Post by odellmPost by GKnollPost by Steve BarberPost by GKnollI am proposing a new rule.
Here it is...
When the moderator wants to make a reply or create a new thread, he has
to put post into the same queue that we members have to put our posts
into. If he does this, then he will have to wait in line like everyone
else before his post is published. He will experience the lag time. If
he wants to have his post published to the NG, then he will have to
clear the queue until his post gets to the front of the queue.
Now lets see if he will agree to this new rule.
I have a question for you. Why is it that you won't go into an open
forum where there is no waiting at all? Why not Duncan McRae's forum?
There is no waiting around, we can post images right away, as well as
links, and so forth. Is there some reason you refuse to go to an open
forum?
Why should I go to any other forum? Are you going to answer the
questions that you are avoiding to answer over in those forums? Of
course you will not.
I am reminding you that you are stonewalling on answering one of the
most important questions for the JFK Research Community in 37 years.
That question is, where exactly do you hear the "try to determine" cross
talk fragment on Channel 1?
I have told the Newsgroup where I hear it. I am waiting for you and
Micahel O'Dell to tell the newsgroup where you hear it. Both of you have
an obligation to do that.
You are a public figure who injected himself into the acoustic debate 37
years ago. By your own admission, back in 1981, during the time the Ramsey
Panel was in session, you told people that you hear 3 other cross talk
fragments which come before the "hold" cross talk fragment. When you were
asked if you told the Ramsey Panel about this, you said you do not
remember.
Now, 37 years later, it comes to light that those cross talk fragments
prove that there was a skip on the Dictabelt, and you still remain silent.
So, again, why should I go anywhere else to ask you anything?
I'm going to jump in here, somewhat against my better judgement, but what
the hell. I'll respond here and the other thread. Beyond that is
doubtful.
You are off in la la land. This trivia question you have, "where exactly
do you hear the "try to determine" cross talk fragment on Channel 1?", is
just that. Trivia. It is very very far from "one of the most important
questions for the JFK Research Community in 37 years." I know you want it
to be that, because you want to discover something important. But this
ain't it.
Why does it bug you that I said that? This is what it took for you to
come out of the woodwork and respond?
I told you once before that I never bluff. The simple fact is that this
is one of the most important questions in the JFK Research community for
the last 37 years.
I say that fragment proves that there was a back skip on the recorder
right before the "hold" crosstalk. You do not think that is important?
It proves that the NRC Panel was wrong when they said there was no
evidence of a skip on the the Dictabelt.
I don't want to discover something important. I did not say I discovered
this. Steve is the one who discovered the three fragments. I just
located it And once you find it, it becomes clear there is a skip on the
tape. I think what is really going on with you, is you are a little
jealous. Why else would you say something like that.
Post by odellmYou want me to explain something about it, but I cannot fathom why you
should be expecting that. It's a point about which I've devoted about 0
hours of my time to, ever. It isn't something that ever mattered.
Well it should have mattered. You have a very good talent of writing
words and actually saying nothing.
Post by odellmSteve gave you an honest answer that he didn't remember exactly what he
said many years ago. I don't remember much of what I said last year.
Let Steve talk for himself. Only Steve knows if he gave an honest answer
or not. I merely pointed out that he had no trouble remembering he
published it in the TCI but could not remember if he told the DOJ, FBI
or Ramsey Panel.
Post by odellmWithout referring to emails or other documents, most of us might not
remember every detail. But he didn't tell you no. The fact is, if it had
come up he probably did tell them then, but it may not have. Once again,
So now you are trying to make an excuse for him? As I said before, let
Steve talk for himself.
Post by odellmbecause it isn't significant.
How do you know its not significant? You just told me you know nothing
about them. You never studied them. I am telling you it is significant,
extremely significant.
Post by odellmFinally, no, you have not shown that those crosstalk fragments prove there
was a skip on the Dictabelt. You have posted an unsupported assertion,
that's all. If you have an argument to make, make it. Make it
completely. Do the analysis, show your work. This habit of posting
fragmentary thoughts for people to jump at is silly. I won't be playing
that. I've advised Steve he shouldn't either, but of course that's up to
him.
I showed where exactly to look for the "try to determine" fragment on
the recording. I showed you exactly. Something Steve would not do. Now I
think you are plenty capable of finding it on the tape yourself. Why
don't you do that. I am not going to do all the work for you.