Joe Schmoe
2012-03-02 23:57:22 UTC
The new wild card format is good if you want to increase attendance
(MLB's major concern), and I understand that. But I think it will prove
be a mistake, even to the point of undermining the whole premise of the
wild card concept in the first place.
I believe the wild card is supposed to allow a team into the post-season
who may have the second-best record in the league, but also second best
in their division. Now they are going to put in the team with the
fifth-best record as well.
I envision a scenario where wildcard #1 wins 98 games and loses a
one-game playoff to a wildcard #2 who only won 86 games during the season.
Baseball should be about the best teams over the long-haul. Under the
old system, a one-game playoff was only forced under the circumstance of
two teams being tied after the entire season. The new format tends to
further minimize the long-term success considerations. I don't like the
one-game playoff concept.
(MLB's major concern), and I understand that. But I think it will prove
be a mistake, even to the point of undermining the whole premise of the
wild card concept in the first place.
I believe the wild card is supposed to allow a team into the post-season
who may have the second-best record in the league, but also second best
in their division. Now they are going to put in the team with the
fifth-best record as well.
I envision a scenario where wildcard #1 wins 98 games and loses a
one-game playoff to a wildcard #2 who only won 86 games during the season.
Baseball should be about the best teams over the long-haul. Under the
old system, a one-game playoff was only forced under the circumstance of
two teams being tied after the entire season. The new format tends to
further minimize the long-term success considerations. I don't like the
one-game playoff concept.