Were were all the other snipers?

Post by claviger
Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?

And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
over:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-11 02:04:52 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.

I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

mainframetech

2018-07-12 02:40:33 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A straight shot
into the forehead.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-12 20:27:39 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

mainframetech

2018-07-13 22:28:16 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-14 17:10:59 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

mainframetech

2018-07-17 00:48:14 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-17 22:02:34 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

Do you really expect new evidence to show up next month. I think that is
known as incurable optimism. You think these websites you find with ever
more bizarre theories of what happened constitute evidence. You found a
guy with a new angle, placing a shooter on the SoGK and decided that
worked a lot better than the kooks you have put your faith in before.
There isn't a scrap of forensic evidence of any shooter anywhere except
the sniper's nest but that doesn't seem to trouble you in the least.

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-18 22:22:07 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

OK, so did YOU predict when Fox would leak the autopsy photos?

Jason Burke

2018-07-19 02:04:42 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

Creepy thing is that the CT crowd *does* think there's evidence "right
around the corner".

I guess they HAVE to. Being as they've failed outright for over half a
century.

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-19 21:46:27 UTC

Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you
are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the
truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something
to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck
through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the
upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the
forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A
straight shot
into the forehead.

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there
were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

Creepy thing is that the CT crowd *does* think there's evidence "right
around the corner".
I guess they HAVE to. Being as they've failed outright for over half a
century.

1978

bigdog

2018-07-20 16:04:11 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

Creepy thing is that the CT crowd *does* think there's evidence "right
around the corner".
I guess they HAVE to. Being as they've failed outright for over half a
century.

They think the evidence is right around the corner. The trouble is they
are going around in circles.

mainframetech

2018-07-19 17:53:42 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered. In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-20 16:21:33 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Post by mainframetech
In fact much
of the solution to the case is there, and don't bother me with it not
being recognized by others, since you've been unable to show their
surprise at finding nothing there.

You've been unable to show that the Lifton/Horne theory has gained
traction in the conspiracy community despite the ARRB files having been in
the public domain for over 20 years. Don't you think if there was wide
acceptance of the things you have been arguing for that there would be
more than a few kook websites trumpeting those findings?

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-21 00:11:31 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

It did gain traction for a few years.Best Evidence was a best seller. But
then people began to see holes in it. And the hard core of serious
researchers such as myself, Tink and Cyril rejected the idea of
alteration. Incompetence usually explains all the errors.

mainframetech

2018-07-23 01:33:57 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

Well, there certainly are plenty of kook websites espousing the LN and
WCR view of things, or their theories anyway.

However, and example of the truth catching on can be found in the
article I've recently been pushing, which is here:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-23 21:10:35 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

mainframetech

2018-07-25 01:32:36 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-26 02:23:09 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.

Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

It shows a bullet path going through the other occupants of the limo but
magically not hitting them. It shows that a if a bullet fired from the
SoGK had hit JFK in your forehead temple, it would not have exited the
BOH. It would have either been a grazing or trenching wound along the
right side of his head. That's why the geometry is impossible for you.

mainframetech

2018-07-27 00:50:35 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.

And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-28 03:54:53 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-29 18:23:03 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

You never show us your diagrams so you have no standing to order others to
do that.

WE both know it's impossible, but we don't need a drawing to know that.
Others have made ridiculous drawings. Do you know how to use a search
engine to see them?

I'd like to see you try ANY drawing using the original entrance hole in
the back of the head near the EOP. You demand it of others, but do YOU
have the skills to do it yourself? Do you even have Windows Ai now? Can
you print it out on your 3D printer?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiC7IGcs8LcAhVCMd8KHeWMAQkQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinterest.ca%2Fpin%2F14918242493977101%2F&psig=AOvVaw3SBcEva9efKY23T1Q3puKn&ust=1532887977560684

mainframetech

2018-07-30 01:57:19 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
South GK shots:

http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-31 01:28:27 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

mainframetech

2018-08-01 03:25:00 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

Chris

bigdog

2018-08-02 16:29:31 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.

All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?

mainframetech

2018-08-04 03:58:27 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.

Post by bigdog
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?

No problem. Image 022 states "The line drawn from the skull is at 25
degrees to profile and represents the direction he was facing - not bullet
trajectory". That image shows the situation where the shooter will hit
the right side of the face in the forehead and that bullet will pass
through the skull and blow out the BOH. The line shown is NOT the
trajectory, as it says clearly. What's your problem?

Chris

bigdog

2018-08-05 03:58:09 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.

How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?

When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.

If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.

mainframetech

2018-08-06 04:11:46 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.

How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?

When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.
If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.

Goddamnit! Why can't you listen and follow simple instructions?
image 022 shows the direction that JFK was looking in when struck by the
bullet to the forehead. The line is not of trajectory at all, but where
JFK was looking. It's simple enough to see that there is an imaginary
line from the south parking lot to the head of JFK, and it will work
easily to cause the bullet hole in the forehead, and the blow out at the
BOH.

If this is going ot be another one of your pick, pick, pick things,
just because you don't have any serious evidence, give yourself a break
and don't bother.

Chris

bigdog

2018-08-07 04:40:36 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.

How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?

When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.
If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.

I know it doesn't show the trajectory but when I challenged you to show
how a bullet fired from that location through your imaginary
forehead/temple entry wound could exit the BOH, you offered this kook's
work. If image 022 doesn't show that, than which of his images does. You
correctly pointed out that an imaginary line could show your trajectory
because if you drew a real line it would become obvious it doesn't work.
Such a shot would exit the side of the head. You know this which is why
you can't diagram such a shot or point to any image from this kook that
does show it.

Post by mainframetech
If this is going ot be another one of your pick, pick, pick things,
just because you don't have any serious evidence, give yourself a break
and don't bother.

So you think it is nitpicking to ask you to show how your imaginary shot
from the SoGK could actually enter and exit where you claim it did. It is
an impossibility and you know it yet you won't admit it.

Anthony Marsh

2018-08-07 15:34:36 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

WRONG! Your childish attempt to get me to do your work for you is
pathetic.

How did supplying evidence to support your theories become my work?

When you move the line to where you claim the bullet entered, it doesn't
exit from the BOH. You know it. I know it. Anyone who reads this and lays
a straight edge from the origin of the shot to the point where you claim
the bullet entered the skull can see that.
If you go back through this thread you will see I challenged you to draw a
line through your alleged entry and exit wounds that would lead back to
your SoGK shooter. You offered this image instead but now tell us that
image wasn't intended to show the bullet trajectory. So you have not met
the challenge I made to you. You won't because you can't. The geometry
won't work and you know it.

You can issue all the challenges you want, but you can't accept them when
we present them. You are a hypocrite. Just to proved that you are a loyal
WC defender.

Anthony Marsh

2018-08-06 03:51:58 UTC

Post by bigdog
Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

So this is your way of sidestepping the inconvenient fact the images shown
aren't compatible with your silly forehead/temple entry. You can't point
to an image which shows that to be possible so you try to shift the burden
on me to find it.
All the images up through 020 are dealing with the throat shot. I don't
see an image 021. Image 022 is the one that shows the angle of the bullet
to the skull. While the skull is greatly oversized, that doesn't alter the
angle. As anyone can see, the only way to get that line to your BOH
blowout location is by having the entry go through the center of the
forehead. If you move that line to your imaginary forehead/temple entry
wound, you will see it doesn't exit at the BOH. In the past you have
denied that this diagram was intended to show the bullet path through the
head, only the angle of the shot. You just claimed the author showed an
image with a forehead/temple entry and a BOH exit. If it isn't image 022,
which one is it? Of are you going to continue to demand that I find the
image that supports your theory because you are unable to do it?

How rude? Asking a kook to get specific and prove a point?
I wouldn't do that to you!

Anthony Marsh

2018-08-02 16:55:48 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

What's impossible is your figuring. The article makes it clear that
there was no "magic" which is LN type thinking. The line for the bullets
was clear and worked well for both the throat and forehead shots.
And I remind you again, the author takes into account the forehead
shot, and not any silly BOH shot that can't be proved.

Try drawing a straight line from your imaginary rear exit wound to your
equally imaginary forehead/temple entrance wound and see where that leads
you. Hint: nowhere near the SoGK.

Actually, that was done by the author of the article that describes the
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Which image would that be?

Skip through them quickly and you'll see it.

Evasion. Link directly to the image you think proves your point.

Post by mainframetech
Chris

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-28 03:29:10 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.

It was here that I found information about the ARRB work that was
done, and found that many things had been newly uncovered.

What did you find in the ARRB that indicates there was a shooter on the
SoGK?

Nothing so far.

So if the ARRB had no evidence of a shooter on the SoGK, where did you
find evidence for that?

You were told the answer to that. Why do you like so much to see your
name up in the forum, repeating the same stuff over and over??

I guess this is your way of saying there is no such evidence.
Why is it when people like you and Marsh are asked a question for which
you have no answer you claim to have given the answer?

An article for which you've offered no supporting evidence.

Post by mainframetech
That article also is aware that there is a bullet hole in the
forehead/temple area.

An article that shows the geometry for such a shot is impossible.

Nope, won't do. It shows the bullet paths very well. The problem has
to be where it often is, in your understanding.

How about Dale Myers and his diagrams showing the bullet go between
JFK's outstretched fingers and not hitting them? That's OK with you?

Loading Image...

Loading Image...

Gee, I wonder why Dale had to change his drawing about 20 times?

When did you ever see JFK in this postion in the Zapruder film?

Jason Burke

2018-07-18 00:14:09 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Chris

Undoubtedly the same place your "evidence" has been the last 650+ months.

But keep fighting the silly fight!

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-18 22:23:14 UTC

Were were all the other snipers located? One persistent CT
has endorsed a theory including 20 snipers.
Sniper One was in the 6th floor window of the TSBD.
Sniper Two was behind the fence on the GK.
Where were the other 18 snipers located?
Why did all but 2 miss the primary target?

