FAQ: What would you accept as evidence of my god?

Post by !! Atheist ------------------------------

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

1. Your alleged god should know what would convince me.
2. I'll accept all amputees everywhere having their limbs restored tomorrow.
Ya got nothing, dickhead, except massive evidence of non-existence.

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's evidence. What you
demand isn't the evidence of God. It's the evidence of idol. You are
demanding physical proof for the spiritual God. That is illogical and
impossible. Your understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want
to understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why you can't
find the evidence of God. You don't even know what it is.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Stanislaus Stewart

2018-03-12 17:55:30 UTC

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

1. Your alleged god should know what would convince me.
2. I'll accept all amputees everywhere having their limbs restored
tomorrow.
Ya got nothing, dickhead, except massive evidence of non-existence.

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's evidence. What you
demand isn't the evidence of God. It's the evidence of idol. You are
demanding physical proof for the spiritual God. That is illogical and
impossible. Your understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want
to understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why you
can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the rich and the
super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the poverty

and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

aaa

2018-03-12 22:01:54 UTC

Post by !! Atheist ------------------------------

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's evidence. What you
demand isn't the evidence of God. It's the evidence of idol. You are
demanding physical proof for the spiritual God. That is illogical and
impossible. Your understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want
to understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why you
can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the rich and the
super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the poverty
and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

That's still not much different from his demand. You still want physical
proof for the spiritual God. It's still an illogical demand. This
physical world is our responsibility. God has given this world to us. We
are responsible for what happens in this world. We can't demand God to
do our job for us just so we can believe in him. That's like the rotten
kid demanding his parents to do his homework so that he can behave himself.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Stanislaus Stewart

2018-03-12 22:30:58 UTC

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

1. Your alleged god should know what would convince me.
2. I'll accept all amputees everywhere having their limbs restored
tomorrow.
Ya got nothing, dickhead, except massive evidence of non-existence.

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's evidence. What you
demand isn't the evidence of God. It's the evidence of idol. You are
demanding physical proof for the spiritual God. That is illogical and
impossible. Your understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want
to understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why you
can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the rich and the
super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the poverty
and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

That's still not much different from his demand. You still want
physical proof for the spiritual God. It's still an illogical demand.
This physical world is our responsibility. God has given this world to
us. We are responsible for what happens in this world. We can't demand
God to do our job for us just so we can believe in him. That's like
the rotten kid demanding his parents to do his homework so that he can
behave himself.

So all those people who buy defective cars, etc. should be responsible
for them, not the makers?

aaa

2018-03-12 23:28:19 UTC

Post by !! Atheist ------------------------------

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's evidence. What you
demand isn't the evidence of God. It's the evidence of idol. You are
demanding physical proof for the spiritual God. That is illogical and
impossible. Your understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want
to understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why you
can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the rich and the
super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the poverty
and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

That's still not much different from his demand. You still want
physical proof for the spiritual God. It's still an illogical demand.
This physical world is our responsibility. God has given this world to
us. We are responsible for what happens in this world. We can't demand
God to do our job for us just so we can believe in him. That's like
the rotten kid demanding his parents to do his homework so that he can
behave himself.

So all those people who buy defective cars, etc. should be responsible
for them, not the makers?

Why do you say that? Have you brought something from God that is defective?

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Stanislaus Stewart

2018-03-13 20:00:27 UTC

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

1. Your alleged god should know what would convince me.
2. I'll accept all amputees everywhere having their limbs restored
tomorrow.
Ya got nothing, dickhead, except massive evidence of non-existence.

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's evidence. What you
demand isn't the evidence of God. It's the evidence of idol. You are
demanding physical proof for the spiritual God. That is illogical and
impossible. Your understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want
to understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why you
can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the rich and the
super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the poverty
and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

That's still not much different from his demand. You still want
physical proof for the spiritual God. It's still an illogical demand.
This physical world is our responsibility. God has given this world to
us. We are responsible for what happens in this world. We can't demand
God to do our job for us just so we can believe in him. That's like
the rotten kid demanding his parents to do his homework so that he can
behave himself.

So all those people who buy defective cars, etc. should be responsible
for them, not the makers?

Why do you say that? Have you brought something from God that is defective?

