Discussion:
David Irving: Hostile Interview on Norwegian TV
(too old to reply)
Kixi
2018-01-11 19:51:31 UTC
Permalink
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before. Well worth 17 minutes to watch.



dolf
2018-01-11 19:58:54 UTC
Permalink
— WHEN WILL JULIAN ASSANGE’S REMAINS BE BROUGHT HOME AND LAID TO REST?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 12 January, 2018

Julian,

<http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-11/could-julian-assange-be-deported-from-ecuador-embassy/9321004>

I think it time that the Ecuador Embassy deported you to Australia and you
overcome your fear that Americans will subject you to legal action if you
leave the embassy.

Take for example the Russian enquiry which the Americans have been
undertaking for so long that they are clearly caught in a rut which
suggests a lack of noumenon that ought to be the arbiter of reality and the
protector of the sovereign state. If that was adhered to, then no action
of yours would be an impediment.

That President Trump’s frequent TWEETS are from a public relations
perspective one of the few ways that American politics gets anything done.
Rightly or wrongly he creates an universe of discourse whereby motion of
government occurs.

And in that respect your leaks of Intelligence information does exactly the
same thing and your release of the Wolffe’s “Fire and Fury” manuscript has
assisted Trump’s cause.

If I can still detect from Hitler’s TABLE TALK writings translated into
English a #231 conspiracy with Roman Catholicism to slaughter Jews, what
validity is there to the argument that anyone can make especially given the
matches of morphological sym-bulimia keyed with the STRONGS Hebrew/Greek
lexicon and impositions of a substantiated substituted ethos being made
upon our BOER / ANZAC tradition.

Perhaps this suggests that academics such as Miller are inhumane and
obsessed with pedantry to such a degree that they can be accused of
themselves being propagandists for the cause of fascism.

<https://www.disclose.tv/an-ancient-manuscript-of-the-bible-has-been-discovered-proving-that-it-is-a-work-of-fiction-314928>

A manuscript of a handwritten copy of the Bible has been discovered at
Cambridge University. The fascinating document shows the King James Bible
in the early editing process of the work and shines a light on just how
much of the original text of the Bible has been omitted from the version
that Christians read today.

King James Bible heavily edited from the original text according to
academics at the prestigious university, the handwritten manuscript had
been mislabelled which meant that it had been left undetected and without
investigation for an incredibly long time.

However, once the manuscript was discovered it caused something of a flurry
of excitement in historical and theological circles as it proves that the
King James Bible, which is one of the most widely read editions of the
Bible in the modern world, has been heavily edited from the original text.

Whole sections of the original text of the Bible are reported to have been
cut out from the finished product with notable people and events being
completely omitted from the finished product.

Professor Miller, who was responsible for re-discovering the astonishing
text and bringing it to light, says that he believes that these omissions
were due to the academics of the age either falling ‘down on the job’ or
just being too lazy to include everything.

He says that his find really illustrates the human impact on the creation
of the King James Bible which is often overlooked by Christians and
academics.

Aren’t you rather, by your statements, simply engaging in fascist
apologetics and subterfuge?

What otherwise is the point you are trying to make?

The discovery of this highly edited text is bound to cause some degree of
controversy in theological circles. The vast majority of Christians who use
the King James Bible today believe that it is the divine word of God, and
yet this discovery proves that the Bible is really a product of the whims
of the translators, the editors and the political figures who lived long
after the death of Christ.

This manuscript will surely raise questions as to whether Christians today
are really following the original line and letter of Christianity.

We prefer the Aramaic Targums any day— Every page reads of Catholic hatred
and intention to slaughter Jews.

How did they come to otherwise possess such intellectual property rights of
others?

I would suggest that my publishing a cursory analysis of Adolf Hitler’s
TABLE TALK would reasonably be categorised as publishing national secrets
of a magnitude greater than ASSANGE has ever done.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Voyeurism.pdf>

Can we even trust the French or this given President “what’s his name”
infatuation with the Roman Catholic Church—didn’t they make him an
anomalous Prince as reward for pandering to their fascist idealism?

Such is his empathy that he weeps for slaughtered priests who “died that we
might live” for their cause célèbre...

Should we not rather mark our centennial by pouring red paint upon our war
graves so as to remind those incalcitrant and ungrateful French and
Europeans that we clearly fought against fascist imperialism?

Why does he (Miller) not have things to say about Hitler’s TABLE TALK
writings translated into English confirming a #231 conspiracy with Roman
Catholicism to slaughter Jews?

I think it is because he derives a pleasure from the crime...

“But God said unto him, ‘[Thou] fool, this night thy soul shall be required
of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?’”
[Luke 12:20 (KJV)]

- dolf

Initial Post: 12 January 2018
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before. Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
http://youtu.be/suCv3ASXO9s
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of
an Application for Planning Permit

- <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the
microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean
[Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER.

- <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING
AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN
THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

- http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
M.I.Wakefield
2018-01-11 20:32:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
— WHEN WILL JULIAN ASSANGE’S REMAINS BE BROUGHT HOME AND LAID TO REST?
Assange only has one real choice left in his life; to die in London, or to
die in Florence.

And I don't mean the Florence with the great food and all the art, I mean
this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADX_Florence
dolf
2018-01-11 21:10:54 UTC
Permalink
As a neo-Nazi apologist you missed the clear and incontrovertible facts
which discredits DAVID IRVING’s claim (*HAVE* *NO* *ANSWER* *YOU* *SWINE*
*DOG*)...

I’ve included a German newsgroup so that your crime is made complete.

If I can still detect from Hitler’s TABLE TALK writings translated into
English a #231 conspiracy with Roman Catholicism to slaughter Jews, what
validity is there to the argument that anyone can make especially given the
matches of morphological sym-bulimia keyed with the STRONGS Hebrew/Greek
lexicon and impositions of a substantiated substituted ethos being made
upon our BOER / ANZAC tradition.

IRREPARABLE HARM DONE TO A CERTAIN CULT OF PERSONALITY
We haven’t yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial two
day analysis of Hitler’s Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the individual
as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of inadequacy and
resourcefulness which is my education. Or rather a lack thereof. Which,
if I sought such further opportunities in particular that of psychology,
would greatly assist my cursory and informal as haphazard approach to the
project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented the
very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and has
yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally conclude
from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose below, as to it
being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made upon the MIND
of the population.

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the matter
as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited an
immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as theoretical
noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: “a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen.”

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

I’m at the stage of writing this attention point, currently up-to #150
pages and I anticipate finishing our introduction into a proof of concept
in the existence of what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term "noumena"
as not which is self evident, since it literally means not "things as they
are in dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as
they are understood by pure thought."

“And I have seen wonders.
And I have seen miracles
Oh, I have seen some things...”

Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can comprehend things
in the latter way."

— TRUTH WHISPERS AS TEARS IN RAIN —

“WHAT OF GODHEAD.
AND IMAGO DEI.
OR TRUTH CONVEY?
BY PURE CONCEIT.

WHY BE WICKED.
SUCH AS THEE.
OF BLASPHEMY.
SELFISH DECEIT.

WHOM DID BLEED.
WAS IT NOT FOR ME?
YOUR COCK DENY.
NOW ALL FORFEIT.” [Written: 3 December 2017]

What history would have been if someone had some 70 years ago, slimed his
credibility in such comprehensive manner as the cause for irreparable self
harm done against this persona—more effective than an assassination.

