youth.
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
What a foetid piece of gibbering slime you are! Moreover you couldn't
recognise a Nazi if one kicked you in your shrivelled old bollocks.
Anyway it looks as if I got to you somehow, so I suppose I should
congratulate myself.
Now fuck off.
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-26 05:30:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you  are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Ewwww.... and that's supposed to scare me.  You fucking Nazi moron.
You're probably pissed and jealous because you thought that YOU were
the only one your sister was dick-sucking.
Of course, if she sues me (ha ha ha), she'd have to reveal her real
name, and then she'd have to defend how many times it can be found
along with her telephone number on every shithouse wall within 25
miles of your home, preceded by the comment "for a good time, call...."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
If you weren't such a filthy, incontinent and exceedingly stupid
lowlife you would leave my sister out of it, who has never done you
any harm.
What's your problem, Nazi-boy?  Everyone knows the slutty ways of
your sister.  It's in the genes.  After all, it was your mother who starred
as the bride in "The Bride and the Burro," in a cabaret in Tijuana,
back in the early 70s.
Which is how she met your father when he caught the bouquet.
After that role as the bride, birthing you was no more trouble for her
than crapping out a raisin.
Tell me, did she ever have that cosmetic surgery to remove those
hanging flaps on her vagina?  They sure were tough to cover up
when she wore anything shorter than a peasant frock.  And she
had a crotch larger than a well-endowed man when she tried to
tuck them in.  Ah, well... the product of a desolate youth.
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
What a foetid piece of gibbering slime you are! Moreover you couldn't
recognise a Nazi if one kicked you in your shrivelled old bollocks.
Anyway it looks as if I got to you somehow, so I suppose I should
congratulate myself.
Now fuck off.
Mission accomplished!! No question that I've gotten under your
skin. Tell us again how your sister is going to sue me. You
fuckiing Nazi moron.
saracene
2011-11-26 10:16:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all.  Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
What a really filthy pig you  are to be sure! I'll tell her what you
wrote so she can sue you for libel.
Ewwww.... and that's supposed to scare me.  You fucking Nazi moron.
You're probably pissed and jealous because you thought that YOU were
the only one your sister was dick-sucking.
Of course, if she sues me (ha ha ha), she'd have to reveal her real
name, and then she'd have to defend how many times it can be found
along with her telephone number on every shithouse wall within 25
miles of your home, preceded by the comment "for a good time, call...."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
If you weren't such a filthy, incontinent and exceedingly stupid
lowlife you would leave my sister out of it, who has never done you
any harm.
What's your problem, Nazi-boy?  Everyone knows the slutty ways of
your sister.  It's in the genes.  After all, it was your mother who starred
as the bride in "The Bride and the Burro," in a cabaret in Tijuana,
back in the early 70s.
Which is how she met your father when he caught the bouquet.
After that role as the bride, birthing you was no more trouble for her
than crapping out a raisin.
Tell me, did she ever have that cosmetic surgery to remove those
hanging flaps on her vagina?  They sure were tough to cover up
when she wore anything shorter than a peasant frock.  And she
had a crotch larger than a well-endowed man when she tried to
tuck them in.  Ah, well... the product of a desolate youth.
You fucking Nazi moron.
Planet Visitor II
What a foetid piece of gibbering slime you are! Moreover you couldn't
recognise a Nazi if one kicked you in your shrivelled old bollocks.
Anyway it looks as if I got to you somehow, so I suppose I should
congratulate myself.
Now fuck off.
Mission accomplished!!  No question that I've gotten under your
skin.  Tell us again how your sister is going to sue me.  You
fuckiing Nazi moron.
JohnR
2011-12-20 23:47:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force. I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
Planet Visitor II
Like most people, including your foul self.
That isn't what your sister called me, when she spit out my jism after
taking it all. Although I do admit to feeling quite dirty when I let her
blow me.
Planet Visitor II
you cult freaks really are into fantasies.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-26 03:19:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
.. is the _right_ answer.

Where do people get this idea that there is 'no cure for anti-Semitism'?
Of _course_ there is a cure. It's called the .45 ACP cartridge, and it is
100% effective when used correctly.