Couldn't have done that. I'm a non-believer. According to the
bible,God created Adam and Eve. He also
created them with defects-disobedience and deceit-defects. He should
have done what those companies
have done when they make a defective product-recall and repair. God
didn't do that. And the result is history
If we are products of those defects how could we be held responsible for
our actions?

aaa

2018-03-14 06:52:37 UTC

On 03/12/2018 11:43 AM, !! Atheist

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None
whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

You've been told many times: 1. Your alleged god should
know what would convince me. 2. I'll accept all amputees
everywhere having their limbs restored tomorrow.
Ya got nothing, dickhead, except massive evidence of
non-existence.

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's
evidence. What you demand isn't the evidence of God. It's
the evidence of idol. You are demanding physical proof for
the spiritual God. That is illogical and impossible. Your
understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want to
understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why
you can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know
what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the
rich and the super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the
poverty
and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

That's still not much different from his demand. You still
want physical proof for the spiritual God. It's still an
illogical demand. This physical world is our responsibility.
God has given this world to us. We are responsible for what
happens in this world. We can't demand God to do our job for us
just so we can believe in him. That's like the rotten kid
demanding his parents to do his homework so that he can behave
himself.

So all those people who buy defective cars, etc. should be
responsible for them, not the makers?

Why do you say that? Have you brought something from God that is defective?

Couldn't have done that. I'm a non-believer. According to the
bible,God created Adam and Eve. He also created them with
defects-disobedience and deceit-defects. He should have done what
those companies have done when they make a defective product-recall
and repair. God didn't do that. And the result is history If we are
products of those defects how could we be held responsible for our
actions?

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Cloud Hobbit

2018-03-14 17:52:06 UTC

That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection isn't
genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of good and
evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was sin in our mind.
- show quoted text -

That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.

Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from thousands of years ago.

aaa

2018-03-14 23:06:54 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created
perfect. They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human
imperfection isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the
knowledge of good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie
before there was sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible. Bible is
a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-15 22:49:31 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was sin
in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can grow
to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

aaa

2018-03-16 00:59:55 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was sin
in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can grow
to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-16 23:07:00 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible. Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or fairy
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Gospel TT

2018-03-16 23:13:28 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible. Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or fairy
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

Smiler

2018-03-17 00:57:49 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never
existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people
from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible.
Bible is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with
science or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas
can grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

Ignorance and lying aren't mutually exclusive.

Gospel TT

2018-03-17 01:55:49 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

Post by aaa
from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Post by aaa
Bible is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with
science or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

Post by Smiler
can grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

Ignorance and lying aren't mutually exclusive.

Yeh but has he been known to lie???

aaa

2018-03-17 10:27:36 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Gospel TT

2018-03-17 14:43:29 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

Post by aaa
from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Post by aaa
Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

Post by aaa
can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like King
Kong. Understand now??????

Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little
Italy true except for the part's that aren't.

aaa

2018-03-17 22:42:30 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

Post by aaa
from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Post by aaa
Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

Post by aaa
can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like King
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little Italy
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe. So he is
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have already pointed
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should have
followed my conversation more closely.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Gospel TT

2018-03-17 23:27:48 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like King
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little Italy
true except for the part's that aren't.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

aaa

2018-03-18 09:29:48 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created

sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like

King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little

Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe. So

he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have already

pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should

have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said, it's
non sequitur.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

TT Liams

2018-03-18 13:59:49 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created

sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like

King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe. So

he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have already

pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should

have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said, it's
non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you
don't see that.

aaa

2018-03-18 18:57:02 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created

sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,

though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like

King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe.

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have already

pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should

have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,

it's

Post by aaa
non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you don't
see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has just
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Gospel TT

2018-03-18 19:03:03 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,

though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like

King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I

believe.

Post by aaa
So

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have

already

Post by aaa
pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should

have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his

response

Post by aaa
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,

it's

Post by aaa
non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you don't
see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has just
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

aaa

2018-03-18 21:56:34 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

were

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing

the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of

the

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence

that

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,

though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction

Post by aaa
King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I

believe.

Post by aaa
So

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have

already

Post by aaa
pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He

should

Post by aaa
have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his

response

Post by aaa
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,

it's

Post by aaa
non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you

don't

Post by aaa
see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.

:-)

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Gospel TT

2018-03-18 21:59:34 UTC

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:27:36 +0800, aaa

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of

knowing

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of

the

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence

that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite

correct,

Post by aaa
though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is

fiction

Post by Cloud Hobbit
like

Post by aaa
King

Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I

believe.

Post by aaa
So

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have

already

Post by aaa
pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He

should

Post by aaa
have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non

sequitur.

Post by aaa
I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his

response

Post by aaa
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,

it's

Post by aaa
non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you

don't

Post by aaa
see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.
:-)

You'll be able to find the Bible in audio after you return to Canada

Smiler

2018-03-19 01:34:34 UTC

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:27:36 +0800, aaa

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and

Eve

Post by Cloud Hobbit
were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of

knowing

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to

lie

Post by aaa
before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and

Eve

Post by aaa
never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do

with

Post by aaa
science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence

that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite

correct,

Post by aaa
though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise

Post by aaa
lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I

said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is

fiction

Post by Cloud Hobbit
like

Post by aaa
King

Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe.
So he is
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have already pointed
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should have
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non
sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his

response

Post by aaa
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I
said, it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if
you don't see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.

You'll be able to find the Bible in audio after you return to Canada

No need. The voices in his head tell him all about it.

Gospel TT

2018-03-19 16:07:06 UTC

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 06:42:30 +0800, aaa

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:27:36 +0800, aaa

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and

Eve

Post by Cloud Hobbit
were

created

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they

sinned.

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of

knowing

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to

lie

Post by aaa
before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and

Eve

Post by aaa
never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

people

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of

understanding

Post by aaa
of

Bible.

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do

with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be

evidence

Post by Cloud Hobbit
that

gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite

correct,

Post by aaa
though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's.

Otherwise

Post by aaa
he

Post by aaa
lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I

said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is

fiction

Post by Cloud Hobbit
like

King

Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Italy

true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe.
So he is
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have
already pointed
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He
should have
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his

response

Post by aaa
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I
said, it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if
you don't see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.

You'll be able to find the Bible in audio after you return to Canada

No need. The voices in his head tell him all about it.

Apparently so, but I don't want him to miss out on all the violence
and porn if he's into that sort of thing.

Smiler

2018-03-18 23:41:04 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

were

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing

the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of

the

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence

that

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,

though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction

Post by aaa
King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I

believe.

Post by aaa
So

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have

already

Post by aaa
pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He

should

Post by aaa
have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his
response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,
it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you
don't see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.

Nobody understands a word you write.

aaa

2018-03-19 08:19:09 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

were

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing

the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of

the

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence

that

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,

though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction

Post by aaa
King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I

believe.

Post by aaa
So

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have

already

Post by aaa
pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He

should

Post by aaa
have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his
response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,
it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you
don't see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.

Nobody understands a word you write.

That too is just your blind denial. You have nothing else to offer.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-19 23:33:26 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

were

Post by aaa
perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human

imperfection

Post by aaa
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing

the

knowledge of

Post by aaa
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie

before

there was

Post by aaa
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve

never

existed.

Post by aaa
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically

ignorant

from

Post by aaa
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of

the

Bible

Post by aaa
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with

science or

fairy

Post by aaa
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not

created

Post by aaa
sinful

Post by aaa
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence

that

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
gorillas

can

Post by Smiler
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,

though.

Post by aaa
Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he

lied.

Post by aaa
I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction

Post by aaa
King

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is

Little

Post by aaa
Italy

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I

believe.

Post by aaa
So

Post by aaa
he is

Post by aaa
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have

already

Post by aaa
pointed

Post by aaa
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He

should

Post by aaa
have

Post by aaa
followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,
it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you
don't see that.

Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just

Post by aaa
been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.

Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.

Nobody understands a word you write.

That too is just your blind denial.

Do tell us who thinks you make sense.

Post by aaa
You have nothing else to offer.

Your delusions of grandeur are getting worse.

hypatiab7

2018-03-19 06:28:17 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and

Eve were created perfect. They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Human imperfection isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of
knowing the knowledge of good and evil. We, as humans, had no
reason to lie before there was sin in our mind.

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve
never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically
ignorant people from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of
the Bible. Bible is a book of philosophy. It has nothing > >> >> >> >> >> >>> to do with science or fairy tales. Adam and Eve are proof
that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence
that gorillas can grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct,
though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction
like King Kong. Understand now?????? Cause I'm Christian, I
believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little Italy true except
for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I
believe. So he is not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur.
I have already pointed out that the Bible has nothing to do with
fairy tales. He should have Followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said,
it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you

don't see that.

Post by aaa
Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that has

just been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.
Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.
:-)

I always have, faaake. You have no point, aside from wanting to be smarter than those who are smarter than you and wanting to form your own religion with you as its leader. You are never going to be smart and you are unable to form your
basically Christian religion without outside help which you're not going to get. If anyone does volunteer to help you, they're planning to take over without you. Have fun!

aaa

2018-03-19 08:20:40 UTC

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 06:42:30 +0800, aaa

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:27:36 +0800, aaa

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:06:54 +0800, aaa

On 03/15/2018 01:52 AM, Cloud Hobbit

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding.
Adam and

Eve were created perfect. They didn't become imperfect until they sinned.