YOUTUBE: “Time to Die (Gary Numan)”



It is not the stories of war which are its valour but that America or any
other country adhered to universal principles (eg. such as DAOist
meta-descriptor prototypes) of right as the basis for any just cause for
the prosecution of war.

— MOTHER'S LITTLE HELPERS (PISSY HERRINGS) —

"TRUMP IS OFF SOMEWHERES 👣.
FAKE NEWS ✍️ HELTER SKELTER.
EVERYONE CHANTS DESPAIRS.
PARADES OF MUMMY HELPER 💊.
MELANIA HAS LOST SOME PAIRS 👙.
MIGHT HE WEAR 'EM AS WELTER? {ie. note any abnormal intake of water}
PRANCING WITH SUCH AYRES.
SHIP OF STATE 🦅 IN DEEP WATER 🌊.”

<Loading Image...>

YOUTUBE: "Mother's Little Helper - Rolling Stones - Oldies Refreshed"



JACO DAR (***@KOOKS) @ 0419 HOURS ON 26 FEBRUARY 2017: "A homosexual
military man is at a far greater risk of castration from the barracks, than
a homosexual man walking down the street.

Most military men come from traditional conservative backgrounds and would
not be as likely to come out of the closet as their flamboyant urban
cousin."

KERNEL DON JUAN @ 0026 HOURS 5 JULY 2017: “FURST POAST FOR INDEPENDENCE DAY
2017!

Up which da chickens is me.”

DOLF @ 0047 HOURS ON 5 JULY 2017: “It's the 5 July 2017 here wanker:

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:1,col:5,nous:77&idea:{118}&idea:{377}&idea:{138}&idea:{467}>

***@zen: 2, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 77 [Super: #377 / #57 - Laissez
Faire Politics, Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 - The Family (the clan),
Dwelling People, Family members; Tetra: 39 - Residence, Ego: #467 / #77 -
Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill
(stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - Guardedness]

We know time before you do and hence we don't need chickens in cages to
warn us of Saddam Hussein's chemical attacks.”

COLONEL [DON JUAN] EDMUND BURKE (***@STD-GIRLS.COM) @ 1428 HOURS ON
6 DECEMBER 2017: "I OPENED MY MAIL:

And received an offer for one of them Mastercard Black (the Luxury card).

Indeed, Mastercard knows when a feller's got uh exemplary credit standing,
as do I. So I laughed a tad when I saw the $495.00 annual fee.

DOLF : “About the price of *RUSSIAN* *VODKA* *CRYSTAL* *SKULLS* which a
welfare recipient ought not be able to repeatedly afford let alone buy off
eBay because they have an adverse credit circumstance and when they can't
even on occasion buy food / toilet paper for themselves.”

COLONEL [DON JUAN] EDMUND BURKE (***@STD-GIRLS.COM) @ 1428 HOURS ON
6 DECEMBER 2017: “I'm thinking of thankin' them for da offer, which
something like..."Dearest Mastercard Black, Just a little note to let you
know. When I'm about to get cornholed, please put a little lube on the
dildo first.

LOL”

SEE ALSO 'HITLER'S TABLE TALK': IDEA @I / PAGE #3 {#9 - Autonomous Nature
{#6 - Form of Nature}} ON Saturday, 5th July 1941: ARYANS AND RUSSIANS —
*NECESSITY* *OF* *THE* *MAILED* *FIST* *IN* *RUSSIA* — DETERIORATION OF
SOIL, AS THE IMPETUS FOR SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BEING PREMEDITATED
SLANDER BY {SYM-BULIMIA AS EVIDENCE OF DOMESTIC CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM
AS BEING WAR CRIMES}:

YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who - Journey's End - The Reality Bomb"


— FLANDERS SOIL —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. / #1 - Will, free will, choice / Remember the Sabbath
Day
I HEAR THE CLARION. / #2 - desire, inclination / Honour Parents
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. / #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do
Not Kill
STEADFAST MIGHT. / #4 - favour, affection / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie.
Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)
MARCHING TO SION. / #5 - last will, testament / Do Not Steal
AGAINST THIS WHORE. / #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear
False Witness
ARREST THE BLIGHT." / #7 - signification, import / Do Not Covet [LATIN
definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN definition:
NOLUNTĀTIS]

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



What we need is a collective view of people's wish to live and manner of
living.

We must distinguish between the Fascist popular movement and the popular
movement in Russia. The *FASCIST* *MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS*
*RETURN* *TO* *THE* *TRADITIONS* *OF* *ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}. The
Russian movement has an essential tendency towards anarchy.

By instinct, the Russian does not incline towards a higher form of society.
Certain peoples can live in such a way that with them a *COLLECTION* *OF*
*FAMILY* *UNITS* *DOES* *NOT* *MAKE* *A* *WHOLE*; *AND* *ALTHOUGH* *RUSSIA*
*HAS* *SET* *UP* *A* *SOCIAL* *SYSTEM* *WHICH*, *JUDGED* *BY* *WESTERN*
*STANDARDS*, *QUALIFIES* *FOR* *THE* *DESIGNATION* " *STATE* ", *IT* *IS*
*NOT*, *IN* *FACT*, *A* *SYSTEM* *WHICH* *IS* *EITHER* *CONGENIAL* *OR*
*NATURAL* to her.

It is true that, in a sense, *EVERY* *PRODUCT* *OF* *HUMAN* *CULTURE*,
*EVERY* *WORK* *GIFTED* *WITH* *BEAUTY* *CAN* *BE* *BORN* *ONLY* *OF* *THE*
*EFFECT* *OF* *THE* *CONSTRAINT* *WHICH* *WE* *CALL* *EDUCATION*.

The Aryan peoples are peoples who are particularly active. A man like
Krümel works from morning to night; such-and- such another person never
stops thinking. In the same way, the Italian is as diligent as an ant
(bienenfleissig). In *THE* *EYES* *OF* *THE* *RUSSIAN*, *THE* *PRINCIPAL*
*SUPPORT* *OF* *CIVILISATION* *IS* *VODKA*. His ideal consists in never
doing any thing but the indispensable. Our conception of work (work, and
then more of it!) is one that he submits to as if it were *A* *REAL*
*CURSE*.

It is doubtful whether anything at all can be done in Russia without the
help of the Orthodox priest. It's the priest who has been able to reconcile
the Russian to the fatal necessity of work—by promising him more happiness
in another world.

The Russian will never make up his mind to work except under compulsion
from outside, for he is incapable of organising himself. And if, despite
everything, he is apt to have organisation thrust upon him, that is thanks
to the drop ofAryan blood in his veins. It's only because of this drop that
the Russian people has created something and possesses an organised State,
It takes energy to rule Russia. The corollary is that, the tougher a
country's régime, the more appropriate it is that equity and justice
should be practised there. The horse that is not kept constantly under
control forgets in the wink of an eye the rudiments of training that have
been inculcated into it. In the same way, with the Russian, there is an
instinctive force that invariably leads him back to the *STATE* *OF*
*NATURE*. People sometimes quote the case of the horses that escaped from a
ranch in America, and by some ten years later had formed huge herds of wild
horses. It is so easy for an animal to go back to its origins! For the
Russian, the return to the *STATE* *OF* *NATURE* *IS* *A* *RETURN* *TO*
*PRIMITIVE* *FORMS* *OF* *LIFE*. The family exists, the female looks after
her children, like the female of the hare, with all the *FEELINGS* *OF* *A*
*MOTHER*.

