Post by Marvin SebournPost by dukePost by Marvin SebournPost by dukePost by Marvin SebournDuke wrote: "The occasions were: (Presidents missing D-Day
commemoration ceremonies in France)
1. Barack Obama, 2010
2. Barack Obama, 2011
3. Barack Obama, 2012
4. Barack Obama, 2013"
Ah Duke, look how slyly this was written. Yes, President Obama did
not attend in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, the only years listed.
Did you get the line I published about "Presidents missing D-Day commemoration
ceremonies in France"
Of course I got the lie you "published" about "Presidents missing D-Day
commemoration ceremonies in France". Then again, we get many lies from you.
Actually, you've NEVER received a lie form me.
Short term memory loss, Duke? Earlier in the thread you said you would
acknowledge if you spoke falsely, in your statements regarding President
Obama's presence at D-Day ceremonies in France.
I showed that he was present on two occasions during his presidency, and
I asked, if you were wrong in saying that he never had been there: >1)
Will you acknowledge that you were mistaken?
And you replied: "If I was." You were shown to be wrong, but you refused
to acknowledge it, making you statement a lie.
And I asked you, concerning my statement that he had been there, and that
you had not spoken truthfully when you said President Obama is the only
"2) (If you are wrong) Will you acknowledge that I told the truth?
"If you did."
You were shown to be wrong, but you refused to acknowledge it, making you statement a lie.
And I asked you, if in this post yo see that I told the truth: "3) Will
you acknowledge that you lied when you wrote in this post, speaking of
me, that "So you (Marvin) are a dirty liar."
And Duke wrote: "If I did. "
You were shown to be wrong, but you refused to acknowledge it, making you statement a lie.
Post by dukePost by Marvin SebournBut you were too cowardly to admit it was a lie.
Your lies are on the slippery slope from occasional to frequent. The
slope is greased. You are going to your personal Hell in your own home-made handbasket.
Post by duke1. Barack Obama, 2010
2. Barack Obama, 2011
3. Barack Obama, 2012
4. Barack Obama, 2013"
Heeheehee. The site I found may have been published before 2014. That happens,
you know.
The site wouldn't have been published before 2013, because it lists
2013 as a non-appearance date for President Obama.
He didn't in 2014 according to the dates.
No. Duke, the listing did not include 2014. Are you really so poor at
reading comprehension that you believe what you wrote: "He didn't in 2014
according to the dates." means anything?
Post by dukePost by Marvin SebournThey slyly said (and you agreed) that they didn't mention 2009, as
President Obama had visited there that year. I'll try and simplify this for you,
Duke--if they knew he wasn't there in 2013, they would have known if he
was there in 2009. Unless their research skills and their honesty were
on the order of yours.
But you notice there is no data for 2009. By all reasoning, 2009 was his first
year in office. He may have gone then, but it would appear not again. 2009 was
possibly a photo shoot.
There is obviously no data for 2009 as it was slyly omitted. First you
said he had never been to a D-Day memorial in France, and now you bleat
"He may have gone then..."
Post by dukePost by Marvin SebournI said a few weeks ago in a thread here that: "But I do think you
(Duke) are more honest than President Trump. And likely a good deal smarter."
I admit that I was grievously wrong in both cases, Duke. My mistake, but not a lie.
But I wasn't mistaken about your lying.
Duke wrote: Mistakes are not lies.
They are if you keep upholding them as truth when you have been shown not
to have told the truth.
And you refused to acknowledge you didn't tell the truth, doubling down
in you "mistakes", which have become lies.
Duke wrote: "Like you, I do make mistakes..."
But you never acknowledge them, Duke.
Possibly my biggest mistake was thinking that in this NG, you would be
capable of a reasonable, honest discussion.
Duke wrote: "...but I NEVER lie on the ng."
Of course you do, Duke.
You lied about President Obama never being present at a D-Day ceremony in
France. Another lie, Duke.
You lied when you said every American President had attended ceremonies
there since 1945. Another lie, Duke.
You lied about saying you would acknowledge if your statements were
false, see above. You didn't. Another lie of yours, Duke.
You lied about acknowledging that you were incorrect, if my statements
were true. You made no acknowledgement. Another lie, Duke.
You lied about acknowledging that you had untruthfully called me a liar.
You didn't do that. You lied, Duke, again.
Okay Duke. At least five lies from you.
And numerous ones from the past.
Duke, it's not so much that you make a mistake, it's that when you are
shown to have made a mistake, you refuse to acknowledge the mistake, make
the same claim again, and turn your mistake into your lie.
And you try to be a bully, particularly towards the women here. But your
reading comprehension and/or your critical reasoning and/or your memory
AND your twisted ethics make that impossible. You are an ineffectual bully.
You refer to "feminazis" freely here, and seem to direct this towards a
couple of the ladies here who have Jewish roots. This is disgusting.
Despicable. But you do it in stride.
You seem to be losing control of your emotions. You called me a "dirty
liar", when you lied and I told the truth. You called someone else here a
dirty bastard", saying that they lied. If you have proof, show it. But you never do.
Beneath contempt.
Marvin Sebourn
LOL. Duke is subhuman, on the level of a rodent. You treated him with far
more respect than he deserves. Rodents just bite and scratch whenever you