Post by Anthony MarshPost by John McAdamsOn 22 Aug 2018 21:47:53 -0400, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony MarshPost by John McAdamsOn 20 Aug 2018 21:54:13 -0400, Anthony Marsh
Post by Anthony MarshSilly. Mark Lane questioned Helms under oath at the hearing about the
lawsuit. So you have to call Helms a liar, not me.
How do you know Lane did that, and what Helms said?
Published record.
Post by John McAdamsPost by Anthony MarshPost by John McAdamsYou should know better.
We've been over this 200 times and you never admit anything.
You never produce a primary source. You just expect everybody
to believe the assertions of Mark Lane.
I always do. A few hundred times.
You play the same game every year.
If you *have* a source other than Lane's claim, you could post it
right here, right now, in response to this post.
But we know you can't.
Everyone knows that I did, several times over several years.
You job here is to deny facts.
His job is to supply facts.
CTs are known to be allergic to facts, so McAdams must be careful
not to serve up too many at one time. They might start coughing
and wheezing then break out in hives and end up in the ER. So he
must serve them in small portions. By contrast, LNs are addicted
to facts, the more the better, and can thrive on a diet of pure facts
like meat and potatoes.
Here is a fact: even though surrounded by many witness with normal
eyesight and normal hearing it has been alleged there was a shooter
behind the fence on the GK who fired a shot at the motorcade, and
yet none of the closest witnesses saw this person with a weapon
or heard the loud blast from a rifle.
That is a Fact.
CTs struggle with this Fact and try to find witnesses further away
who thought a shot came from up there, which only dilutes their
argument. There is no way the closer witnesses could not hear
a rifle blast, as any hunter or soldier can tell you. The reason they
wear earplugs on the practice range.
Some of these witnesses were so close they should be able to
smell the burnt gunpowder, but they didn't. Several witnesses
who did smell gunpowder were down on Elm Street.
CTs claim a shot from the GK went right over 3 close witnesses
standing on the steps. Groundskeeper Emmett Hudson was one
of those witnesses and never mentioned the smell of gunpowder.
If that blast was directly behind him he should have smelled the
pungent burnt smell immediately. None of the witness on the GK
smelled gunpowder either.
So you are asking people to believe your doubtful story of a
sniper on the grassy knoll with no proof or evidence, just take
your word for it.
Conjecture is not evidence and neither is your claim there was
no entrance wound on the back of the head. All your wags lack
evidence and the so-called SOTGK is simply a delusion of your
imagination you let run wild.
The "acoustic evidence" was a bust so there is nothing left to
argue that a shot came from the front of the Limousine. So the
only hope CTs have is the Dal-Tex Bldg scenario. Groden finally
wised up to that reality and moved his CT over there. It's time
you joined him in that new snipe hunt location.