But the Russian doesn't want anything more. His *REACTION* *AGAINST* *THE*
*CONSTRAINT* *OF* *THE* *ORGANISED* *STATE* (*WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *A*
*CONSTRAINT*, *SINCE* *IT* *LIMITS* *THE* *LIBERTY* *OF* *THE*
*INDIVIDUAL*) *IS* *BRUTAL* *AND* *SAVAGE*, *LIKE* *ALL* *FEMININE*
*REACTIONS*. When he collapses and should yield, the Russian bursts into
lamentations. This will to return to the state of nature is exhibited in
his revolutions. For the Russian, *THE* *TYPICAL* *FORM* *OF* *REVOLUTION*
*IS* *NIHILISM*.

I think there's still petroleum in thousands of places. As for coal, we
know we're reducing the natural reserves, and that in so doing we are
creating gaps in the sub-soil. But as for petroleum, it may be that the
lakes from which we are drawing are constantly renewed from invisible
reservoirs.

Without doubt, man is the most dangerous microbe imaginable. He exploits
the ground beneath his feet without ever asking whether he is disposing
thus of products that would perhaps be indispensable to the life of other
regions. If *ONE* *EXAMINED* *THE* *PROBLEM* *CLOSELY*, *ONE* *WOULD*
*PROBABLY* *FIND* *HERE* *THE* *ORIGIN* *OF* *THE* *CATASTROPHES* *THAT*
*OCCUR* *PERIODICALLY* *IN* *THE* *EARTH'S* *SURFACE.*"

DOLF @ 1615 HOURS ON 31 DECEMBER 2017: "Hey colonel"

KERNEL DON JUAN @ 1344 HOURS ON 5 JANUARY 2018: "Never 'hey' Your Colonel."

DOLF @ 1548 HOURS ON 5 JANUARY 2018: "Hey you senile fascist prick
colonel."

KERNEL DON JUAN @ 2357 HOURS ON 21 JUNE 2017: "DOLF LEENDERT BORK!

Step to the podium, and be quick about it!

Hmm, I do not find your name written here in The Book of Eternal Life,
Bork.

You are hereby condemned to HELL!

Suck those nigger cocks well, you sinner!"

YOUTUBE: "Gotye - Somebody That I Used To Know (feat. Kimbra)"



May it be upon your conscience until the day you die and hang as a pall of
travesty upon the nation's memorials.

YOUTUBE: "Where Have All The Flowers Gone?"



— STUBBORN DENIAL —

"OLD KING KOHL.
TWAS SUCH A MATE.
A MERRY OLD SOUL.
NOW *CONFUSTICATE*.

NO MORE CROISSANT 🥐.
LUNCH FILLET MINION.
HATRED SO POIGNANT.
NOTHING TO PISS ON.

THERE IS NO DENIAL.
SO ANGEL {#474 as #100, #4, #10, #300, #10, #50 = qaddiysh (Aramaic)
(H6922): {#6 as #414} 1) holy, separate; 2) (TWOT) angels, saints} CHOIRS
SING.
OVER HEAVEN'S TRIAL.
HE HATES NAZI BLING.

THE FRIDGE SITS COLD ⛄️.
A LAGER 🍺 CONCEIT FIRES 🔥.
GOODBYE FATHER BOLD.
AND LOVE FRENCH FRIES 🍟."

*CONFUSTICATE*
- [Slang]: to confuse or perplex; bewilder.
- Word of the Day for 20 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

YOUTUBE: "Hello (Adele)"



FOREBODING THE BRINGING FORTH OF A *WELTSCHMERZ* {ie. [German]: sorrow that
one feels and accepts as one's necessary portion in life; sentimental
pessimism; 'pessimism about life,' 1875, from German Weltschmerz, coined
1810 by Jean Paul Richter, from Welt 'world' (see world ) + Schmerz 'pain';
Word for the Day on 31 March 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com} DAY, THAT
WOULD BE CONSEQUENTIAL TO YOUR INHOSPITALITY AS A MONGRELISED PEOPLES, A
LACK OF FAIR AND TIMELY JUSTICE, NO CONCERN FOR ANOTHER'S ETHOS AS LIFE
VALUES BY A TOTAL LACK, EXCEPT FOR FOOTBALL OF ANY EMPATHETIC AND INCLUSIVE
COMMUNITY.

WHERE, I WOULD ZEALOUSLY CHALLENGE MY SIBLINGS IN A COURT OF LAW, FOR THE
RIGHT TO EXHUME MY PARENT'S CORPSES, WHEREBY MY FRISIAN MOTHER DIED ON THE
EQUINOX OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1985 AND MY DUTCH FATHER DIED ON THE EQUINOX OF 20
MARCH 1976 AND THEN CREMATING THEM FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE WANDERING AS
THE DEPARTING.

AND AS A CONFRONTATION OVER SACRED COWS BY THE RETURNING OF THEIR ASHES TO
AMSTERDAM AS THE CITY WHERE THEY WERE MARRIED.

AS TO INFRACT THE CULTURAL SENSIBILITIES OVER YOU HAVING A HOLOCAUST GUILT.

WHEREBY WE CAME TO ESCAPE THE CONQUISTADORS OF FASCISM AND FOUND YOU JUST
THE SAME.

AND CONVEYING YOUR BEING UNWORTHY OF A 'SON'S SACRIFICE'. BY THE POURING
OUT THEIR ASHES INTO THE KEIZERSGRACHT ('EMPERORS / CAESER'S CANAL), NEAR
THE HISTORIC HOMO MONUMENT AS A MEMORIAL SITUATED AT THE WESTERKERK CHURCH
IN THE CENTRE OF AMSTERDAM. WHICH COMMEMORATES ALL GAY MEN AND LESBIANS
WHO HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO PERSECUTION BECAUSE OF THEIR HOMOSEXUALITY

THE LAST PERSON TO BE HUNG FOR SODOMY IN AMSTERDAM OCCURRED IN 1765 AND
WHILST SUCH CRIMINALISED ACTS OCCURRED UPON DUTCH SHIPS AND WERE PROSECUTED
THERE WAS THEREAFTER A DEGREE OF CULTURAL PERMISSIBILITY, AND THE BRITISH
PERVERSE EXPERIENCE OF PROSTITUTED MARRIED NATIVE WOMEN WAS AS A SOCIAL
DEPRAVITY, ENTIRELY UNKNOWN.

AND THEN READING THIS SPECIALLY PREPARED POEM ALOUD:
— CRUSADING MATADORI —

"JINGO BELLS 🔔,
JINGO BELLS 🔔,
JINGO ALL THE WAY,
OH WHAT FUN IT IS TO RIDE,
ON A ONE TERSE—OPEN SLAY! 📣

IT IS NOT EVEN MONDAY."

YOUTUBE: "Hells Bells from No Bull (AC/DC)"


Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by dolf
— WHEN WILL JULIAN ASSANGE’S REMAINS BE BROUGHT HOME AND LAID TO REST?
Assange only has one real choice left in his life; to die in London, or to
die in Florence.
And I don't mean the Florence with the great food and all the art, I mean
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADX_Florence
— WHEN WILL JULIAN ASSANGE’S REMAINS BE BROUGHT HOME AND LAID TO REST?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 12 January, 2018

Julian,

<http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-11/could-julian-assange-be-deported-from-ecuador-embassy/9321004>

I think it time that the Ecuador Embassy deported you to Australia and you
overcome your fear that Americans will subject you to legal action if you
leave the embassy.

