[fpc-devel] Last call for 3.0.4 merges

[Marco van de Voort]

While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.

If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.

Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/ma

[Joost van der Sluis]

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.

I'm hesitating about merging all fpmkunit and fppkg changes. Things
improved a lot, but a little bit more testing could be useful. Not that
it's used a lot, though.

At least it should handle https, since idefix is https only, now.

What do you think?

Joost.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l

[Nikolay Nikolov]

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.
Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

Another merge request:

r36498 - the fix for the fpwidestring bug, which caused the #0 in the
compiler output of fpc-trunk. Even though the fpc-fixes compiler doesn't
output #0 characters (because it doesn't have code page aware compiler
messages), the actual bug is in fpwidestring's conversion from
widestring to utf-8 and it still exists in fpc-fixes, therefore this
merge request... :)

Nikolay
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.

[Nikolay Nikolov]

Post by Nikolay Nikolov

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.
Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

r36498 - the fix for the fpwidestring bug, which caused the #0 in the
compiler output of fpc-trunk. Even though the fpc-fixes compiler
doesn't output #0 characters (because it doesn't have code page aware
compiler messages), the actual bug is in fpwidestring's conversion
from widestring to utf-8 and it still exists in fpc-fixes, therefore
this merge request... :)

Are you planning to merge this?

Nikolay
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.
Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

Below a really long list. They are patches that happened after tag of 3.0.2,
so they suppose that all earlier patches to fcl-pdf, fcl-js, pas2js, fcl-passrc
have been merged already (which, I think, should be the case).

Output from svn log, so I assume it is somehow scriptable.

Michael.

Everything related fcl-pdf:

r35519
r36354
r36355
r36356
r36357
r36358

Everything related to fcl-js:

r35402
r35416
r35428
r35471
r35490
r35502
r35576
r35577
r35633
r35640
r35651
r35789
r36235
r36471
r36492
r36493
r36494

Everything related to fcl-passrc:

r35391
r35402
r35415
r35428
r35468
r35469
r35470
r35487
r35488
r35489
r35503
r35522
r35524
r35562
r35571
r35578
r35579
r35580
r35581
r35582
r35584
r35586
r35588
r35591
r35593
r35597
r35612
r35613
r35614
r35616
r35617
r35621
r35625
r35631
r35633
r35635
r35636
r35637
r35638
r35639
r35641
r35642
r35648
r35652
r35667
r35680
r35681
r35682
r35691
r35692
r35694
r35695
r35697
r35702
r35703
r35708
r35709
r35710
r35713
r35715
r35718
r35719
r35720
r35728
r35731
r35735
r35737
r35782
r35790
r35791
r35793
r35794
r35798
r35801
r35806
r35808
r35810
r35827
r35829
r35839
r35842
r35844
r35846
r35851
r35853
r35859
r35863
r35865
r35866
r35868
r35870
r35872
r35874
r35876
r35883
r35884
r35887
r35889
r35895
r35896
r35897
r35898
r35902
r35904
r35909
r35910
r35912
r35914
r35915
r35916
r35917
r35923
r35926
r35928
r35931
r35933
r35938
r35940
r35947
r35948
r35949
r35950
r35951
r35960
r35963
r35964
r35966
r36006
r36069
r36084
r36117
r36121
r36125
r36126
r36127
r36129
r36130
r36131
r36140
r36154
r36155
r36160
r36161
r36171
r36177
r36178
r36179
r36181
r36182
r36183
r36184
r36185
r36186
r36187
r36188
r36189
r36190
r36192
r36205
r36213
r36216
r36217
r36218
r36219
r36220
r36221
r36222
r36223
r36224
r36225
r36226
r36228
r36234
r36237
r36238
r36241
r36246
r36248
r36318
r36320
r36376
r36397
r36453
r36458

pas2js related:

r35402
r35417
r35428
r35472
r35491
r35504
r35574
r35583
r35585
r35587
r35615
r35631
r35633
r35643
r35653
r35668
r35683
r35693
r35696
r35697
r35704
r35705
r35706
r35711
r35714
r35716
r35718
r35719
r35729
r35732
r35736
r35738
r35795
r35799
r35802
r35803
r35804
r35805
r35809
r35811
r35828
r35840
r35843
r35845
r35847
r35852
r35854
r35860
r35862
r35864
r35867
r35869
r35871
r35873
r35875
r35888
r35903
r35905
r35908
r35911
r35917
r35919
r35920
r35927
r35932
r35939
r36007
r36035
r36037
r36070
r36085
r36118
r36154
r36156
r36172
r36236
r36242
r36247
r36319
r36459
r36460
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-

[Joost van der Sluis]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
Below a really long list. They are patches that happened after tag of 3.0.2,
so they suppose that all earlier patches to fcl-pdf, fcl-js, pas2js, fcl-passrc
have been merged already (which, I think, should be the case).

