BOZ
2018-04-29 23:52:09 UTC
https://www.nsa.gov/news-features/declassified-documents/jfk/assets/files/jfk00001.pdf
Discussion:
(too old to reply)
claviger
2018-05-02 02:31:23 UTC
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
mainframetech
2018-05-03 01:56:37 UTC
Post by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
bigdog
2018-05-04 12:46:46 UTC
Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
"A theory is a guess that one hopes is true"???Post by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
The irony in that statement falls on you like a bale of hay.
mainframetech
2018-05-08 01:57:23 UTC
Post by bigdog
The irony in that statement falls on you like a bale of hay.
Yet another OPINION, lacking any example or proof of anything.Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
"A theory is a guess that one hopes is true"???Post by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
The irony in that statement falls on you like a bale of hay.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-04 12:52:51 UTC
Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
Just don't fall into the logic trap of assuming that something must NOT bePost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY. A theory is a guess that
one hopes is true, as do the LNs. As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the
facts and witnesses that have proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
true because a WC said it. Sometimes they accidentally stumble onto the
truth.
claviger
2018-05-08 23:41:59 UTC
Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-10 18:50:28 UTC
Post by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
What does that have to do with anything?Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
claviger
2018-05-21 02:36:43 UTC
Post by Anthony Marsh
I can't believe you ask this question.Post by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
What does that have to do with anything?Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have
proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have
proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-22 22:30:50 UTC
Post by claviger
I can believe that you are not smart enough to answer my questions.Post by Anthony Marsh
I can't believe you ask this question.Post by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
What does that have to do with anything?Post by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have
proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have
proven that the SBT is false.
Chris
mainframetech
2018-05-17 14:02:00 UTC
Post by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Chris
bigdog
2018-05-18 20:50:37 UTC
Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
mainframetech
2018-05-19 14:48:35 UTC
Post by bigdog
sense.
So now you're defending Claviger? Pretending to be Bugliosi?Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
I notice there was no request for the cites and links. Must be I was
believed for a change.
Chris
bigdog
2018-05-20 01:13:10 UTC
Post by mainframetech
I wasn't defending anybody. I was pointing out your nonsense. It'sPost by bigdog
sense.
So now you're defending Claviger? Pretending to be Bugliosi?Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
becoming a full time job.
Post by mainframetech
I notice there was no request for the cites and links. Must be I was
believed for a change.
If that's what you want to believe, go ahead. It seems to be your soleI notice there was no request for the cites and links. Must be I was
believed for a change.
criteria for what you deem to be credible.
mainframetech
2018-05-22 02:11:05 UTC
Post by bigdog
becoming a full time job.
criteria for what you deem to be credible.
Well, you had your chance and didn't take it. You must have beenPost by mainframetech
I wasn't defending anybody. I was pointing out your nonsense. It'sPost by bigdog
sense.
So now you're defending Claviger? Pretending to be Bugliosi?Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
becoming a full time job.
Post by mainframetech
I notice there was no request for the cites and links. Must be I was
believed for a change.
If that's what you want to believe, go ahead. It seems to be your soleI notice there was no request for the cites and links. Must be I was
believed for a change.
criteria for what you deem to be credible.
afraid of what I would show, which you have seen before.
Chris
Steve M. Galbraith
2018-05-19 14:51:45 UTC
Post by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
bigdog
2018-05-20 01:13:33 UTC
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Whatever needed to have happened for Chris's beliefs to be true must havePost by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
happened because he would never consider that his beliefs could be wacky.
mainframetech
2018-05-22 02:00:59 UTC
Post by bigdog
happened because he would never consider that his beliefs could be wacky.
What happened is what I'm concerned with, and I note that it doesn'tPost by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Whatever needed to have happened for Chris's beliefs to be true must havePost by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
happened because he would never consider that his beliefs could be wacky.
matter to you what actually happened, because it would detract from the
WCR.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-20 01:33:18 UTC
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
Funny, but the CIA did Award a contract to the highest bidder to makePost by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
special ammo for the Carcano. Explosive bullets to be used on Castro.