Take for example the Russian enquiry which the Americans have been
undertaking for so long that they are clearly caught in a rut which
suggests a lack of noumenon that ought to be the arbiter of reality and the
protector of the sovereign state. If that was adhered to, then no action
of yours would be an impediment.

That President Trump’s frequent TWEETS are from a public relations
perspective one of the few ways that American politics gets anything done.
Rightly or wrongly he creates an universe of discourse whereby motion of
government occurs.

And in that respect your leaks of Intelligence information does exactly the
same thing and your release of the Wolffe’s “Fire and Fury” manuscript has
assisted Trump’s cause.

If I can still detect from Hitler’s TABLE TALK writings translated into
English a #231 conspiracy with Roman Catholicism to slaughter Jews, what
validity is there to the argument that anyone can make especially given the
matches of morphological sym-bulimia keyed with the STRONGS Hebrew/Greek
lexicon and impositions of a substantiated substituted ethos being made
upon our BOER / ANZAC tradition.

Perhaps this suggests that academics such as Miller are inhumane and
obsessed with pedantry to such a degree that they can be accused of
themselves being propagandists for the cause of fascism.

<https://www.disclose.tv/an-ancient-manuscript-of-the-bible-has-been-discovered-proving-that-it-is-a-work-of-fiction-314928>

A manuscript of a handwritten copy of the Bible has been discovered at
Cambridge University. The fascinating document shows the King James Bible
in the early editing process of the work and shines a light on just how
much of the original text of the Bible has been omitted from the version
that Christians read today.

King James Bible heavily edited from the original text according to
academics at the prestigious university, the handwritten manuscript had
been mislabelled which meant that it had been left undetected and without
investigation for an incredibly long time.

However, once the manuscript was discovered it caused something of a flurry
of excitement in historical and theological circles as it proves that the
King James Bible, which is one of the most widely read editions of the
Bible in the modern world, has been heavily edited from the original text.

Whole sections of the original text of the Bible are reported to have been
cut out from the finished product with notable people and events being
completely omitted from the finished product.

Professor Miller, who was responsible for re-discovering the astonishing
text and bringing it to light, says that he believes that these omissions
were due to the academics of the age either falling ‘down on the job’ or
just being too lazy to include everything.

He says that his find really illustrates the human impact on the creation
of the King James Bible which is often overlooked by Christians and
academics.

Aren’t you rather, by your statements, simply engaging in fascist
apologetics and subterfuge?

What otherwise is the point you are trying to make?

The discovery of this highly edited text is bound to cause some degree of
controversy in theological circles. The vast majority of Christians who use
the King James Bible today believe that it is the divine word of God, and
yet this discovery proves that the Bible is really a product of the whims
of the translators, the editors and the political figures who lived long
after the death of Christ.

This manuscript will surely raise questions as to whether Christians today
are really following the original line and letter of Christianity.

We prefer the Aramaic Targums any day— Every page reads of Catholic hatred
and intention to slaughter Jews.

How did they come to otherwise possess such intellectual property rights of
others?

I would suggest that my publishing a cursory analysis of Adolf Hitler’s
TABLE TALK would reasonably be categorised as publishing national secrets
of a magnitude greater than ASSANGE has ever done.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Voyeurism.pdf>

Can we even trust the French or this given President “what’s his name”
infatuation with the Roman Catholic Church—didn’t they make him an
anomalous Prince as reward for pandering to their fascist idealism?

Such is his empathy that he weeps for slaughtered priests who “died that we
might live” for their cause célèbre...

Should we not rather mark our centennial by pouring red paint upon our war
graves so as to remind those incalcitrant and ungrateful French and
Europeans that we clearly fought against fascist imperialism?

Why does he (Miller) not have things to say about Hitler’s TABLE TALK
writings translated into English confirming a #231 conspiracy with Roman
Catholicism to slaughter Jews?

I think it is because he derives a pleasure from the crime...

“And I will say to my soul, ‘Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many
years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry.’

But God said unto him, ‘Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of
thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?’

So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.”
[Luke 12:19-21 (KJV)]

- dolf

Initial Post: 12 January 2018
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of
an Application for Planning Permit

- <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the
microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean
[Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER.

- <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING
AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN
THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

- http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
saracene
2018-01-11 22:19:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
As a neo-Nazi apologist you missed the clear and incontrovertible facts
which discredits DAVID IRVING’s claim (*HAVE* *NO* *ANSWER* *YOU* *SWINE*
*DOG*)...
I’ve included a German newsgroup so that your crime is made complete.
If there'sa crime there it's you who are committing it.
M.I.Wakefield
2018-01-11 20:25:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.

On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
saracene
2018-01-11 20:46:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
abelard
2018-01-11 20:51:41 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:46:35 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
he can be...he is also highly dishonest as the previous poster told
you...but i doubt you mind that
--
www.abelard.org
A. Filip
2018-01-11 20:56:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:46:35 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
he can be...he is also highly dishonest as the previous poster told
you...but i doubt you mind that
You expect honesty, don't you? You must be quite frequently disappointed.
--
A. Filip
| Home is the place where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in.
| -- Robert Frost, "The Death of the Hired Man"
abelard
2018-01-11 20:58:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by A. Filip
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:46:35 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
he can be...he is also highly dishonest as the previous poster told
you...but i doubt you mind that
You expect honesty, don't you? You must be quite frequently disappointed.
what is shocking is when a socialist is honest...that rally confuses
me
but it is very rare
--
www.abelard.org
Farmer Giles
2018-01-11 21:27:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
Post by A. Filip
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:46:35 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
he can be...he is also highly dishonest as the previous poster told
you...but i doubt you mind that
You expect honesty, don't you? You must be quite frequently disappointed.
what is shocking is when a socialist is honest...that rally confuses
me
but it is very rare
Your problem is that you wouldn't recognise honesty if you saw it.

Your life is just one long catalogue of dishonest lies.

Watching the usual suspects pile in here when certain individuals are
mentioned should tell all decent European people how their enemies
operate and just what the agenda is.
saracene
2018-01-11 22:16:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:46:35 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
he can be...he is also highly dishonest as the previous poster told
you...but i doubt you mind that
How precisely has he been shown to be "highly dishonest"? He should not have sued for libel, certainly. Is he really an antisemite and a holocaust denier? Those are very fuzzy categories, much open to interpretation. It was not demonstrably libellous to characterise him thus. People are against him for political reasons. He has his beliefs, like other historians. I can read a Marxist historian like Christpher Hill, and he has committed some egregious errors. I have read only one of Irving's books Hitler's War 1939-1942. Fellow historians. Taylor and Charmley have expressed much respect for his work.
abelard
2018-01-11 22:27:20 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:16:41 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:46:35 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by Kixi
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before.
On the stand usually ... not going well, usually ... including "in the
course of an unsuccessful libel case he filed against Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books, he was shown to have deliberately misrepresented historical
evidence to promote Holocaust denial. The English court found that Irving
was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who 'for his own
ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and
manipulated historical evidence'. In addition, the court found that Irving's
books had distorted the history of Adolf Hitler's role in the Holocaust to
depict Hitler in a favourable light."
Post by Kixi
Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
David Irving isn't worth seventeen seconds of anyone's time.
Sheer prejudice that. He's actually very interesting.
he can be...he is also highly dishonest as the previous poster told
you...but i doubt you mind that
How precisely has he been shown to be "highly dishonest"? He should not have sued for libel, certainly. Is he really an antisemite and a holocaust denier?
it is reasonable to call him a holocaust denier...
i don't do mind reading so i don't know his motives...