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'I love California - I practically grew up in Phoenix'
(Dan Quayle (1947 - ))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
saracene
2011-11-26 07:38:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
He needs to be stopped from accessing the Internet, and the only way I see
that happening, is by the use of deadly force.  I have no intentions of
employing it (he's not worth prison), but I'm surprised that someone else
hasn't.
Is that a roundabout way of soliciting murder?
No... it's a direct way of saying some people are alive simply because
it's illegal to kill them.
.. is the _right_ answer.
Where do people get this idea that there is 'no cure for anti-Semitism'?
Of _course_ there is a cure.  It's called the .45 ACP cartridge, and it is
100% effective when used correctly.
Y.
Apply it consistently and there'd be only Jews left in the world, and
not that many of them
JohnR
2011-12-20 23:47:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I spoke to him once on the phone, _circa_ 1998. He came across as being an
arrogant fuckhead.
ROFL
Moishe
2011-11-22 03:37:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP.

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 03:56:18 UTC
Permalink
{ snip sockpuppet }

<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-22 04:04:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP.

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 04:18:47 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-22 19:19:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 19:26:19 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-23 16:45:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-23 16:48:49 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-24 02:36:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-24 11:32:24 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-24 02:36:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-24 11:32:13 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-24 18:59:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-25 01:39:17 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Moishe
2011-11-30 21:30:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-30 21:37:52 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Anonymous Remailer (austria)
2011-11-30 23:54:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Moishe
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the
good work of Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as
he did for the RCMP, in the public interest,
You are post-digested food, Grosvenor - a complete and
total disgrace to humanity, as the following court
judgment illustrates:

<http://tinyurl.com/GROSVENORSUCKS>
Moishe
2011-12-20 23:22:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been the victim of his attacks for close to 20 years, now. In the
mid-nineties, I tried to initiate a prosecution, but the head of Alberta
Justice told me that it was 'not in the public interest'. I even offered
to pay my own fare from Paris (where I was living at the time).
Guess the authorities in Alberta Justice must have appreciated the good work of
Grosvenor, in exposing serious white collar criminals, as he did for the RCMP,
in the public interest,

Perhaps someone in Justice contacted the Zionazi`s employers, to advise them of
his thievery

Even Warman and McVay could not file any criminal charges, although they really
tried.

Grosvenor's work has been well appreciated by Muslim nations, including
Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Muslim autonomous state of South Philippines.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-12-21 01:03:38 UTC
Permalink
<http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william/>
<http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html>
Sorry O.
2011-11-21 22:02:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@universal.zionazi.sk
In the court documents, the judge states that there was no actual evidence
supporting the allegations of Warman, but that because Grosvenor had not
appeared, she had to give a default order !
Warman was a lawyer and brought his charges thousands of miles away from where
the Defendant lived.
Educate yourself:

Identification of the Defendant

[12] I did have some initial concerns as to the reliability of
the plaintiff’s identification of the defendant as the author of the
Postings and the Emails, notwithstanding the deemed admission of the
truth of the allegations by virtue of the operation of the Rules,
which arguably could be said to only amount to deemed admissions by a
defendant called William Grosvenor, without there being an evidentiary
link to establish that the person who was served with the Statement of
Claim was the same person who was the author of the Postings and the
Emails.

[13] My review of the evidence satisfies me, however, that the
plaintiff has proved the defendant to be the author of the Postings
and the Emails. I accept the plaintiff’s analysis of the issue of
identification contained in paragraphs 11–18 of the Affidavit, as
supplemented by his evidence at trial.

[14] The following evidence is particularly persuasive. In 1996
by way of an Internet posting, a person who identified himself as
William Grosvenor called on “mature ladies” to contact him at a
certain address in Edmonton. This was the same address used to serve
the Statement of Claim on the defendant with the same name. The
defendant of the same name responded, giving this same address in his
Notice of Intent to Defend. The Emails began on January 16, 2008,
which was the day after the Statement of Claim had been served on the
defendant. The first of the Emails repeated, in the same words, the
invitation to others to harm the plaintiff and the links to the
plaintiff’s former home address combined with an aerial photograph, as
had been contained in some of the previous Postings. The further
Emails have continued some of the same patterns exhibited by the
Postings in terms of their style, content and obsessions.

