Discussion:
Poll of Theists on Trolling
(too old to reply)
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 09:08:53 UTC
Permalink
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?


My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Malte Runz
2017-08-13 09:59:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
--
Malte Runz
Kevrob
2017-08-13 10:31:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.


See:

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq

[quote]

The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information

1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.

[/quote]

Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.

Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for? - push back against those who violate the group charter is
rich.

ArtieJoe doesn't lack for chutzpah!

Kevin R
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 11:37:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
SUCK MY DICK, ASSHOLE.
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 11:43:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
You just contradicted yourself, dimwit. You posted this above:

"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"

Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-13 13:58:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"
Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
What's wrong with the statement? Everyone's welcome until they break the rules and prove they're not.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Kevrob
2017-08-13 15:36:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"
Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
You stopped mid-sentence:

".... as long as they are not trolls."

You fail, big time, there, Tandy.

Kevin R
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 15:40:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"
Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
".... as long as they are not trolls."
You fail, big time, there, Tandy.
Kevin R
I never see you contribute anything to a conversation here.
All ya do is make stupid wisecracks and tell people to leave.
That makes YOU a troll.
Kevrob
2017-08-13 17:21:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
I never see you contribute anything to a conversation here.
All ya do is make stupid wisecracks and tell people to leave.
That makes YOU a troll.
Who cares what a theist troll thinks.
Go play in alt.alterkocker

Kevin R
Kurt Nicklas
2017-08-14 19:44:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by v***@gmail.com
I never see you contribute anything to a conversation here.
All ya do is make stupid wisecracks and tell people to leave.
That makes YOU a troll.
Who cares what a theist troll thinks.
Every time you respond you prove that the answer to that question is YOU do.
Post by Kevrob
Go play in alt.alterkocker
Tim
2017-08-13 19:51:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"
Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
".... as long as they are not trolls."
You fail, big time, there, Tandy.
Kevin R
I never see you contribute anything to a conversation here.
I do, you should learn how to read, and count.
Post by v***@gmail.com
All ya do is make stupid wisecracks and tell people to leave.
That makes YOU a troll.
You should go have a look at the poll results. The consensus is that you're a lying sack of shit.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-14 03:12:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"
Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
".... as long as they are not trolls."
You fail, big time, there, Tandy.
Kevin R
I never see you contribute anything to a conversation here.
All ya do is make stupid wisecracks and tell people to leave.
That makes YOU a troll.
Of course it doesn't.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:21:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Complaining when atheists in the group - y'know, the ones the group
is for?
"All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not"
Are you retarded, senile, or just a plain old hypocrite?
".... as long as they are not trolls."
You fail, big time, there, Tandy.
Kevin R
I never see you contribute anything to a conversation here.
All ya do is make stupid wisecracks and tell people to leave.
That makes YOU a troll.
Not when he's responding to trolls like you.
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 11:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
I guess you cannot read:
The subject line said this poll is for theists.Any comments you make are off topic trolling, you flaky motherfucker.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-13 13:58:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
The subject line said this poll is for theists.Any comments you make are off topic trolling, you flaky motherfucker.
You post here, you accept responses from anybody. If you don't like it, post your silly "poll" somewhere else.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
hypatiab7
2017-08-13 19:44:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
The subject line said this poll is for theists.Any comments you make are off topic trolling, you flaky motherfucker.
You post here, you accept responses from anybody. If you don't like it, post your silly "poll" somewhere else.
Hey! We both made the top three in his poll. That's pretty good.
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:13:22 UTC
Permalink
Art, if atheists post to this thread what are you going to do?
Haul off and leave us alone?

Puss ant.
Kurt Nicklas
2017-08-14 19:43:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Note: No they wont.

EVERYWHERE else in NewsgroupLand trolls are ignored.

In THIS group the people you call trolls DRIVE THE GROUP.

Without BELIEVERS this group would disappear out of sheer boredom.
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 20:55:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Note: No they wont.
EVERYWHERE else in NewsgroupLand trolls are ignored.
In THIS group the people you call trolls DRIVE THE GROUP.
Without BELIEVERS this group would disappear out of sheer boredom.
Go away and let's find out for sure.
Kurt Nicklas
2017-08-15 07:15:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kevrob
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
This is like having vegetarians voting on the "best beef brisket"
category at a barbecue contest.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Note: Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Note: No they wont.
EVERYWHERE else in NewsgroupLand trolls are ignored.
In THIS group the people you call trolls DRIVE THE GROUP.
Without BELIEVERS this group would disappear out of sheer boredom.
Go away and let's find out for sure.
I rest my case as presented above.