many of these book writer like to be 'controversial' to sell books
...to get famous...etc...
Post by saracene
Those are very fuzzy categories, much open to interpretation. It was not demonstrably libellous to characterise him thus. People are against him for political reasons. He has his beliefs, like other historians. I can read a Marxist historian like Christpher Hill, and he has committed some egregious errors.
i don't know him
Post by saracene
I have read only one of Irving's books Hitler's War 1939-1942. Fellow historians. Taylor and Charmley have expressed much respect for his work.
i've read at least 3

i don't much do 'respect'...i do analysis

you will find any of my relevant comments here

http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm

there are sufficient links there for you to follow up should you care

his problems don't much interest me...my interest is in the poisonous
mental disease of socialism
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-11 22:38:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
How precisely has he been shown to be "highly dishonest"? He should not have sued for libel, certainly. Is he really an antisemite and a holocaust denier?
it is reasonable to call him a holocaust denier...
What does that mean precisely. Are you saying he denies that the Nazis killed a lot of Jews? And anyway what has that got to do with dishonesty?
Post by abelard
i don't do mind reading so i don't know his motives...
So you won't call him an antisemite?
Post by abelard
many of these book writer like to be 'controversial' to sell books
...to get famous...etc...
So yo do do mind reading and claim to know know his motives?
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Those are very fuzzy categories, much open to interpretation. It was not demonstrably libellous to characterise him thus. People are against him for political reasons. He has his beliefs, like other historians. I can read a Marxist historian like Christpher Hill, and he has committed some egregious errors.
i don't know him
Historian of the seventeenth century. Very famous. One of his books is "the world turned upside down".
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
I have read only one of Irving's books Hitler's War 1939-1942. Fellow historians. Taylor and Charmley have expressed much respect for his work.
i've read at least 3
i don't much do 'respect'...i do analysis
Do you do it better that Taylor of Charmley?
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
there are sufficient links there for you to follow up should you care
his problems don't much interest me...my interest is in the poisonous
mental disease of socialism
Don't we know it.
abelard
2018-01-11 22:51:26 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:38:17 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
How precisely has he been shown to be "highly dishonest"? He should not have sued for libel, certainly. Is he really an antisemite and a holocaust denier?
it is reasonable to call him a holocaust denier...
What does that mean precisely. Are you saying he denies that the Nazis killed a lot of Jews? And anyway what has that got to do with dishonesty?
i've referenced sources at the end of my last post
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
i don't do mind reading so i don't know his motives...
So you won't call him an antisemite?
again, i can only repeat my previous response
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
many of these book writer like to be 'controversial' to sell books
...to get famous...etc...
So yo do do mind reading and claim to know know his motives?
i've just told you the opposite...

eg i won't guess whether he's an anti semite...to reinforce that
i gave you other possibilities..
please try to read more attentively
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Those are very fuzzy categories, much open to interpretation. It was not demonstrably libellous to characterise him thus. People are against him for political reasons. He has his beliefs, like other historians. I can read a Marxist historian like Christpher Hill, and he has committed some egregious errors.
i don't know him
Historian of the seventeenth century. Very famous. One of his books is "the world turned upside down".
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
I have read only one of Irving's books Hitler's War 1939-1942. Fellow historians. Taylor and Charmley have expressed much respect for his work.
i've read at least 3
i don't much do 'respect'...i do analysis
Do you do it better that Taylor of Charmley?
i don't do much analysis of hitler's war machine...or his
mad attack of judaism...
socialists generally seek an enemy...i've many pages at my site
which you prefer not to read...
i see no point in repeating them all over and over again here..

again i repeat...it's the socialist mental disease that is
my focus
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
there are sufficient links there for you to follow up should you care
his problems don't much interest me...my interest is in the poisonous
mental disease of socialism
Don't we know it.
i should hope so
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-11 23:23:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:38:17 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
How precisely has he been shown to be "highly dishonest"? He should not have sued for libel, certainly. Is he really an antisemite and a holocaust denier?
it is reasonable to call him a holocaust denier...
What does that mean precisely. Are you saying he denies that the Nazis killed a lot of Jews? And anyway what has that got to do with dishonesty?
i've referenced sources at the end of my last post
Please summarsie here. I can't be bothered with your website.
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
i don't do mind reading so i don't know his motives...
So you won't call him an antisemite?
again, i can only repeat my previous response
Post by abelard
again, i can only repeat my previous response
Cut and paste the relevant bits then
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
many of these book writer like to be 'controversial' to sell books
...to get famous...etc...
So you do do mind reading and claim to know know his motives?
i've just told you the opposite...
You did but you contradict yourself.
Post by abelard
eg i won't guess whether he's an anti semite...to reinforce that
i gave you other possibilities..
please try to read more attentively
Just possiblities? You sounded more definite.
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Those are very fuzzy categories, much open to interpretation. It was not demonstrably libellous to characterise him thus. People are against him for political reasons. He has his beliefs, like other historians. I can read a Marxist historian like Christpher Hill, and he has committed some egregious errors.
i don't know him
Historian of the seventeenth century. Very famous. One of his books is "the world turned upside down".
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
I have read only one of Irving's books Hitler's War 1939-1942. Fellow historians. Taylor and Charmley have expressed much respect for his work.
i've read at least 3
i don't much do 'respect'...i do analysis
Do you do it better that Taylor of Charmley?
i don't do much analysis of hitler's war machine...or his
mad attack of judaism...
socialists generally seek an enemy...i've many pages at my site
which you prefer not to read...
i see no point in repeating them all over and over again here..
there wold be a point. I might read them
Post by abelard
again i repeat...it's the socialist mental disease that is
my focus
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
there are sufficient links there for you to follow up should you care
his problems don't much interest me...my interest is in the poisonous
mental disease of socialism
Don't we know it.
i should hope so
--
www.abelard.org
abelard
2018-01-12 00:02:43 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:23:37 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:38:17 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
How precisely has he been shown to be "highly dishonest"? He should not have sued for libel, certainly. Is he really an antisemite and a holocaust denier?
it is reasonable to call him a holocaust denier...
What does that mean precisely. Are you saying he denies that the Nazis killed a lot of Jews? And anyway what has that got to do with dishonesty?
i've referenced sources at the end of my last post
Please summarsie here. I can't be bothered with your website.
your problem

rest binned unread
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
i don't do mind reading so i don't know his motives...
So you won't call him an antisemite?
again, i can only repeat my previous response
Post by abelard
again, i can only repeat my previous response
Cut and paste the relevant bits then
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
many of these book writer like to be 'controversial' to sell books
...to get famous...etc...
So you do do mind reading and claim to know know his motives?
i've just told you the opposite...
You did but you contradict yourself.
Post by abelard
eg i won't guess whether he's an anti semite...to reinforce that
i gave you other possibilities..
please try to read more attentively
Just possiblities? You sounded more definite.
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
Those are very fuzzy categories, much open to interpretation. It was not demonstrably libellous to characterise him thus. People are against him for political reasons. He has his beliefs, like other historians. I can read a Marxist historian like Christpher Hill, and he has committed some egregious errors.
i don't know him
Historian of the seventeenth century. Very famous. One of his books is "the world turned upside down".
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
I have read only one of Irving's books Hitler's War 1939-1942. Fellow historians. Taylor and Charmley have expressed much respect for his work.
i've read at least 3
i don't much do 'respect'...i do analysis
Do you do it better that Taylor of Charmley?
i don't do much analysis of hitler's war machine...or his
mad attack of judaism...
socialists generally seek an enemy...i've many pages at my site
which you prefer not to read...
i see no point in repeating them all over and over again here..
there wold be a point. I might read them
Post by abelard
again i repeat...it's the socialist mental disease that is
my focus
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
there are sufficient links there for you to follow up should you care
his problems don't much interest me...my interest is in the poisonous
mental disease of socialism
Don't we know it.
i should hope so
--
www.abelard.org
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-11 22:43:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"