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html


(Imagine that - William Grosvenor lied again.)
saracene
2011-11-21 20:59:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clem Kadiddlehopper
Post by saracene
On Nov 21, 4:56 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel and
defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
I don't really know who either of these people are.
I read that one William Grosvenor had a run in with what I hear from
other sources was an extremely unpleasant libel lawyer called Richard
Warman.
But I'm sure that Shitsack can look after himself.
Have you read the judgment in the warman-v-grosvenor case? If not, you
really shouldn't discuss warman's character - or grosvenor's, for that
matter.
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii5...
.html
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete shit out to suppress freedom of expression. I
looked him up and that appears to be the case.
William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
2011-11-21 21:52:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete shit out to suppress freedom of expression. I
looked him up and that appears to be the case.
I see, so you haven't read the law, or studied warman's cases, you've just
"decided" because someone ELSE who hasn't read the law, or studied warman's
cases, "told you."

Your mother must be SO proud of you.

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.h
tml
saracene
2011-11-21 23:00:58 UTC
Permalink
On Nov 21, 9:52 pm, "William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit"
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Post by saracene
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete shit out to suppress freedom of expression. I
looked him up and that appears to be the case.
I see, so you haven't read the law, or studied warman's cases, you've just
"decided" because someone ELSE who hasn't read the law, or studied warman's
cases, "told you."
Stuff the law.
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
Your mother must be SO proud of you.
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii5...
tml
He is trying to stifle free discussion isn't he? Isn't that enough
reason to dislike him?
Clem Kadiddlehopper
2011-11-21 23:27:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
He is trying to stifle free discussion isn't he? Isn't that enough
reason to dislike him?
No, he isn't. He was trying to "stifle" assault, defamation, libel, and
invasion of privacy.

You really ought to spend a few minutes reading parts of the judgment, to
avoid making an even bigger fool of yourself:

Defamation

[54] With respect to the first element, the Postings on the various
websites and with the various website groups are clearly defamatory
according to their ordinary meaning. They are calculated to be
personally and professionally insulting and demeaning. They refer to the
plaintiff as a dishonest man, liar, scumbag, pimp and disgusting maggot,
to name a few. They falsely allege that the plaintiff is part of
organized crime and financed by “mobs”. They falsely allege that the
plaintiff was convicted of child molestation. They attack the
plaintiff’s credibility and reputation as a lawyer. They significantly
discredit his personal and professional reputation and they do so over
and over again. They heap hatred, contempt and ridicule on the plaintiff
and by their volume and wide dissemination, they seriously expose the
plaintiff to hatred, contempt and ridicule from others. As the plaintiff
testified at trial, to be falsely alleged to be a pedophile convicted of
sexual assault against a young person is particularly hurtful.

[55] With respect to the second element, I have no difficulty
concluding that the defamatory words are published. The Internet is a
means of publication like no other, given its ability to instantaneously
send words throughout the world to the millions who have access to
computers. The defendant has caused defamatory words to be communicated
to others by the Postings and each time he has re-posted the same
defamatory words in the Postings, he has created a new publishing of
these words.

[56] I also have no difficulty concluding that the third element has
been established, in that the plaintiff was clearly the person being
defamed. The defendant mentioned the plaintiff’s name in all of the
Fourteen Postings referred to above. In some of the Postings, the
defendant included links to a picture of the plaintiff.

[57] It is for these reasons I conclude that the defendant’s
Postings have defamed the plaintiff.

Assault

[58] Assault is the intentional creation of the apprehension of
imminent harmful or offensive contact. The tort of assault furnishes
protection for the interest in freedom from fear of being physically
interfered with. Damages are recoverable by someone who is made
apprehensive of immediate physical contact, even though that conduct
never actually occurs: Allen M. Linden and Bruce Feldthusen, Canadian
Tort Law, Eighth Edition (Markham: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006), at p.
46.

[59] Conduct that intentionally arouses apprehension of an imminent
battery (physical contact) constitutes an assault. Frightening or
threatening someone, however, does not constitute an assault unless the
event feared is imminent: Canadian Tort Law, supra, at p. 47.

[60] I am satisfied that the plaintiff is reasonably apprehensive of
imminent physical contact as a result of the Postings and the Emails.

