dolf
2017-06-05 17:55:42 UTC
-- DO YOU TEAR HEADS OFF LIVE RABBITS
It's not a rhetorical question.
Although it's a contrivance reality.
Nevertheless it is not a fiction.
It was a mistake for which I am truly remorseful.
And shall I tell this tale of woe?
I'll do so from yesterday at breakfast.
When I conveyed to the cafe owner the causal and conspiratorial notion of
the Catholic: #465 / Islamic: #306 Categories of Understanding associated
with their cause célèbre of extremism and terrorist events.
Now I have noticed that you appear within a advertisement video associated
with a certain business who also sponsors persons with whom I have
bellicose {ie. war} as belligerent clandestine opposition.
They as a criteria of community convey no empathy, have a stubborn
jingoistic mindset, engage within scorn and derision such that we are
alienated.
So whilst you have no understanding of what I am actually conveying to you
is a concern minimising harm consequential to have consciousness of
reality.
It is all very well to be pointing out that you stand at the edge of an
abyss, but it is no value when you have taken a step too far.
It is not a parachute after all.
So accept that you are good at what you do.
And I am good at what I do.
My burger arrived it was not as pleasing to my palate.
And whilst within the range of tolerable acceptability, it was not
exceptional.
It simply lacked the spectrum of ingredients to which I was accustomed.
So I spoke to owner's wife who agreed that she had made it by default
according to her liking, and hadn't consciously thought about leaving
several ingredients out--such as lettuce et al.
Appreciate then that when I was in Year 10 of my schooling here in this
town, I did Home Economics for which I received a 100% mark.
I achieved that by on one occasion roasting a rabbit which I had hunted and
brought it to the class and roasted it for an atonement but not eaten.
That was my last rabbit.
Thus the story is this.
My younger brother and I had caught a few too many rabbits on this day.
I'm considered of animals and not intentionally cruel.
But it takes a certain strength to stretch a rabbits neck in such a manner
as to cause a humane and instant death.
My strength failed me.
The creature was motionless.
And I pinned it up on its hind legs.
And flayed it down to its neck.
When it came back to life.
I was appalled that my recklessness was a futility of purpose (ie. like
Australian lawyers and judges).
So I cut its neck as quickly as I could and resolutely ceased this wretched
animal's suffering.
Although it's true, I have never torn the head off a live rabbit--I wish
that I had on this occasion because it would have been less shameful as a
faster death.
I'll never forget that penultimate rabbit.
And the act of atonement which followed was my Home Economics class.
Every day for 20 years I have been publicly flayed online by Usenet hate
speech which never once is accountable for its pain except that Google
Groups wants to store it forever.
YOUTUBE: "I Am Not An Animal (Elephant Man)"
-
I am still alive and you hunted me and have flayed a living and sapient
being for only your hedonistic amusement as collective sensual pleasure of
enjoyment.
BARBARIC don't you think?
- dolf
--
#5 / #6: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
- http://www.grapple369.com
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."
It's not a rhetorical question.
Although it's a contrivance reality.
Nevertheless it is not a fiction.
It was a mistake for which I am truly remorseful.
And shall I tell this tale of woe?
I'll do so from yesterday at breakfast.
When I conveyed to the cafe owner the causal and conspiratorial notion of
the Catholic: #465 / Islamic: #306 Categories of Understanding associated
with their cause célèbre of extremism and terrorist events.
Now I have noticed that you appear within a advertisement video associated
with a certain business who also sponsors persons with whom I have
bellicose {ie. war} as belligerent clandestine opposition.
They as a criteria of community convey no empathy, have a stubborn
jingoistic mindset, engage within scorn and derision such that we are
alienated.
So whilst you have no understanding of what I am actually conveying to you
is a concern minimising harm consequential to have consciousness of
reality.
It is all very well to be pointing out that you stand at the edge of an
abyss, but it is no value when you have taken a step too far.
It is not a parachute after all.
So accept that you are good at what you do.
And I am good at what I do.
My burger arrived it was not as pleasing to my palate.
And whilst within the range of tolerable acceptability, it was not
exceptional.
It simply lacked the spectrum of ingredients to which I was accustomed.
So I spoke to owner's wife who agreed that she had made it by default
according to her liking, and hadn't consciously thought about leaving
several ingredients out--such as lettuce et al.
Appreciate then that when I was in Year 10 of my schooling here in this
town, I did Home Economics for which I received a 100% mark.
I achieved that by on one occasion roasting a rabbit which I had hunted and
brought it to the class and roasted it for an atonement but not eaten.
That was my last rabbit.
Thus the story is this.
My younger brother and I had caught a few too many rabbits on this day.
I'm considered of animals and not intentionally cruel.
But it takes a certain strength to stretch a rabbits neck in such a manner
as to cause a humane and instant death.
My strength failed me.
The creature was motionless.
And I pinned it up on its hind legs.
And flayed it down to its neck.
When it came back to life.
I was appalled that my recklessness was a futility of purpose (ie. like
Australian lawyers and judges).
So I cut its neck as quickly as I could and resolutely ceased this wretched
animal's suffering.
Although it's true, I have never torn the head off a live rabbit--I wish
that I had on this occasion because it would have been less shameful as a
faster death.
I'll never forget that penultimate rabbit.
And the act of atonement which followed was my Home Economics class.
Every day for 20 years I have been publicly flayed online by Usenet hate
speech which never once is accountable for its pain except that Google
Groups wants to store it forever.
YOUTUBE: "I Am Not An Animal (Elephant Man)"
-
I am still alive and you hunted me and have flayed a living and sapient
being for only your hedonistic amusement as collective sensual pleasure of
enjoyment.
BARBARIC don't you think?
- dolf
--
#5 / #6: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
- http://www.grapple369.com
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."