<snickers>
John Baker
2017-08-14 19:59:34 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:59:34 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
You don't have a vote here, Artie. Nobody gives a fuck what you think.
Post by Malte Runz
I hope I at least make the short list this time.
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-16 01:08:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:59:34 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
You don't have a vote here, Artie. Nobody gives a fuck what you think.
This is not a election to put politicians in office. Qualifications to register for voting do not apply. What I do have that you seem unaware of is the protection of the US Constitution, Amendment I, which reads:"Congress shall make no law restricting the freedom of speech or of the press...."

Get it, dimwit? If Congress may not silence me, you sure as hell may not.

Were you too busy flagging your dong to pay attention in 7th grade when they
tried to teach you about American law?
Kevrob
2017-08-16 07:29:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Baker
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:59:34 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
You don't have a vote here, Artie. Nobody gives a fuck what you think.
This is not a election to put politicians in office. Qualifications to register for voting do not apply. What I do have that you seem unaware of is the protection of the US Constitution, Amendment I, which reads:"Congress shall make no law restricting the freedom of speech or of the press...."
Get it, dimwit? If Congress may not silence me, you sure as hell may not.
Were you too busy flagging your dong to pay attention in 7th grade when they
tried to teach you about American law?
You know the First Amendment applies to government action to
silence people, as do the cognate state constitutional free
speech/press clauses, don't you? USENET isn't a government.
It is a network of networks, some privately owned. A governmental
entity may provide access. It started as a way to transfer mail
and files between 2 universities: 1 public (University of
North Carolina) and 1 private (Duke.) Any ISP or other
gateway to USENET can "shut a user up" by terminating access,
either because it doesn't want to host USENET at all or by
ruling a user has violated terms of service. These usually
list activities generally considered trolling, harassment
or legally questionable activity (copyright infringement,
making threats, posting child porn in the binary groups,
using USENET to commit wire fraud, etc.)

Flooding, spamming and excessive cross-posting are often expressly
forbidden in a TOS agreement. Even munging your headers may be
against it.

Since you enjoy reading about Supreme Court cases, find one
that says private internet providers nor private USENET
providers can't enforce these types of rules on their network.

No one, other than your ISP or USENET provider can expel
anyone from a group that isn't moderated. People can
"netcop" trolls and other black hats: report offending
posts to the relevant providers, so they can make a TOS
judgment.

Dealing with the copyright violation problem, DMCA complaints from
those who own copyrights, etc is why many ISPs have stopped providing
newsgroup feeds the way they used to. When they still handled USENET
feeds, ISPs would TOSs users if they got enough complaints about such
bad behavior.

I'd prefer it if people used some sense and has some $#@!& manners
and not spam, flood, troll, etc.

Kevin R
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 11:38:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
That's your momma's job
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
That's your momma's job
Just curious, why fuck with duke? I would have assumed you'd be on the same
side (both assholes).
Kevrob
2017-08-13 15:35:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
That's your momma's job
She can't tonight. She has to disinfect her strap-on.

Kevin R
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-13 14:00:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Nah, coming from ArtieJoe this is a great honor and compliment. We are the people who intimidate him the most.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Nah, coming from ArtieJoe this is a great honor and compliment. We are
the people who intimidate him the most.
Good call, I see what you mean. :)
duke
2017-08-14 21:31:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Old ted - direct from the lips of satan himself.

the dukester, American-American


*****
Purpose of Life: To Know, love and serve God and to love your
neighbor as yourself and thus be happy with God in heaven.
*****
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Old ted - direct from the lips of satan himself.
LOL.
duke
2017-08-15 14:01:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Old ted - direct from the lips of satan himself.
LOL.
Pastafaries are not Christians.

the dukester, American-American


*****
Purpose of Life: To Know, love and serve God and to love your
neighbor as yourself and thus be happy with God in heaven.
*****
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Old ted - direct from the lips of satan himself.
LOL.
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.

Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Bible also says you'll share your father's fate:

Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
duke
2017-08-16 11:40:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.