Post by TT Liams

Post by TT Liams

Human imperfection isn't genetic. It's entirely
the result of knowing the knowledge of good and
evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before
there was sin in our mind.

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding.
Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a
scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of
understanding of the Bible. Bible is a
book of philosophy. It has nothing > >>

Post by aaa
to do with science or

fairy tales. Adam and Eve are proof that
humans are not created sinful or
imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be
evidence that gorillas can grow to 50'
tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite
correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's.
Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what
I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is
fiction like King Kong. Understand now?????? Cause
I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is
Little Italy true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I
believe. So he is not following what I said, thus, a
non sequitur. I have already pointed out that the Bible
has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should have
Followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non
sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his
response logical to the discussion. If his words don't
follow what I said, it's non sequitur.

His word's was logical to the discussion & your irrational if you

don't see that.

Post by aaa
Not really. There is no logic to just repeat the point that
has

just been shown to be wrong without any rebuttal.
Now your acting like a rumdum

I'm sure you have understood my point by now.
:-)

I always have, faaake. You have no point, aside from wanting to be
smarter than those who are smarter than you and wanting to form your
own religion with you as its leader. You are never going to be smart
and you are unable to form your basically Christian religion without
outside help which you're not going to get. If anyone does volunteer
to help you, they're planning to take over without you. Have fun!

Again, I have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-18 23:48:53 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human
imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the
knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before
there was sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant
people from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible.
Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with
science or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created
sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that
gorillas can grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like
King Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little
Italy true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe.

Who gives a fuck what nonsense you believe?

Post by aaa
So he is
not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have already pointed
out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy tales. He should
have followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said, it's
non sequitur.

My words exactly followed the same line of 'reasoning' that you used.

aaa

2018-03-19 08:29:58 UTC

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC), Smiler

Post by aaa
created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before
there was sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant
people from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible.
Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with
science or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created
sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that
gorillas can grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like
King Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little
Italy true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe.

Who gives a fuck what nonsense you believe?

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said, it's
non sequitur.

My words exactly followed the same line of 'reasoning' that you used.

If that's what you think, then your logic is screwed. Your words only
follow your own line of reasoning. They have nothing to do with mine.
It's why they are a non sequitur.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-19 23:41:00 UTC

Post by aaa
created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human
imperfection isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of
knowing the knowledge of good and evil. We, as humans, had
no reason to lie before there was sin in our mind. - show
quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant
people from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible.
Bible is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with
science or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful
or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that
gorillas can grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Maybe he don't no what non sequitur mean's. Otherwise he lied.

I believe I do. His projection doesn't follow what I said.

It's cause he believe's the story of Adam & Eve is fiction like
King Kong. Understand now??????
Cause I'm Christian, I believe the story of Adam & Eve is Little
Italy true except for the part's that aren't.

That might be what he believes, but that is not what I believe.

Who gives a fuck what nonsense you believe?

Post by aaa
So he is not following what I said, thus, a non sequitur. I have
already pointed out that the Bible has nothing to do with fairy
tales. He should have followed my conversation more closely.

He believe's it, therefore his response was not a non sequitur.

I don't care whether he believes it. He needs to make his response
logical to the discussion. If his words don't follow what I said, it's
non sequitur.

My words exactly followed the same line of 'reasoning' that you used.

If that's what you think, then your logic is screwed.

Says the moron who insanely believes in a supposed god for which he
has no evidence.

Post by aaa
Your words only follow your own line of reasoning.

They exactly follow your insane line of 'reasoning'.

Post by aaa
They have nothing to do with mine.

Blind denial.

Post by aaa
It's why they are a non sequitur.

It's why you avoided answering, coward.

aaa

2018-03-17 10:23:31 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible. Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or fairy
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Perfect sense. You don't understand the philosophy of the Bible. It's
why you compare it to fairy tales.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-18 23:51:19 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible. Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or fairy
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Perfect sense.

Total nonsense

Post by aaa
You don't understand the philosophy of the Bible. It's
why you compare it to fairy tales.

You don't understand anything. It's why you believe the fairy story bible.

aaa

2018-03-19 08:32:59 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human imperfection
isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing the knowledge of
good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to lie before there was
sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people from
thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible. Bible
is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science or fairy
tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Perfect sense.