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Tell us YOUR favorite SBT.It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-20 18:32:37 UTC
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Well, at least we don't have to draw a new SBT diagram every week.Post by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
Steve M. Galbraith
2018-05-21 19:58:39 UTC
Post by Anthony Marsh
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
If you believe the acoustics evidence then I don't see how you can rejectPost by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Well, at least we don't have to draw a new SBT diagram every week.Post by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
the SBT.
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-23 01:34:07 UTC
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
the SBT.
Silly. How do you figure that?Post by Anthony Marsh
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
If you believe the acoustics evidence then I don't see how you can rejectPost by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Well, at least we don't have to draw a new SBT diagram every week.Post by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
the SBT.
You think I prefer the HSCA's SBT over the WC's SBT?
mainframetech
2018-05-23 01:53:05 UTC
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
the SBT.
And if you don't believe the acoustics evidence, then you can rejectPost by Anthony Marsh
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
If you believe the acoustics evidence then I don't see how you can rejectPost by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
Well, at least we don't have to draw a new SBT diagram every week.Post by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
You must be so proud of Free Frank Warner.
the SBT.
the SBT? That makes sense to you?
Chris
mainframetech
2018-05-22 02:11:39 UTC
Post by Steve M. Galbraith
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
As usual, you avoid the facts to make jokes about a murder of thePost by bigdog
sense.
The sniper team used two "short" bullets that went in the back and thePost by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
neck just a few inches.
Why? Well the CIA awarded the contract to the lowest bidder. And the
lowest bidder used cheap ammo. Doug Horne said so.
It's fun being a conspiracist; you can just make things up and wing it.
Why worry about making sense?
POTUS. LNs tend to feel they can insult and demean anyone that doesn't
believe as they do. There were not 2 "short bullets" which is ridiculous.
There was ONE 'short shot' to the upper back of JFK. The term 'short
shot' was used by one of the witnesses in the case. I repeated it from
him.
Now to correct another of your mass of mistakes, the throat wound was
from the front and was probably stopped by the spine. There was evidence
of someone digging around in the throat wound, probably to remove the
bullet so that it wouldn't be seen to be multiple shooters with differing
weapons. The effort spent to make sure the 'lone nut' scenario was
protected was huge.
Chris
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-19 20:12:04 UTC
Post by bigdog
sense.
WC defenders are the Flat Earthers who reject science.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
OHLeeRedux
2018-05-20 18:36:25 UTC
Anthony Marsh
- hide quoted text -
Thank you, Anthony "Trump Sycophant" Marsh.
- hide quoted text -
Post by bigdog
sense.
WC defenders are the Flat Earthers who reject science.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
Thank you, Anthony "Trump Sycophant" Marsh.
BOZ
2018-05-20 18:38:45 UTC
Post by Anthony Marsh
YOUR CREDIBILITY DOES NOT EXIST.Post by bigdog
sense.
WC defenders are the Flat Earthers who reject science.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
claviger
2018-05-21 02:37:39 UTC
Post by Anthony Marsh
CTs reject all legitimate science on this case becausePost by bigdog
sense.
WC defenders are the Flat Earthers who reject science.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
it rains on your playground.
mainframetech
2018-05-22 01:57:44 UTC
Post by claviger
it rains on your playground.
LNs deal in only opinions, which they formed long before they dealtPost by Anthony Marsh
CTs reject all legitimate science on this case becausePost by bigdog
sense.
WC defenders are the Flat Earthers who reject science.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
it rains on your playground.
with any facts. I am quite supportive of science, but when I present
parts of the case that are scientific, you ignore it.
Chris
Jason Burke
2018-05-23 01:34:54 UTC
Post by mainframetech
with any facts. I am quite supportive of science, but when I present
parts of the case that are scientific, you ignore it.
Chris
Sad. Really sad.Post by claviger
it rains on your playground.
LNs deal in only opinions, which they formed long before they dealtPost by Anthony Marsh
CTs reject all legitimate science on this case becausePost by bigdog
sense.
WC defenders are the Flat Earthers who reject science.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Why don't you just tell us the earth is flat. It would make just as muchPost by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
sense.
it rains on your playground.
with any facts. I am quite supportive of science, but when I present
parts of the case that are scientific, you ignore it.