You shold take on Irving. I doubt if he'd be impressed by your attemtps at mind reading though.
But anyway, Irving as historian is about much more than that not especially intersting claim.
abelard
2018-01-11 22:54:02 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
Post by saracene
I doubt if he'd be impressed by your attemtps at mind reading though.
But anyway, Irving as historian is about much more than that not especially intersting claim.
not interesting to you
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-11 23:26:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
Post by abelard
Post by saracene
I doubt if he'd be impressed by your attemtps at mind reading though.
But anyway, Irving as historian is about much more than that not especially intersting claim.
not interesting to you
--
www.abelard.org
abelard
2018-01-12 00:09:52 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...

irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-12 00:12:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...
irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
You are happy with cliches.
abelard
2018-01-12 00:14:45 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:12:38 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...
irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
You are happy with cliches.
i 'speak' to you
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-12 08:35:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:12:38 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...
irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
You are happy with cliches.
i 'speak' to you
--
Your mind is irredeemably seco9nd rate. I remember trial and the verdict well enough. I was not convinced that any of evidence produced had succeeded in proving his dishonesty or in discrediting hinm as a historian. Just asking me to reread the testimony of lot of so called experts is unlikely to persuade me otherwise.
abelard
2018-01-12 09:02:17 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:35:21 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:12:38 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...
irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
You are happy with cliches.
i 'speak' to you
--
Your mind is irredeemably seco9nd rate. I remember trial and the verdict well enough. I was not convinced that any of evidence produced had succeeded in proving his dishonesty or in discrediting hinm as a historian. Just asking me to reread the testimony of lot of so called experts is unlikely to persuade me otherwise.
i do understand

your 'mind' is made up...and you don't wish to be
confused by facts...

same with any cult...same with jehovah's witnesses...
same with socialists
--
www.abelard.org
saracene
2018-01-12 09:53:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:35:21 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:12:38 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...
irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
You are happy with cliches.
i 'speak' to you
--
Your mind is irredeemably seco9nd rate. I remember trial and the verdict well enough. I was not convinced that any of evidence produced had succeeded in proving his dishonesty or in discrediting hinm as a historian. Just asking me to reread the testimony of lot of so called experts is unlikely to persuade me otherwise.
i do understand
your 'mind' is made up...and you don't wish to be
confused by facts...
That is as lie. As I see it your mind is made up. I'm prefectly willing to be persuaded by facts, but not by cliches and prejudices. I was foolishly hoping far an argument, but you don't believe in that. At least you always shy away from it.
As I said, I don't think Irving should have brought that libel case, and it was right that he lost it. But that is not the point. As far as I understand it he is a conscientious historian who does not deserve to be dismissed out of hand.
Farmer Giles
2018-01-12 09:32:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:12:38 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:26:57 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:43:22 -0800 (PST), saracene
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
you will find any of my relevant comments here
http://www.abelard.org/hitler2.htm
"I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust"
You shold take on Irving.
what on earth for?
Once he was offering a prize to whoever could prove him wrong. You could be famous. You believe in facts, don't you, not mind reading? so you should be able to do it.
what for...
i'm content to rely on the experts at the lipstadt at the libel trial
which i bothered to follow and read and that is over my long
term studies of hitler's national socialism
it was over 20 years ago and i'm not going to re-read it...
irving is irrelevant to anyone but screw-looses nat socialists
like yourself
Post by saracene
Post by abelard
he's irrelevant and he has been comprehensively disassembled
on the issue of the holocaust...
That is not evident to me.
then study the relevant documents...i don't need convincing
but you have a strong aversion to working or studying
You are happy with cliches.
i 'speak' to you
--
Your mind is irredeemably seco9nd rate. I remember trial and the verdict well enough. I was not convinced that any of evidence produced had succeeded in proving his dishonesty or in discrediting hinm as a historian. Just asking me to reread the testimony of lot of so called experts is unlikely to persuade me otherwise.
Particularly so-called experts who were paid vast amounts of money to
give their 'evidence'. It was David Irving on his own against world
Jewry. Not true? Then look at the millions given to Deborah Lipstadt to
fund her case through organisations like the Shoah Foundation, and from
individuals like Steven Spielberg.
dolf
2018-01-11 20:57:32 UTC
Permalink
Your fascist piece of DAVID IRVINE ***@t conveys an email address which is
not valid accordingly I have now included a German newsgroup group so as to
render your actions of holocaust denial within an Australian newsgroup a
criminal offence as the which has the gravitas of a war crime having a
universal jurisdiction.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Missionary.pdf>

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Voyeurism.pdf>
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
confidently deals with the usual hostile questions thrown at him. He's
been through it before. Well worth 17 minutes to watch.
http://youtu.be/suCv3ASXO9s
— WHEN WILL JULIAN ASSANGE’S REMAINS BE BROUGHT HOME AND LAID TO REST?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 12 January, 2018

Julian,

<http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-11/could-julian-assange-be-deported-from-ecuador-embassy/9321004>

I think it time that the Ecuador Embassy deported you to Australia and you
overcome your fear that Americans will subject you to legal action if you
leave the embassy.

Take for example the Russian enquiry which the Americans have been
undertaking for so long that they are clearly caught in a rut which
suggests a lack of noumenon that ought to be the arbiter of reality and the
protector of the sovereign state. If that was adhered to, then no action
of yours would be an impediment.

That President Trump’s frequent TWEETS are from a public relations
perspective one of the few ways that American politics gets anything done.
Rightly or wrongly he creates an universe of discourse whereby motion of
government occurs.

And in that respect your leaks of Intelligence information does exactly the
same thing and your release of the Wolffe’s “Fire and Fury” manuscript has
assisted Trump’s cause.

If I can still detect from Hitler’s TABLE TALK writings translated into
English a #231 conspiracy with Roman Catholicism to slaughter Jews, what
validity is there to the argument that anyone can make especially given the
matches of morphological sym-bulimia keyed with the STRONGS Hebrew/Greek
lexicon and impositions of a substantiated substituted ethos being made
upon our BOER / ANZAC tradition.

Perhaps this suggests that academics such as Miller are inhumane and
obsessed with pedantry to such a degree that they can be accused of
themselves being propagandists for the cause of fascism.

