Aaron Wood
2017-08-30 05:15:40 UTC
I don't have a full writeup yet, but wanted to ask if people on here have
run into this.
I'm seeing a disparity between flent and the dslreports speed tests. On my
connection at home (Comcast 150/12), I figured it was something related to
the test implementations, but minor. But on a connect at a friend with
business-class Comcast (300/12), we're seeing a huge difference. Flent
can't seem to achieve more than 120Mbps, often with an early, couple-second
hump at a much higher speed. But dslreports' speed tests gets the full
300Mbps.
In looking closer at my connection, with sqm (cake) turned off, I'm seeing
~180Mbps download with 500ms of bufferbloat when I use the dslreports test (
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/20805152).
Yet flent can't come close to that, even with the tcp_12down test:
â
The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either traffic
class, or the ports that traffic are running on. I've ruled out the ping
streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts downloads has the same
120Mbps roof.
It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port
80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if doing
deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP transfer).
-Aaron
run into this.
I'm seeing a disparity between flent and the dslreports speed tests. On my
connection at home (Comcast 150/12), I figured it was something related to
the test implementations, but minor. But on a connect at a friend with
business-class Comcast (300/12), we're seeing a huge difference. Flent
can't seem to achieve more than 120Mbps, often with an early, couple-second
hump at a much higher speed. But dslreports' speed tests gets the full
300Mbps.
In looking closer at my connection, with sqm (cake) turned off, I'm seeing
~180Mbps download with 500ms of bufferbloat when I use the dslreports test (
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/20805152).
Yet flent can't come close to that, even with the tcp_12down test:
â
The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either traffic
class, or the ports that traffic are running on. I've ruled out the ping
streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts downloads has the same
120Mbps roof.
It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port
80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if doing
deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP transfer).
-Aaron