[61] By way of example, in the First Posting, the defendant invited
readers to let the plaintiff “meet his just fate – execution at the hands
of a people’s government”. In the Second Posting through to the
Fourteenth Posting and continuing to the present time, the defendant
urged readers to “pay him a visit” and included the plaintiff’s residence
address and phone numbers. The Sixth Posting encouraged the readers “to
email the co-op and complain about their resident (he may get kicked out
if they get enough complaints)”. The plaintiff testified that the
management of his co-operative where he lived did receive calls. As a
consequence, he moved to a different address at the end of October 2007.
The Seventh Posting referred to the plaintiff as “a dead Jew walkin’”.
The Fourteenth Posting concluded its message with, “I AM GOD AND I HAVE A
RUGER P-90 AND IT’S BULLETS HAVE YOUR NAME ON THEM FAGBOY WARMAN”. One
of the Emails in March 2008 said, “Your day of reckoning is coming, you
little homo creep!”

[62] The Postings and the Emails have continued for over two years.
They have persistently expressed hatred and anger and have called on
others to act against the plaintiff, to try to get him evicted and to
make him a target of violence. They are not general threats. They are
threatening and intimidating and by virtue of their repetitiveness, their
detail regarding the plaintiff’s whereabouts and their level of
malevolence, they are more than mere empty threats and insults. They are
vicious and serious and are to be taken seriously. They have made the
plaintiff apprehensive of imminent physical harm and reasonably so,
particularly in the context of the wide publication of the Postings on
the Internet and the very real possibility that someone will, as they
have in the past by contacts with the management of the plaintiff’s
residence, act on the defendant’s repeated invitations to others to find
the plaintiff and inflict serious physical harm on him.

[63] It is for these reasons that I find the plaintiff is entitled
to recover damages for the defendant’s assault against him.

Invasion of Privacy

[64] In addition to the defamatory nature of the Postings causing
injury to the plaintiff’s reputation and in addition to the assaultive
nature of both the Postings and the Emails causing him to fear imminent
physical harm, the plaintiff also claims damages for invasion of privacy
because of the Postings.

[65] Since 2004 and with his extensive human rights work relating to
hate propaganda on the Internet and the attention that this work has
garnered, the plaintiff has attempted to keep his home address private.
He has had his address removed from telephone listings and, since 2007 he
has maintained an unlisted telephone number. By their publication of the
plaintiff’s personal information including an aerial photograph and map
to locate the plaintiff’s residence, the Postings certainly do invade the
plaintiff’s privacy.

[66] I am cognizant, as stated by Aston J. in Nitsopoulos v. Wong,
[2008] O.J. No. 3498, at paras. 8-16 and 19, of there being a difference
in judicial opinion as to whether there exists a common right to privacy
in Canada. Even if I were to find, as Aston J. did in Wong, that the
law is not settled in Ontario and that the law of libel and slander
“should not act to bludgeon other meritorious causes of action where they
can stand on their own” (at para. 16), the damages would have to flow
from harm that is not subsumed by the torts of defamation and assault.

[67] I do not find that the damages claimed by the plaintiff for the
tort of invasion of privacy are distinct from those flowing from the
torts of defamation and assault.

[68] In Wong, there was separate conduct that could have been the
source of the tort of invasion of privacy, separate from the libelous
words.

[69] In the present case, there is no tortious conduct amounting to
an invasion of privacy that is separate from the conduct making the
defendant liable for damages for defamation and assault. The result is
that while the defendant’s conduct amounting to defamation and assault
have caused injury to the plaintiff’s reputation and to his right to
“mental security” (Canadian Tort Law, supra, at p. 49) and the plaintiff
is able to recover damages for these injuries, there is no separate
injury to any common law right to privacy that the plaintiff may enjoy.
In particular, the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for the
defendant’s assault against him, for the same reason that he seeks
damages for breach of his right to privacy, namely, because of the
Postings that publish his personal information and cause him apprehension
of imminent physical harm.

[70] In other words, the conduct causing the harm is recoverable in
damages for defamation and assault and there is no separate tortious
conduct resulting in separate harm, in my view, that is recoverable by
the plaintiff for a tort of invasion of privacy

[71] Another of the cases relied on by the plaintiff regarding the
issue of there being an actionable tort available to the plaintiff, is
also distinguishable. In Griffen v. Sullivan, [2008] B.C.J. No. 1333
(B.C.S.C.), the claim for breach of privacy was based on a statutorily
actionable tort created by s. 1 of the Privacy Act of British Columbia,
making it a tort “for a person, willfully and without a claim of right,
to violate the privacy of another”. There is no similar claim by the
plaintiff in the present case.