<https://www.disclose.tv/an-ancient-manuscript-of-the-bible-has-been-discovered-proving-that-it-is-a-work-of-fiction-314928>

A manuscript of a handwritten copy of the Bible has been discovered at
Cambridge University. The fascinating document shows the King James Bible
in the early editing process of the work and shines a light on just how
much of the original text of the Bible has been omitted from the version
that Christians read today.

King James Bible heavily edited from the original text according to
academics at the prestigious university, the handwritten manuscript had
been mislabelled which meant that it had been left undetected and without
investigation for an incredibly long time.

However, once the manuscript was discovered it caused something of a flurry
of excitement in historical and theological circles as it proves that the
King James Bible, which is one of the most widely read editions of the
Bible in the modern world, has been heavily edited from the original text.

Whole sections of the original text of the Bible are reported to have been
cut out from the finished product with notable people and events being
completely omitted from the finished product.

Professor Miller, who was responsible for re-discovering the astonishing
text and bringing it to light, says that he believes that these omissions
were due to the academics of the age either falling ‘down on the job’ or
just being too lazy to include everything.

He says that his find really illustrates the human impact on the creation
of the King James Bible which is often overlooked by Christians and
academics.

Aren’t you rather, by your statements, simply engaging in fascist
apologetics and subterfuge?

What otherwise is the point you are trying to make?

The discovery of this highly edited text is bound to cause some degree of
controversy in theological circles. The vast majority of Christians who use
the King James Bible today believe that it is the divine word of God, and
yet this discovery proves that the Bible is really a product of the whims
of the translators, the editors and the political figures who lived long
after the death of Christ.

This manuscript will surely raise questions as to whether Christians today
are really following the original line and letter of Christianity.

We prefer the Aramaic Targums any day— Every page reads of Catholic hatred
and intention to slaughter Jews.

How did they come to otherwise possess such intellectual property rights of
others?

I would suggest that my publishing a cursory analysis of Adolf Hitler’s
TABLE TALK would reasonably be categorised as publishing national secrets
of a magnitude greater than ASSANGE has ever done.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Voyeurism.pdf>

Can we even trust the French or this given President “what’s his name”
infatuation with the Roman Catholic Church—didn’t they make him an
anomalous Prince as reward for pandering to their fascist idealism?

Such is his empathy that he weeps for slaughtered priests who “died that we
might live” for their cause célèbre...

Should we not rather mark our centennial by pouring red paint upon our war
graves so as to remind those incalcitrant and ungrateful French and
Europeans that we clearly fought against fascist imperialism?

Why does he (Miller) not have things to say about Hitler’s TABLE TALK
writings translated into English confirming a #231 conspiracy with Roman
Catholicism to slaughter Jews?

I think it is because he derives a pleasure from the crime...

“And I will say to my soul, ‘Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many
years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry.’

But God said unto him, ‘Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of
thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?’

So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.”
[Luke 12:19-21 (KJV)]

- dolf

Initial Post: 12 January 2018
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of
an Application for Planning Permit

- <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the
microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean
[Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER.

- <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING
AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN
THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

- http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
2018-01-11 21:47:47 UTC
Permalink
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!

He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat history.
That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!

The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
End of story!

Everybody loves a nice fairy-tale here and there but Kixi's feeble
attempt at telling one to its neo-Nazi mates in Usenet is less than
recreational.

Regurgitating the very same revisionist propaganda crap endlessly won't
help Kixis's Nazi cause one little bit.

Its Nazi propaganda is hereby flushed!

Neo-Nazis still live in the dark glory of the Drittes Reich!
Luckily modern Germany has moved on!
But hey, Nazis and neo-Nazis always have a strange relationship with the
our Universe.
Maybe Kixi should search for another Universe to live in?

Posting brain-fart neo-Nazi verbal vomit that is exclusively directed
for consumption by demented extremist US right retards achieves absolutely
nothing when its is dumped into non-US newsgroups.

The only reason Kixi can't come to grips with this simple fact is that it
is a neo-Nazi.
Post by Kixi
https://www.youtube.com/
...and here is why:

" * How neo-Nazis may be making money from You Tube advertising * "

"Extremists post videos to exploit Google Adsense to share revenues from
advertisers such as Virgin Media, BT and O2."

Source:
<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/jun/21/neo-nazis-money-
youtube-advertising>
--
Lock all Nazi fuckers up for good! Lets enjoy our "Kristalltag"!
<http://tinyurl.com/n7hb3dl>
Farmer Giles
2018-01-11 21:59:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat history.
That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified of
those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect it.
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
saracene
2018-01-11 22:18:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat history.
That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified of
those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect it.
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
You shouldn't take that person seriously. He's Kixi's alter ego.
Farmer Giles
2018-01-11 22:42:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by saracene
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat history.
That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified of
those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect it.
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
You shouldn't take that person seriously. He's Kixi's alter ego.
My comment was a more general one, it wasn't specifically aimed at him -
he probably doesn't read this ng anyway.
Ned Latham
2018-01-11 23:02:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat history.
That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified of
those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect it.
Sure! Let's discuss this for another thousand years. That would
reincarnate all those gassed, shot or starved to death during the
holocaust manufactured by Nazis and their pro-fascist right-wing
political enablers...NOT.
But by doing so let's help our neo-Nazi comrades's propaganda stay well
alive & thriving.
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
Indeed!
You've forgotten the mandatory salute at the end of your response:
Sieg Heil!
Kixi
2018-01-12 00:23:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and
Australia, >>
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat
history. >> That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified
of those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect
it.
Sure! Let's discuss this for another thousand years. That would
reincarnate all those gassed, shot or starved to death during the
holocaust manufactured by Nazis and their pro-fascist right-wing
political enablers...NOT.
But by doing so let's help our neo-Nazi comrades's propaganda stay
well alive & thriving.
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
Indeed!
Sieg Heil!
Wow! It didn't take long for the David Irving thread to turn into a
"Holocaust" rant.

The interviewer too, inevitably, introduced that topic. Irving
referenced holocausts of Dresden, Hiroshima and London and went on to
say WWII was a holocaust.

Irving has never written on the "Holocaust" because he writes only
about what he finds in documents. He's done good books on Churchill,
Nuremberg and Dresden. Just watch his interview and judge for yourself.
http://youtu.be/suCv3ASXO9s
Bad cop
2018-01-12 00:32:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
Wow! It didn't take long for the David Irving thread to turn into a
"Holocaust" rant.
Isn't that what you wanted by xposting that Irving shit all over the
place?
Post by Kixi
Just watch his interview and judge for yourself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch...

NO thanks!
Life is too short to waste it on Holocaust denial and neo-Nazi propaganda
outlets like you!
--
Admission extracted!
de chucka
2018-01-12 01:08:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and
Australia, >>
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat
history. >> That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified
of those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect
it.
Sure! Let's discuss this for another thousand years. That would
reincarnate all those gassed, shot or starved to death during the
holocaust manufactured by Nazis and their pro-fascist right-wing
political enablers...NOT.
But by doing so let's help our neo-Nazi comrades's propaganda stay
well alive & thriving.
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
Indeed!
Sieg Heil!
Wow! It didn't take long for the David Irving thread to turn into a
"Holocaust" rant.
The interviewer too, inevitably, introduced that topic. Irving
referenced holocausts of Dresden, Hiroshima and London and went on to
say WWII was a holocaust.
Irving has never written on the "Holocaust" because he writes only
about what he finds in documents.
and his court case against American historian Deborah Lipstadt and
Penguin Books show what he does with those documents i.e. deliberately
misrepresents historical evidence to promote Holocaust denial. He is on
the holocaust denial lecture circuit even if he only does forwards for
Holocaust denial books

He's done good books on Churchill,
Post by Kixi
Nuremberg and Dresden. Just watch his interview and judge for yourself.
http://youtu.be/suCv3ASXO9s
dolf
2018-01-12 04:05:29 UTC
Permalink
It is as not a rant you fascist dog, and you either substantiate your
remark or retract because such dehumanising conduct in which you are
engaged is a war crime.

