dolf
2018-06-27 11:46:58 UTC
If I may intrude on the discussion and raise the point the with respects to
Islam’s reliance upon a centrist fallacy as cortical array {ie. north,
east, south, west} comprising and canonical artifice of: 41, 42, 43, 44, 45
within a magic sum series: #41 to #49 which equates to #135 row sum / #405
total sum.
The first and second of the SEPTET magic squares each sum to #123 {ie. #246
- ANGEL GABRIEL} as being Abrahamic given 3 x #41 of the intellectus as
genitive voluntātus and the SEPTET #369 each conveys a mathematical
function relativity to this property:
38 45. 40
43 41 39
42 37 44
Can you play tic-tac-toe?
G52@{
#1: Sup: 1; Ego: 1,
#2: Sup: 4; Ego: 3,
#3: Sup: 54; Ego: 50,
#4: Sup: 43; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
#6: Sup: 54; Ego: 1,
#7: Sup: 11; Ego: 38,
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335
#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 AS #135 AS
UMBRA INTERFERENCE MAPPING WITHIN ISLAMIC *CORTICAL* ARRAY* AS *ORBITAL*
PYTHAGOREAN BELIEF ASSIGNED TO THE ARCH-ANGEL OF ARIES AS *EQUINOX* OF 21
MARCH – 19 APRIL} 1) lack of knowledge, *IGNORANCE*; 1a) esp. of divine
things; 1b) of moral blindness;
YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching:
H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 -
Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance at
Re-Stau; I am not a slayer of men.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #nnn % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; *I* *AM* *NOT* *OF* *AGGRESSIVE* *HAND*.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH PROTOTYPES
#FIVE: #114 / #342 AND #SIX: #123 / #369
HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#6 as #114 / #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272), <-- #391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70,
#50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia (G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13}
1) the management of a household or of household affairs; 1a) specifically,
the management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342
TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#5 as #114 / #342)@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 27 (#40); Ego: 14 (#27),
@3: Sup: 42 (#82); Ego: 15 (#42),
@4: Sup: 79 (#161); Ego: 37 (#79),
@5: Sup: 36 (#197); Ego: 38 (#117),
@6: Sup: 75 (#272); Ego: 39 (#156),
@7: Sup: 55 (#327); Ego: 61 (#217),
@8: Sup: 36 (#363); Ego: 62 (#279),
@9: Sup: 18 (#381); Ego: 63 (#342),
Male: #381; Feme: #342
} // 342 as Vav (#6) + Tsade (#90) + Gimel (#3) + Yod (#10) + He (#5) /
#342 as AIR (-)
#209 as [#50, #70, #9, #70, #10] = nothos (G3541): {UMBRA: #17 as #399 %
#41 = #30} 1) illegitimate, bastard; 2) one born, not in lawful wedlock,
but of a concubine or female slave;
#316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41 =
#5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut off,
destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut off,
separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:
9(9²+1)/2 = #369
to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence.
Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is referential integrity
relating to the nature of references or any allusions. And for this
realisation one must have recourse to at least a rudimentary understanding
of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being implicit within the notion of
any metacognition which is "cognition about cognition", "thinking about
thinking", "knowing about knowing", becoming "aware of one's awareness" and
higher-order thinking skills. The term comes from the root word meta,
meaning "beyond".
The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or more
informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition as
knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a person
is engaging in metacognition if he notices that he is having more trouble
learning A than B, or if it strikes her that she should double-check C
before accepting it as fact. [J. H. Flavell (1976, p. 232)]
If you argue textual interpretations you are engaged in only a
circumlocution of an infinite reality but if you argue the legitimacy of
the central canonical premise given the syncretic perennialist alternative
of THOTH MEASURES and DAOist equivalents of 4 / 2 BCE published by YANG
HSIUNG, then the whole artifice will collapse
- dolf
Indeed. Do we need a replacement for fundamentalist Islam?
All this smacks to me of attempting to establish rules in order to stifle
certain forms of debate.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Islam’s reliance upon a centrist fallacy as cortical array {ie. north,
east, south, west} comprising and canonical artifice of: 41, 42, 43, 44, 45
within a magic sum series: #41 to #49 which equates to #135 row sum / #405
total sum.
