FSHG
2015-03-06 00:45:36 UTC
I was reading an interesting post in one of the forums about
witness/photographer Bob Jackson that included the following paragraphs
about the WC's theoretical shot sequence that I had never realized, until
now, was true.
It mentions that the majority of the witnesses stated the second and third
heard shots were bunched much closer together than the first and second
shots.
BUT, the WC (current) theory has the second and third shots timed 46%
further apart than the WC's first and second shots.
The most important determination by Mr. Jackson, by far, (that he has also
always maintained to this very day), AND, that the WCR report even also
admitted to a "substantial majority" witnesses majority (that Dulles
stated was a five-to-one ratio), is that Mr. Jackson, along a very
significant, large percentage of his fellow witnesses who recalled hearing
3 or more shots, all maintained and described that the 2nd and 3rd shots
were definitely bunched much closer together, than were the 1st and 2nd
shots they could hear.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro/20141118-photographers-recall-capturing-the-history-of-kennedy-assassination.ece
- But, WC believers (current) theory of LN shots triggered at Zap-160,
221, and triggered at 310, is contradictory to the significant majority of
the witnesses actually there, in that the (current) WC theory places its
2nd and 3rd LN shots 46% further spaced apart than its 1st and 2nd
theoretical LN shots--"
A number like 46% is very, very significant IMHO, and a majority of
persons definitely WOULD notice that significant difference.
(especially witnesses, laws enforcement officials, and Secret Service
Agents who had extensive prior experiences actually firing weapons)
(for example, do you think you would notice a politician winning an
election by 46%, or your suddenly having to pay today $3.18 for a gallon
for gas that was $2.17 yesterday)
Whether you are a CT or (especially) a LNer, can you simply explain that
46% longer time in the WC current theory?
witness/photographer Bob Jackson that included the following paragraphs
about the WC's theoretical shot sequence that I had never realized, until
now, was true.
It mentions that the majority of the witnesses stated the second and third
heard shots were bunched much closer together than the first and second
shots.
BUT, the WC (current) theory has the second and third shots timed 46%
further apart than the WC's first and second shots.
The most important determination by Mr. Jackson, by far, (that he has also
always maintained to this very day), AND, that the WCR report even also
admitted to a "substantial majority" witnesses majority (that Dulles
stated was a five-to-one ratio), is that Mr. Jackson, along a very
significant, large percentage of his fellow witnesses who recalled hearing
3 or more shots, all maintained and described that the 2nd and 3rd shots
were definitely bunched much closer together, than were the 1st and 2nd
shots they could hear.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro/20141118-photographers-recall-capturing-the-history-of-kennedy-assassination.ece
- But, WC believers (current) theory of LN shots triggered at Zap-160,
221, and triggered at 310, is contradictory to the significant majority of
the witnesses actually there, in that the (current) WC theory places its
2nd and 3rd LN shots 46% further spaced apart than its 1st and 2nd
theoretical LN shots--"
A number like 46% is very, very significant IMHO, and a majority of
persons definitely WOULD notice that significant difference.
(especially witnesses, laws enforcement officials, and Secret Service
Agents who had extensive prior experiences actually firing weapons)
(for example, do you think you would notice a politician winning an
election by 46%, or your suddenly having to pay today $3.18 for a gallon
for gas that was $2.17 yesterday)
Whether you are a CT or (especially) a LNer, can you simply explain that
46% longer time in the WC current theory?