Do we understand one another about your obligations in discussions and if
not we will prosecute you for slander...

Added German newsgroup so as to impress upon you a legal accountability for
having refuted David Irving

— WHEN WILL JULIAN ASSANGE’S REMAINS BE BROUGHT HOME AND LAID TO REST?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 12 January, 2018

Julian,

<http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-11/could-julian-assange-be-deported-from-ecuador-embassy/9321004>

I think it time that the Ecuador Embassy deported you to Australia and you
overcome your fear that Americans will subject you to legal action if you
leave the embassy.

Take for example the Russian enquiry which the Americans have been
undertaking for so long that they are clearly caught in a rut which
suggests a lack of noumenon that ought to be the arbiter of reality and the
protector of the sovereign state. If that was adhered to, then no action
of yours would be an impediment.

That President Trump’s frequent TWEETS are from a public relations
perspective one of the few ways that American politics gets anything done.
Rightly or wrongly he creates an universe of discourse whereby motion of
government occurs.

And in that respect your leaks of Intelligence information does exactly the
same thing and your release of the Wolffe’s “Fire and Fury” manuscript has
assisted Trump’s cause.

If I can still detect from Hitler’s TABLE TALK writings translated into
English a #231 conspiracy with Roman Catholicism to slaughter Jews, what
validity is there to the argument that anyone can make especially given the
matches of morphological sym-bulimia keyed with the STRONGS Hebrew/Greek
lexicon and impositions of a substantiated substituted ethos being made
upon our BOER / ANZAC tradition.

Perhaps this suggests that academics such as Miller are inhumane and
obsessed with pedantry to such a degree that they can be accused of
themselves being propagandists for the cause of fascism.

<https://www.disclose.tv/an-ancient-manuscript-of-the-bible-has-been-discovered-proving-that-it-is-a-work-of-fiction-314928>

A manuscript of a handwritten copy of the Bible has been discovered at
Cambridge University. The fascinating document shows the King James Bible
in the early editing process of the work and shines a light on just how
much of the original text of the Bible has been omitted from the version
that Christians read today.

King James Bible heavily edited from the original text according to
academics at the prestigious university, the handwritten manuscript had
been mislabelled which meant that it had been left undetected and without
investigation for an incredibly long time.

However, once the manuscript was discovered it caused something of a flurry
of excitement in historical and theological circles as it proves that the
King James Bible, which is one of the most widely read editions of the
Bible in the modern world, has been heavily edited from the original text.

Whole sections of the original text of the Bible are reported to have been
cut out from the finished product with notable people and events being
completely omitted from the finished product.

Professor Miller, who was responsible for re-discovering the astonishing
text and bringing it to light, says that he believes that these omissions
were due to the academics of the age either falling ‘down on the job’ or
just being too lazy to include everything.

He says that his find really illustrates the human impact on the creation
of the King James Bible which is often overlooked by Christians and
academics.

Aren’t you rather, by your statements, simply engaging in fascist
apologetics and subterfuge?

What otherwise is the point you are trying to make?

The discovery of this highly edited text is bound to cause some degree of
controversy in theological circles. The vast majority of Christians who use
the King James Bible today believe that it is the divine word of God, and
yet this discovery proves that the Bible is really a product of the whims
of the translators, the editors and the political figures who lived long
after the death of Christ.

This manuscript will surely raise questions as to whether Christians today
are really following the original line and letter of Christianity.

We prefer the Aramaic Targums any day— Every page reads of Catholic hatred
and intention to slaughter Jews.

How did they come to otherwise possess such intellectual property rights of
others?

I would suggest that my publishing a cursory analysis of Adolf Hitler’s
TABLE TALK would reasonably be categorised as publishing national secrets
of a magnitude greater than ASSANGE has ever done.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Voyeurism.pdf>

Can we even trust the French or this given President “what’s his name”
infatuation with the Roman Catholic Church—didn’t they make him an
anomalous Prince as reward for pandering to their fascist idealism?

Such is his empathy that he weeps for slaughtered priests who “died that we
might live” for their cause célèbre...

Should we not rather mark our centennial by pouring red paint upon our war
graves so as to remind those incalcitrant and ungrateful French and
Europeans that we clearly fought against fascist imperialism?

Why does he (Miller) not have things to say about Hitler’s TABLE TALK
writings translated into English confirming a #231 conspiracy with Roman
Catholicism to slaughter Jews?

I think it is because he derives a pleasure from the crime...

“And I will say to my soul, ‘Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many
years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry.’

But God said unto him, ‘Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of
thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?’

So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.”
[Luke 12:19-21 (KJV)]

- dolf

Initial Post: 12 January 2018
Post by Kixi
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and
Australia, >>
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat
history. >> That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified
of those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect
it.
Sure! Let's discuss this for another thousand years. That would
reincarnate all those gassed, shot or starved to death during the
holocaust manufactured by Nazis and their pro-fascist right-wing
political enablers...NOT.
But by doing so let's help our neo-Nazi comrades's propaganda stay
well alive & thriving.
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
End of story!
Not quite.
Indeed!
Sieg Heil!
Wow! It didn't take long for the David Irving thread to turn into a
"Holocaust" rant.
The interviewer too, inevitably, introduced that topic. Irving
referenced holocausts of Dresden, Hiroshima and London and went on to
say WWII was a holocaust.
Irving has never written on the "Holocaust" because he writes only
about what he finds in documents. He's done good books on Churchill,
Nuremberg and Dresden. Just watch his interview and judge for yourself.
http://youtu.be/suCv3ASXO9s
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of
an Application for Planning Permit

- <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the
microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean
[Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER.

- <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING
AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN
THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

- http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Reticula
2018-01-14 18:48:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
Irving has never written on the "Holocaust"
This group is CLOSED to you Godless nazi vermin!

LEAVE NOW.

- The management
Farmer Giles
2018-01-12 06:53:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Kick your Nazi butt back to the stone age
Kixi grunts: "Sieg Heil"
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews from entering Canada and Australia,
Wrong again neo-Nazi brain-dead shithead!
He was banned by all sane people who know how not to repeat history.
That was quite an ethnicity independent wise decision!
The facts of the "Holocaust" have been proven without any doubt.
Revisionist crap won't confuse sane people.
If you're so sure of that then one wonders why you're so terrified of
those facts being discussed. The truth needs no laws to protect it.
Sure! Let's discuss this for another thousand years. That would
reincarnate all those gassed, shot or starved to death during the
holocaust manufactured by Nazis and their pro-fascist right-wing
political enablers...NOT.
Yes, let's discuss whatever we like about history. Only those with
something to hide would want to prevent it.
Reticula
2018-01-14 18:48:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
David Irving, banned by the Jews
This group is CLOSED to you Godless nazi vermin!

LEAVE NOW.

- The management

Loading...