Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right

[kensi]

The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable
predictions, and climate models have been making predictions since the
1970s. How reliable have they been? Now a new evaluation of global
climate models used to project Earth’s future global average surface
temperatures over the past half-century answers that question: most of
the models have been quite accurate.

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

[benj]

Post by kensi
The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable
predictions, and climate models have been making predictions since the
1970s. How reliable have they been? Now a new evaluation of global
climate models used to project Earth’s future global average surface
temperatures over the past half-century answers that question: most of
the models have been quite accurate.
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

NASA mouse painters? Bwhahahahahaha. Nasa has been faking data and
publishing lies for some time now. Nothing they say can be believed
anymore. Their reputation for science is all past. Now it's nothing but
journo-science and virtually EVERY prediction they make is provably wrong!

To say they their predictions have been correct is to say that the north
pole is ice free, Siberia is green farmland and nobody knows what snow
is anymore. Kensi, is such a grifter! This is laughable "science".


Here is actual data of model success! Note that the further this array
of climate models drifts from reality the MORE IPCC crows about how
conviced they are that warming is "real".

Loading Image...

Hlaf century of accurate predictions my ass! They can't even predict
tomorrows weather without lies.

[unknown]

Post by kensi
The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable
predictions, and climate models have been making predictions since the
1970s. How reliable have they been? Now a new evaluation of global
climate models used to project Earth’s future global average surface
temperatures over the past half-century answers that question: most of
the models have been quite accurate.
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/

So your idea of science is to ONLY look for data
that confirms your predictions while ignoring data
that belies them? Like predicting a temperature
rise for the FUTURE then going back into the past
for your *evidence*? OMG!

Here's a clue, kensi, selective science is anything
BUT science.

[a425couple]

Post by kensi
The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable
predictions, and climate models

Yo kensi, what do you think of this?

from
https://www.vox.com/world/2020/1/8/21051756/australia-fires-climate-change-coal-politics

As Australia burns, its leaders are clinging to coal
Australia is the world’s largest coal exporter, but its government is
downplaying its contributions to climate change.

By Umair Irfan Jan 8, 2020, 12:00pm EST

Firefighters battle a bushfire in New South Wales on December 31, 2019.
Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images

The devastating bushfires across Australia have cemented the fact that
the country is on the front lines of a major climate-linked disaster,
one that scientists saw coming and one that will only get worse from here.

The fires have already torched an area larger than West Virginia,
destroyed 2,000 homes, and killed at least 26 people since igniting in
September. The blazes clouded the skies above cities like Canberra and
Sydney, creating some of the worst air pollution in the world. The
swirling smoke is so dense, satellites can see it from space.

Yet as the deadly flames continue to spread and smoke smothers major
cities, Australia’s government is dismissing its own contributions to
the problem.

Government officials continue to downplay the link between climate
change and wildfires. Prime Minister Scott Morrison also said that the
country doesn’t need to do more to limit its greenhouse gas emissions.

“Climate change is a global phenomenon and we’re doing our bit as part
of the response to climate change — we’re taking action on climate
change,” Morrison told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in
November. But he also said that “the suggestion that any way shape or
form that Australia, accountable for 1.3% of the world’s emissions, that
the individual actions of Australia are impacting directly on specific
fire events, whether it’s here or anywhere else in the world, that
doesn’t bear up to credible scientific evidence either.”

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (center) has downplayed the
link between climate change and the bushfires. ----

Can the catastrophic fires bring some sanity to Australian climate politics?
As Australia burns, its leaders are clinging to coal

[Sergio]

Post by kensi
The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable
predictions, and climate models

Yo kensi,  what do you think of this?
from
https://www.vox.com/world/2020/1/8/21051756/australia-fires-climate-change-coal-politics
As Australia burns, its leaders are clinging to coal
Australia is the world’s largest coal exporter, but its government is
downplaying its contributions to climate change.
By Umair Irfan  Jan 8, 2020, 12:00pm EST
Firefighters battle a bushfire in New South Wales on December 31, 2019.
Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images
The devastating bushfires across Australia have cemented the fact that
As Australia burns, its leaders are clinging to coal

but think of the GOOD !

Roasted Bush Meat is Good for the people of Australia !

millions of critters, insects, toads, crawly things fresh roasted

[Michael Ejercito]

Post by kensi
The hallmark of good science, however, is the ability to make testable
predictions, and climate models have been making predictions since the
1970s.

In 2005, UNEP published a mathematical theorem showing that, if climate
change was true, it would lead to 50 mikllion climate refugees by 2010.

No such refugees showed up.

http://ethicsalarms.com/2011/04/17/global-warming-advocates-flunk-ethics-and-credibility-again/



Michael