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you
are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the
truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to
chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

I rather expected you to be confused. First shot struck
through the
windshield and then into the throat of JFK. Second shot in the upper
back, and third shot struck the front of the head at the
forehead/temple
area. When struck from outside, tempered glass will direct the shot
somewhat downward given that the windshield sloped downward, second shot
from the South Knoll was without windshield in the way. A
straight shot
into the forehead.

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there
were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.

Can't wait to see where your shooters are next month.

As you've been told, it will depend on the evidence next month.
Chris

Undoubtedly the same place your "evidence" has been the last 650+ months.
But keep fighting the silly fight!

OK, so you are on the record as saying that to fight for Democracy is
silly. It that why you are a Trump supporter?

Jason Burke

2018-07-14 20:42:48 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

claviger

2018-07-15 21:43:18 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-16 11:58:50 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Now wait a damn minute! You are stipulating that 2 snipers did not miss?
What are their names and where were they shooting from?

Don't pretend that you know the name of the CIA officer shooting from the
grassy knoll.

claviger

2018-07-17 17:23:05 UTC

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by claviger
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Now wait a damn minute! You are stipulating that 2 snipers did
not miss?

I'm stipulating only one sniper fired at the Limousine from the 6th
floor of the TSBD.

Post by Anthony Marsh
What are their names and where were they shooting from?

His name was Lee Harvey Oswald and he was shooting from a
6th floor window in front of a sniper's nest he arranged with
malice of forethought.

Post by Anthony Marsh
Don't pretend that you know the name of the CIA officer shooting
from the grassy knoll.

There was no sniper on the grassy knoll and no creepy black dogman
with a rifle in the patio.

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-18 18:55:05 UTC

Post by Anthony Marsh

Post by claviger
MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Now wait a damn minute! You are stipulating that 2 snipers did
not miss?

I'm stipulating only one sniper fired at the Limousine from the 6th
floor of the TSBD.

20-18=2, not 1.

Post by Anthony Marsh
What are their names and where were they shooting from?

His name was Lee Harvey Oswald and he was shooting from a
6th floor window in front of a sniper's nest he arranged with
malice of forethought.

Post by Anthony Marsh
Don't pretend that you know the name of the CIA officer shooting
from the grassy knoll.

There was no sniper on the grassy knoll and no creepy black dogman
with a rifle in the patio.

Black Dog Man is what some conspiracy kooks made up to describe the man
in a black suit behind the retaining wall.
They think he is creepy. I don't.
You still can't admit that you worded it incorrectly and ended up with 2
shooters. Why not just call it a TYPO?

mainframetech

2018-07-17 00:48:05 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

I don't believe in any "snipers" as you well know. Our definitions of
shooters and snipers differ. Snipers to me are trained specialists like
the Marine scout/snipers. Shooters are just that. Not specially trained
for that particular task. To hit the target with shooters, you need many
more of them.

Chris

bigdog

2018-07-17 22:02:01 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

I suppose you could be more ridiculous but it is hard to imagine how. You
are proposing a sophisticated plot to assassinate the POTUS and rather
than hire one expert marksman to do the job, "they" seem to have entrusted
the job to a small army of klutzes and on top of that after firing all
that lead into DP "they" thought they could still frame one guy. I suppose
this all makes sense to you.

Jason Burke

2018-07-19 02:05:13 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Sadly, it probably does.

mainframetech

2018-07-19 17:54:21 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Well you see, you didn't notice, but it worked!

Chris

Jason Burke

2018-07-20 16:04:22 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Well you see, you didn't notice, but it worked!
Chris

When you're totally making up cr*p, you can believe anything you want.

Steve M. Galbraith

2018-07-20 16:27:03 UTC

You were given an answer to those questions, but here you are asking
the same ones over again. If you weren't going to believe the truth, why
bother everyone with the questions over again?
And 3 shooters struck JFK with bullets. Here's something to chew on,
and it includes trajectories and sight lines just like you want to drool
http://www.jfksouthknollgunman.com/index.php/08-2south-knoll/

Can't wait to see where you put your shooters next month.
I am a bit confused. Your website claims the south knoll gunman hit JFK
twice from the front left. Then you have the wound in the back. That's
only two gunman who hit JFK. You just claimed 3 shooters hit him. Where
was that third shooter and what wound did he cause?

Nobody is interested in your amateur ballistic analysis. I asked where
your three shooters were that struck JFK.

It's a dumb question. It's not known from the wounds if there were 3
shooters of 2 shooters that caused the 3 shots that struck JFK. The

That's actually technically true, Chris.
But what *is* known is that there was one shooter that caused the three
shots that struck JFK.

Post by mainframetech
throat and forehead shots might have ben the same person, or two people
near each other on the south knoll.
Chris

MFT believes in a 20 snipers scenario. If true 18 were totally
incompetent.

Fake films, fake autopsy, fake this and that. CIA, FBI, Justice
Department.

All of these powerful groups engaging in all of this detailed activity.

But they hired some clowns to do the actual shooting. Because, y'know, it
was hard to get quality snipers back then.

Anthony Marsh

2018-07-21 00:11:44 UTC

Post by Steve M. Galbraith