Chris
InsideSparta
2018-05-20 01:33:03 UTC
The back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-21 15:03:17 UTC
Post by InsideSparta
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
Is that a serious question or is it just supposed to be rhetorical.The back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
There are a few theories. Take your pick.
Ice Bullet melted.
Got stuck in his throat. Coughed it up.
Fell out into his clothing.
Got pushed out of his back during heart massage.
I think they have no other choice then if they admit that there even was
a throat wound. The autopsy doctors thought it was a tracheotomy done at
Parkland to help the President breath.
The wackiest one I saw was the bullet hit the back of the head and
exited the throat in the front.
Loading Image...
Well, the MAGIC BULLET is only for the one they claim hit Kennedy and then
Connally. You could still have a bullet hit JFK in the back and exit his
throat without being Magic enough to hit Connally. There are other ways to
explain a separate back wound and a separate throat wound. If you get
really desperate you can look up the flechette theory for the throat
wound.
Post by InsideSparta
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
That is false. The Connally wound was not elongated to the length of CEboth of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
399. The Carcano bullets are 1.2 inches long. Connally's wound was 5/8"
long, only about half the length of the bullet. The bullet was not flying
sideways.
Post by InsideSparta
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
AH, it's called The Zapruder Film.Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
InsideSparta
2018-05-22 05:26:14 UTC
Post by Anthony Marsh
There are a few theories. Take your pick.
Ice Bullet melted.
Got stuck in his throat. Coughed it up.
Fell out into his clothing.
Got pushed out of his back during heart massage.
Ice bullet? Really. Typical Marsh. When you don't have an answer, you justPost by InsideSparta
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
Is that a serious question or is it just supposed to be rhetorical.The back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
There are a few theories. Take your pick.
Ice Bullet melted.
Got stuck in his throat. Coughed it up.
Fell out into his clothing.
Got pushed out of his back during heart massage.
get silly. "Stuck in his throat"? Nope. Wasn't found there. "Coughed it
up"? Then where did it go? "Fell out into his clothing"? Then where did it
go? "Got pushed out his back during heart massage"? The where did it go?
Post by Anthony Marsh
I think they have no other choice then if they admit that there even was
a throat wound. The autopsy doctors thought it was a tracheotomy done at
Parkland to help the President breath.
The wackiest one I saw was the bullet hit the back of the head and
exited the throat in the front.
There's no question as to whether or not there was a throat wound. TheI think they have no other choice then if they admit that there even was
a throat wound. The autopsy doctors thought it was a tracheotomy done at
Parkland to help the President breath.
The wackiest one I saw was the bullet hit the back of the head and
exited the throat in the front.
doctors at Parkland saw it, and were the ones that told Humes about it.
That cleared up the mystery as to where the bullet that entered the back
went to. If anyone wants to claim that the throat wound was an entrance
wound, they have to then come up with a logical, reasonable explanation as
to where it went.
Post by Anthony Marsh
http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/Globe11-23-63.jpg
Well, the MAGIC BULLET is only for the one they claim hit Kennedy and then
Connally. You could still have a bullet hit JFK in the back and exit his
throat without being Magic enough to hit Connally. There are other ways to
explain a separate back wound and a separate throat wound. If you get
really desperate you can look up the flechette theory for the throat
wound.
If the bullet that went through Kennedy's neck didn't go on to strikehttp://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/Globe11-23-63.jpg
Well, the MAGIC BULLET is only for the one they claim hit Kennedy and then
Connally. You could still have a bullet hit JFK in the back and exit his
throat without being Magic enough to hit Connally. There are other ways to
explain a separate back wound and a separate throat wound. If you get
really desperate you can look up the flechette theory for the throat
wound.
Connolly, where did it go? Did it magically disappear? You're actually
proving my point. To deny the single bullet fact, one has to "get really
desperate" with alternate theories; like ice bullets, flechettes, and
those oh-so-evil deep state villains running amok in Dallas.
Post by Anthony Marsh
399. The Carcano bullets are 1.2 inches long. Connally's wound was 5/8"
long, only about half the length of the bullet. The bullet was not flying
sideways.
