I like watching atheists make invalid arguments

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

Or hey: creationists could be like Charles Jackson, who proudly announces
that he has four (4) (count `em, four!) degrees, unlike evolutionists
like PZ Myers, who has only a measly two!

Of course two of Jackson's are in education, none is a PhD (like Myers'),
but hey: he's got quantity!

But back to your claim -- I assume you have one or more examples of this
to show us, so that we can discuss them more specifically? "Plenty of references"
does sound intriguing.

Selene

Malte Runz

2018-04-03 19:48:34 UTC

Or hey: creationists could be like Charles Jackson, who proudly announces
that he has four (4) (count `em, four!) degrees, unlike evolutionists
like PZ Myers, who has only a measly two!
Of course two of Jackson's are in education, none is a PhD (like Myers'),
but hey: he's got quantity!
But back to your claim -- I assume you have one or more examples of this
to show us, so that we can discuss them more specifically? "Plenty of references"
does sound intriguing.

He's got nothing. He knows he has nothing, and he knows that we know
that he knows he has nothing. The only thing he has left is trying to
be as annoying as possible. Just look at the way he goes on and on
about Piltdown Man and Ernst Haeckel. Even his blanks are misfiring.

--
Malte Runz

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-03 19:42:53 UTC

I like watching theists try to bend logic and science so they can try to rationalize their bullshit beliefs.

Perhaps, if theists didn't use dishonest arguments, lies, outdated science, mined quotes or their own ignorant misunderstanding of science they might be taken more seriously.

When theists can provide the same quality evidence and observation and testing that Science relies on, they wouldn't be seen as ridiculous.

Not that such things matter to the fake theists we get here, who are trolls first and religious second if at all.

Malte Runz

2018-04-03 19:45:10 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

... So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? ...

We do nothing but. You know I have linked to tons of material.
Material you refuse to look at if you have to click on a link, and if
there are footnotes, you us as an excuse for not addressing the
critique of the BS you post as "reasoning, science and plenty of
references".

But this projection of your own shortcomings is standard MO. My
question is, whether or not you realize that you're lying and if you
do, do you also realize that we know you're lying.

... Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

And if a creationist should do the same, we'd all listen. But until
that happens we will keep mocking you and your kind. Ian fucking
Juby... Ha!

--
Malte Runz

Amazing Answers

2018-04-03 20:27:56 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on it's own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that life did not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This is simply just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of science simply do not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy to contend with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts to back up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we are expected to believe it because you say, and I quote, "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in an unusual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason) and I cannot accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an indicator of truth. I want to know what your reasons are and "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your laughing by stating, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer so why should I except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so provide it. And provide it now.

... So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? ...

We do nothing but. You know I have linked to tons of material.
Material you refuse to look at if you have to click on a link, and if
there are footnotes, you us as an excuse for not addressing the
critique of the BS you post as "reasoning, science and plenty of
references".
But this projection of your own shortcomings is standard MO. My
question is, whether or not you realize that you're lying and if you
do, do you also realize that we know you're lying.

... Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

And if a creationist should do the same, we'd all listen. But until
that happens we will keep mocking you and your kind. Ian fucking
Juby... Ha!
--
Malte Runz

s***@gmail.com

2018-04-03 21:26:29 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on it's own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that life did not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This is simply just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of science simply do not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.

Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to, if you please,
and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis flouts them:

Selene

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

... So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? ...

We do nothing but. You know I have linked to tons of material.
Material you refuse to look at if you have to click on a link, and if
there are footnotes, you us as an excuse for not addressing the
critique of the BS you post as "reasoning, science and plenty of
references".
But this projection of your own shortcomings is standard MO. My
question is, whether or not you realize that you're lying and if you
do, do you also realize that we know you're lying.

... Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

And if a creationist should do the same, we'd all listen. But until
that happens we will keep mocking you and your kind. Ian fucking
Juby... Ha!
--
Malte Runz

Amazing Answers

2018-04-03 21:37:00 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to, if you please,
Selene

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in nature. There has to be cognition involved.

... So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? ...

We do nothing but. You know I have linked to tons of material.
Material you refuse to look at if you have to click on a link, and if
there are footnotes, you us as an excuse for not addressing the
critique of the BS you post as "reasoning, science and plenty of
references".
But this projection of your own shortcomings is standard MO. My
question is, whether or not you realize that you're lying and if you
do, do you also realize that we know you're lying.

... Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

And if a creationist should do the same, we'd all listen. But until
that happens we will keep mocking you and your kind. Ian fucking
Juby... Ha!
--
Malte Runz

s***@gmail.com

2018-04-03 22:20:09 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to, if you please,
Selene

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Post by Amazing Answers
Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in nature. There has to be cognition involved.

I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can comprehend -- and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.

So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates "laws of physics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner would those laws be broken:

Selene

... So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? ...

We do nothing but. You know I have linked to tons of material.
Material you refuse to look at if you have to click on a link, and if
there are footnotes, you us as an excuse for not addressing the
critique of the BS you post as "reasoning, science and plenty of
references".
But this projection of your own shortcomings is standard MO. My
question is, whether or not you realize that you're lying and if you
do, do you also realize that we know you're lying.

... Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

And if a creationist should do the same, we'd all listen. But until
that happens we will keep mocking you and your kind. Ian fucking
Juby... Ha!
--
Malte Runz

Gospel TT

2018-04-03 22:48:17 UTC

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore

Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of science

simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

Post by s***@gmail.com
You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring

to, if y=

ou please,

Post by s***@gmail.com
Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in

an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason)

and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates "laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

hypatiab7

2018-04-03 23:55:22 UTC

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 12:45:12 PM UTC-7, Malte Runz

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore

Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of science

simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring

to, if y=

ou please,

and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis flouts
Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in

an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason)

and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates "laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

Whether he admits it or not, we KNOW artieJoe IS a liar. He doesn't know the difference between a disagreement and a lie. Now watch him dig up definitions
that prove me right. He'll post correct definitions, then he'll go on lying.

v***@gmail.com

2018-04-04 00:07:15 UTC

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 12:45:12 PM UTC-7, Malte Runz

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore

Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of science

simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring

to, if y=

ou please,

and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis flouts
Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in

an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason)

and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates "laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

Whether he admits it or not, we KNOW artieJoe IS a liar.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, you retarded fruitcake..