So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.

the dukester, American-American


*****
Purpose of Life: To Know, love and serve God and to love your
neighbor as yourself and thus be happy with God in heaven.
*****
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Then please explain this:

Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
MessageID:***@4ax.com

Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
MessageID:***@4ax.com
duke
2017-08-17 18:08:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
Sorry, I never claimed to be an engineer.

the dukester, American-American


*****
Purpose of Life: To Know, love and serve God and to love your
neighbor as yourself and thus be happy with God in heaven.
*****
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
Sorry, I never claimed to be an engineer.
"I'm an engineer"
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"I'm an engineer"
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"I'm an engineer"
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
duke
2017-08-18 14:02:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
Sorry, I never claimed to be an engineer.
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
Not my posts.

the dukester, American-American


*****
Purpose of Life: To Know, love and serve God and to love your
neighbor as yourself and thus be happy with God in heaven.
*****
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
Sorry, I never claimed to be an engineer.
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
Not my posts.
Earlier this evening, I posted the originals, including the message
headers. Although you're too stupid to know this, your headers rat you out.
Do you know what information is carried by usenet headers? (Probably you
don't.) I noticed that at least one of them even included your IP address.
They were your posts.
duke
2017-08-19 17:04:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
Sorry, I never claimed to be an engineer.
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
Not my posts.
Earlier this evening, I posted the originals, including the message
headers. Although you're too stupid to know this, your headers rat you out.
Do you know what information is carried by usenet headers? (Probably you
don't.) I noticed that at least one of them even included your IP address.
They were your posts.
I wasn't ratted out. The issue is "did I lie". And the answer is NO!

the dukester, American-American


*****
Purpose of Life: To Know, love and serve God and to love your
neighbor as yourself and thus be happy with God in heaven.
*****
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by duke
Pastafaries are not Christians.
And yet, Pastafarians aren't as distant from true Christianity as are
Catholics. The RCC is the polar opposite of Christ's Church and you
represent it appropriately.
It's clear you don't even know what the RCC stands for. Let me give you a hint
about that - the very teachings from the lips of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago.
The teachings are in scripture - the teachings are evident in the RCC every day.
So, if you wish to make a case, let's see some examples.
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Sorry, pastafairy, I never lie on the ng. You have already admitted that you
are not a Christian. End of Story.
Post by Ted
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
That's why I don't lie.
Duke: "Hey, I have an engineering degree."
Original: goo.gl/qj38FF
Thread: goo.gl/HYjDRQ
Duke: "Sorry, never claimed to be an engineer. More of you lies"
Original: goo.gl/fEQnZ2
Thread: goo.gl/Qf2j8k
Sorry, I never claimed to be an engineer.
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
"I'm an engineer"
Not my posts.
Earlier this evening, I posted the originals, including the message
headers. Although you're too stupid to know this, your headers rat you out.
Do you know what information is carried by usenet headers? (Probably you
don't.) I noticed that at least one of them even included your IP address.
They were your posts.
I wasn't ratted out. The issue is "did I lie". And the answer is NO!
Do you deny having said "I'm an engineer"?
Patrick
2017-08-16 19:12:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
It seems that robt and mikey have got you suckered.
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick
Post by Ted
Real Christians, for example, aren't pathological liars. You, on the other
hand, "are of your father the devil ... When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) And the
Revelation 21:8 "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone"
It seems that robt and mikey have got you suckered.
Nah, duke really is thoroughly (and despicably) dishonest. I witnessed it
first hand.
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-16 07:56:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by duke
Post by duke
Post by Ted
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Fuck you, asshole.
Old ted - direct from the lips of satan himself.
LOL.
Pastafaries are not Christians.
Pastafarians are. as Christian, as you are, just smarter.
And less gullible.
Post by duke
the dukester, American Closet Pastafarian
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-13 13:48:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 13:54:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
It isn't:


The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information

1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
hypatiab7
2017-08-13 20:00:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-13 21:15:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
That's another LIE. The FAQ does not require us to be "friendly". It only requires we not be trolls. That means we make worthwhile contributions to discussions. I spend the bulk of my time here discussing important issues and informing the group. You NEVER post anything but insults, putdowns, and lies like the one you just told. That's why I don't even read your posts 95% of the time. You are a mindless, lying scatterbrain with the IQ of a carrot and I refuse to waste my time even reading your childish crap.
hypatiab7
2017-08-14 04:05:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
That's another LIE. The FAQ does not require us to be "friendly". It only requires we not be trolls. That means we make worthwhile contributions to discussions. I spend the bulk of my time here discussing important issues and informing the group. You NEVER post anything but insults, putdowns, and lies like the one you just told. That's why I don't even read your posts 95% of the time. You are a mindless, lying scatterbrain with the IQ of a carrot and I refuse to waste my time even reading your childish crap.
Funny thing about that - the only unfriendly people who come to alt.atheism are trolls.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-14 08:08:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, w=
hich ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
Post by Jeanne Douglas
=20
=20
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
=20
=20
How can we troll in our own group?
=20
=20
=20
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by athe=
ists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they =
are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of=
=20
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.=20
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
=20
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=3DYou%27re+a+Troll&view=3Ddetail&mid=
=3DD26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=3DVIRE=20
=20
=20
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Informati=
on=20
=20
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
That's another LIE. The FAQ does not require us to be "friendly". It only r=
equires we not be trolls. That means we make worthwhile contributions to di=
scussions. I spend the bulk of my time here discussing important issues and=
informing the group.
Is that what you actually think you're doing? Let me tell you, you're not.