Even at 5/8 inches, it's longer than the radius of CE399. The wound wasPost by InsideSparta
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
That is false. The Connally wound was not elongated to the length of CEboth of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
399. The Carcano bullets are 1.2 inches long. Connally's wound was 5/8"
long, only about half the length of the bullet. The bullet was not flying
sideways.
not circular in shape, as one would expect an entrance wound to appear if
made from an unobstructed 6.5mm bullet.
Post by Anthony Marsh
The Z-film completely corroborates the single bullet fact. Both JFK andPost by InsideSparta
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
AH, it's called The Zapruder Film.Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
Connolly react at the exact same instant, and one can even see Connolly's
jacket lapel on his right side flap over just after he emerges from the
sign. The position of the two men at the moment the shot strikes them is
perfectly aligned with a shot fired from the 6th floor window piercing
Kennedy and going on to strike Connolly exactly in the location where he
was struck. Thanks for playing.
mainframetech
2018-05-22 02:00:43 UTC
Post by InsideSparta
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
Thank you for asking in a civilized manner, which is not so commonThe back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
testified as follows:
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
O'Connor, Technologist and member of the autopsy team:
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
InsideSparta
2018-05-23 03:03:15 UTC
Post by mainframetech
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
Dr. Pierre Finck ordered the full body x-rays for the purpose of locatingPost by InsideSparta
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
Thank you for asking in a civilized manner, which is not so commonThe back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
any bullets or their fragments, since it was not realized at the time that
the tracheotomy had obliterated the exit wound that corresponded with the
entrance wound in the back. The x-rays did not reveal a bullet within the
body cavity. Custer's statements to the AARB are in complete disagreement
with the sworn WC and HSCA testimonies of Dr. Finck, and if true, would
make Finck guilty of perjury. That's a pretty tall accusation to make
against Finck,as well as Humes and Boswell. The problem I have with Custer
is he clearly goes outside the bounds of his area of expertise by making
opinion based statements about bullet trajectories. There is also no
corroborating physical evidence in the x-rays or photos that support his
claims of bullet fragments in the neck area, and an entry wound in the eye
area of Kennedy. Nor was their any documentation of this mysterious bullet
fragment that Custer claimed fell out of the president's back. When the
bullet fragments were removed from the head of the president, a receipt
was written up and signed by FBI agents Francis O'Neill and James Sibert.
Where is there any such document for this other phantom bullet fragment?
Why document some fragments but not another? O'Connor's statements that
you cite were made during an interview with an author, and not made during
sworn testimony. Since he was merely a 21 year-old corpsman at the time of
the autopsy, his opinions about the path of the bullet that entered the
back of the president does not carry much weight when juxtaposed alongside
of the official autopsy report that was signed by three pathologists.
Anthony Marsh
2018-05-24 14:35:46 UTC
Post by InsideSparta
any bullets or their fragments, since it was not realized at the time that
the tracheotomy had obliterated the exit wound that corresponded with the
entrance wound in the back. The x-rays did not reveal a bullet within the
body cavity. Custer's statements to the AARB are in complete disagreement
with the sworn WC and HSCA testimonies of Dr. Finck, and if true, would
make Finck guilty of perjury. That's a pretty tall accusation to make
So what? Welcome to the real world where even experts lie.Post by mainframetech
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
Dr. Pierre Finck ordered the full body x-rays for the purpose of locatingPost by InsideSparta
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
Thank you for asking in a civilized manner, which is not so commonThe back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
any bullets or their fragments, since it was not realized at the time that
the tracheotomy had obliterated the exit wound that corresponded with the
entrance wound in the back. The x-rays did not reveal a bullet within the
body cavity. Custer's statements to the AARB are in complete disagreement
with the sworn WC and HSCA testimonies of Dr. Finck, and if true, would
make Finck guilty of perjury. That's a pretty tall accusation to make
I don't see anything important in Custer's opinions and it doesn't
change the physical facts. Finck could commit perjury and it doesn't
alter the body. We now have the autopsy photographs so we don't have to
choose which person to believe.