Gospel TT

2018-04-04 00:58:07 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT),

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing

Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 12:45:12 PM UTC-7, Malte Runz

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing

Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore

Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of science

simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are

referring

to, if y=

ou please,

and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis flouts
Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in

an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason)

and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't

occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates "laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner

would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

Whether he admits it or not, we KNOW artieJoe IS a liar.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, you retarded fruitcake..

she's smarter then you & she no's your a liar.

hypatiab7

2018-04-04 06:54:22 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT),

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing

Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-7, Amazing

Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 12:45:12 PM UTC-7, Malte

Runz

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing

Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument

using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making

bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen.

Therefore

Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not

start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put,

that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer.

This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of

science

simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are

referring

to, if y=

ou please,

and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis

flouts

Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree.

Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian

Juby

Post by Malte Runz
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of

shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you

find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no

facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to

study in

an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use

reason)

and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer

so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning,

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't

occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates

"laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner

would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

Whether he admits it or not, we KNOW artieJoe IS a liar.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, you retarded

fruitcake..
she's smarter then you & she no's your a liar.

Thank you, TT.

Gospel TT

2018-04-04 19:54:31 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 23:54:22 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 6:48:21 PM UTC-4, Gospel TT

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT),

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing

Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-7,

Amazing

Post by Malte Runz
Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 12:45:12 PM UTC-7, Malte

Runz

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing

Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument

using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is

making

Post by Malte Runz
bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen.

Therefore

Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not

start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put,

that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an

engineer.

Post by Malte Runz
This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of

science

simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are

referring

to, if y=

ou please,

and then tell us exactly how the concept of

abiogenesis

Post by Malte Runz
flouts

Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree.

Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian

Juby

Post by Malte Runz
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of

shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you

find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing,

adding no

Post by Malte Runz
facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to

study in

an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use

reason)

and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my

answer

Post by Malte Runz
so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and

reasoning,

Post by Malte Runz
so

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't

occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would

violates

Post by Malte Runz
"laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner

would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

Whether he admits it or not, we KNOW artieJoe IS a liar.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, you retarded

fruitcake..
she's smarter then you & she no's your a liar.

Thank you, TT.

Yw. :-)

Gospel TT

2018-04-04 00:56:41 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:55:22 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:37:03 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:26:33 PM UTC-7,

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-7, Amazing

Answers

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 12:45:12 PM UTC-7, Malte Runz

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using

reasoning, =

science and plenty of references, ...

Post by Malte Runz
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold

unevidence=

Post by Malte Runz
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen.

Therefore

Post by Gospel TT
Goddidi=

Post by Malte Runz
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start

on it's=

own, without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that

life did=

not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This

is simply=

just a fact. The constraints of physics and the laws of

science

Post by Gospel TT
simply do=

not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are

referring

Post by Gospel TT
to, if y=

ou please,

and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis flouts
Selene

Post by Amazing Answers
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often

the evo=

lutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

Post by Malte Runz
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy

to cont=

end with? Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts

to back=

up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we

are expect=

ed to believe it because you say, and I quote,

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahaha=

hahaaaaaaa)". I'm a college graduate who also happened to

study in

Post by Gospel TT
an unus=

ual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use

reason)

Post by Gospel TT
and I can=

not accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an

indicator of tru=

th. I want to know what your reasons are and

"(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahah=

ahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. What if I responded to your

laughing by sta=

ting, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! You wouldn't accept my answer so why

should I=

except yours? You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so

provide it=

. And provide it now.
+

Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in

nature. T=

here has to be cognition involved.
I didn't ask you to put it simply. You will find that I can

comprehend -- =

and discuss --
science at any level you want to pitch the discussion.
So I ask you again: you claim that abiogenesis would violates "laws

of phys=

ics".
So let's have it: which laws, and in exactly what manner would

those laws b=
He'd have to admit he's a liar.

Whether he admits it or not, we KNOW artieJoe IS a liar. He doesn't

know the difference between a disagreement and a lie. Now watch him
dig up definitions

Post by hypatiab7
that prove me right. He'll post correct definitions, then he'll go on lying.

That's rite

s***@gmail.com

2018-04-04 20:02:27 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to, if you please,
Selene

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Post by Amazing Answers
Simply put, magic on the level of Mary Poppins doesn't occur in nature. There has to be cognition involved.

The subject line you chose for this thread is growing unintentionally more ironic the longer
you dodge this, you know.

Selene

... So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead of pointing out something that has no relevance? ...

We do nothing but. You know I have linked to tons of material.
Material you refuse to look at if you have to click on a link, and if
there are footnotes, you us as an excuse for not addressing the
critique of the BS you post as "reasoning, science and plenty of
references".
But this projection of your own shortcomings is standard MO. My
question is, whether or not you realize that you're lying and if you
do, do you also realize that we know you're lying.

... Reasoning, science and references stand on their own. If a dog came along reasoning, using science and using references perhaps the evolutionist will respond properly.

And if a creationist should do the same, we'd all listen. But until
that happens we will keep mocking you and your kind. Ian fucking
Juby... Ha!
--
Malte Runz

Brian E. Clark

2018-04-03 22:02:50 UTC

In article <101799f4-beb4-4c14-87d4-
***@googlegroups.com>, ***@gmail.com
says...