Dude, you are one messed up m.f.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Michelle Malkin
2017-08-15 05:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, w=
hich ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
Post by Jeanne Douglas
=20
=20
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
=20
=20
How can we troll in our own group?
=20
=20
=20
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by athe=
ists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they =
are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of=
=20
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.=20
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
=20
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=3DYou%27re+a+Troll&view=3Ddetail&mid=
=3DD26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=3DVIRE=20
=20
=20
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Informati=
on=20
=20
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
That's another LIE. The FAQ does not require us to be "friendly". It only r=
equires we not be trolls. That means we make worthwhile contributions to di=
scussions. I spend the bulk of my time here discussing important issues and=
informing the group.
Geeze, I didn't think you had that active an imagination.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Is that what you actually think you're doing? Let me tell you, you're not.
Dude, you are one messed up m.f.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
%
2017-08-14 01:02:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
that's right
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-14 01:07:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-14 13:01:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Kevrob
2017-08-14 14:18:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
I wouldn't require friendly. I's settle for polite.

I'll be friendly to anybody being friendly to me, who
respects the group charter.

Kevin R
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:33:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
I wouldn't require friendly. I's settle for polite.
I'll be friendly to anybody being friendly to me, who
respects the group charter.
Kevin R
So would all of us. Art thinks he's providing some kind of public service.
How a low life scum bag who posts nothing but attack threads and lies and insults people is doing a public service is crazy. It's like he took a page from the Nazi playbook.
Michelle Malkin
2017-08-15 01:50:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
I wouldn't require friendly. I's settle for polite.
I'll be friendly to anybody being friendly to me, who
respects the group charter.
I agree with you, but please don't hold your breath. We do have a few theists who have been accepted into the group for just that reason.
They are polite and don't throw their religion in our faces. But the ones who have been nasty theist trolls for ten years or more aren't about
to change. They don't want to. If there was a way to dump theist trolls from any newsgroup they've been invading for over five years, most
trolls would vanish. They are the mentally ill ones. They either use religion as an excuse for their behavior or their religion has made them
mentally ill. Life long fear and hatred will do that to people.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
%
2017-08-15 02:16:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michelle Malkin
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
I wouldn't require friendly. I's settle for polite.
I'll be friendly to anybody being friendly to me, who
respects the group charter.
I agree with you, but please don't hold your breath. We do have a few theists who have been accepted into the group for just that reason.
They are polite and don't throw their religion in our faces. But the ones who have been nasty theist trolls for ten years or more aren't about
to change. They don't want to. If there was a way to dump theist trolls from any newsgroup they've been invading for over five years, most
trolls would vanish. They are the mentally ill ones. They either use religion as an excuse for their behavior or their religion has made them
mentally ill. Life long fear and hatred will do that to people.
but as long as they respect you like you do them
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-15 03:41:59 UTC
Permalink
Hypartia7, let's all try ignoring them and see what happens.