Which reminds me...

We use fcl-passrc to use pascalscript to validate form-input on
websites. We evaluate the scripts on the server-side, but also direct on
the client. With a very simple pascalscript to js converter.

But it doesn't work with trunk anymore, at least, it doesn't parse the
statement 'false;', together with 'true;' anymore. Which is used a lot
in our system. (For example for the 'required'-statements.)

Is this intentional?

Regards,

Joost.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepasca

[Mattias Gaertner]

On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:18:52 +0200

Post by Joost van der Sluis
[...]
But it doesn't work with trunk anymore, at least, it doesn't parse the
statement 'false;', together with 'true;' anymore. Which is used a lot
in our system. (For example for the 'required'-statements.)
Is this intentional?

fpc gives "Illegal expression".
Maybe pascalscript needs a flag in pparser to allow this.

Mattias

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.

This is now fixed, rev. 36510.

I will still check the svn log of rtl/packages for any fixes that may be merged.

Unless you have somewhere an up-to-date list of possible candidates ?

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.

This is now fixed, rev. 36510.
I will still check the svn log of rtl/packages for any fixes that may be merged.
Unless you have somewhere an up-to-date list of possible candidates ?

The usual weblocation? http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26

Some quick checks (greps for the searchterm in commitlog+ filenames)

fcl-pdf eligible: 33713,34002,34008,34615,35278,35833,36395

fcl-passrc eligible:
29399,29950,29974,30891,31177,31318,31527,31857,34002,34008,35833,36006,36020,36069,36084,36117,36121,36125,36126,36127,36129,36130,36131,36140,36154,36155,36160,36161,36171,36177,36178,36179,36181,36182,36183,36184,36185,36186,36187,36188,36189,36190,36192,36205,36213,36216,36217,36218,36219,36220,36221,36222,36223,36224,36225,36226,36228,36234,36237,36238,36241,36246,36248,36318,36320,36321,36376,36395,36397,36453,36458

pas2js:
29399,29950,29974,30891,31177,31318,31525,31527,34002,34008,35833,36035,36037,36085,36118,36154,36156,36172,36236,36242,36247,36319,36391,36459,36460

etc etc.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mail

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.

This is now fixed, rev. 36510.
I will still check the svn log of rtl/packages for any fixes that may be merged.
Unless you have somewhere an up-to-date list of possible candidates ?

The usual weblocation? http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26
Some quick checks (greps for the searchterm in commitlog+ filenames)

The 'merge sets' are followed by a pair of numbers.
What is the meaning of these numbers ?

Then if I open 'fcl-pdf', I see:
(inactive) Revisions in this set 33162,33163,33175,33176,33212,33215,33255,33264,33401,33428,33431,33453,33456,33468,33482,33483,33484,33485,33495,33497,33499,33535,33543,33563,33564,33566,33573,33998,34037,34060,34543,34563,34767,34778,34779,34780,34781,34804,35083,35084,35090,35094,35126,35131,35519

What does (inactive) mean ?

Concerning the eligble below, everything can be merged.

fcl-image: everything can be merged.
fcl-web: everything can be merged.
fpdoc: everything can be merged.

I will check out fcl-base.


Michael.

Post by Marco van de Voort
fcl-pdf eligible: 33713,34002,34008,34615,35278,35833,36395
29399,29950,29974,30891,31177,31318,31527,31857,34002,34008,35833,36006,36020,36069,36084,36117,36121,36125,36126,36127,36129,36130,36131,36140,36154,36155,36160,36161,36171,36177,36178,36179,36181,36182,36183,36184,36185,36186,36187,36188,36189,36190,36192,36205,36213,36216,36217,36218,36219,36220,36221,36222,36223,36224,36225,36226,36228,36234,36237,36238,36241,36246,36248,36318,36320,36321,36376,36395,36397,36453,36458
29399,29950,29974,30891,31177,31318,31525,31527,34002,34008,35833,36035,36037,36085,36118,36154,36156,36172,36236,36242,36247,36319,36391,36459,36460
etc etc.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mai

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort
Some quick checks (greps for the searchterm in commitlog+ filenames)

The 'merge sets' are followed by a pair of numbers.
What is the meaning of these numbers ?

Active/inactive

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
Then if I open 'fcl-pdf', I see: (inactive) Revisions in this set
33162,33163,33175,33176,33212,33215,33255,33264,33401,33428,33431,33453,33456,33468,33482,33483,33484,33485,33495,33497,33499,33535,33543,33563,33564,33566,33573,33998,34037,34060,34543,34563,34767,34778,34779,34780,34781,34804,35083,35084,35090,35094,35126,35131,35519
What does (inactive) mean ?

Added to the set, but disappeared from eligible after that. In other words:
already merged. Only active ones matter.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepa

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort
Some quick checks (greps for the searchterm in commitlog+ filenames)

The 'merge sets' are followed by a pair of numbers.
What is the meaning of these numbers ?

Active/inactive

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
Then if I open 'fcl-pdf', I see: (inactive) Revisions in this set
33162,33163,33175,33176,33212,33215,33255,33264,33401,33428,33431,33453,33456,33468,33482,33483,33484,33485,33495,33497,33499,33535,33543,33563,33564,33566,33573,33998,34037,34060,34543,34563,34767,34778,34779,34780,34781,34804,35083,35084,35090,35094,35126,35131,35519
What does (inactive) mean ?

already merged. Only active ones matter.

Okay, thanks.

You may want to add this info as a 'legend' to the pages, because it is not readily obvious
(well, not to me anyway). Maybe also put the inactive ones at the end...

Michael.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Marco van de Voort
Some quick checks (greps for the searchterm in commitlog+ filenames)

The 'merge sets' are followed by a pair of numbers. What is the meaning of
these numbers ?

Active/inactive

Then if I open 'fcl-pdf', I see: (inactive) Revisions in this set
33162,33163,33175,33176,33212,33215,33255,33264,33401,33428,33431,33453,33456,33468,33482,33483,33484,33485,33495,33497,33499,33535,33543,33563,33564,33566,33573,33998,34037,34060,34543,34563,34767,34778,34779,34780,34781,34804,35083,35084,35090,35094,35126,35131,35519
What does (inactive) mean ?

already merged. Only active ones matter.

For fcl-base, I think

34498,34499,34506,34509, 35518,35742

can be merged.

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Marco van de Voort
Some quick checks (greps for the searchterm in commitlog+ filenames)

The 'merge sets' are followed by a pair of numbers. What is the meaning of
these numbers ?

Active/inactive

Then if I open 'fcl-pdf', I see: (inactive) Revisions in this set
33162,33163,33175,33176,33212,33215,33255,33264,33401,33428,33431,33453,33456,33468,33482,33483,33484,33485,33495,33497,33499,33535,33543,33563,33564,33566,33573,33998,34037,34060,34543,34563,34767,34778,34779,34780,34781,34804,35083,35084,35090,35094,35126,35131,35519
What does (inactive) mean ?

already merged. Only active ones matter.

Reviewed some more lists:

fcl-db:
34464,34468,34469,34510,34962,34963,34980,35209,35419,35486,35899

fcl-web:
35297,25563,35821

non-categorized:

31464,31467,31468,
32271,32326,32327,32332,32369,
33210,33363,33695,
34097,34238,34239,34240,34245,34475,34476,34481,34483,34484,34487,34489,34490,34493,34494,34495,
34501,34502,34505,34507,34511,34518,34683,34725,34817,34834,34847,34866,34868,34873,34874,34884,
34903,34905,34925,34968,34966,34968,34969,34970,34983,34986,34997,
35063,35331,35332,35333,35342,35356,35398,35422,35423,35467,35474,35517,35560,35598,
35601,35603,35611,35619,35620,35622,35624,35892,35901,35913,35946,35954,
36062,36214,36215,36274,36406


Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fp

[Ladislav Karrach]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
34464,34468,34469,34510,34962,34963,34980,35209,35419,35486,35899

34962,34963 - this was already merget as a special patch IIRC
35209 - IMO depends on changes in sqldb (which are related to code page
awara TStringField, TMemoField)
L.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepas

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
You may want to add this info as a 'legend' to the pages, because it is not readily obvious
(well, not to me anyway). Maybe also put the inactive ones at the end...

