ACAB

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

ACAB
We see the ACAB tattoo mostly in British prisons. The letters stand for 'All
Cops Are Bastards.' It is a way to show their disgust to the authorities who
watch them every day. Skinheads and other racial groups like to wear the tat
....

Wait wait wait, Your Honor!

ACAB should mean "All Corrupted-cops Are Bastards"! :)

[e***@hotmail.com]

We see the ACAB tattoo mostly in British prisons. The letters stand for 'All

Cops Are Bastards.' It is a way to show their disgust to the authorities who
watch them every day. Skinheads and other racial groups like to wear the tat
....

Wait wait wait, Your Honor!

ACAB should mean "All Corrupted-cops Are Bastards"! :)
*****
No, people convicted of crimes consider ALL authority figures bastardized. They’re not differentiating between dirty or clean cops!

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com

Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
ACAB should mean "All Corrupted-cops Are Bastards"! :)

*****
No, people convicted of crimes consider ALL authority figures bastardized. They’re not differentiating between dirty or clean cops!

Then they are just terrorists not very far from ISIS! ;)

[e***@hotmail.com]

No. Terrorists, by nature, are trying to cause terror in support of a political viewpoint. Criminals are usually doing something unlawful with the expectation of a monetary pay out at the end.

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
No. Terrorists, by nature, are trying to cause terror in support of a political viewpoint. Criminals are usually doing something unlawful with the expectation of a monetary pay out at the end.

Which country draws the line that way? Only in USA?

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
Criminals are usually doing something unlawful with the expectation of a monetary pay out at the end.

What about murderers and rapists? Are they criminals?

They do things unrelated to "monetary pay", but joy and excitement.

[e***@hotmail.com]

That’s a point, although I wouldn’t consider their take on it “joy and excitement.” Either way, they’re not targeting large groups of strangers to make political statements, so they’re not terrorists.

Can you show me another country that considers one-on-one criminal activity to be “terrorism?”

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
That’s a point, although I wouldn’t consider their take on it “joy and
excitement.” Either way, they’re not targeting large groups of
strangers to make political statements, so they’re not terrorists.

SO you don't buy the story that some criminals commit crimes for
pleasure? Because it's abnormal psychology?

A good example of pleasure-based crimes might be Hong Kong's recent riot
in Central and Mong Kok?

Post by e***@hotmail.com
Can you show me another country that considers one-on-one criminal activity to be “terrorism?”

I cannot, as I have no means nor authority to probe their jurisdiction. ;)

[e***@hotmail.com]

SO you don't buy the story that some criminals commit crimes for
pleasure? Because it's abnormal psychology?

A good example of pleasure-based crimes might be Hong Kong's recent riot
in Central and Mong Kok?

Post by e***@hotmail.com
Can you show me another country that considers one-on-one criminal activity to be “terrorism?”

I cannot, as I have no means nor authority to probe their jurisdiction. ;)
****
There are probably psychos out there who get off on their deeds. Craig Price comes to mind. He still doesn’t qualify as a terrorist.

If you can’t prove that the USA is the only country that does not consider criminals who attack individuals not terrorists, then don’t make the suggestion.

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
If you can’t prove that the USA is the only country that does not consider criminals who attack individuals not terrorists, then don’t make the suggestion.

A suggestion is NOT a proof nor accusation. You don't need evidences for
that. The same applies to conspiracy theories.

[e***@hotmail.com]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
If you can’t prove that the USA is the only country that does not consider criminals who attack individuals not terrorists, then don’t make the suggestion.

A suggestion is NOT a proof nor accusation. You don't need evidences for
that. The same applies to conspiracy theories.
*****
But it’s unnecessarily muddying the waters!

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
There are probably psychos out there who get off on their
deeds. Craig Price comes to mind. He still doesn’t qualify
as a terrorist.

So psychos could not be classified as terrorists nor criminals?

[e***@hotmail.com]

There are probably psychos out there who get off on their

Post by e***@hotmail.com
deeds. Craig Price comes to mind. He still doesn’t qualify
as a terrorist.

So psychos could not be classified as terrorists nor criminals?
- show quoted text -
Criminal is the major set of anyone who commits an unlawful act for any reasons.

Terrorist is a sub-set of criminal. Psychopath is another sub-set. There may be some overlap, but for the most part, terrorists are people who commit murder and mayhem on a large scale for political purposes.

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
- show quoted text -
Criminal is the major set of anyone who commits an unlawful act for any reasons.
Terrorist is a sub-set of criminal. Psychopath is another sub-set. There may be some overlap, but for the most part, terrorists are people who commit murder and mayhem on a large scale for political purposes.

So the intention of the criminals can never be about pleasure, joy
and/or excitement?

[e***@hotmail.com]

I accepted that there are some criminals who are in it for the thrills. I mentioned Craig Price as an example. “Some people just want to watch the world burn!”

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

Post by e***@hotmail.com
I accepted that there are some criminals who are in
it for the thrills. I mentioned Craig Price as an
example. “Some people just want to watch the world burn!”

Especially serial killers!!! And if they were trained in the military of
hiding secrets, well, how could the police find them suspicious?

Well... :)