I bet Arty Joe will lose his tiny mind.
Duke will probably be a close second.
Michelle Malkin
2017-08-15 03:20:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
You sorta, kinda left off the part of the sentence about trolls, oh slithery one.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
You were already our enemy before you ever invaded alt.atheism, troll. Thanks for admitting this.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
No way a decrepit old troll like ArtieJoe will ever agree with our FAQ/Charter.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-16 01:51:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michelle Malkin
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
You sorta, kinda left off the part of the sentence about trolls, oh slithery one.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
You were already our enemy before you ever invaded alt.atheism, troll. Thanks for admitting this.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
No way a decrepit old troll like ArtieJoe will ever agree with our FAQ/Charter.
Look who's talking. You sling more insults, tell more lies and do more trolling than anybody else here.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-16 04:03:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Michelle Malkin
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
You sorta, kinda left off the part of the sentence about trolls, oh slithery one.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
You were already our enemy before you ever invaded alt.atheism, troll. Thanks for admitting this.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
No way a decrepit old troll like ArtieJoe will ever agree with our FAQ/Charter.
Look who's talking. You sling more insults, tell more lies and do more trolling than anybody else here.
How can one troll one's own group?
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
%
2017-08-16 04:29:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Michelle Malkin
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
You sorta, kinda left off the part of the sentence about trolls, oh slithery one.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
You were already our enemy before you ever invaded alt.atheism, troll. Thanks for admitting this.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Paraphrasing. Sheesh. If she'd meant it literally, she would have quoted the FAQ with the proper quote marks.
No way a decrepit old troll like ArtieJoe will ever agree with our FAQ/Charter.
Look who's talking. You sling more insults, tell more lies and do more trolling than anybody else here.
How can one troll one's own group?
no one owns a group
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:18:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
Yes, it is, according to the FAQ/Charter. Alt.atheism was created by atheists for atheists to discuss whatever we want. Others are welcome, if they are friendly. You, ArtieJoe, are definitely not friendly and ignore most of
the FAQ/Charter. You proselytize and you lie about the atheists here.
You are a theist troll and an annoyance troll and a pity troll. And, you
are not welcome in alt.atheism. Therefore, as the FAQ/Charter says, you
get treated as you deserve - as a troll.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=You%27re+a+Troll&view=detail&mid=D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0D26B86D0C47A8E29ABB0&FORM=VIRE
Post by Kevrob
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
that's right
LOL! In my last talk with hypatiab, she claimed the rules require us theists to be "friendly" to them. Do you see that word anywhere?
IT REQUIRES THAT YOU NOT BE TROLLS. That leaves you out in the cold where you belong.
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:20:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
How can we troll in our own group?
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
As long as they are not trolls. Youse (sic) are a troll.
Tim
2017-08-13 14:21:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
hypatiab7
2017-08-14 04:27:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
Actually, we do have one atheist troll. That was determined over ten years ago -
Don Kresch. He used to post a lot more, but was just as nasty. The newsgroup
put it up for a vote and Don lost. He did, however, get his atheist #, since
he is an atheist.
Olrik
2017-08-14 04:45:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
Actually, we do have one atheist troll. That was determined over ten years ago -
Don Kresch. He used to post a lot more, but was just as nasty. The newsgroup
put it up for a vote and Don lost. He did, however, get his atheist #, since
he is an atheist.
Although I finally plonked "Kresch" some time ago, I see his posts
battling alt-right fascists bent on genocidal fantasies against enemies
(real or perceived) of the USA.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
Michelle Malkin
2017-08-15 07:36:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Olrik
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
Actually, we do have one atheist troll. That was determined over ten years ago -
Don Kresch. He used to post a lot more, but was just as nasty. The newsgroup
put it up for a vote and Don lost. He did, however, get his atheist #, since
he is an atheist.
Although I finally plonked "Kresch" some time ago, I see his posts
battling alt-right fascists bent on genocidal fantasies against enemies
(real or perceived) of the USA.
Anyone would be against them, except Nazis , other white supremicists and KKKers.
He's none of them, just a Libertarian. A very nasty Libertarian. There are other
Libertarians in alt. atheism. None of them were ever trolls.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-14 13:31:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
Actually, we do have one atheist troll. That was determined over ten years ago -
Don Kresch. He used to post a lot more, but was just as nasty. The newsgroup
put it up for a vote and Don lost. He did, however, get his atheist #, since
he is an atheist.
And he seems to have come back for a return engagement. I wonder how long till he slinks off.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Don Martin
2017-08-14 22:36:17 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:27:04 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
Actually, we do have one atheist troll. That was determined over ten years ago -
Don Kresch. He used to post a lot more, but was just as nasty. The newsgroup
put it up for a vote and Don lost. He did, however, get his atheist #, since
he is an atheist.
And I keep hoping he'll "come to Jesus" and get the fuck out of here.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
A***@yahoo.com
2017-08-19 17:19:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
You got emotional.
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which
ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
None. The only trolls here are all theist cunts, like you, dumb cunt.
You got emotional.
Why do you think that?

hypatiab7
2017-08-13 19:39:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him. Theist trolls in
atheist newsgroups never do well.
%
2017-08-13 19:45:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him. Theist trolls in
atheist newsgroups never do well.
the aren't here to do well
Tim
2017-08-14 08:34:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him. Theist trolls in
atheist newsgroups never do well.
the aren't here to do well
You're illiterate, fluffer gimp.
Andrew
2017-08-13 21:01:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.