[72] It is for these reasons that I do not find the plaintiff has
established he is entitled to damages for a tort of invasion of privacy.
Runge 131
2011-11-22 01:39:52 UTC
Permalink
Big yawn
Post by saracene
He is trying to stifle free discussion isn't he? Isn't that enough
reason to dislike him?
No, he isn't. He was trying to "stifle" assault, defamation, libel, and
invasion of privacy.

You really ought to spend a few minutes reading parts of the judgment, to
avoid making an even bigger fool of yourself:

Defamation

[54] With respect to the first element, the Postings on the various
websites and with the various website groups are clearly defamatory
according to their ordinary meaning. They are calculated to be
personally and professionally insulting and demeaning. They refer to the
plaintiff as a dishonest man, liar, scumbag, pimp and disgusting maggot,
to name a few. They falsely allege that the plaintiff is part of
organized crime and financed by “mobs”. They falsely allege that the
plaintiff was convicted of child molestation. They attack the
plaintiff’s credibility and reputation as a lawyer. They significantly
discredit his personal and professional reputation and they do so over
and over again. They heap hatred, contempt and ridicule on the plaintiff
and by their volume and wide dissemination, they seriously expose the
plaintiff to hatred, contempt and ridicule from others. As the plaintiff
testified at trial, to be falsely alleged to be a pedophile convicted of
sexual assault against a young person is particularly hurtful.

[55] With respect to the second element, I have no difficulty
concluding that the defamatory words are published. The Internet is a
means of publication like no other, given its ability to instantaneously
send words throughout the world to the millions who have access to
computers. The defendant has caused defamatory words to be communicated
to others by the Postings and each time he has re-posted the same
defamatory words in the Postings, he has created a new publishing of
these words.

[56] I also have no difficulty concluding that the third element has
been established, in that the plaintiff was clearly the person being
defamed. The defendant mentioned the plaintiff’s name in all of the
Fourteen Postings referred to above. In some of the Postings, the
defendant included links to a picture of the plaintiff.

[57] It is for these reasons I conclude that the defendant’s
Postings have defamed the plaintiff.

Assault

[58] Assault is the intentional creation of the apprehension of
imminent harmful or offensive contact. The tort of assault furnishes
protection for the interest in freedom from fear of being physically
interfered with. Damages are recoverable by someone who is made
apprehensive of immediate physical contact, even though that conduct
never actually occurs: Allen M. Linden and Bruce Feldthusen, Canadian
Tort Law, Eighth Edition (Markham: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006), at p.
46.

[59] Conduct that intentionally arouses apprehension of an imminent
battery (physical contact) constitutes an assault. Frightening or
threatening someone, however, does not constitute an assault unless the
event feared is imminent: Canadian Tort Law, supra, at p. 47.

[60] I am satisfied that the plaintiff is reasonably apprehensive of
imminent physical contact as a result of the Postings and the Emails.

[61] By way of example, in the First Posting, the defendant invited
readers to let the plaintiff “meet his just fate – execution at the hands
of a people’s government”. In the Second Posting through to the
Fourteenth Posting and continuing to the present time, the defendant
urged readers to “pay him a visit” and included the plaintiff’s residence
address and phone numbers. The Sixth Posting encouraged the readers “to
email the co-op and complain about their resident (he may get kicked out
if they get enough complaints)”. The plaintiff testified that the
management of his co-operative where he lived did receive calls. As a
consequence, he moved to a different address at the end of October 2007.
The Seventh Posting referred to the plaintiff as “a dead Jew walkin’”.
The Fourteenth Posting concluded its message with, “I AM GOD AND I HAVE A
RUGER P-90 AND IT’S BULLETS HAVE YOUR NAME ON THEM FAGBOY WARMAN”. One
of the Emails in March 2008 said, “Your day of reckoning is coming, you
little homo creep!”

[62] The Postings and the Emails have continued for over two years.
They have persistently expressed hatred and anger and have called on
others to act against the plaintiff, to try to get him evicted and to
make him a target of violence. They are not general threats. They are
threatening and intimidating and by virtue of their repetitiveness, their
detail regarding the plaintiff’s whereabouts and their level of
malevolence, they are more than mere empty threats and insults. They are
vicious and serious and are to be taken seriously. They have made the
plaintiff apprehensive of imminent physical harm and reasonably so,
particularly in the context of the wide publication of the Postings on
the Internet and the very real possibility that someone will, as they
have in the past by contacts with the management of the plaintiff’s
residence, act on the defendant’s repeated invitations to others to find
the plaintiff and inflict serious physical harm on him.

[63] It is for these reasons that I find the plaintiff is entitled
to recover damages for the defendant’s assault against him.

Invasion of Privacy

[64] In addition to the defamatory nature of the Postings causing
injury to the plaintiff’s reputation and in addition to the assaultive
nature of both the Postings and the Emails causing him to fear imminent
physical harm, the plaintiff also claims damages for invasion of privacy
because of the Postings.

[65] Since 2004 and with his extensive human rights work relating to
hate propaganda on the Internet and the attention that this work has
garnered, the plaintiff has attempted to keep his home address private.
He has had his address removed from telephone listings and, since 2007 he
has maintained an unlisted telephone number. By their publication of the
plaintiff’s personal information including an aerial photograph and map
to locate the plaintiff’s residence, the Postings certainly do invade the
plaintiff’s privacy.

[66] I am cognizant, as stated by Aston J. in Nitsopoulos v. Wong,
[2008] O.J. No. 3498, at paras. 8-16 and 19, of there being a difference
in judicial opinion as to whether there exists a common right to privacy
in Canada. Even if I were to find, as Aston J. did in Wong, that the
law is not settled in Ontario and that the law of libel and slander
“should not act to bludgeon other meritorious causes of action where they
can stand on their own” (at para. 16), the damages would have to flow
from harm that is not subsumed by the torts of defamation and assault.

[67] I do not find that the damages claimed by the plaintiff for the
tort of invasion of privacy are distinct from those flowing from the
torts of defamation and assault.

[68] In Wong, there was separate conduct that could have been the
source of the tort of invasion of privacy, separate from the libelous
words.

[69] In the present case, there is no tortious conduct amounting to
an invasion of privacy that is separate from the conduct making the
defendant liable for damages for defamation and assault. The result is
that while the defendant’s conduct amounting to defamation and assault
have caused injury to the plaintiff’s reputation and to his right to
“mental security” (Canadian Tort Law, supra, at p. 49) and the plaintiff
is able to recover damages for these injuries, there is no separate
injury to any common law right to privacy that the plaintiff may enjoy.
In particular, the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for the
defendant’s assault against him, for the same reason that he seeks
damages for breach of his right to privacy, namely, because of the
Postings that publish his personal information and cause him apprehension
of imminent physical harm.

[70] In other words, the conduct causing the harm is recoverable in
damages for defamation and assault and there is no separate tortious
conduct resulting in separate harm, in my view, that is recoverable by
the plaintiff for a tort of invasion of privacy

[71] Another of the cases relied on by the plaintiff regarding the
issue of there being an actionable tort available to the plaintiff, is
also distinguishable. In Griffen v. Sullivan, [2008] B.C.J. No. 1333
(B.C.S.C.), the claim for breach of privacy was based on a statutorily
actionable tort created by s. 1 of the Privacy Act of British Columbia,
making it a tort “for a person, willfully and without a claim of right,
to violate the privacy of another”. There is no similar claim by the
plaintiff in the present case.

[72] It is for these reasons that I do not find the plaintiff has
established he is entitled to damages for a tort of invasion of privacy.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 02:48:11 UTC
Permalink
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO Warman
is a complete Jooooooo. I looked him up and that appears to be the case.
Typo corrected.