Well, we know that they lied, but we can work around that by the
physical facts.
Post by InsideSparta
is he clearly goes outside the bounds of his area of expertise by making
opinion based statements about bullet trajectories. There is also no
So what? Some days maybe only a janitor is in the right place at theis he clearly goes outside the bounds of his area of expertise by making
opinion based statements about bullet trajectories. There is also no
right time to SEE something important.
Post by InsideSparta
corroborating physical evidence in the x-rays or photos that support his
claims of bullet fragments in the neck area, and an entry wound in the eye
area of Kennedy. Nor was their any documentation of this mysterious bullet
Eye area? What the Hell are you talking about? There was a bullet holecorroborating physical evidence in the x-rays or photos that support his
claims of bullet fragments in the neck area, and an entry wound in the eye
area of Kennedy. Nor was their any documentation of this mysterious bullet
on the forehead ABOVE the right eye. You can call it an exit wound if
you like, but then you're stuck with an impossible trajectory. SOme of
us know it was an entrance wound.
Is that anything like Hoover saying a bullet fell out of the head when
they took the body out of the coffin. Ignore the morons. Look at the
physical evidence.
Post by InsideSparta
bullet fragments were removed from the head of the president, a receipt
was written up and signed by FBI agents Francis O'Neill and James Sibert.
Where is there any such document for this other phantom bullet fragment?
Silly. Where are the documents about an extra fragment removed frombullet fragments were removed from the head of the president, a receipt
was written up and signed by FBI agents Francis O'Neill and James Sibert.
Where is there any such document for this other phantom bullet fragment?
Connally?
Post by InsideSparta
Why document some fragments but not another? O'Connor's statements that
you cite were made during an interview with an author, and not made during
Oversight? Incompetence? Cover-up?Why document some fragments but not another? O'Connor's statements that
you cite were made during an interview with an author, and not made during
Post by InsideSparta
sworn testimony. Since he was merely a 21 year-old corpsman at the time of
the autopsy, his opinions about the path of the bullet that entered the
back of the president does not carry much weight when juxtaposed alongside
of the official autopsy report that was signed by three pathologists.
I don't know for sure which -ism you were trying for. Ageism?sworn testimony. Since he was merely a 21 year-old corpsman at the time of
the autopsy, his opinions about the path of the bullet that entered the
back of the president does not carry much weight when juxtaposed alongside
of the official autopsy report that was signed by three pathologists.
SHould we ignore what a child says and let the criminals run free?
You can throw your 3 pathologists in the trash can. The Three Stooges.
InsideSparta
2018-05-25 18:35:57 UTC
Post by Anthony Marsh
I don't see anything important in Custer's opinions and it doesn't
change the physical facts. Finck could commit perjury and it doesn't
alter the body. We now have the autopsy photographs so we don't have to
choose which person to believe.
Well, we know that they lied, but we can work around that by the
physical facts.
They lied? Prove it.Post by InsideSparta
any bullets or their fragments, since it was not realized at the time that
the tracheotomy had obliterated the exit wound that corresponded with the
entrance wound in the back. The x-rays did not reveal a bullet within the
body cavity. Custer's statements to the AARB are in complete disagreement
with the sworn WC and HSCA testimonies of Dr. Finck, and if true, would
make Finck guilty of perjury. That's a pretty tall accusation to make
So what? Welcome to the real world where even experts lie.Post by mainframetech
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
Dr. Pierre Finck ordered the full body x-rays for the purpose of locatingPost by InsideSparta
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
Thank you for asking in a civilized manner, which is not so commonThe back wound bullet never left the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally,
and therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
If the bullet that caused Kennedy's back wound never exited, where didand therefore there is NO 'single bullet' THEORY.
Chris
that bullet go to? How do you then explain the throat wound? Are you
implying the throat wound was a wound of entrance? If so, where did that
bullet go to? You're asking us to believe there were two magic bullets,
both of which disappeared. If the bullet that stuck Connolly's back didn't
first pass through Kennedy's neck and tumble upon exiting the president,
why was Connolly's back wound elongated and shaped exactly like CE399?