As Jesus taught us to be.
John Locke
2017-08-13 21:31:22 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:01:01 -0400, "Andrew"
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
Post by Andrew
As Jesus taught us to be.
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus. At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Andrew
2017-08-14 08:35:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
He is the awesome One.

So awesome.
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
As Jesus taught us to be.
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus.
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.

"For by Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that
are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or
dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created
by Him, and for Him: And He is before all things, and by Him all
things consist." ~ Word of the Living God
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
"And he was there in the wilderness forty days,
tempted of Satan; and was with the wild beasts;
and the angels ministered unto him." ~ Mark 1:13
Melzzzzz
2017-08-14 09:05:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
He is the awesome One.
So awesome.
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
As Jesus taught us to be.
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus.
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.
"For by Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that
are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or
dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created
by Him, and for Him: And He is before all things, and by Him all
things consist." ~ Word of the Living God
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
"And he was there in the wilderness forty days,
tempted of Satan; and was with the wild beasts;
and the angels ministered unto him." ~ Mark 1:13
What makes you think another fictional story is true? Is this because
2000 years ago work of fiction was considered true?
--
press any key to continue or any other to quit...
Kevrob
2017-08-14 14:16:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
He is the awesome One.
So awesome.
The Online Etymology Dictionary has:

awesome (adj.)
1590s, "profoundly reverential," from awe (n.) + -some (1). Meaning
"inspiring awe or dread" is from 1670s; weakened colloquial sense
of "impressive, very good" is recorded by 1961 and was in vogue from
after c. 1980. Related: Awesomely; awesomeness.

[/quote]

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=Awesome

I wouldn't call something that "inspires dread" a good thing.
I guess that's part of the imaginary boogieman job description,
though.
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
As .....
(.....people reporting what Josh was supposed to have said.
No way to know if he really existed, or really said any of
those things. People may also have put words into his mouth,
the way Plato used Socrates in the later dialogues.)

Jesus taught us to be.
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus.
That's interesting, since He is the...
<blah, blah, proselytizing snipped>
Post by Melzzzzz
What makes you think another fictional story is true? Is this because
2000 years ago work of fiction was considered true?
My theory is that the theists who babble on about "awesomeness"
get an endorphin buzz out of their religious enthusiasm.

They are junkies.

Kevin R
John Locke
2017-08-14 15:34:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
He is the awesome One.
So awesome.
awesome (adj.)
1590s, "profoundly reverential," from awe (n.) + -some (1). Meaning
"inspiring awe or dread" is from 1670s; weakened colloquial sense
of "impressive, very good" is recorded by 1961 and was in vogue from
after c. 1980. Related: Awesomely; awesomeness.
[/quote]
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=Awesome
I wouldn't call something that "inspires dread" a good thing.
I guess that's part of the imaginary boogieman job description,
though.
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
As .....
(.....people reporting what Josh was supposed to have said.
No way to know if he really existed, or really said any of
those things. People may also have put words into his mouth,
the way Plato used Socrates in the later dialogues.)
Jesus taught us to be.
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus.
That's interesting, since He is the...
<blah, blah, proselytizing snipped>
Post by Melzzzzz
What makes you think another fictional story is true? Is this because
2000 years ago work of fiction was considered true?
My theory is that the theists who babble on about "awesomeness"
get an endorphin buzz out of their religious enthusiasm.
They are junkies.
...poor old Androol would enter withdrawal if we took the "awesome"
word away from him. But like all true Jesus crazed Christians, he'd
bounce right back with a nice new synonym. Let's see...hows about
breathtaking, magnificent, stunning, staggering, imposing, stirring,
impressive...nah, they just don't have the same ring as "awesome".




---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Kevrob
2017-08-14 16:39:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Locke
Post by Kevrob
My theory is that the theists who babble on about "awesomeness"
get an endorphin buzz out of their religious enthusiasm.
They are junkies.
...poor old Androol would enter withdrawal if we took the "awesome"
word away from him. But like all true Jesus crazed Christians, he'd
bounce right back with a nice new synonym. Let's see...hows about
breathtaking, magnificent, stunning, staggering, imposing, stirring,
impressive...nah, they just don't have the same ring as "awesome".
Stupefying?!

When I was confirmed in the Catholic church - at the totally adult,
no pressure, it's not like you'll be living in the street if you
say "no" to this age of 10 years old - they told us "fear of the Lord"
was a gift of the Holy Spirit.* In the real world, people who give
you fear as a "gift" are to be avoided.