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'Unsuccessful candidates for the Presidency should be quietly hanged as
a matter of public sanitation and decorum'
(H.L. Mencken)
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
saracene
2011-11-22 09:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO Warman
is a complete Jooooooo.  I looked him up and that appears to be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Y.
--
He appears not to be one. But he is a man with a mission, to close
down websites, and that mission is odious to liberty loving people.
Like Harry J Anslinger, such a person is prima facie a cunt. That he
should be subject to libellous abuse is understandable, and he
provokes no sympathy.
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-22 12:42:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete Jooooooo.  I looked him up and that appears to
be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
Well, you seem to be the expert on that...
Post by saracene
He appears not to be one. But he is a man with a mission, to close down
websites, and that mission is odious to liberty loving people. Like
Harry J Anslinger, such a person is prima facie a cunt. That he should be
subject to libellous abuse is understandable, and he provokes no
sympathy.
Anyone even remotely pro-Jewish 'provokes no sympathy' in someone who
thinks that Jews all have 'repulsive traits'.

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'If Shaw and Einstein couldn't beat death, what chance do I have?'
(Mel Brooks (1926 - ))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
saracene
2011-11-22 13:04:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete Jooooooo. I looked him up and that appears to
be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
Well, you seem to be the expert on that...
Post by saracene
He appears not to be one. But he is a man with a mission, to close down
websites, and that mission is odious to liberty loving people.  Like
Harry J Anslinger, such a person is prima facie a cunt. That he should be
subject to libellous abuse is understandable, and he provokes no
sympathy.
Anyone even remotely pro-Jewish 'provokes no sympathy' in someone who
thinks that Jews all have 'repulsive traits'.
Y.
I said typical ones do, which is different. I have litttle sympathy
for people who set themselves up as moral policemen.
saracene
2011-11-22 13:46:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete Jooooooo. I looked him up and that appears to
be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
Well, you seem to be the expert on that...
Post by saracene
He appears not to be one. But he is a man with a mission, to close down
websites, and that mission is odious to liberty loving people.  Like
Harry J Anslinger, such a person is prima facie a cunt. That he should be
subject to libellous abuse is understandable, and he provokes no
sympathy.
Anyone even remotely pro-Jewish 'provokes no sympathy' in someone who
thinks that Jews all have 'repulsive traits'.
Y.
The man is a cunt, A little research throws this up:-

http://tinyurl.com/cg2aqzc
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
2011-11-23 07:55:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
Post by saracene
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO
Warman is a complete Jooooooo. I looked him up and that appears to
be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
Well, you seem to be the expert on that...
Post by saracene
He appears not to be one. But he is a man with a mission, to close down
websites, and that mission is odious to liberty loving people.  Like
Harry J Anslinger, such a person is prima facie a cunt. That he should be
subject to libellous abuse is understandable, and he provokes no
sympathy.
Anyone even remotely pro-Jewish 'provokes no sympathy' in someone who
thinks that Jews all have 'repulsive traits'.
The man is a cunt
My irony meter just exploded.

Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'AADP's Left-Wing Israeli Intellectual'
'Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do'
(Bertrand Russel (1872 - 1970))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-23 07:01:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO Warman
is a complete Jooooooo.  I looked him up and that appears to be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
No... but "saracene" and "Nazi" are.



Planet Visitor II
saracene
2011-11-23 10:29:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO Warman
is a complete Jooooooo.  I looked him up and that appears to be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
No... but "saracene" and "Nazi" are.
I suppose that at your age there is little hope you might yet learn to
differentiate your arse from your elbow.
Planet Visitor II
2011-11-24 06:50:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Planet Visitor II
Post by saracene
Post by Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
I have been informed by a correspondent of long standing that IHO Warman
is a complete Jooooooo.  I looked him up and that appears to be the case.
Typo corrected.
Are 'shit' and 'Joooooo' virtually interchangaeable IYHO?
No... but "saracene" and "Nazi" are.
I suppose that at your age there is little hope you might yet learn to
differentiate your arse from your elbow.
Do you really believe that I'd let an insult from a proven Nazi bother
me, Nazi-boy???


Planet Visitor II
Runge 131
2011-11-21 19:23:42 UTC
Permalink
You don't understand much, sending the same stuff again and again doesn't
help at all.
Gros vomit I suppose you know what that means in french ?



"William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit" a écrit dans le message de groupe de
Post by saracene
Post by William 'Humpboys' Grosvomit
So you believe libel should go unanswered?
Its a bit repetitious, like the Revd. and his alter ego.
So if I understand you correctly, it is okay to spew hatred, libel and
defamation, so long as you do it over and over again?
Loading...