v***@gmail.com
2016-12-22 22:17:01 UTC
Morgan espoused:—
I merely say here about the odds of Shakespeare having 'met a sailor in his local pub'.
What are the odds of not meeting a sailor in the Port of London?
On this fact alone, requiring no special knowledge, but a liberal understanding of how London is situated upon the River Thames and its national import thereby since the time of Claudius, dothed Morgan's point propose itself.
True he has other 'points' though for similar reason, let them be 'blunts' for the moment, while we make discourse in a 'hello sailor' interim, supposing along a line whereas a bloke could meet a sailor.
[I know this may be controversial to mention, but I sought in vain in this newsgroup for further mention of Elizabeth's rescue-dwarf collection, or dwarves as some say, so switched to sailors.]
At least one could agree with Morgan's observation, possibly original, that a list will go on.
Even on and on, being the very nature of a list, or lists in plural.
Though my main inquiry is this matter of the extancy of sailors in pubs, specially since The Stratfordian was in Town for quite a while, and changing the emphasis from the unlikeliness of The Author meeting them, to the very high likelihood of meeting them in pubs — even if the Stratfordian wrote nought of the work, a subtle deviance, though notable from the logics.
Phil Innes
Stratfordian Response: Shakspere could have met a sailor in his local pub.
The list of observation and response goes on and on. Ironically, the Stratfordians constantly claim that the anti-Stratfordians are crackpots. I think the Stratfordians need to take a look in the mirror.
Merlin's mirror, presumably.The list of observation and response goes on and on. Ironically, the Stratfordians constantly claim that the anti-Stratfordians are crackpots. I think the Stratfordians need to take a look in the mirror.
I merely say here about the odds of Shakespeare having 'met a sailor in his local pub'.
What are the odds of not meeting a sailor in the Port of London?
On this fact alone, requiring no special knowledge, but a liberal understanding of how London is situated upon the River Thames and its national import thereby since the time of Claudius, dothed Morgan's point propose itself.
True he has other 'points' though for similar reason, let them be 'blunts' for the moment, while we make discourse in a 'hello sailor' interim, supposing along a line whereas a bloke could meet a sailor.
[I know this may be controversial to mention, but I sought in vain in this newsgroup for further mention of Elizabeth's rescue-dwarf collection, or dwarves as some say, so switched to sailors.]
At least one could agree with Morgan's observation, possibly original, that a list will go on.
Even on and on, being the very nature of a list, or lists in plural.
Though my main inquiry is this matter of the extancy of sailors in pubs, specially since The Stratfordian was in Town for quite a while, and changing the emphasis from the unlikeliness of The Author meeting them, to the very high likelihood of meeting them in pubs — even if the Stratfordian wrote nought of the work, a subtle deviance, though notable from the logics.
Phil Innes