Total nonsense

Blind denial.

Post by aaa
You don't understand the philosophy of the Bible. It's
why you compare it to fairy tales.

You don't understand anything. It's why you believe the fairy story bible.

I believe my understanding should prove that the Bible is indeed a book
of philosophy that has nothing to do with fairy tales.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

Smiler

2018-03-19 23:44:05 UTC

Post by aaa
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve were created perfect.
They didn't become imperfect until they sinned. Human
imperfection isn't genetic. It's entirely the result of knowing
the knowledge of good and evil. We, as humans, had no reason to
lie before there was sin in our mind. - show quoted text -
That would be your misunderstanding. Adam and Eve never existed.
Just another fairy tale from a scientifically ignorant people
from thousands of years ago.

That only shows your total lack of understanding of the Bible.
Bible is a book of philosophy. It has nothing to do with science
or fairy tales.
Adam and Eve are evidence that humans are not created sinful or imperfect.

Then the story of King Kong must also be evidence that gorillas can
grow to 50' tall.
The "humans are not created" part is quite correct, though.

Non sequitur.

Non sense.

Perfect sense.

Total nonsense

Blind denial.

Is all you have.

Post by aaa
You don't understand the philosophy of the Bible. It's why you compare
it to fairy tales.

You don't understand anything. It's why you believe the fairy story bible.

I believe my understanding should prove that the Bible is indeed a book
of philosophy that has nothing to do with fairy tales.

How does your insane 'personal understanding' prove anything?

Stanislaus Stewart

2018-03-14 20:38:26 UTC

On 03/12/2018 11:43 AM, !! Atheist

You have no verifiable evidence of a god. None
whatsoever.

What would you accept as evidence of my god?

You've been told many times: 1. Your alleged god should
know what would convince me. 2. I'll accept all amputees
everywhere having their limbs restored tomorrow.
Ya got nothing, dickhead, except massive evidence of
non-existence.

That shows you don't know what constitutes as God's
evidence. What you demand isn't the evidence of God. It's
the evidence of idol. You are demanding physical proof for
the spiritual God. That is illogical and impossible. Your
understanding of God is all imaginary. You don't want to
understand God spiritually or philosophically. This is why
you can't find the evidence of God. You don't even know
what it is.

Then let god use his spiritual influence to "influence "the
rich and the super rich to use their wealth to alleviate the
poverty
and sickness in the world. That would be 'evidence'.

That's still not much different from his demand. You still
want physical proof for the spiritual God. It's still an
illogical demand. This physical world is our responsibility.
God has given this world to us. We are responsible for what
happens in this world. We can't demand God to do our job for us
just so we can believe in him. That's like the rotten kid
demanding his parents to do his homework so that he can behave
himself.

So all those people who buy defective cars, etc. should be
responsible for them, not the makers?

Why do you say that? Have you brought something from God that is defective?

Couldn't have done that. I'm a non-believer. According to the
bible,God created Adam and Eve. He also created them with
defects-disobedience and deceit-defects. He should have done what
those companies have done when they make a defective product-recall
and repair. God didn't do that. And the result is history If we are
products of those defects how could we be held responsible for our
actions?

Isn't it possible that some sort of 'imperfection' caused them to
sin? It's some some sort of flaw-imperfection-in their

products that caused those companies to recall those products that
caused problems that made them unsafe to continue

using them . When god saw Adam and Eve 'sin' he should have
'recalled'them and start anew before they did harm.

Kevrob

2018-03-14 22:31:33 UTC

Post by Stanislaus Stewart
Isn't it possible that some sort of 'imperfection' caused them to
sin? It's some some sort of flaw-imperfection-in their
products that caused those companies to recall those products that
caused problems that made them unsafe to continue
using them . When god saw Adam and Eve 'sin' he should have
'recalled'them and start anew before they did harm.

You obviously don't understand proper circular reasoning.

Pre-Christian "pagan" ideas of the ghodz held that they were
more powerful beings, not necessarily all-powerful ones. The
Olympians overthrew the Titans, for example, and even they
weren't the ur-ghodz, creators of everything, the way Yahooey
is supposed to be. The idea of a ghod as being perfect, all-
this and all-that, was a construction of the Greek philosophers,
and layered onto the previous Hebrew myths by the "Church Faddas."

Since the ghod was perfect, any flaws had to be our fault.
It's like when the manufacturer accuses you of voiding your
warranty, due to error by the operator. :)

Kevin R

aaa

2018-03-14 23:11:30 UTC