Dueling babble quotes:

Psalms 33:8 - Let all the earth fear the LORD:
let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him.

Isaiah 41:10 - Fear thou not; for I [am] with thee: be not
dismayed; for I [am] thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea,
I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand
of my righteousness.

So, which is it babble buddies? Fear, or Fear Not?

Kevin R

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_gifts_of_the_Holy_Spirit
Michelle Malkin
2017-08-15 00:23:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Locke
Post by Kevrob
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
All are welcome but not trolls. Andrew is a troll. Anyone can
check out his posting history to see that he is just a mealy-
mouthed troll trying to sound nice. J, Duke and Asteroid7
tried this and it didn't fool anyone. Andrew isn't fooling
anyone, either, except newbies to the newsgroup who
haven't been reading his messages for years.
Post by John Locke
Post by Kevrob
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
He is the awesome One.
So awesome.
awesome (adj.)
1590s, "profoundly reverential," from awe (n.) + -some (1). Meaning
"inspiring awe or dread" is from 1670s; weakened colloquial sense
of "impressive, very good" is recorded by 1961 and was in vogue from
after c. 1980. Related: Awesomely; awesomeness.
[/quote]
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=Awesome
I wouldn't call something that "inspires dread" a good thing.
I guess that's part of the imaginary boogieman job description,
though.
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
As .....
(.....people reporting what Josh was supposed to have said.
No way to know if he really existed, or really said any of
those things. People may also have put words into his mouth,
the way Plato used Socrates in the later dialogues.)
Jesus taught us to be.
Post by Melzzzzz
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus.
That's interesting, since He is the...
<blah, blah, proselytizing snipped>
Post by Melzzzzz
What makes you think another fictional story is true? Is this because
2000 years ago work of fiction was considered true?
My theory is that the theists who babble on about "awesomeness"
get an endorphin buzz out of their religious enthusiasm.
They are junkies.
...poor old Androol would enter withdrawal if we took the "awesome"
word away from him. But like all true Jesus crazed Christians, he'd
bounce right back with a nice new synonym. Let's see...hows about
breathtaking, magnificent, stunning, staggering, imposing, stirring,
impressive...nah, they just don't have the same ring as "awesome".
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:29:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That
is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to
discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I like you, but I know you don't like me.
Post by hypatiab7
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him.
Theist trolls in atheist newsgroups never
do well.
All are welcome. Folks, let us
try to be kind to one another.
...we might be nicer to you if you'd stop manifesting your
imaginary Jesus character in our news group.
He is the awesome One.
Awesomely non-existent.
Post by Andrew
So awesome.
So awesome he doesn't exist.
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
Post by Andrew
As Jesus taught us to be.
Riiiight. What a fucking moron.
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
...there's not a molecule of evidence supporting the existence
of any divine Jesus.
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people and imaginary events.
Malte Runz
2017-08-14 19:18:43 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
(snip)
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Some claims are so far out, that asking for evidence gives them a
micron of credibility that they don't deserve. The existences of gods
is a text book example.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people and imaginary events.
Let's not forget the mutually exclusive ad hocs, created to explain
events that never could have taken place.
--
Malte Runz
Christopher A. Lee
2017-08-14 20:46:02 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:18:43 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
(snip)
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Some claims are so far out, that asking for evidence gives them a
micron of credibility that they don't deserve. The existences of gods
is a text book example.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people and imaginary events.
Let's not forget the mutually exclusive ad hocs, created to explain
events that never could have taken place.
Not if it's to get them to shut the fuck up because they can't put
up.
v***@gmail.com
2017-08-16 01:49:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:18:43 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
(snip)
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Some claims are so far out, that asking for evidence gives them a
micron of credibility that they don't deserve. The existences of gods
is a text book example.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people and imaginary events.
Let's not forget the mutually exclusive ad hocs, created to explain
events that never could have taken place.
Not if it's to get them to shut the fuck up because they can't put
up.
Tell ya what, fruitcake:Why don't you create a moderated atheist newsgroup and make yourself the moderator. Then you can sit back and silence anybody you like. Considering your attitude toward independent speech, it will likely be the most boring thing on USENET,
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-16 04:00:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:18:43 +0200, Malte Runz
=20
Post by Malte Runz
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
(snip)
=20
Post by Cloud Hobbit
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the=20
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Some claims are so far out, that asking for evidence gives them a
micron of credibility that they don't deserve. The existences of gods
is a text book example.=20
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.=20
=20
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people=
and imaginary events.
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Malte Runz
Let's not forget the mutually exclusive ad hocs, created to explain
events that never could have taken place.
=20
Not if it's to get them to shut the fuck up because they can't put
up.
Tell ya what, fruitcake:Why don't you create a moderated atheist newsgroup =
and make yourself the moderator. Then you can sit back and silence anybody =
you like. Considering your attitude toward independent speech, it will like=
ly be the most boring thing on USENET,
Nobody wants to silence anybody. We just wants you trolls to silence yourselves.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
%
2017-08-16 04:29:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:18:43 +0200, Malte Runz
=20
Post by Malte Runz
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
(snip)
=20
Post by Cloud Hobbit
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the=20
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Some claims are so far out, that asking for evidence gives them a
micron of credibility that they don't deserve. The existences of gods
is a text book example.=20
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.=20
=20
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people=
and imaginary events.
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Malte Runz
Let's not forget the mutually exclusive ad hocs, created to explain
events that never could have taken place.
=20
Not if it's to get them to shut the fuck up because they can't put
up.
Tell ya what, fruitcake:Why don't you create a moderated atheist newsgroup =
and make yourself the moderator. Then you can sit back and silence anybody =
you like. Considering your attitude toward independent speech, it will like=
ly be the most boring thing on USENET,
Nobody wants to silence anybody. We just wants you trolls to silence yourselves.
no
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-16 08:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:18:43 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
(snip)
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
That's interesting, since He is the awesome Creator of all of the
molecules in the Universe.
Unevidenced claim dismissed.
Some claims are so far out, that asking for evidence gives them a
micron of credibility that they don't deserve. The existences of gods
is a text book example.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
Post by John Locke
At the most, all you might have is an annoying
Jewish crack pot wandering around the desert.
You have nothing Andrew. Just myths, lies, forgeries, imaginary people and imaginary events.
Let's not forget the mutually exclusive ad hocs, created to explain
events that never could have taken place.
Not if it's to get them to shut the fuck up because they can't put
up.
Tell ya what, fruitcake:Why don't you create a moderated atheist newsgroup and make yourself the moderator. Then you can sit back and silence anybody you like. Considering your attitude toward independent speech, it will likely be the most boring thing on USENET,
What would you do after we all leave? Just argue with Bob?

Not that that wouldn't be fun, I just think you would tire soon.

You know you're shitting all over the charter of this group and you know you are an asshole because that's what you want to be. Why you would choose this sort of persona or behavior, but if it's not an act and you really are this way IRL I see how desperate you would be for attention And since you're probably only used to negative attention, this is where you come to get more.


You've demonstrated that you are not honest, you don't understand proof, and you don't care what the facts actually say. Sadly, you can't stand to lose, which is something that happens to you quite often.

I dunno what to tell ya man, you're just fucked.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-14 07:20:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him. Theist trolls in
atheist newsgroups never do well.
Yep, that's about it.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 18:22:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
WoW! I made 1st place! He hates me! He really, really hates me!
I don't hate him. I just feel sorry for him. Theist trolls in
atheist newsgroups never do well.
Personally, I'm disappointed.
Yap Honghor
2017-08-14 06:19:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Why do you think squeezing me in between two women is appropriate?
Andrew
2017-08-14 08:33:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yap Honghor
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling? That is,
which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Why do you think squeezing me in between two women is appropriate?
He figured you needed the love.
Yap Honghor
2017-08-14 13:35:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew
Post by Yap Honghor
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling? That is,
which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Why do you think squeezing me in between two women is appropriate?
He figured you needed the love.
So, you are very jealous?
Jeanne Douglas
2017-08-14 13:37:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Why do you think squeezing me in between two women is appropriate?
Why wouldn't it be?
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Michelle Malkin
2017-08-15 02:42:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Why do you think squeezing me in between two women is appropriate?
Why wouldn't it be?
That's it, Yap. You're plonked
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Yap Honghor
2017-08-16 13:30:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
Why do you think squeezing me in between two women is appropriate?
Why wouldn't it be?
Because I have no profiles of your two...
Cloud Hobbit
2017-08-14 20:56:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by v***@gmail.com
Which atheists do you consider to be doing much trolling?That is, which ones are the most insulting and contribute the least to discussions?
My vote goes to Hypatiab.
Yap is in second place
Jeanne Douglas is a close 3rd.
We can not troll our own group, you moron.
Loading...