Where is your supporting "physical evidence" that anything other than a
single bullet passing through both Kennedy and Connolly actually occurred?
here. To answer, first, the throat wound was indeed from the front. It
was strangely enlarged far more than the average tracheostomy usually is.
That is probably because Humes and Boswell had orders to remover ALL
bullets and fragments from the body when the body got to them at Bethesda.
Howwever, there is a comment from an X-ray Technician, Jerrol Custer, who
"When I lifted the body up to take films of
the torso, and the lumbar spine, and the pelvis,
this is when a king-size fragment - I’d say -
estimate around three, four sonometers - fell from
the back. And this is when Dr. Finck come over
with a pair of forceps, picked it up, and took -
That’s the last time I ever saw it.
Now, it was big enough -That’s about,
I’d say, an inch and a half. My finger-my small
finger. First joints."
From: http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf
Page 53
Sonometer = centimeter, and 3-4 centimeters is long enough to be many
types of bullet.
And to give you more information on the back wound from the autopsy,
which wasn't reported correctly by Humes. Here are the words of Paul
"O'Connor: We started out with a rigid probe and found that it only went
in so far. I'd say maybe an inch and a quarter. It didn't go any further
than that. So we used a malleable probe and bent it a little bit and found
out that the bullet entered the body, went through the intercostal
muscles—the muscles in between the ribs. The bullet went in
through the muscles, didn't touch any of the ribs, arched downwards, hit
the back of the pleural cavity, which encases the lungs, both front and
back. It bounced off that cavity and stopped. It actually went down and
stopped. Went through the ribs and stopped (photo 10). So we didn't know
the track of the bullet until we eviscerated the body later. That's what
happened at that time. We traced the bullet path down and found out it
didn't traverse the body. It did not go in one side and come out the other
side of the body.
Law: You can be reasonably sure of that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: It was just from the probe then?
O'Connor: Oh yes.
Law: And these doctors knew that?
O'Connor: Absolutely.
Law: While it happened?
O'Connor: Absolutely."
O'Connor is corroborated by the other Technologist James Jenkins.
Chris
any bullets or their fragments, since it was not realized at the time that
the tracheotomy had obliterated the exit wound that corresponded with the
entrance wound in the back. The x-rays did not reveal a bullet within the
body cavity. Custer's statements to the AARB are in complete disagreement
with the sworn WC and HSCA testimonies of Dr. Finck, and if true, would
make Finck guilty of perjury. That's a pretty tall accusation to make
I don't see anything important in Custer's opinions and it doesn't
change the physical facts. Finck could commit perjury and it doesn't
alter the body. We now have the autopsy photographs so we don't have to
choose which person to believe.
Well, we know that they lied, but we can work around that by the
physical facts.
Post by Anthony Marsh
right time to SEE something important.
And maybe the janitor doesn't know what the heck he's talking about.Post by InsideSparta
is he clearly goes outside the bounds of his area of expertise by making
opinion based statements about bullet trajectories. There is also no
So what? Some days maybe only a janitor is in the right place at theis he clearly goes outside the bounds of his area of expertise by making
opinion based statements about bullet trajectories. There is also no
right time to SEE something important.
Post by Anthony Marsh
on the forehead ABOVE the right eye. You can call it an exit wound if
you like, but then you're stuck with an impossible trajectory. SOme of
us know it was an entrance wound.
If you "know it was an entrance wound", why can't you prove it? Where'sPost by InsideSparta
corroborating physical evidence in the x-rays or photos that support his
claims of bullet fragments in the neck area, and an entry wound in the eye
area of Kennedy. Nor was their any documentation of this mysterious bullet
Eye area? What the Hell are you talking about? There was a bullet holecorroborating physical evidence in the x-rays or photos that support his
claims of bullet fragments in the neck area, and an entry wound in the eye
area of Kennedy. Nor was their any documentation of this mysterious bullet
on the forehead ABOVE the right eye. You can call it an exit wound if
you like, but then you're stuck with an impossible trajectory. SOme of
us know it was an entrance wound.
the ballistic evidence to support you're theory?
