Peter Howarth
2017-05-20 10:50:08 UTC
In an attempt to be more positive on how to research English mediaeval heraldry, I suggest that the best starting points are two works, the 'Dictionary of British Arms' and Steen Clemmensen's 'Ordinary of Medieval Armorials'. The problem with general works is that they concentrate on heraldry in the 19th and 20th century, which bears little resemblance to what actually happened in mediaeval times. It is most unfortunate that Brian Timms's website, with its descriptions of many mediaeval rolls of arms, including some French ones, is no longer on line.
'Dictionary of British Arms: Medieval Ordinary', edd. Hubert Chesshyre, Thomas Woodcock et al., 4 vols., London: Society of Antiquaries, 1992-2014
This is arranged as an ordinary, that is by the arms themselves and not by the names of the owners. There is an index of names at the end of each volume, but it is cumbersome to use because you must search each volume separately for all the different spellings and variations on a surname. The research into the different sources (mainly British, before 1530) was carried out from 1940 to 1980 and the results were put onto hand-written index cards by over 70 volunteers before being collated, eventually onto computer, by staff at the College of Heralds. It is not surprising that in the process some errors have crept in.
Nonetheless, this is a most valuable work. It is not limited to the different rolls of arms, of which England still has many more than any other country, but also includes the major collections of seals and many other sources including architecture, church windows and carvings, and manuscripts. But its greatest value lies in the sources that are given for each entry, so that it is possible to check on each one and to give it at least an approximate date. This is where I start looking for arms I haven't already researched.
Unfortunately, at £95.00 a volume it's not cheap and there are not many second-hand copies around yet. It should be available in larger libraries.
Clemmensen, Steen, 'Ordinary of Medieval Armorials', a Microsoft Access database on CD-ROM, rev. edn., Copenhagen: http://www.armorial.dk/, 2013
The whole of Steen Clemmensen's website is worth investigating because he has carried out a quite prodigious amount of work on rolls of arms, both English and continental, which is not just limited to listing the contents of the different rolls but which also analyses how they were written and the connections between them. He has also produced critical editions in pdf format of several fourteenth-century rolls. It therefore seems a little churlish to point out that his database 'Ordinary of Medieval Armorials' is limited to the various rolls and does not include any seals or other types of sources. He uses a special kind of blazon where the tinctures are listed separately from the charges and he often invents different sigla for the rolls. It also requires the purchase of Microsoft Access. And as might be expected in such an enormous work, there are some typos here and there.
But the great advantage is that Clemmensen standardises the surnames so that it is possible to look up all the different versions of a coat of arms used within a family, together with their sources, including continental rolls as well as English ones. I use it almost as often as the DBA.
Amongst cheaper alternatives, the best is Joseph Foster's 'Feudal Coats of Arms' (1902), available in modern reprints. He was constrained by the more limited knowledge of his day, but he was the first to go back to mediaeval rolls of arms for his information, and to give his sources, instead of just copying freely from earlier writers. C R Humphery-Smith, 'Anglo-Norman Armoury' (1973) and 'Anglo-Norman Armoury Two' (1984) are also useful but not so easily found. Ideally, all of these compilations, including the two big ones, should be checked against editions of the original rolls: Tremlett and London in 'Rolls of Arms Henry III' (1967), Brault, 'Rolls of Arms Edward I', 2 vols (1997) and 'Eight Thirteenth-Century Rolls of Arms in French and Anglo-Norman Blazon' (1971). Transcriptions of later rolls have been made by Clemmensen or are listed in Wagner, 'A Catalogue of English Mediaeval Rolls of Arms' (1950) available from Archive CD Books http://www.archivecdbooks.org/ Unfortunately, many of the transcriptions are not easily accessible.
For seals, the Internet Archive has Walter de Gray Birch, 'Catalogue of Seals in the Department of Manuscripts in the British Museum', 6 vols., London: British Museum, 1887-1900, and Louis-Claude Douët d’Arcq, 'Collection de sceaux', 3 vols., Paris, 1863-68, which has many English seals. The Durham Cathedral collection of seals is available at http://reed.dur.ac.uk/xtf/view?docId=ead/dcd/dcdmseal.xml and the card-index of seals at the Public Record Office has now been made available on the National Archives website. These are the major collections but there are plenty of other, smaller ones scattered over the country and, sometimes, the internet.
Genealogists now research amongst mediaeval documents themselves and no longer consider secondary sources unless they cite contemporary evidence. I am looking forward to the time when mediaeval heraldry is treated in the same way. It could therefore be helpful to include references to other sources of mediaeval heraldry.
Peter Howarth
'Dictionary of British Arms: Medieval Ordinary', edd. Hubert Chesshyre, Thomas Woodcock et al., 4 vols., London: Society of Antiquaries, 1992-2014
This is arranged as an ordinary, that is by the arms themselves and not by the names of the owners. There is an index of names at the end of each volume, but it is cumbersome to use because you must search each volume separately for all the different spellings and variations on a surname. The research into the different sources (mainly British, before 1530) was carried out from 1940 to 1980 and the results were put onto hand-written index cards by over 70 volunteers before being collated, eventually onto computer, by staff at the College of Heralds. It is not surprising that in the process some errors have crept in.
Nonetheless, this is a most valuable work. It is not limited to the different rolls of arms, of which England still has many more than any other country, but also includes the major collections of seals and many other sources including architecture, church windows and carvings, and manuscripts. But its greatest value lies in the sources that are given for each entry, so that it is possible to check on each one and to give it at least an approximate date. This is where I start looking for arms I haven't already researched.
Unfortunately, at £95.00 a volume it's not cheap and there are not many second-hand copies around yet. It should be available in larger libraries.
Clemmensen, Steen, 'Ordinary of Medieval Armorials', a Microsoft Access database on CD-ROM, rev. edn., Copenhagen: http://www.armorial.dk/, 2013
The whole of Steen Clemmensen's website is worth investigating because he has carried out a quite prodigious amount of work on rolls of arms, both English and continental, which is not just limited to listing the contents of the different rolls but which also analyses how they were written and the connections between them. He has also produced critical editions in pdf format of several fourteenth-century rolls. It therefore seems a little churlish to point out that his database 'Ordinary of Medieval Armorials' is limited to the various rolls and does not include any seals or other types of sources. He uses a special kind of blazon where the tinctures are listed separately from the charges and he often invents different sigla for the rolls. It also requires the purchase of Microsoft Access. And as might be expected in such an enormous work, there are some typos here and there.
But the great advantage is that Clemmensen standardises the surnames so that it is possible to look up all the different versions of a coat of arms used within a family, together with their sources, including continental rolls as well as English ones. I use it almost as often as the DBA.
Amongst cheaper alternatives, the best is Joseph Foster's 'Feudal Coats of Arms' (1902), available in modern reprints. He was constrained by the more limited knowledge of his day, but he was the first to go back to mediaeval rolls of arms for his information, and to give his sources, instead of just copying freely from earlier writers. C R Humphery-Smith, 'Anglo-Norman Armoury' (1973) and 'Anglo-Norman Armoury Two' (1984) are also useful but not so easily found. Ideally, all of these compilations, including the two big ones, should be checked against editions of the original rolls: Tremlett and London in 'Rolls of Arms Henry III' (1967), Brault, 'Rolls of Arms Edward I', 2 vols (1997) and 'Eight Thirteenth-Century Rolls of Arms in French and Anglo-Norman Blazon' (1971). Transcriptions of later rolls have been made by Clemmensen or are listed in Wagner, 'A Catalogue of English Mediaeval Rolls of Arms' (1950) available from Archive CD Books http://www.archivecdbooks.org/ Unfortunately, many of the transcriptions are not easily accessible.
For seals, the Internet Archive has Walter de Gray Birch, 'Catalogue of Seals in the Department of Manuscripts in the British Museum', 6 vols., London: British Museum, 1887-1900, and Louis-Claude Douët d’Arcq, 'Collection de sceaux', 3 vols., Paris, 1863-68, which has many English seals. The Durham Cathedral collection of seals is available at http://reed.dur.ac.uk/xtf/view?docId=ead/dcd/dcdmseal.xml and the card-index of seals at the Public Record Office has now been made available on the National Archives website. These are the major collections but there are plenty of other, smaller ones scattered over the country and, sometimes, the internet.
Genealogists now research amongst mediaeval documents themselves and no longer consider secondary sources unless they cite contemporary evidence. I am looking forward to the time when mediaeval heraldry is treated in the same way. It could therefore be helpful to include references to other sources of mediaeval heraldry.
Peter Howarth