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on
it's own, without the assistance of an engineer [...]

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to,
if you please, and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis

I'm just as curious for him to list the laws of physics
which stipulate that an engineer is required for some
outcome to result.

What, for instance, are the SI units of "engineer"? (One
daVinci?)

--
-----------
Brian E. Clark

Peter Pan

2018-04-06 22:53:07 UTC

Post by Brian E. Clark
In article <101799f4-beb4-4c14-87d4-
says...

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on
it's own, without the assistance of an engineer [...]

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to,
if you please, and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis

I'm just as curious for him to list the laws of physics
which stipulate that an engineer is required for some
outcome to result.
What, for instance, are the SI units of "engineer"? (One
daVinci?)

We've been told by aaa/Niunian that the 2nd law of
"thermal dynamics" requires intelligence to create
complexity, therefore proving again that abiogenesis is
impossible. aaa was unable to specify the unit or
dimensions of "intelligence".

In another thread AmazingAss reveals that "faith can be
quantized", which would be, I suppose, in units of
stupidity. Then we could invent and define SI units for
faith and its reciprocal, intelligence, as

Asstroid^-1 = microHawking

or, one A of stupidity is equivalent to, and the inverse
of, one uH of intelligence.

Gospel TT

2018-04-06 23:30:37 UTC

Post by Brian E. Clark
In article <101799f4-beb4-4c14-87d4-
says...

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on
it's own, without the assistance of an engineer [...]

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to,
if you please, and then tell us exactly how the concept of

abiogenesis

Post by Brian E. Clark
I'm just as curious for him to list the laws of physics
which stipulate that an engineer is required for some
outcome to result.
What, for instance, are the SI units of "engineer"? (One
daVinci?)

We've been told by aaa/Niunian that the 2nd law of
"thermal dynamics" requires intelligence to create
complexity, therefore proving again that abiogenesis is
impossible. aaa was unable to specify the unit or
dimensions of "intelligence".
In another thread AmazingAss reveals that "faith can be
quantized", which would be, I suppose, in units of
stupidity. Then we could invent and define SI units for
faith and its reciprocal, intelligence, as
Asstroid^-1 = microHawking
or, one A of stupidity is equivalent to, and the inverse
of, one uH of intelligence.

LOLOLOL!! Excellent! :-)

Ted

2018-04-06 23:37:19 UTC

Post by Brian E. Clark
In article <101799f4-beb4-4c14-87d4-
says...

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on
it's own, without the assistance of an engineer [...]

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to,
if you please, and then tell us exactly how the concept of abiogenesis

I'm just as curious for him to list the laws of physics
which stipulate that an engineer is required for some
outcome to result.
What, for instance, are the SI units of "engineer"? (One
daVinci?)

We've been told by aaa/Niunian that the 2nd law of
"thermal dynamics" requires intelligence to create
complexity, therefore proving again that abiogenesis is
impossible. aaa was unable to specify the unit or
dimensions of "intelligence".
In another thread AmazingAss reveals that "faith can be
quantized", which would be, I suppose, in units of
stupidity. Then we could invent and define SI units for
faith and its reciprocal, intelligence, as
Asstroid^-1 = microHawking
or, one A of stupidity is equivalent to, and the inverse
of, one uH of intelligence.

Thank you, Peter. This gives us a method of ranking the fuckwits here. :)

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-06 23:43:45 UTC

Smiler

2018-04-08 02:59:37 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on
it's own, without the assistance of an engineer [...]

You know, that's a bit vague. As in Andrew-level vague.
Outline specifically which "laws of physics" you are referring to,
if you please, and then tell us exactly how the concept of

I'm just as curious for him to list the laws of physics which stipulate
that an engineer is required for some outcome to result.
What, for instance, are the SI units of "engineer"? (One daVinci?)

We've been told by aaa/Niunian that the 2nd law of "thermal dynamics"
requires intelligence to create complexity, therefore proving again that
abiogenesis is impossible. aaa was unable to specify the unit or
dimensions of "intelligence".
In another thread AmazingAss reveals that "faith can be quantized",
which would be, I suppose, in units of stupidity. Then we could invent
and define SI units for faith and its reciprocal, intelligence, as
Asstroid^-1 = microHawking

Asstroid^-1 = picoHawking. Get your units right!

or, one A of stupidity is equivalent to, and the inverse of, one uH of
intelligence.

Except that A is used for the Angstrom and H is used for the Henry (the unit of inductance).
The Hawking could be the Hw and the Arsetroll could be the Ao.

--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Malte Runz

2018-04-03 21:53:44 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:27:56 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on it's own, ...

Please, use "reasoning, science and plenty of references".

You're doing precisely what I accuse you, and creationists in general,
of doing. Present bold, unevidenced assertions as proven facts. Don't
you see it?

... without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that life did not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This is simply just a fact. ...

Called it! I swear I had not read this far when I wrote the above.

The constraints of physics and the laws of science simply do not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.

You continue to spew unevidenced blah, blah, blah. It is not "simply
just a fact" that unaided abiogenesis cannot happen. Try this on for
size:

'It is simply just a fact that there are no gods. Therefore all
religions are false.'

And no, I'm not serious. I'd never use the same, flawed logic you use.

... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...

I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.

Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy to contend with? ...

He believes the Flood happened, right? He also believes the Universe
was created by an omnipotent deity in a week. He believes all the
layers you see in the Grand Canyon were formed in a single event. He
believes the stories about magic in the Bible are all true. You know,
all the idiotic, unscientific, unevidenced religious crap you also
believe. All you get from Juby is confirmation that you're right, and,
sure, you'll go to Heaven one day.

But you're welcome to quote Juby here, and I'll address specific
claims. But don't expect me to watch hours and hours of his youtube
stuff. Give me a specific item to play with.

... Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts to back up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we are expected to believe it because you say, and I quote, "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)". ...

Opinions are not to be believed, just registered. And I'm pretty sure
you now know how I feel about Juby. Mission accomplished.

... I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in an unusual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason) and I cannot accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an indicator of truth. ...

It was never meant to be. But you want me to accept "... life did not
start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This is
simply just a fact." You know I don't accept your facts as a fact, but
you didn't find it necessary to make "an argument using reasoning,
science and plenty of references". You never do.

... I want to know what your reasons are and "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. ...

I laugh at 'Professor Juby' because he pretends to believe in things
that are not true, and he tries to convince others that they are. Like
'T. rex was vegetarian'. God damned! Do you understand how wrong that
is, and how easy it is to show that it is wrong? Juby does, but he is
lying to you, kiddo, and that's how he makes a living. Juby, Geller,
Comfort, Ham... they're leaches and I loathe them all.

... What if I responded to your laughing by stating, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! ...

That would be perfectly all right. You'd make as much sense as you
usually do.

You wouldn't accept my answer so why should I except yours? ...

I know you never do. Whether I supply you with links, quotes and
explanations, or laugh out loud and long, none of it leaves a mark.
'Piltdown man was a fraaaaaaaud!', or, in one word:
"urgagurgagooooha-ha"

... You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so provide it. And provide it now.

Or else? I know, you get a lot of reactions to your posts, and nobody
expects you to respond to it all. But it is quite telling that when
you do choose to reply to one of my posts, you choose the simple ones.
The 'ha ha posts' and never, never ever my posts where I make "an
argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references". Those you
always ignore and prefer to go looking for somebody who'll play the
'you're emotional, no you're emotional, no you're emotional, ook ook
monkey donkey game'. (You know who you are, and I wish you'd stop.)

--
Malte Runz

Davej

2018-04-03 22:09:11 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using
reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...

Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold
unevidenced statements like 'We know evolution cannot
happen. Therefore Goddidit is the only logical answer'.
Your guys suck!

When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start
on it's own, without the assistance of an engineer...

The "laws of physics" are still being discovered. You have no clue
what they are. Your imaginary friend bends them on a whim.

v***@gmail.com

2018-04-03 21:20:44 UTC

I would not call anything they say an "argument."
Perhaps "tirade" or "tantrum" would be more appropriate.

Malte Runz

2018-04-03 22:02:50 UTC

I would not call anything they say an "argument."
Perhaps "tirade" or "tantrum" would be more appropriate.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU CAN'T READ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30

Like that?

--
Malte Runz

v***@gmail.com

2018-04-03 22:30:27 UTC

I would not call anything they say an "argument."
Perhaps "tirade" or "tantrum" would be more appropriate.

Go back to your remedial English class. You haven't learned shit.

Gospel TT

2018-04-03 22:49:14 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using

reasoning, scie=

Post by Amazing Answers
nce and plenty of references, the evolutionist says he doesn't have

a degre=

Post by Amazing Answers
e. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. So one

wonders as =

Post by Amazing Answers
to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter reasoning, science and

deal wit=

Post by Amazing Answers
h the creationist's references instead of pointing out something

that has n=

Post by Amazing Answers
o relevance? Reasoning, science and references stand on their

own. If a =

Post by Amazing Answers
dog came along reasoning, using science and using references

perhaps the ev=

Post by Amazing Answers
olutionist will respond properly.

Post by v***@gmail.com
I would not call anything they say an "argument."
Perhaps "tirade" or "tantrum" would be more appropriate.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU CAN'T READ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28
,2=

Post by Amazing Answers
9,30

Post by Malte Runz
Like that?

Go back to your remedial English class. You haven't learned shit.

You need to relax.

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-04 07:14:47 UTC

Go back to your remedial English class. You haven't learned shit.
_______________

THAT'S A LIE.

We all learned shit.
It's what you like on your pizza.

Malte Runz

2018-04-04 19:13:34 UTC

I would not call anything they say an "argument."
Perhaps "tirade" or "tantrum" would be more appropriate.

Go back to your remedial English class. You haven't learned shit.

Snappy comebacks never were your long suite.

And by the way YOU CAN'T COUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!

--
Malte Runz

Yap Honghor

2018-04-03 23:43:16 UTC

I would not call anything they say an "argument."
Perhaps "tirade" or "tantrum" would be more appropriate.

And you call creationism having argument or scientific methods to prove there was a creator????????

Where?

MarkA

2018-04-03 21:30:04 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning,
science and plenty of references,

A Creationist made an argument using reasoning, science, and plenty of
references, and I missed it? Damn! That probably won't happen again for
like another 100 years, if ever!

--
MarkA

Believing with 100% certainty does not mean you've found truth. It
means you've stopped looking for it. -- Bill Flavell

Malte Runz

2018-04-03 22:05:37 UTC

Post by MarkA

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning,
science and plenty of references,

A Creationist made an argument using reasoning, science, and plenty of
references, and I missed it? ...

#Metoo

Post by MarkA
... Damn! That probably won't happen again for
like another 100 years, if ever!

Just like Jesus.

--
Malte Runz

Davej

2018-04-03 21:56:11 UTC

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument...

...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

Amazing Answers

2018-04-03 22:09:13 UTC

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument...

...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials. An oft quoted item coming from engineers is that often the most inept people have doctorates coming from universities. I recall one class I took at a jr college where it was unusual if you had a doctor teaching a class. And this man was highly lauded as such, and also was one of the worst teachers I ever had at the college.

Yap Honghor

2018-04-03 23:47:23 UTC

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument...

...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

A donkey can judge?
You tell that as a joke for us to laugh, right?

Davej

2018-04-04 19:33:32 UTC

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument...

...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials.

Really? So if I have fake credentials and I present them to you
that doesn't seem strange?

Post by Amazing Answers
...the most inept people have doctorates...

So then is he pretending to be inept?

Siri Cruise

2018-04-04 20:12:20 UTC

Post by Davej
...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials.

Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
I'm saving up to buy the Donald a blue stone This post / \
from Metebelis 3. All praise the Great Don! insults Islam. Mohammed

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-04 21:01:26 UTC

Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.
_________________

Try the FSM website.
Www.venganza.org.

Peter Pan

2018-04-09 10:29:57 UTC

Post by Siri Cruise
Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.
_________________
Try the FSM website.
Www.venganza.org.

And leave us not forget www.subgenius.com !

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-09 22:04:27 UTC

Post by Siri Cruise
Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.
_________________
Try the FSM website.
Www.venganza.org.

And leave us not forget www.subgenius.com !

Fucking splinters.

v***@gmail.com

2018-04-05 02:56:04 UTC

Post by Davej
...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials.

Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.
--

That's what the law calls fraud. Some states have laws which specifically
penalize impersonating a physician. You wouldn't like jail.

Kevrob

2018-04-05 15:14:32 UTC

Post by Davej
...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials.

Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.
--

That's what the law calls fraud. Some states have laws which specifically
penalize impersonating a physician. You wouldn't like jail.

DD is "doctor of divinity," as in "The Rev Dr So-and-So."

If you want an even easier gut route to the "Dr" title,
try for "Doctor of Ministry."

Kevin R

Don Martin

2018-04-05 21:51:13 UTC

Post by Davej
...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials.

Where can I get a cheap DD? I think it would be fun to pretend to be impressive
by calling myself a doctor.
--

That's what the law calls fraud. Some states have laws which specifically
penalize impersonating a physician. You wouldn't like jail.

DD is "doctor of divinity," as in "The Rev Dr So-and-So."
If you want an even easier gut route to the "Dr" title,
try for "Doctor of Ministry."

A young theologian named Fiddle,
Refused to accept his degree:
"It's bad enough being called Fiddle,
"Without being Fiddle, DD!"

(not original, but recalled from ages past)

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

Amazing Answers

2018-04-05 04:16:07 UTC

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument...

...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials.

Really? So if I have fake credentials and I present them to you
that doesn't seem strange?

Post by Amazing Answers
...the most inept people have doctorates...

So then is he pretending to be inept?

I would think that if you presented a fake doctorate that you evidently thought you were qualified for that doctorate. In that case I would consider what you have to say and decide if it's any good.

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-05 06:08:51 UTC

I would think that if you presented a fake doctorate that you evidently thought you were qualified for that doctorate. In that case I would consider what you have to say and decide if it's any good.
_______________

The problem is the people with the proper education say he's a loon.

Being a young earth creationist is all the evidence one needs in order to figure he's a loon.

He's also part of some creation science group which makes 2 strikes against him.

He has no credentials and that's 3 strikes.

Amazing Answers

2018-04-05 06:33:02 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
I would think that if you presented a fake doctorate that you evidently thought you were qualified for that doctorate. In that case I would consider what you have to say and decide if it's any good.
_______________
The problem is the people with the proper education say he's a loon.
Being a young earth creationist is all the evidence one needs in order to figure he's a loon.
He's also part of some creation science group which makes 2 strikes against him.
He has no credentials and that's 3 strikes.

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my own experience.

You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all. Maybe another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to read. Then, you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to read maybe two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have Tues and Thursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of days. But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you have six classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to select a topic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time, you come up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your paper with and it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many books and papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With time constraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover all the ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have studied is .0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a liberal figure.

College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, watching Youtube instruction videos. I learn more studying subject matter that I'm interested in. The papers you get assigned to are usually your teacher's subject of interest. I also get more done praying and then researching than by just looking. Then you have the problem of the limitations of your library catalog and the time it takes for ordered papers to come in. Of course with the internet it's easier to do research these days, but not so when I was at the University.

Greywolf

2018-04-05 06:46:17 UTC

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my own experience.
You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all. Maybe another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to read. Then, you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to read maybe two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have Tues and Thursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of days. But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you have six classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to select a topic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time, you come up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your paper with and it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many books and papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With time constraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover all the ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have studied is .0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a liberal figure.
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, watching Youtube instruction videos. I learn more studying subject matter that I'm interested in. The papers you get assigned to are usually your teacher's subject of interest. I also get more done praying and then researching than by just looking. Then you have the problem of the limitations of your library catalog and the time it takes for ordered papers to come in. Of course with the internet it's easier to do research these days, but not so when I was at the University.

_________

Hey! Aren't you that Christian dude who lied about discussing the Garden of Eden story in depth with me?

Why you sure are!

What happened? Don't mess around *this* post when you've got some serious atheist refutin' to do!

You seem amazed at why an atheist would be an atheist. Well, sit your ass down and respond to my Garden of Eden piece--in depth!

What's the matter? Can't refute it?

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-05 06:55:46 UTC

Well, sit your ass down and respond to my Garden of Eden piece--in depth!

What's the matter? Can't refute it?
________________

Assroid: Must not read...might have facts and logic and stuff.
Make Assroid look dum.

Assroid only pawn in game of bullshit.

Kit

2018-04-05 14:51:18 UTC

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my own experience.
You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all. Maybe another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to read. Then, you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to read maybe two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have Tues and Thursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of days. But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you have six classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to select a topic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time, you come up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your paper with and it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many books and papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With time constraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover all the ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have studied is .0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a liberal figure.
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, > watching Youtube instruction videos.

If the something in the YouTube video you have a question about, how do you ask the video to clarify the matter?

Post by Amazing Answers
I learn more studying subject matter that I'm
interested in.

Fair enough.

Post by Amazing Answers
The papers you get assigned to are usually your
teacher's subject of interest.

Actually, they usually are germane to the subject you are studying.

Post by Amazing Answers
I also get more done praying and then researching than
by just looking.

How much do you get done by praying alone?

Post by Amazing Answers
Then you have the problem of the limitations of your
library catalog and the time it takes for ordered
papers to come in. Of course with the internet it's
easier to do research these days, but not so when I was
at the University.

There always have been sufficient resources to do thorough research.

-- Kit

Kevrob

2018-04-05 15:22:34 UTC

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my own experience.
You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all. Maybe another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to read. Then, you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to read maybe two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have Tues and Thursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of days. But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you have six classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to select a topic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time, you come up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your paper with and it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many books and papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With time constraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover all the ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have studied is .0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a liberal figure.
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, > watching Youtube instruction videos.

If the something in the YouTube video you have a question about, how do you ask the video to clarify the matter?

Post by Amazing Answers
I learn more studying subject matter that I'm
interested in.

Fair enough.

Post by Amazing Answers
The papers you get assigned to are usually your
teacher's subject of interest.

Actually, they usually are germane to the subject you are studying.

Course materials at the various levels are usually approved by
state bureacracy, for elementary and secondary public schools,
and/or by the local school boards. In private schools there are
standards set by accrediting institutions. At the collegiate
undergraduate level in the US, required texts for a section have to
get the approval of the department chair, or relevant committee.
Instructors and professors have to submit a syllabus for approval.
The course may be a pre-requisite for a more advanced course in the
department, and neglecting to cover certain material might be a
serious lack, when the student is expected to know it later.

Post by Amazing Answers
I also get more done praying and then researching than
by just looking.

The praying is superfluous, except, perhaps as motivation by
self-delusion.

Post by Kit
How much do you get done by praying alone?

Are you another alumnus of Unca Bubba's Bait Shop and Bible College?

Post by Kit
There always have been sufficient resources to do thorough research.

Doing original research is the tough row to hoe, and that's
what Phd candidates have to do.

Kevin R

Amazing Answers

2018-04-05 15:31:26 UTC

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my own experience.
You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all. Maybe another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to read. Then, you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to read maybe two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have Tues and Thursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of days. But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you have six classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to select a topic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time, you come up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your paper with and it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many books and papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With time constraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover all the ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have studied is .0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a liberal figure.
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, > watching Youtube instruction videos.

If the something in the YouTube video you have a question about, how do you ask the video to clarify the matter?

Post by Amazing Answers
I learn more studying subject matter that I'm
interested in.

Fair enough.

Post by Amazing Answers
The papers you get assigned to are usually your
teacher's subject of interest.

Actually, they usually are germane to the subject you are studying.

Post by Amazing Answers
I also get more done praying and then researching than
by just looking.

The praying is superfluous, except, perhaps as motivation by
self-delusion.

Post by Kit
How much do you get done by praying alone?

Are you another alumnus of Unca Bubba's Bait Shop and Bible College?

Post by Kit
There always have been sufficient resources to do thorough research.

Doing original research is the tough row to hoe, and that's
what Phd candidates have to do.
Kevin R

Went to the University library and prayed. I had this impression and went in that direction. Looked at the shelves and saw Scientific American magazine volumes. Had this impression to look during the time Piltdown Man was found. There it was, the two page spread.

Greywolf

2018-04-05 15:54:37 UTC

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my own experience.
You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all. Maybe another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to read. Then, you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to read maybe two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have Tues and Thursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of days. But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you have six classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to select a topic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time, you come up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your paper with and it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many books and papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With time constraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover all the ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have studied is .0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a liberal figure.
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, > watching Youtube instruction videos.

If the something in the YouTube video you have a question about, how do you ask the video to clarify the matter?

Post by Amazing Answers
I learn more studying subject matter that I'm
interested in.

Fair enough.

Post by Amazing Answers
The papers you get assigned to are usually your
teacher's subject of interest.

Actually, they usually are germane to the subject you are studying.

Post by Amazing Answers
I also get more done praying and then researching than
by just looking.

The praying is superfluous, except, perhaps as motivation by
self-delusion.

Post by Kit
How much do you get done by praying alone?

Are you another alumnus of Unca Bubba's Bait Shop and Bible College?

Post by Kit
There always have been sufficient resources to do thorough research.

Doing original research is the tough row to hoe, and that's
what Phd candidates have to do.
Kevin R

___________

While you were in "University Library," did you read up on the Garden of Eden story in Genesis too?

You know, the one you claim you and I have discussed right here in alt.atheism.

I think you made that up, that you flat-out lied.

C'mon, prove this atheist wrong. If you can't, at least gracefully admit you lied and show viewers of alt.atheism some real class.

Or is it that you're devoid any? Go ahead and refuse to tackle the Garden of Eden story, or provide a rational explanation as to why you won't address it.

Admit it, you're only here to annoy and antagonize atheists, you prick.

If I'm wrong, just say so.

s***@gmail.com

2018-04-06 03:25:01 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, watching Youtube instruction videos. I learn more studying subject matter that I'm interested in. The papers you get assigned to are usually your teacher's subject of interest. I also get more done praying and then researching than by just looking. Then you have the problem of the limitations of your library catalog and the time it takes for ordered papers to come in. Of course with the internet it's easier to do research these days, but not so when I was at the University.

Well, I can now understand why I'll never get my questions answered about
which "laws of physics" abiogenesis allegedly violates.

Selene

Gospel TT

2018-04-06 17:55:27 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
I would think that if you presented a fake doctorate that you

evidently=

Post by Amazing Answers
thought you were qualified for that doctorate. In that case I

would consid=

Post by Amazing Answers
er what you have to say and decide if it's any good.

Post by Amazing Answers
_______________
The problem is the people with the proper education say he's a loon.
Being a young earth creationist is all the evidence one needs

in order =

Post by Amazing Answers
to figure he's a loon.

Post by Amazing Answers
He's also part of some creation science group which makes 2

strikes aga=

Post by Amazing Answers
inst him.

Post by Amazing Answers
He has no credentials and that's 3 strikes.

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my

own expe=

Post by Amazing Answers
rience.

Post by Amazing Answers
You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's not all.

Maybe =

Post by Amazing Answers
another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to

read. Then,=

Post by Amazing Answers
you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to

read maybe =

Post by Amazing Answers
two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have

Tues and Th=

Post by Amazing Answers
ursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of

days. =

Post by Amazing Answers
But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you

have si=

Post by Amazing Answers
x classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to

select a t=

Post by Amazing Answers
opic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time,

you come=

Post by Amazing Answers
up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your

paper with a=

Post by Amazing Answers
nd it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many

books a=

Post by Amazing Answers
nd papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With

time co=

Post by Amazing Answers
nstraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover

all the=

Post by Amazing Answers
ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have

studied is =

Post by Amazing Answers
.0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a

liberal f=

Post by Amazing Answers
igure.
+

Post by Amazing Answers
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, watching

Youtube inst=

Post by Amazing Answers
ruction videos. I learn more studying subject matter that I'm

interested i=

Post by Amazing Answers
n. The papers you get assigned to are usually your teacher's

subject of int=

Post by Amazing Answers
erest. I also get more done praying and then researching than by

just look=

Post by Amazing Answers
ing. Then you have the problem of the limitations of your library

catalog =

Post by Amazing Answers
and the time it takes for ordered papers to come in. Of course

with the in=

Post by Amazing Answers
ternet it's easier to do research these days, but not so when I was

at the =

Post by Amazing Answers
University.
Well, I can now understand why I'll never get my questions answered

about=

Post by Amazing Answers
which "laws of physics" abiogenesis allegedly violates.
Selene

LOLOLOL!!!!1

2018-04-06 18:24:26 UTC

On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 11:33:05 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers

On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 11:08:55 PM UTC-7, Cloud Hobbit

Post by Amazing Answers
I would think that if you presented a fake doctorate that you

evidently=

thought you were qualified for that doctorate. In that case I

would consid=

er what you have to say and decide if it's any good. > > _______________

Post by Cloud Hobbit
The problem is the people with the proper education say he's a

loon.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Being a young earth creationist is all the evidence one needs

in order =

to figure he's a loon.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
He's also part of some creation science group which makes 2

strikes aga=

inst him.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
He has no credentials and that's 3 strikes.

Dude. Education? Let's take a look at this, reporting from my

own expe=

rience. > > You are usually assigned a general textbook. But that's
not all.

Maybe =

another book, as well, and a couple of other stuff you have to

read. Then,=

you are assigned papers. We're talking one class. You have to

read maybe =

two chapters in that text before the next class. So if you have

Tues and Th=

ursday classes, all your reading has to be done in those couple of

days. =

But that's not all. We're only talking about one class! So if you

have si=

x classes you have all that reading to do. Papers. You have to

select a t=

opic. By the time you've scouted around, utilizing valuable time,

you come=

up with empty and realized that you have nothing to fill your

paper with a=

nd it's too late to change topics. But all said and done, how many

books a=

nd papers have you actually read before you get your diploma? With

time co=

nstraints you can't provide quality reading time, nor can you cover

all the=

ground you want to. All said, the amount of material you have

studied is =

.0000000000000001 % of everything that is out there. And that's a

liberal f=

igure.

Post by Amazing Answers
College is a joke. I learn more, waste less time, watching

Youtube inst=

ruction videos. I learn more studying subject matter that I'm

interested i=

n. The papers you get assigned to are usually your teacher's

subject of int=

erest. I also get more done praying and then researching than by

just look=

ing. Then you have the problem of the limitations of your library

catalog =

and the time it takes for ordered papers to come in. Of course

with the in=

ternet it's easier to do research these days, but not so when I was

at the =

University.
Well, I can now understand why I'll never get my questions answered

about=

which "laws of physics" abiogenesis allegedly violates.
Selene

LOLOLOL!!!!1

Malte Runz

2018-04-04 19:34:38 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:09:13 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument...

...and then we find out he has a fake degree from an online
Bible college?

I'll judge a man by what he says rather than his credentials. ...

So when Juby claims that T. rex was vegetarian we should trust his
words, ignoring that the guy has no credentials to make such a call?
Of course an education makes all the difference in such cases.

... An oft quoted item coming from engineers is that often the most inept people have doctorates coming from universities. I recall one class I took at a jr college where it was unusual if you had a doctor teaching a class. And this man was highly lauded as such, and also was one of the worst teachers I ever had at the college.

You'd be an absolutely terrible teacher because most of the time you
simply make up stuff when you need an explanation.

--
Malte Runz

Cloud Hobbit

2018-04-04 20:56:56 UTC

Yap Honghor

2018-04-03 23:41:27 UTC

Scientific Creationism using words to con people, never anything being scientific or facts!

That is how the society view your creationism!
More like selling snake oil to believers...

Amazing Answers

2018-04-04 07:04:42 UTC

Post by Yap Honghor

Scientific Creationism using words to con people, never anything being scientific or facts!
That is how the society view your creationism!
More like selling snake oil to believers...

Snake oil? All you have added to this discussion is forced ridicule. Complete nonsense. So don't talk about snake oil if snake oil is all you have to give.

Malte Runz

2018-04-04 19:50:59 UTC

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 00:04:42 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Yap Honghor

Scientific Creationism using words to con people, never anything being scientific or facts!
That is how the society view your creationism!
More like selling snake oil to believers...

Snake oil? All you have added to this discussion is forced ridicule. Complete nonsense. So don't talk about snake oil if snake oil is all you have to give.

The only reason you object to the use of the term "snake oil" is your
legendary ignorance on most things scientific.

Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect
example. He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

--
Malte Runz

Siri Cruise

2018-04-04 20:09:12 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect
example. He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it had been
created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would become a carnivore.

So the fix was in from the beginning.

Malte Runz

2018-04-04 21:41:12 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect
example. He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it had been
created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would become a carnivore.
So the fix was in from the beginning.

Exactly. It devolved into a meat eater by losing genetic information
caused by the Fall... a mere 40 days after Creation.

--
Malte Runz

Don Martin

2018-04-05 21:51:13 UTC

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 23:41:12 +0200, Malte Runz

Post by Malte Runz
Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect
example. He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it had been
created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would become a carnivore.
So the fix was in from the beginning.

Exactly. It devolved into a meat eater by losing genetic information
caused by the Fall... a mere 40 days after Creation.

Supercharged Evolution! God is Great!

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

Smiler

2018-04-08 03:12:19 UTC

Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect example.
He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it had
been created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would become a
carnivore.
So the fix was in from the beginning.

It chewed the cud with *those* teeth????

Gospel TT

2018-04-08 03:30:52 UTC

Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect example.
He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it had
been created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would become a
carnivore.
So the fix was in from the beginning.

It chewed the cud with *those* teeth????

They was lot's skinnier back in them day's.

Smiler

2018-04-09 01:21:11 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect

example.

Post by Malte Runz
He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it

had

Post by Siri Cruise
been created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would

become a

Post by Siri Cruise
carnivore.
So the fix was in from the beginning.

It chewed the cud with *those* teeth????

They was lot's skinnier back in them day's.

Did you see it yourself, or did your cousin tell you?

Gospel TT

2018-04-09 04:58:15 UTC

Post by Malte Runz
Juby telling you that T. rex was not a meat eater is a perfect

example.

Post by Malte Runz
He lies, you buy it, you never register it happened.

Given its teeth and jaws are adapted for meat eating, even if it

had

Post by Siri Cruise
been created a herbivore, it was created anticipating it would

become a

Post by Siri Cruise
carnivore.
So the fix was in from the beginning.

It chewed the cud with *those* teeth????

They was lot's skinnier back in them day's.

Did you see it yourself, or did your cousin tell you?

I don't got no cousin's that are old enough cause that was when my
great uncle was a kid & he's the one that told me. He was a lion
tamer then cause it was so easy cause lion's back then was only
little brown furry creature's with long nose's that ate ant's.

Kevrob

2018-04-09 05:16:05 UTC

Post by Smiler
Did you see it yourself, or did your cousin tell you?

Who was your uncle, Johnny Hart?

Kevin R

Gospel TT

2018-04-09 05:42:13 UTC

Post by Smiler
Did you see it yourself, or did your cousin tell you?

Who was your uncle, Johnny Hart?
Kevin R

No but they was good friend's & he was Hart's inspiration. He was an
accountant before he became a lion tamer & that's when they met.

Yap Honghor

2018-04-05 08:44:20 UTC

Post by Yap Honghor

Scientific Creationism using words to con people, never anything being scientific or facts!
That is how the society view your creationism!
More like selling snake oil to believers...

Snake oil? All you have added to this discussion is forced ridicule. Complete nonsense. So don't talk about snake oil if snake oil is all you have to give.

What else is a donkey capable to sell, apart from snake oil????
While snake oil may have certain small value, you have not really been trained well enough to be a professional salesman.

Mitchell Holman

2018-04-04 02:35:03 UTC

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist

There is nothing scientific about creationism.

That is why you ran away when I asked for proof
of the creationist "lab experiments" you cited.

Post by Amazing Answers
makes an argument using reasoning,
science and plenty of references, the evolutionist says he doesn't
have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either.
So one wonders as to why the evolutionist doesn't use counter
reasoning, science and deal with the creationist's references instead
of pointing out something that has no relevance?

Evolutionists don't need "counter reasoning"
since they have FACTS on their side.

Evolution observed

http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/

http://discovermagazine.com/2015/march/19-life-in-the-fast-lane

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42103058

Malte Runz

2018-04-04 20:06:32 UTC

On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 21:35:03 -0500, Mitchell Holman

Post by Mitchell Holman

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist

There is nothing scientific about creationism.
That is why you ran away when I asked for proof
of the creationist "lab experiments" you cited.

Give him a break. There are so many to pick from, making it simply
impossible to choose.

Post by Mitchell Holman

Evolutionists don't need "counter reasoning"
since they have FACTS on their side.
Evolution observed
http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/
http://discovermagazine.com/2015/march/19-life-in-the-fast-lane
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42103058

It's no use. Assroid suffers from Factofobia. The evidence resisting
strain.

--
Malte Runz

Tim

2018-04-04 07:43:11 UTC

How is pointing out an appeal to authority an invalid argument. You don't know what a valid argument is. Stop pretending, fake Christian.

b***@m.nu

2018-04-04 11:36:51 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

Post by Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument

That is an oxymoron "Scientific Creationist", there is no such thing.
So from that view a "Scientific Creationist" can not make an argument
because they don't even actually exist, so whatever gobblygoop you
said after those 7 words was just fluff to make yourself feel
important. In your next life please by all means spend more time in
school.

John Locke

2018-04-04 20:22:57 UTC

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers

After a Scientific Creationist....

...no you don't..."scientific creationist" is an oxymoron. Those are
conflicting terms...there's no such animal and there's nothing
scientific about a creationist.

v***@gmail.com

2018-04-05 02:53:26 UTC