Post by Anthony Marsh
Is that anything like Hoover saying a bullet fell out of the head when
they took the body out of the coffin. Ignore the morons. Look at the
physical evidence.
That's rich. A CT telling us to look at the physical evidence. Cute.Is that anything like Hoover saying a bullet fell out of the head when
they took the body out of the coffin. Ignore the morons. Look at the
physical evidence.
Post by Anthony Marsh
Connally?
Um, Connally wasn't in the Naval Medical Center at Bethesda that night.Post by InsideSparta
bullet fragments were removed from the head of the president, a receipt
was written up and signed by FBI agents Francis O'Neill and James Sibert.
Where is there any such document for this other phantom bullet fragment?
Silly. Where are the documents about an extra fragment removed frombullet fragments were removed from the head of the president, a receipt
was written up and signed by FBI agents Francis O'Neill and James Sibert.
Where is there any such document for this other phantom bullet fragment?
Connally?
Post by Anthony Marsh
Or better yet, there wasn't any such fragment to document in the firstPost by InsideSparta
Why document some fragments but not another? O'Connor's statements that
you cite were made during an interview with an author, and not made during
Oversight? Incompetence? Cover-up?Why document some fragments but not another? O'Connor's statements that
you cite were made during an interview with an author, and not made during
place.
Post by Anthony Marsh
SHould we ignore what a child says and let the criminals run free?
You can throw your 3 pathologists in the trash can. The Three Stooges.
Go ahead and hang your conspiratorial hat on the 21 year-old x-rayPost by InsideSparta
sworn testimony. Since he was merely a 21 year-old corpsman at the time of
the autopsy, his opinions about the path of the bullet that entered the
back of the president does not carry much weight when juxtaposed alongside
of the official autopsy report that was signed by three pathologists.
I don't know for sure which -ism you were trying for. Ageism?sworn testimony. Since he was merely a 21 year-old corpsman at the time of
the autopsy, his opinions about the path of the bullet that entered the
back of the president does not carry much weight when juxtaposed alongside
of the official autopsy report that was signed by three pathologists.
SHould we ignore what a child says and let the criminals run free?
You can throw your 3 pathologists in the trash can. The Three Stooges.
technician. Let's see where that gets you.
OHLeeRedux
2018-05-26 18:40:24 UTC
InsideSparta
- show quoted text -
They lied? Prove it.
Mr. Marsh never proves his accusations for the simple reason that he makes
them up as he goes.
- show quoted text -
They lied? Prove it.
Mr. Marsh never proves his accusations for the simple reason that he makes
them up as he goes.
claviger
2018-05-21 02:37:26 UTC
Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Chris
Complete jabberwocky.Post by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Chris
Do you really expect anyone to believe this insipid pablum?
mainframetech
2018-05-22 01:58:01 UTC
Post by claviger
Do you really expect anyone to believe this insipid pablum?
You must believe me, since you didn't ask for the cites and links.Post by mainframetech
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Chris
Complete jabberwocky.Post by claviger
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
You've never been information hunting, have you? And so never foundPost by mainframetech
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
Theories are developed based on the Scientific Method, something you knowPost by claviger
LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
So you have nothing better to do but put out false ad hominem remarks?LNs accept Science while CTs respond with their strange versions of
voodoo science that defies the Law of Gravity. To them Newton was
a heretic.
As to your comment, I can easily point out the difference between LNs and
CTs by pointing at the 'Single Bullet' THEORY.
nothing about. The culmination of corroborative evidence points to the
same conclusion. Your guessing games don't qualify as a scientific
theory.
Thanks for proving my point. You have no clue what a scientific theory
is.
Post by mainframetech
As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
You've never been deer hunting have you?As a proud CT, I'd rather stick to the facts and witnesses that have proven
that the SBT is false.
Chris
out that the SBT is completely false. The back wound bullet never left
the body of JFK, and so never hit Connally, and therefore there is NO
'single bullet' THEORY. That info I put out here is all based on fact,
something that MOST theory users relish. If you need the cites and links,
Let me know.
Chris
Do you really expect anyone to believe this insipid pablum?
Having your beliefs of years soiled this way must be terribly painful.
Chris