The first and second of the SEPTET magic squares each sum to #123 {ie. #246
- ANGEL GABRIEL} as being Abrahamic given 3 x #41 of the intellectus as
genitive voluntātus and the SEPTET #369 each conveys a mathematical
function relativity to this property:
38 45. 40
43 41 39
42 37 44
Can you play tic-tac-toe?
G52@{
#1: Sup: 1; Ego: 1,
#2: Sup: 4; Ego: 3,
#3: Sup: 54; Ego: 50,
#4: Sup: 43; Ego: 70,
#5: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
#6: Sup: 54; Ego: 1,
#7: Sup: 11; Ego: 38,
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335
#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 AS #135 AS
UMBRA INTERFERENCE MAPPING WITHIN ISLAMIC *CORTICAL* ARRAY* AS *ORBITAL*
PYTHAGOREAN BELIEF ASSIGNED TO THE ARCH-ANGEL OF ARIES AS *EQUINOX* OF 21
MARCH – 19 APRIL} 1) lack of knowledge, *IGNORANCE*; 1a) esp. of divine
things; 1b) of moral blindness;
YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching:
H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 -
Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance at
Re-Stau; I am not a slayer of men.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #nnn % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; *I* *AM* *NOT* *OF* *AGGRESSIVE* *HAND*.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH PROTOTYPES
#FIVE: #114 / #342 AND #SIX: #123 / #369
HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#6 as #114 / #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272), <-- #391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70,
#50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia (G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13}
1) the management of a household or of household affairs; 1a) specifically,
the management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342
TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#5 as #114 / #342)@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 27 (#40); Ego: 14 (#27),
@3: Sup: 42 (#82); Ego: 15 (#42),
@4: Sup: 79 (#161); Ego: 37 (#79),
@5: Sup: 36 (#197); Ego: 38 (#117),
@6: Sup: 75 (#272); Ego: 39 (#156),
@7: Sup: 55 (#327); Ego: 61 (#217),
@8: Sup: 36 (#363); Ego: 62 (#279),
@9: Sup: 18 (#381); Ego: 63 (#342),
Male: #381; Feme: #342
} // 342 as Vav (#6) + Tsade (#90) + Gimel (#3) + Yod (#10) + He (#5) /
#342 as AIR (-)
#209 as [#50, #70, #9, #70, #10] = nothos (G3541): {UMBRA: #17 as #399 %
#41 = #30} 1) illegitimate, bastard; 2) one born, not in lawful wedlock,
but of a concubine or female slave;
#316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41 =
#5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut off,
destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut off,
separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:
9(9²+1)/2 = #369
to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence.
Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is referential integrity
relating to the nature of references or any allusions. And for this
realisation one must have recourse to at least a rudimentary understanding
of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being implicit within the notion of
any metacognition which is "cognition about cognition", "thinking about
thinking", "knowing about knowing", becoming "aware of one's awareness" and
higher-order thinking skills. The term comes from the root word meta,
meaning "beyond".
The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or more
informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition as
knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a person
is engaging in metacognition if he notices that he is having more trouble
learning A than B, or if it strikes her that she should double-check C
before accepting it as fact. [J. H. Flavell (1976, p. 232)]
If you argue textual interpretations you are engaged in only a
circumlocution of an infinite reality but if you argue the legitimacy of
the central canonical premise given the syncretic perennialist alternative
of THOTH MEASURES and DAOist equivalents of 4 / 2 BCE published by YANG
HSIUNG, then the whole artifice will collapse
- dolf
Dan S. MacAbre -
there's something that needs to be destroyed.
Destructive criticism is there to demolish things without providing any
viable alternatives as replacement.
Well, sometimes, I don't think you need, or want, a replacement.Dan S. MacAbre -
criticism and a destructive one.
I don't think there's anything wrong with a destructive criticism ifSo why take any notice of anyone who's critical of anything?
Because there is a world of difference between a well argued constructivecriticism and a destructive one.
there's something that needs to be destroyed.
viable alternatives as replacement.
All this smacks to me of attempting to establish rules in order to stifle
certain forms of debate.
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS