Post by Ed StasiakAdam H. Kerman
That the script is written nationally but read over the air locally
without stating who had written the script is unique to Sinclair.
Like the coward that he is, Ed Stasiak quotes selectively. I've already
addressed each of these points specifically.
CNN has no concept of "local broadcast stations"; it's not comparable.
I've stated this over and over and over again. I think you actually
understand it but you're repeating the same stupidity over and over
again because you're too much of a jerk to flat out admit that your
analogies suck.
Post by Ed StasiakThe New York Times,
Reporters are all unionized. If a reporter's byline appeared on a work
that he didn't write, there would be a grievance. The union contract
specifically protects against exactly this sort of mispresentation.
Post by Ed StasiakHuffington Post, etc.
If that occurred, the writer would simply move his blog somewhere else.
All the misrepresentation shit you pull constantly on Usenet, Ed, is
never tolerated by any professional writer in America under any
circumstances.
Post by Ed Stasiakall can and do tell their employees what to say/write, all the way from
simply critiquing or editing a story
Editing a story is not a misrepresentation of the story's origin. A good
editor may shorten a paragraph or cut portions of the story, but he will
never re-write it to mean exactly the opposite of what the reporter wrote.
If the latter happens, the reporter is obligated to resign.
Post by Ed Stasiakto providing a complete script that=E2=80=99s=
read
on the air in-full and there is nothing illegal or immoral about this.
No one said "illegal" nor "immoral". It is unethical. It truly is
unfortunate that you think you can get away with your bullshit by
abusing English moviePig style.
Post by Ed StasiakThat Sinclair broadcasts via local channels while the others are national
or global doesn=E2=80=99t make a single shit of difference.
Just because you deny that there's a difference doesn't allow you to
declare victory, Ed. That's not the way argument works.
Post by Ed StasiakAre you suggesting that employees have complete freedom of speech
at work and on the company's dime and the boss can't do anything
about it?
I know it's confusing, Ed, but you can tell what I wrote because it's my
name on From. The way you have re-written what I'd already written to
suggest that I meant something entirely different is a perfect example
of the way you misrepresent your opponent's words on Usenet. You do it
constantly, and I will continue to call you on it.
Of course you speak up for misrepresentation. It's why you exist on Usenet,
everything that you live for.