I added a line, but the most important thing to understand is that the
revision sets are revisions that I "isolated" from the "merged not in other
sets" category.

So all new revs enter the "to be merged not in other sets" category, and
when I do queries I get lists of revs that go into the query categories.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Marco van de Voort
So all new revs enter the "to be merged not in other sets" category, and
when I do queries I get lists of revs that go into the query categories.

.... so e.g. newer fcl-base revs might still be in the to be merged category. The
categorization is all manual. (since if you do it in an automated way, revs
that touch many directories like makefile or fpmake related end up in random
categories)

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr

[Denis Kozlov]

Can you merge r35878 as well please?

It is a small fix for TAssert.AssertEquals with strings.

Thanks,
Denis

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.
Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Joost van der Sluis

Post by Marco van de Voort
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.

I'm hesitating about merging all fpmkunit and fppkg changes. Things
improved a lot, but a little bit more testing could be useful. Not that
it's used a lot, though.
At least it should handle https, since idefix is https only, now.
What do you think?

We could have take the risk just after a release, so we had some months for
problems to emerge. Last minute merge of 118 revs that are not regularly tested
in trunk is a bit minor. Moreover fpmkunit is heavily used due to fpmake,
and merging is a pain, since support for newer targets that don't exist in
fixes might need manual adjusting.

So I would guess try to name hotfixes only.

That is a bit unfair, since I do merge fcl-passrc atm, but that package is
currently quite used heavily in trunk, and I kept up with merging every 2
months or so without reported problems.


_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mai

[Joost van der Sluis]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Joost van der Sluis
I'm hesitating about merging all fpmkunit and fppkg changes. Things
improved a lot, but a little bit more testing could be useful. Not that
it's used a lot, though.
At least it should handle https, since idefix is https only, now.
What do you think?

We could have take the risk just after a release, so we had some months for
problems to emerge. Last minute merge of 118 revs that are not regularly tested
in trunk is a bit minor. Moreover fpmkunit is heavily used due to fpmake,
and merging is a pain, since support for newer targets that don't exist in
fixes might need manual adjusting.
So I would guess try to name hotfixes only.
That is a bit unfair, since I do merge fcl-passrc atm, but that package is
currently quite used heavily in trunk, and I kept up with merging every 2
months or so without reported problems.

No probem, I can live with that. It's clear this way.

Also, the changes are only stable for about a few weeks. Merging it
earlier was not really an option.

I'll see if I can make a list with hotfixes. Which will be a pain to
merge, as the code in which the fixes are done might even not exist anymore.

But I think we have to change http into https in a few places...

Regards,

Joost.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr

[Joost van der Sluis]

Post by Joost van der Sluis
I'll see if I can make a list with hotfixes. Which will be a pain to
merge, as the code in which the fixes are done might even not exist anymore.
But I think we have to change http into https in a few places...

Ok, please merge:

32732
32759
33016
33017
33033 *
34141
34142
34144
34145
34190
34314
34396
34401 *
34403 *
34486
35277 (If difficult to merge, skip)
35881
36511
36529 *
36550 (brand new, but needed to handle https downloads and redirects)
36551 (idem)
36552 (idem)
36553 (idem)

Marked with * are really important. The last few are just small changes,
but necessary for the https-change. It could be that they don't merge
due to earlier changes. In that case, just change 'http' to 'https' and
'lnet' to 'FPC' manually....

Regards,

Joost.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Denis Kozlov
Can you merge r35878 as well please?
It is a small fix for TAssert.AssertEquals with strings.

Done.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi

[Marco van de Voort]

In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]

Post by Joost van der Sluis

Post by Joost van der Sluis
I'll see if I can make a list with hotfixes. Which will be a pain to
merge, as the code in which the fixes are done might even not exist
anymore.
But I think we have to change http into https in a few places...

32732
32759
33016
33017
33033 *

The first four merge, but the fifth has conflicts that are easily resolved
but won't compile. r32022 ?

I did a query for fpmkunit.pp and added it to the mergelogs fppkg /fpmkunit
category, so that all fpmkunit.pp revs are 100% there.

http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/fppkg.html

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lis

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Joost van der Sluis
32759
33016
33017
33033 *

The first four merge, but the fifth has conflicts that are easily resolved
but won't compile. r32022 ?

.. which has tie-ins to unmerged TProcess revisions.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bi

[Joost van der Sluis]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Joost van der Sluis
32759
33016
33017
33033 *

The first four merge, but the fifth has conflicts that are easily resolved
but won't compile. r32022 ?

.. which has tie-ins to unmerged TProcess revisions.

Then skip them. As you can see they solve TProcess-related problems on
Windows. Maybe these problems are not there in fixes.

Or.. we have serious problems with TProcess on Windows, and the fix
therefor is not fixed yet. Maybe that Pierre can help with that?

Regards,

Joost.

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mail

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Joost van der Sluis

Post by Marco van de Voort
.. which has tie-ins to unmerged TProcess revisions.

Then skip them. As you can see they solve TProcess-related problems on
Windows. Maybe these problems are not there in fixes.

They are new features, not fixes:

* patch by Mattias Gaertner to make TProcess more unicode aware, resolves
issue #29136
* Add poPassInput to be able to handle interactive processes
* improved TProcess.WaitOnExit with timeout implementation to use
fpGetTimeOfDay to work more precise
* Do not call CloseHandle on hStdInput if poPassInput is in Options

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bi

[Nikolay Nikolov]

Post by Marco van de Voort
While I have not done much the last month, I did keep up with most of the
merging so most requests have been honoured, and I plan to branch mid next
week or even monday if there is not much response.
If I missed some, or there are important new ones, there is still a few days
time, waiting for the win32/64 findfirst fix.
Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

ptc merge request:

r34598, r35481, r36507, r36508, r36509, r36555, r36556

Nikolay
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Nikolay Nikolov

Post by Marco van de Voort
Note that compiler/language merges need approval and an estimate of
mergability from a compiler devel.

r34598, r35481, r36507, r36508, r36509, r36555, r36556

Merged. The first is the FSF address update, so I got initially a lot of
files :-)
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort
already merged. Only active ones matter.

It was last call for emergency revs the day before release branching, not
everything you could find :-)

Maybe I should have made that clearer. The changes of Nikolay e.g. are only
local to one package that isn't used that much.

The db changes have been vetted by lacak already and

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
35297,25563,35821

e.g.

35821 is blocked uses 3.1.1 language features. (due to bug #32047 in the ini
handling of 3.0.2+ the warnings don't show up anymore it seems)

the others are about new packages that are then enabled for all OS the day
before branchpoint? Not really a good idea.

Nothing urgent.

Post by Michael Van Canneyt
31464,31467,31468,
32271,32326,32327,32332,32369,
33210,33363,33695,
34097,34238,34239,34240,34245,34475,34476,34481,34483,34484,34487,34489,34490,34493,34494,34495,
34501,34502,34505,34507,34511,34518,34683,34725,34817,34834,34847,34866,34868,34873,34874,34884,
34903,34905,34925,34968,34966,34968,34969,34970,34983,34986,34997,
35063,35331,35332,35333,35342,35356,35398,35422,35423,35467,35474,35517,35560,35598,
35601,35603,35611,35619,35620,35622,35624,35892,35901,35913,35946,35954,
36062,36214,36215,36274,36406

Also contains patches already rejected for 3.0.2 like the first ones.

There might be some cherry picking doable here, but is that really worth
delaying the release?
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/ma

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Marco van de Voort
already merged. Only active ones matter.

It was last call for emergency revs the day before release branching, not
everything you could find :-)

No problem, leave it as-is then :)

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr

[Marco van de Voort]

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Marco van de Voort
already merged. Only active ones matter.

It was last call for emergency revs the day before release branching, not
everything you could find :-)

No problem, leave it as-is then :)

I branch at home tonight. I'll see if I can do some of the more harmless
fixes of the last list (like the comment only changes, the openssl changes)
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org

[Michael Van Canneyt]

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Michael Van Canneyt

Post by Marco van de Voort

Post by Marco van de Voort
already merged. Only active ones matter.

It was last call for emergency revs the day before release branching, not
everything you could find :-)

No problem, leave it as-is then :)

I branch at home tonight. I'll see if I can do some of the more harmless
fixes of the last list (like the comment only changes, the openssl changes)

Great, many thanks !

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-***@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman