occam
2017-09-24 14:43:33 UTC
A BBC News story about a rediscovered masterpiece says:
"A "lost" portrait by Flemish artist Peter Paul Rubens has been
rediscovered after almost 400 years.
<snip>
It was in Glasgow Museums' collection and on public display at the
city's Pollok House stately home. "
Is there no better word than "lost" here? (I understand the quotes
imply it was not really lost, just "lost".)
Clearly someone, somewhere 'lost track of' the painting. By all accounts
the true significance of the painting was forgotten. But to link
"forget" with "to lose" is a big step. If I forget a friend's name, have
I "lost" him?
Full story:
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-41373007
"A "lost" portrait by Flemish artist Peter Paul Rubens has been
rediscovered after almost 400 years.
<snip>
It was in Glasgow Museums' collection and on public display at the
city's Pollok House stately home. "
Is there no better word than "lost" here? (I understand the quotes
imply it was not really lost, just "lost".)
Clearly someone, somewhere 'lost track of' the painting. By all accounts
the true significance of the painting was forgotten. But to link
"forget" with "to lose" is a big step. If I forget a friend's name, have
I "lost" him?
Full story:
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-41373007