On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:03:22 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
No such thing, outside the dishonesty of creationists who need to
imagine that evolution is an ideology, not a scientific fact, ie with
so much confirmation it
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing Answerslike to tell us that the word evolutionist is a
falsehood, an invention of creationists.
The way this liar uses it, is a transparent, offensive falsehood, an
invention of creationists.
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing AnswersThis claim probably emanated from Talkorigins in threads in
which evolutionists were continually upset that I referred to
evolutionists as opposed to creationists. I guess they dont
like the ist in the evolutionist.
More deliberate dishonesty. What these liars pretend is "evolutionism"
is simply living in the real world and accepting the results of more
than a century and a half of objective research which has led to
whole new sciences and technologies we would not even have without it
and that have transformed the way we live today.
He knows it's nothing to do with liking and everything to do with
achieving communication, which cannot happen when he misuses
language.
Trouble is, his "mind" switches off when presented with objective
facts which contradict his brainwashing, due cognitive dissonance.
It's like these liars calling people living in the world of reality,
"gravityists"
On the rare occasions I've seen one of these madmen defining
"evolutionist", it's "someone who believes in evolution" but evolution
isn't a belief so (the way they use it) there are no such people.
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing AnswersIn alt.atheism Jeanne Douglas kept asking the question, what is
an evolutionist?
To bring the point home that the way McShifforbrains uses it, is a
thoroughly dishonest attempt to level the playing field between
objective reality and his deluded fantasy.
Deliberately being both dishonest and stupid.
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing AnswersActually, Charles Darwin used the word evolutionist. You can find the word
When the word meant what the Liars For God use it as today - before it
was proven beyond reasonable doubt.
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it
would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that
apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not
merit equal time in physics classrooms."
- Stephen Jay Gould
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing Answersevolutionists used all the time in evolutionist written books and
By people using the language of creationist liars like McShitforbrains
McCoy, to try and get through to them and failing because in their
minds, its use seems to confirm that it is merely a belief or an
ideology.
Around these morons, you have to take care to use language
unambiguously because they will always filter it through their deluded
fantasy.
Jeanne, I and others try to do this - and instead of taking any
notice, these morons become even more dishonest.
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing AnswersCertainty and Circularity in Evolutionary Taxonomy
Evolution 21: 174-189 March, 1967
It was only a matter of time until the evolutionists themselves
were accused of reasoning in vicious circles.
Did the author of this out-of-context mined quote explain what the
word was supposed to mean?
Because, no matter how often creationists lie about it, evolution
isn't an -ism.
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)Post by Amazing AnswersI just selected ONE sentence from this article of which the word
evolutionist is used many more times.
To be dishonest in yet another thread he started based upon
creationist lies, because he refuses to understand that evolution
isn't what he imagines.
I just wish that people who know what evolution actually is, wouldn't
fall into the creationists' linguistic trap. Because when they use the
creationists' dishonest language it gives tacit acceptance of their
meaning. Thus confirming it in what passes for creationists' minds.